The Façade, the Face, and the Sympathies: Opening the Black Box of Symbolic Capital as a Source of Philanthropic Attractiveness

References

• Ader L, Belousov K (2020) Music and business in postsocialist Russia. Milanović B, Milin M, Mihajlović DL, eds. Music in Postsocialism: Three Decades in Retrospect (Institute of Musicology SASA, Belgrade).Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH (2014) Entrepreneurial exits and innovation. Management Sci. 60(4):867–887.Link, Google Scholar
• Alexander VD (2014) Art and the twenty-first century gift: Corporate philanthropy and government funding in the cultural sector. Anthropology Forum 24(4):364–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell LS, Bernheim BD (1996) Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):349–373.Google Scholar
• Ballesteros L, Gatignon A (2019) The relative value of firm and nonprofit experience: Tackling large-scale social issues across institutional contexts. Strategic Management J. 40(4):631–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballesteros L, Magelssen C (2021) Institutional disruptions and the philanthropy of multinational firms. Organ. Sci. Article in advance.Link, Google Scholar
• Barman E (2008) With strings attached: Nonprofits and the adoption of donor choice. Nonprofit Volunteer Sector Quart. 37(1):39–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barman EA (2016) Varieties of field theory and the sociology of the non‐profit sector. Sociol. Compass 10(6):442–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):151–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blagov Y, Dynin A, Ivanova T (2008) Report on Social Investments in Russia.Integrating CSR principles into Corporate Strategy. The UN Global Compact (United Nations Development Programme).Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1980) The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. Media Culture Soc. 2(3):261–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1983) The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics 12(4-5):311–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory Soc. 14:723–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1993) The Field of Cultural Production (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P, Wacquant LJ (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Millington A (2005) Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 61(1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Allison PD (2014) Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):258–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen JC, Patten DM, Roberts RW (2008) Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? J. Bus. Ethics 82:131–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen IJ, Hsu PH, Officer MS, Wang Y (2020) The Oscar goes to…: High-tech firms’ acquisitions in response to rivals’ technology breakthroughs. Res. Policy 49(7):104078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernozatonskaya E (2015) Upravlyat Teatrom. Kak? (Harvard Business Review, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Edu. Psych. Measures 20:37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correia S, Guimarães P, Zylkin T (2019) PPMLHDFE: Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. Preprint, submitted March 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01690.Google Scholar
• Council of Europe (2011) Compendium cultural policies and trends in Europe. Official report, Council of Europe, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Cuypers IR, Koh PS, Wang H (2015) Sincerity in corporate philanthropy, stakeholder perceptions and firm value. Organ. Sci. 27(1):173–188.Link, Google Scholar
• De Clercq D, Voronov M (2009) The role of cultural and symbolic capital in entrepreneurs’ ability to meet expectations about conformity and innovation. J. Small Bus. Management 47(3):398–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch Y, Ross TW (2003) You are known by the directors you keep: Reputable directors as a signaling mechanism for young firms. Management Sci. 49(8):1003–1017.Link, Google Scholar
• De Nooy W (2002) The dynamics of artistic prestige. Poetics 30(3):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, ed. (1986) Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint, vol. 3 (Oxford University Press on Demand).Google Scholar
• Dowling J, Pfeffer J (1975) Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociol. Rev. 18(1):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drees JM, Heugens PP (2013) Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. J. Management 39(6):1666–1698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eikhof SR, Haunschild A (2007) For arts sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):523–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Johnson V (2008) Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory Soc. 37(1):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filewod A (2011) Committing Theatre: Theatre Radicalism and Political Intervention in Canada (Between the Lines).Google Scholar
• Fombrun CJ (1996) Reputation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Formilan G, Cattani G, Ferriani S (2021) Trajectories of consecration: Signature style and the pace of category spanning. Schuessler E, Cohendet P, Svejenova S, eds. Organizing Creativity in the Innovation Journey (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Froelich KA (1999) Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Volunteer Sector Quart. 28(3):246–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Hafsi T (2017) Political dependence, social scrutiny, and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from disaster relief. Bus. Ethics 26(2):189–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gautier A (2019) Historically contested concepts: A conceptual history of philanthropy in France, 1712-1914. Theory Soc. 48(1):95–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gautier A, Pache AC (2015) Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. J. Bus. Ethics 126(3):343–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhards J, Hans S, Drewski D (2018) Global inequality in the academic system: Effects of national and university symbolic capital on international academic mobility. High. Edu. 76(4):669–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson W, Vom Lehn D (2016) Institutions, Interaction and Social Theory (Macmillan International Higher Education).Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K, Rao H (1997) Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organ. Sci. 8(6):593–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Googins BK, Rochlin SA (2000) Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Bus. Soc. Rev. 105(1):127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guimarães P, Portugal P (2010) A simple feasible procedure to fit models with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata J. 10(4):628–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo C (2007) When government becomes the principal philanthropist: The effects of public funding on patterns of nonprofit governance. Public Admin. Rev. 67(3):458–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampel CE, Tracey P (2017) How organizations move from stigma to legitimacy: The case of Cook’s travel agency in Victorian Britain. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2175–2207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey C, Maclean M, Gordon J, Shaw E (2011) Andrew Carnegie and the foundations of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. Bus. History 53(3):425–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J (1990) Varieties of selection bias. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(2):313–318.Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ (2003). The power of the Buckley and Casson thesis: the ability to manage institutional idiosyncrasies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(2):173–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Bierman L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hudson BA, Okhuysen GA (2009) Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organ. Sci. 20(1):134–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotabe M, Jiang CX, Murray JY (2011) Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China. J. World Bus. 46(2):166–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreiner GE, Hollensbe EC, Sheep ML (2009) Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Acad. Management J. 52:704–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwak DH, Ramamurthy KR, Nazareth DL (2019) Beautiful is good and good is reputable: Multiple-attribute charity website evaluation and initial perceptions of reputation under the halo effect. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(11):3.Google Scholar
• Liket K, Simaens A (2015) Battling the devolution in the research on corporate philanthropy. J. Bus. Ethics 126(2):285–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lizé W (2016) Artistic work intermediaries as value producers. Agents, managers, tourneurs and the acquisition of symbolic capital in popular music. Poetics 59:35–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu J (2018) Fear the government? A meta-analysis of the impact of government funding on nonprofit advocacy engagement. Amer. Rev. Public Admin. 48(3):203–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lux S, Crook TR, Woehr DJ (2011) Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. J. Management 37(1):223–247.Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lee M (2013) Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large US firms. Strategic Management J. 34(4):483–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2016) Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1325–1341.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King BG (2018) Order in the court: How firm status and reputation shape the outcomes of employment discrimination suits. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):61–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKeever BS, Dietz NE, Fyffe SD (2016) The Nonprofit Almanac: The Essential Facts and Figures for Managers, Researchers, and Volunteers (Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
• Meijer M (2009) The effects of charity reputation on charitable giving. Corporate Reputation Rev. 12(1):33–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moir L, Taffler R (2004) Does corporate philanthropy exist?: Business giving to the arts in the UK. J. Bus. Ethics 54(2):149–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldavanova AV, Meloche L, Thompson TL (2022) Understanding the geography of access to cultural amenities: The case of Metropolitan Detroit. J. Urban Affairs 44(4–5):614–639.Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Capron L (2011) Role of resource gap and value appropriation: Effect of reputation gap on price premium in online auctions. Strategic Management J. 32(4):447–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Obloj K (2006) Diminishing returns from reputation: Do followers have a competitive advantage? Corporate Reputation Rev. 9(4):213–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Meara K (2007) Striving for what? Exploring the pursuit of prestige. Smart JC, ed. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XXII (Springer, New York), 121–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrander SA (2007) The growth of benefactor control: Revisiting the social relations of philanthropy. Nonprofit Volunteer Sector Quart. 36(2):356–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrower F (1995) Philanthropy, Prestige and Status in the Philanthropy Reader, 2016. Moody M, Breeze B, eds. The Philanthropy Reader (Routledge), 215–219.Google Scholar
• Ostrower F (2020) Nonprofit arts organizations: Sustainability and rationales for support. The Nonprofit Sector (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 468–486.Google Scholar
• Peng MW, Luo Y (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Acad. Management J. 43(3):486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (2003) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Pontikes E, Negro G, Rao H (2010) Stained red: A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the “red scare” in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puffer SM, McCarthy DJ, Peng MW (2013) Managing favors in a global economy. Asia Pacific J. Management 30(2):321–326.Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Pollock TG, Hayward ML (2006) Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):50–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodner V, Roulet TJ, Kerrigan F, Vom Lehn D (2020) Making space for art: A spatial perspective of disruptive and defensive institutional work in Venezuela’s art world. Acad. Management J. 63(4):1054–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roulet TJ (2020) The Power of Being Divisive: Understanding Negative Social Evaluations (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roulet TJ, Bothello J (2022) Tackling grand challenges beyond dyads and networks: Developing a stakeholder systems view using the metaphor of ballet. Bus. Ethics Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwaiger M, Sarstedt M, Taylor CR (2010) Art for the sake of the corporation: Audi, BMW group, DaimlerChrysler, Montblanc, Siemens, and Volkswagen help explore the effect of sponsorship on corporate reputations. J. Advertising Res. 50(1):77–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott SV, Walsham G (2005) Reconceptualizing and managing reputation risk in the knowledge economy: Toward reputable action. Organ. Sci. 16(3):308–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Markóczy L, Stan CV (2014) The continuing importance of political ties in China. Acad. Management Perspective 28(1):57–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shymko Y, Roulet TJ (2017) When does Medici hurt da Vinci? Mitigating the signaling effect of extraneous stakeholder relationships in the field of cultural production. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1307–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan U, Patterson M, Kelly C, Mair J (2016) Organizations driving positive social change: A review and an integrative framework of change processes. J. Management 42(5):1250–1281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suárez DF (2011) Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 21(2):307–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szőcs I, Schlegelmilch BB, Rusch T, Shamma HM (2016) Linking cause assessment, corporate philanthropy, and corporate reputation. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 44(3):376–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanner J (2003) The Sociology of Art (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Thomson P (2014) Field. Grenfell MJ, ed. Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts (Routledge, Oxon, UK), 65–82.Google Scholar
• Twersky F, Buchanan P, Threlfall V (2013) Listening to those who matter most, the beneficiaries. Stanford Soc. Innovative Rev. 11(2):40–45.Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wernicke G, Brenner S (2018) Signal incongruence and its consequences: A study of media disapproval and CEO overcompensation. Organ. Sci. 29(5):796–817.Link, Google Scholar
• Vilisov V (2019) Like grown ups. Accessed February 10, 2022, https://lenta.ru/articles/2019/10/16/independent/.Google Scholar
• Voropai L (2019) Faked Fakes: Art Strategy and Art Tactic. Unpublished, available at http://95.216.75.113/handle/123456789/249.Google Scholar
• Voss GB, Sirdeshmukh D, Voss ZG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 51(1):147–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waller D, Younger R (2017) The Reputation Game: The Art of Changing How People See You (Oneworld Publications).Google Scholar
• Wang H, Qian C (2011) Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1159–1181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang D, Du F, Marquis C (2019) Defending Mao’s dream: How politicians’ ideological imprinting affects firms’ political appointment in China. Acad. Management J. 62(4):1111–1136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Choi J, Li J (2008) Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):143–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Jia M, Zhang Z (2021) Good deeds done in silence: Stakeholder management and quiet giving by Chinese firms. Organ. Sci. 32(3):649–674.Link, Google Scholar
• Wernicke G, Sajko M, Boone C (2022) How much influence do CEOs have on company actions and outcomes? The example of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Discoveries 8(1):36–55.Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Marquis C, Qiao K (2016) Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1307–1324.Link, Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Ni N, Crilly D (2019) Non‐profit organizations as a nexus between government and business: Evidence from Chinese charities. Strategic Management J. 40(4):658–684.Crossref, Google Scholar