Collaborations and Innovation in Partitioned Industries: An Analysis of U.S. Feature Film Coproductions

References

• Ahuja G, Polidoro F Jr, Mitchell W (2009) Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management J. 30(9):941–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman R (1999) Film/Genre (British Film Institute, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth tradeoff. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arts S, Hou J, Gomez JC (2021) Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures. Res. Policy 50(2):104–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baregheh A, Rowley J, Sambrook S (2008) Toward a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision 47(8):1323–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Carroll GR (1995) Modeling internal organizational change. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 21(1):217–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biskind P (2004) Down and Dirty Pictures: Miramax, Sundance and the Rise of Independent Film (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Boone C, Van Witteloostuijn A, Carroll GR (2002) Resource distributions and market partitioning: Dutch daily newspapers, 1968 to 1994. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 67(3):408–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG (1999) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Networks 21(4):375–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrillat FA, Legoux R, Hadida AL (2018) Debates and assumptions about motion picture performance: A meta-analysis. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 46(2):273–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR (1985) Concentration and specialization: Dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 90(6):1262–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Dobrev SD, Swaminathan A (2002) Organizational processes of resource partitioning. Res. Organ. Behav. 24:1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Piskorski MJ (2005) Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):167–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Negro G, Perretti F (2008) The structure of consensus: Network ties, legitimation, and exit rates of US feature film producer organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):145–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves RE (2000) Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chung S, Singh H, Lee K (2000) Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 21(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Vany A (2003) Hollywood Economics. How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K, (2018) Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Preprint, submitted October 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805.Google Scholar
• Dobrev SD, Carroll GR (2002) Size (and competition) among organizations: Modeling scale‐based selection among automobile producers in four major countries, 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. 24(6):541–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrev SD, Kim TY, Hannan MT (2001) Dynamics of niche width and resource partitioning. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1299–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunne JG (1997) Monster: Living Off the Big Screen (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W (2000) Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management J. 21(2):99–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberse A (2013) Blockbusters: Hit-Making, Risk-Taking, and the Big Business of Entertainment (Henry Holt and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fey CF, Birkinshaw J (2005) External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. J. Management 31(4):597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A, Giarratana MS, Sebrek SS (2020) Resource partitioning and strategies in markets for technology. Strategic Organ. 18(2):251–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox JT (2010) Identification in matching games. Quant. Econom. 1:203–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs S (2009) Against Essentialism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gabler N (1997) The two Hollywoods: One is a global blockbuster business, the other a scrappy, independent cinema: Put them together and the action begins. New York Times Magazine (November 16), https://www.nytimes.com/1997/12/07/magazine/l-the-two-hollywoods-410322.html.Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Leslie P (2005) Cofinancing to manage risk in the motion picture industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(2):231–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Hannan MT, Kovács B (2016) What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):215–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldman W (1983) Adventures in the Screen Trade (Warner Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Le Mens G, Hsu G, Kovács B, Negro G, Pólos L, Pontikes EG, et al. (2019) Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological and Cultural Analysis (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman R, Yeh C (2018) Blitzscaling: The Lightning-Fast Path to Building Massively Valuable Businesses (Currency, New York).Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Negro G, Perretti F (2012) Hybrids in Hollywood: A study of genre spanning in the U.S. film industry. Industry Corporate Change 21(6):1427–1450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Lichtenstein BB (2008) Temporary interorganizational projects: How temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Smith Ring P, eds. Oxford Handbook of Inter–Organizational Relations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 231–255.Google Scholar
• Jourdan J (2018) Institutional specialization and survival: Theory and evidence from the French film industry. Strategy Sci. 3(2):408–425.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):295–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna R, Guler I, Nerkar A (2018) Entangled decisions: Knowledge interdependencies and terminations of patented inventions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 39(9):2439–2465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G (2009) Indiewood, USA. (I.B. Tauris & Co., London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Soule SA (2008) Competition and resource partitioning in three social movement industries. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(6):1568–1610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee L-F (1983) Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica 51(2):507–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Mun H, Park K (2015) When is dependence on other organizations burdensome? The effect of asymmetric dependence on Internet firm failure. Strategic Management J. 36(13):2058–2074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lena JC (2012) Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Shane H, Tsai A (2003) Do equity financing cycles matter? Evidence from biotechnology alliances. J. Financial Econom. 67(3):411–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Mathias BD, Huyghe A, Frid CJ, Galloway TL (2018) An identity perspective on coopetition in the craft beer industry. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3086–3115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mezias JM, Mezias SJ (2000) Resource partitioning, the founding of specialist firms, and innovation: The American feature film industry, 1912–1929. Organ. Sci. 11(3):306–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Mindruta D, Moeen M, Agarwal R (2016) A two-sided matching approach for partner selection and assessing complementarities in partners’ attributes in inter-firm alliances. Strategic Management J. 37(1):206–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Visentin F, Swaminathan A (2014) Resource partitioning and the organizational dynamics of fringe banking. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(4):680–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan D, Dooley L (2009) Applying Innovation (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Santos FM (2015) The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1486–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahnke EC, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM (2015) Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):596–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park DY, Podolny JM (2000) The competitive dynamics of status and niche width: US investment banking, 1920–1949. Industry Corporate Change 9(3):377–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A, Rivera-Santos M (2011) Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. J. Management 37(4):1108–1136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perren A (2012) Indie, Inc.: Miramax and the Transformation of Hollywood in the 1990s (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perretti F, Negro G (2006) Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitaton in team design. Acad. Management J. 49(5):759–777.Google Scholar
• Perretti F, Negro G (2007) Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. J. Organ. Behavior 28(5):563–586.Google Scholar
• Pokorny M, Miskell P, Sedgwick J (2018) Managing uncertainty in creative industries: Film sequels and Hollywood’s profitability, 1988–2015. Competitive Change 23(1):23–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW (1996) Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. J. Institutional Theoretetical Econom. 152(1):197–215.Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravid SA (1999) Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. J. Bus. 72(4):463–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis S, Negro G, Sorenson O, Perretti F, Lomi A (2013) Resource partitioning revisited: Evidence from Italian television broadcasting. Industry Corporate Change 22(2):459–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Padula G (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19(5):669–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT (2001) Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. 22(6-7):687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Boeker W (2008) Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities and alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 29(1):47–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1978) A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(2):224–253.10307892Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrank A, Whitford J (2011) The anatomy of network failure. Sociol. Theory 29(3):151–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwab A, Miner AS (2008) Learning in hybrid–project systems: The effects of project performance on repeated collaboration. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1117–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sears J, Hoetker G (2014) Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(1):48–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sood S, Dréze X (2006) Brand extensions of experiential goods: Movie sequel evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 33(3):352–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton K (2021) Netflix officially switches viewing metrics. Adweek (November 16), https://www.adweek.com/convergent-tv/netflix-new-viewing-metrics-weekly-top-10-lists/.Google Scholar
• Thompson A (2020) Hollywood faces the hardest truth: Movies are no longer king. Indiewire (August 12), https://www.indiewire.com/2020/08/hollywood-movies-no-longer-king-1234579572/.Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW, De Boer M (1999) Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. 10(5):551–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Vandaie R, Zaheer A (2015) Alliance partners and firm capability: Evidence from the motion picture industry. Organ. Sci. 26(1):22–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Anand J (2011) Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Acad. Management J. 54(3):611–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhaal JC, Hoskins JD, Lundmark LW (2017) Little fish in a big pond: Legitimacy transfer, authenticity, and factors of peripheral firm entry and growth in the market center. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2532–2552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman M, Zeng XHT, Amaral LAN (2015) Cross-evaluation of metrics to estimate the significance of creative works. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 112(5):1281–1286.25605881Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang H, Yanfeng Z, Xia Z (2014) Exploration or exploitation? Small firms’ alliance strategies with large firms. Strategic Management J. 35(1):146–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zara C (2012) Hollywood’s incredible shrinking audiences. International Business Times (September 4), https://www.ibtimes.com/hollywoods-incredible-shrinking-audiences-761123.Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Jiang H, Wu R, Li J (2019) Reconciling the dilemma of knowledge sharing: A network pluralism framework of firms’ R&D alliance network and innovation performance. J. Management 45(7):2635–2665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim TY (2003) The critical trade‐off: Identity assignment and box‐office success in the feature film industry. Industry Corporate Change 12(1):27–67.Crossref, Google Scholar