Maintaining or Altering the Status Quo in the Nonmarket Arena: Theory and Evidence from Government Contract Disputes

References

• Abdurakhmonov M, Ridge JW, Hill AD (2021) Unpacking firm external dependence: How government contract dependence affects firm investments and market performance. Acad. Management J. 64(1):327–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdurakhmonov M, Ridge JW, Hill AD, Loncarich H (2022) Strategic risk and lobbying investigating lobbying breadth as risk management. J. Management 48(5):1103–1130.Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Knoeber CR (2001) Do some outside directors play a political role? J. Law Econom. 44(1):179–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aharoni Y, Maimon Z, Segev E (1981) Interrelationships between environmental dependencies: A basis for tradeoffs to increase autonomy. Strategic Management J. 2(2):197–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander R, Mazza S, Scholz S (2009) Measuring rates of return on lobbying expenditures: An empirical case study of tax breaks for multinational corporations. J. Law Politics 25(4):401–457.Google Scholar
• Alizamir S, Iravani F, Mamani H (2019) An analysis of price vs. revenue protection: Government subsidies in the agriculture industry. Management Sci. 65(1):32–49.Link, Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, De Figueiredo JM, Snyder JM Jr (2003) Why is there so little money in US politics? J. Econom. Perspective 17(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arifin T, Hasan I, Kabir R (2020) Transactional and relational approaches to political connections and the cost of debt. J. Corporate Finance 65:101768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber IVB, Diestre L (2019) Pushing for speed or scope? Pharmaceutical lobbying and Food and Drug Administration drug review. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1194–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Rev. 37(2):47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron A (2011) Exploring national culture’s consequences on international business lobbying. J. World Bus. 46(3):320–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basdeo DK, Smith KG, Grimm CM, Rindova VP, Derfus PJ (2006) The impact of market actions on firm reputation. Strategic Management J. 27(12):1205–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner FR, Berry JM, Hojnacki M, Leech BL, Kimball DC (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baye MR, Kovenock D, De Vries CG (1993) Rigging the lobbying process: An application of the all-pay auction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(1):289–294.Google Scholar
• Boddewyn JJ, Brewer TL (1994) International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1):119–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2012) Competition and political organization: Together or alone in lobbying for trade policy? J. Internat. Econom. 87(1):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi JP (2011) Corporate political resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Organ. 9(3):247–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi JP, Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2005) The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):397–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bundy J, Pfarrer MD (2015) A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):345–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter DP, Esterling KM, Lazer DM (2004) Friends, brokers, and transitivity: Who informs whom in Washington politics? J. Politics 66(1):224–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo HS, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2639–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Parsley D, Yang Y (2015) Corporate lobbying and firm performance. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 42(3–4):444–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Figueiredo JM, Silverman BS (2006) Academic earmarks and the returns to lobbying. J. Law Econom. 49(2):597–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (2000) Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. J. Management 26(6):1091–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drutman L (2010) The complexities of lobbying: Toward a deeper understanding of the profession. PS Political Sci. Politics 43(4):834–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drutman L (2015) The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1997) Effective interim collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management J. 18(7):535–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M, Masulis RW, McConnell JJ (2006) Political connections and corporate bailouts. J. Finance 61(6):2597–2635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Acquisition Regulation (2019) Retrieved July 7, 2021, https://www.acquisition.gov/sites/default/files/current/far/pdf/FAR.pdf.Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2018) Competing for government procurement contracts: The role of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1299–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Bansal P (2017) Does a long‐term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1827–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C, Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. 33(2):233–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fritschler AL, Ross BH (1980) Business Regulation and Government Decision-Making (Winthrop Publishers, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gamache D, McNamara G, Graffin S, Kiley J, Haleblian J, Devers E (2019) Impression offsetting as an early warning signal of low CEO confidence in acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1307–1332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldman E, Rocholl J, So J (2013) Politically connected boards of directors and the allocation of procurement contracts. Rev. Finance 17(5):1617–1648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray V, Lowery D (1997) Reconceptualizing PAC formation: It’s not a collective action problem, and it may be an arms race. Amer. Political Quart. 25(3):319–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grier KB, Munger MC, Roberts BE (1994) The determinants of industry political activity 1978–1986. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 88(4):911–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Aksu B, Coombes S (2021) Fifteen minutes of fame? The impact of media visibility and media reputation on the relationship between corporate political activity and government contract awards. Acad. Managment Discovery 7(1):57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Bonardi JP, Dahan NM (2017) Corporate political activity, public policy uncertainty, and firm outcomes: A meta-analysis. Strategic Organ. 15(3):338–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Doh JP, Schneider MA (2018) Corporate political activity and regulatory capture: How some companies blunt the knife of socially oriented investor activism. J. Management 44(5):2064–2093.Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Schuler DA (2013) In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments. Strategic Management J. 34(2):165–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Haire SB, Hartley R, Lindquist SA (1999) Attorney expertise, litigant success, and judicial decision making in the US Courts of Appeals. Law Soc. Rev. 33:667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen JM (1991) Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby 1919–1981 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Harjoto MA (2017) The impact of institutional and technical social responsibilities on the likelihood of corporate fraud. Bus. Professional Ethics J. 36(2):197–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measures 5(4):475–492.Google Scholar
• Heinz JP, Laumann EO, Nelson RL, Salisbury RH (1993) The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hill CW (1990) Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 15(3):500–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill AD, Johnson SG, Greco LM, O’Boyle EH, Walter SL (2021) Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. J. Management 47(1):105–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ (2001) Public affairs, issue management and political strategy: Methodological issues that count—A different view. J. Public Affairs: Internat. J. 1(4):356–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ (2005) Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? J. Management 31(3):464–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Keim G (1995) International variation in the business-government interface: Institutional and organizational considerations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(1):193–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Keim GD, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L (1999) Corporate political strategies and firm performance: indications of firm‐specific benefits from personal service in the US government. Strategic Management J. 20(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holburn GLF, Vanden Bergh RV (2002) Interest group representation in the regulation of public utilities: The diffusion of consumer advocacy legislation in the United States. Unpublished manuscript, Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Holburn GL, Vanden Bergh RG (2008) Making friends in hostile environments: Political strategy in regulated industries. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):521–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Andersen ML (2011) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Ethics 104(4):461–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Insead LC, Chatain O (2008) Competitors’ resource-oriented strategies: Acting on competitors’ resources through interventions in factor markets and political markets. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):97–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacquemin A, Berry C (1979) Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. J. Industrial Econom. 27(4):359–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia N (2018) The “make and/or buy” decisions of corporate political lobbying: Integrating the economic efficiency and legitimacy perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 43(2):307–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Jia N, Bai T, Bruton GD (2021) Cleaning house before hosting new guests: A political path dependence model of political connection adaptation in the aftermath of anticorruption shocks. Strategic Management J. 42(10):1793–1821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones TM (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad. Management Rev. 20:404–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keim G, Baysinger B (1988) The efficacy of business political activity: Competitive considerations in a principal-agent context. J. Management 14(2):163–180.Google Scholar
• Keim GD, Zeithaml CP, Baysinger BD (1984) New directions for corporate political strategy. Sloan Management Rev. 25(3):53.Google Scholar
• Kim JH (2008) Corporate lobbying revisited. Bus. Politics 10(2):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JH (2019) Is your playing field unleveled? US defense contracts and foreign firm lobbying. Strategic Management J. 40(12):1911–1937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, McDonnell M (2015) Good firms, good targets: The relationship among corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds., Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World (Cambridge University Press, New York), 430–454.Google Scholar
• Koontz K, McDonnell MH (2021) How corporate America can engage with social activism. Retrieved June 6, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXTDYvHuG4U.Google Scholar
• Kozhikode RK (2016) Dormancy as a strategic response to detrimental public policy. Organ. Sci. 27(1):189–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Leathley E (2017) Net neutrality and the current debate. Opensecrets.org. Retrieved June 6, 2021, https://www.opensecrets.org/news/issues/net_neutrality/.Google Scholar
• Li J, Wu DA (2020) Do corporate social responsibility engagements lead to real environmental, social, and governance impact? Management Sci. 66(6):2564–2588.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo Y (2006) Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: A structuration perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 37(6):747–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lux S, Crook TR, Woehr DJ (2011) Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. J. Management 37(1):223–247.Google Scholar
• Mariconda S, Zamparini A, Lurati F (2021) Organizational reputation: In search of lost time. Strategic Organ. 1–14.Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, Werner T (2016) Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity. Admin. Sci. Q. 61(4):584–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKay A (2012) Negative lobbying and policy outcomes. Amer. Political Res. 40(1):116–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellahi K, Frynas JG, Sun P, Siegel D (2016) A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. J. Management 42(1):143–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meznar MB, Nigh D (1995) Buffer or bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs activities in American firms. Acad. Management J. 38(4):975–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitnick BM (1993) Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran P (2005) Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management J. 26(12):1129–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nalick M, Kuban S, Hill AD, Ridge JW (2020) Too hot to handle and too valuable to drop: An expanded conceptualization of firms’ reactions to exchange partner misconduct. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1976–2003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nownes AJ (2006) Total Lobbying: What Lobbyists Want (and How They Try to Get It) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C, Holzinger I (2008) The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):496–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action (Harvard University Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5):631–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston LE (1986) Business and public policy. J. Management 12(2):261–275.Google Scholar
• Quest R (2017) Qatar Airways CEO: Don’t shut us out of airline conversation. CNN Business. Retrieved June 6, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imD-9PxduAo.Google Scholar
• Richter BK, Samphantharak K, Timmons JF (2009) Lobbying and taxes. Amer. J. Political Sci. 53(4):893–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridge JW, Hill AD, Ingram A (2018) The signaling role of politician stock ownership: Effects on lobbying intensity. J. Management 44(5):2116–2141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridge JW, Ingram A, Hill AD (2017) Beyond lobbying expenditures: How lobbying breadth and political connectedness affect firm outcomes. Acad. Management J. 60(3):1138–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridge JW, Ingram A, Abdurakhmonov M, Hasija D (2019) Market reactions to non‐market strategy: Congressional testimony as an indicator of firm political influence. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1644–1667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Williamson IO, Petkova AP, Sever JM (2005) Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1033–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ring PS, Lenway SA, Govekar M (1990) Management of the political imperative in international business. Strategic Management J. 11(2):141–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritov I, Baron J (1992) Status-quo and omission biases. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(1):49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1077–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandefur RL (2015) Elements of professional expertise: Understanding relational and substantive expertise through lawyers’ impact. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):909–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuler DA (1996) Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Acad. Management J. 39(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuler DA, Rehbein K, Cramer RD (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Management J. 45(4):659–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Semadeni M, Withers MC, Certo TS (2014) The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management J. 35(7):1070–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer B (1995) Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. J. Management 21(3):495–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer B, Quasney TJ, Grimm CM (2000) Firm level performance implications of nonmarket actions. Bus. Soc. 39(2):126–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Shane S, Gregorio DD (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Steiner ID (1972) Group Process and Productivity (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2001) Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression (Social).Google Scholar
• Tahoun A (2014) The role of stock ownership by US members of Congress on the market for political favors. J. Financial Econom. 111(1):86–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walters S (1993) Enterprise, Government and the Public (McGraw-Hill Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Werner T (2015) Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policy making. Management Sci. 61(8):1989–2011.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Zhang Y (2011) CEO dismissal: The role of investment analysts. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1161–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wise K (2007) Lobbying and relationship management: The K Street connection. J. Public Relations Res. 19(4):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wowak A, Mannor M, Wowak K (2015) Throwing caution to the wind: The effect of CEO stock option pay on the incidence of product safety problems. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1082–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Mannor MJ, Arrfelt M, McNamara G (2016) Earthquake or glacier? How CEO charisma manifests in firm strategy over time. Strategic Management J. 37(3):586–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoffie DB (1987) Corporate strategies for political action: A rational model. Bus. Strategy Public Policy 43:60.Google Scholar
• Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK, Hubbard TD (2016) Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Acad. Management J. 59:253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar