Wisdom in the Wild: Generalization and Adaptive Dynamics

References

• Aggarwal VA, Posen HE, Workiewicz M (2017) Adaptive capacity to technological change: A microfoundational approach. Strategic Management J. 38(6):1212–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision-making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2020) Division of roles and endogenous specialization. Indust. Corporate Change 29(1):105–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) A efficient frontier in organizational design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1198–1219.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Jackson SE (1987) Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):76–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Sull DN (2001) Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(1):106–119.Google Scholar
• Feller W (1968) An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Warglien M (2015) A model of collective interpretation. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1263–1283.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci. 7(2):155–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D (1989) The mechanisms of analogical learning. Vosniadou S, Ortony A, eds. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 199–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1999) Betting on one good reason: The take the best heuristic. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, The ABC Research Group, eds. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 75–95.Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. 62:451–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U, Kleinbölting H (1991) Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psych. Rev. 98(4):506–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1999) The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Le Mens G, Hsu G, Kovács B, Negro G, Pólos L, Pontikes E, Sharkey AJ (2019) Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological and Cultural Analysis (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holyoak K, Thagard P (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2015) The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1960–1978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanerva P (1988) Sparse Distributed Memory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Katsikopoulos KV, Simsek O, Buckmann M, Gigerenzer G (2021) Classification in the Wild: The Science and Art of Transparent Decision Making (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA, Puranam P (2019) A model is a model. Strategy Sci. 4(1):1–3.Link, Google Scholar
• Kruschke JK (1992) ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psych. Rev. 99(1):22–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laureiro‐Martinez D, Brusoni S, Tata A, Zollo M (2019) The manager’s notepad: Working memory, exploration, and performance. J. Management Stud. 56(8):1655–1682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Rerup C (2021) The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 32(3):527–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Soc. 14(1):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1996) Learning to be risk averse. Psych. Rev. 103(2):309–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1999) The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence (Blackwell Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2(1):1–13.Link, Google Scholar
• Markman AB, Ross BH (2003) Category use and category learning. Psych. Bull. 129(4):592–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medin DL, Wattenmaker WD, Hampson SE (1987) Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psych. 19(2):242–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosofsky RM (1988) Similarity, frequency, and category representations. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 14(1):54–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S, Puranam P (2020) Learning what they think vs. learning what they do: The micro-foundations of vicarious learning. Preprint, submitted July 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15264.Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2018) Category strategy for firm advantage. Strategy Sci. 3(4):620–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Chen JS (2013) An advantage of newness: Vicarious learning despite limited absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1701–1716.Link, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reyt J, Wiesenfeld B (2015) Seeing the forest for the trees: Exploratory learning, mobile technology, and knowledge workers’ role in integration behaviors. Acad. Management J. 58(3):739–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psych. 4(3):328–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1978) Prototype classification and logical classification: The two systems. Scholnick EK, ed. New Trends in Conceptual Representation: Challenges to Piaget’s Theory? (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 73–86.Google Scholar
• Rosch E, Mervis CB (1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psych. 7(4):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psych. 8(3):382–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sah R, Stiglitz J (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
• Sattath S, Tversky A (1977) Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika 42(3):319–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafir E (1993) Choosing vs. rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory Cognition 21:546–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard RN (1962) The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. Psychometrika 27(2):125–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard RN, Hovland CI, Jenkins HM (1961) Learning and memorization of classifications. Psych. Monographs 75(13):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Minda JP (1998) Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 24(6):1411–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RS (1996) Generalization in reinforcement learning: Successful examples using sparse coarse coding. Touretzky DS, Mozer MC, Hasselmo ME, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: Proceedings of the 1995 Conference (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 1038–1044.Google Scholar
• Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Introduction to Reinforcement Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang L (2020) Revisiting the locus of experience. Acad. Management Proc. 2020(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (2005) Expert Political Judgment (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Thorndike EL (1898) Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psych. Rev. Monograph Supplements 2(4):1–109.Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psych. Rev. 84(4):327–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward TB (1994) Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psych. 27(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woiczyk TK, Le Mens G (2021) Evaluating categories from experience: The simple averaging heuristic. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 121(4):747–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woiczyk TK, Sump F, Le Mens G (2020) Categories and exploration. Acad. Management Proc. 2020(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Soc. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar