Do Employees Work Less for Female Leaders? A Multi-Method Study of Entrepreneurial Firms

References

• Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abowd JM, Kramarz F, Woodcock S (2008) Econometric analyses of linked employer-employee data. Mátyás L, Sevestre P, eds. The Econometrics of Panel Data (Springer, Berlin), 727–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abraham M, Burbano V (2021) Congruence between leadership gender and organizational claims affects the gender composition of the applicant pool: Field experimental evidence. Organ. Sci. 33(1):393–414.Google Scholar
• Acker J (1990) Hierachies, jobs, bodies. Gender Soc. 4(2):139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R (2019) Human enterprise. Nyberg A, Moliterno T, eds. Handbook of Research on Strategic Human Capital (Elgar, Northampton, MA), 1–29.Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Braguinsky S, Ohyama A (2020) Centers of gravity: The effect of stable shared leadership in top management teams on firm growth and industry evolution. Strategic Management J. 41:467–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Villamor I, Ramani RS (2020) MTurk research: Review and recommendations. J. Management 47(5):823–837.Google Scholar
• Aldrich H, Ruef M (2006) Organizations Evolving, 2nd ed. (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balachandra L, Briggs T, Eddleston K, Brush C (2019) Don’t pitch like a girl!: How gender stereotypes influence investor decisions. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 43(1):116–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Hannan M (2002) Organizational blueprints for success in high-tech start-ups: Lessons from the Stanford project on emerging companies. California Management Rev. 44(3):8–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaman L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2009) Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1497–1540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benard S, Correll SJ (2010) Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender Soc. 24(5):616–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Anal. 20(3):351–368.Google Scholar
• Bianchi SM, Milkie MA, Sayer LC, Robinson JP (2000) Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Soc. Forces 79:191–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigelow L, Lundmark L, McLean Parks J, Wuebker R (2014) Skirting the issues: Experimental evidence of gender bias in IPO prospectus evaluations. J. Management 40(6):1732–1759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bird BJ, Brush CG (2002) A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 26(3):41–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter L, Lima F, Taylor L, Venâncio A (2014) Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal. Econom. J. (London) 124(57):805–832.Google Scholar
• Brett JM, Stroh LK (2003) Working 61 plus hours per week: Why do managers do it? J. Appl. Psych. 88(1):67–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2018) Do start-ups pay less? Industry Labor Related Rev. 71(5):1179–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buttner EH, Rosen B (1988) Bank loan officers’ perceptions of the characteristics of men, women, and successful entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 3(3):249–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buttner EH, Rosen B (1989) Funding new business ventures: Are decision makers biased against women entrepreneurs? J. Bus. Venturing 4(4):249–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byström K, Järvelin K (1995) Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Inform. Processing Management 31(2):191–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 13(1):40–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campero S, Kacperczyk A (2020) Asymmetric gender homophily in the startup labor market. Tzabbar D, Cirillo B, eds. Employee Inter- and Intra-Firm Mobility, vol. 41, Advances in Strategic Management (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK), 329–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardon MS (2003) Contingent labor as an enabler of entrepreneurial growth. Human Resources Management 42(4):357–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Matthews P, Schirm J (2010) Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:504–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellaneta F, Conti R, Kacperczyk A (2020) The (Un)intended consequences of institutions lowering barriers to entrepreneurship: The impact on female workers. Strategic Management J. 41(7):1274–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla E (2008) Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(6):1479–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Benard S (2010) The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):543–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha Y (2010) Reinforcing separate spheres: The effect of spousal overwork on men’s and women’s employment in dual-earner households. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(2):303–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha Y, Weeden KA (2014) Overwork and the slow convergence in the gender gap in wages. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(3):457–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman JB (1975) Comparison of male and female leadership styles. Acad. Management J. 18(3):645–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U, Henderson A (2018) Experimental methods: Measuring effort in economics experiments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 149:74–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psych. 55(1):591–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen PN, Huffman ML (2007) Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(5):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman S, Robb A (2009) A comparison of new firm financing by gender: Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey data. Small Bus. Econom. 33(4):397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly R (1992) The effect of child care costs on married women’s labor force participation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 74(1):83–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corporaal GF, Lehdonvirta V (2017) Platform sourcing: How fortune 500 firms are adopting online freelancing platforms (Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford). https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/publications/platform-sourcing.pdf.Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self‐assessments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1691–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1297–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cotter DA, DeFiore J, Hermsen JM, Kowalewski BM, Vanneman R (1997) All women benefit: The macro-level effect of occupational integration on gender earnings inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(5):714–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crump MJC, McDonnell JV, Gureckis TM (2013) Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One. 8(3):e57410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cullen ZB, Perez-Truglia R (2021) The old boys’ club: Schmoozing and the gender gap. NBER Working paper No. 26530, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Dahl MS, Klepper S (2015) Whom do new firms hire? Industrial Corporate Change 24(4):819–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pope D (2016) What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):1029–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSantola A, Gulati R (2017) Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):640–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desmond M (2008) On the Fireline (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ, Makhijani MG (1995) Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 117(1):125–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eatough EM, Meier LL, Igic I, Elfering A, Spector PE, Semmer NK(2016) You want me to do what? Two daily diary studies of illegitimate tasks and employee well-being. J. Organ. Behav. 37(1):108–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• England P (1992) Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence (Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004) Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution Human Behav. 25(March):63–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaddis SM (2017) How black are Lakisha and Jamal? Racial perceptions from names used in correspondence audit studies. Sociol. Sci. 4(19):1–21.Google Scholar
• Gartside D, Silverstone Y, Farley C, Cantrell SM (2013) Trends Reshaping the Future of HR: The Rise of the Extended Workforce (Accenture, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Gorman EH, Kmec JA (2009) Hierarchical rank and women’s organizational mobility: Glass ceilings in corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(5):1428–1474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Mollick E (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Kacperczyk A (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen BL (2008) The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1980) The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 26(3):386–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1984) Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 33(2):174–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Martell RF, Simon MC (1988) The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicants. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 41(1):98–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendy KC, Liao J, Milgram P (1997) Combining time and intensity effects in assessing operator information-processing load. Human. Factors 39(1):30–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hietaniemi L, Santamaria S, Kacperczyk A, Pltonen J (2022) Human resource redeployability and entrepreneurial hiring strategy: Evidence from Finnish microdata. Preprint, submitted January 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3764531.Google Scholar
• Hillman A, Canella AA, Harris IC (2002) Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? J. Management 28(6):747–763.Google Scholar
• Hochschild A, Machung A (2012) The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Honoré F, Ganco M (2020) Entrepreneurial teams’ acquisition of talent: Evidence from technology manufacturing industries using a two-sided approach. Strategic Management J.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14:399–425.Google Scholar
• Horvath M, Herleman HA, McKie RL (2006) Goal orientation, task difficulty, and task interest: A multilevel analysis. Motivation Emotions 30(2):171–178.Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Res. Policy 36(5):722–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Pearce J (2015) Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):634–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huffman ML, Velasco SC (1997) When more is less: Sex composition, organizations, and earnings in US firms. Work Occupation 24(2):214–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irwin D, Scott JM (2010) Barriers faced by SMEs in raising bank finance. Internat. J. Entrepreneurial Behav. Res. 16(3):245–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs JA, Gerson K (2004) The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Marx M (2016) Revisiting the small-firm effect on entrepreneurship: Evidence from firm dissolutions. Organ. Sci. 27(4):893–910.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AJ, Younkin P (2021) The founding penalty: Evidence from an audit study. Organ. Sci. 33(2):716–745.Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Kang S, Paik Y (2021) The double-edge sword of a female political leadership: Gender diversity-inducing and gender diversity-reducing effects in organizations. Preprint, submitted June 13, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3866169.Google Scholar
• Kassi O, Lehdonvirta V (2016) Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Tech. Forecast and Soc. Change 137:241–248.Google Scholar
• Kim PH, Aldrich HE, Keister LA (2006) Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Bus. Econom. 27(1):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim A, Kim Y, Han K, Jackson SE, Ployhart RE (2017) Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. J. Management 43(5):1335–1358.Google Scholar
• Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or Renaissance man? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD (2017) Learning to hire? Hiring as a dynamic experiential learning process in an online market for contract labor. Management Sci. 64(12):5651–5668.Link, Google Scholar
• Litwin A, Phan P (2013) Quality over quantity: Reexamining the link between entrepreneurship and job creation. Industry Labor Related Rev. 66(4):833–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu P, Li Z (2012) Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework. Internat. J. Industry Ergon. 42(6):553–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lombard K (2001) Female self-employment and demand for flexible, nonstandard work schedules. Econom. Inquiry 39(2):214–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lussier RN (1995) A nonfinancial business success vs. failure prediction model for young firms. J. Small Bus. Management 33(1):8–20.Google Scholar
• Naumovska I, Wernicke G, Zajac E (2020) Last to come and last to go? On the complex role of gender and ethnicity in the reputational penalties for directors linked to corporate fraud. Acad. Management J. 63(3):881–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Page KM, Sigmund K (2000) Fairness vs. reason in the ultimatum game. Science 289:1773–1775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donnell E, Johnson EN (2001) The effects of auditor gender and task complexity on information processing efficiency. Internat. J. Auditing 5(2):91–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42:185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quadlin N (2018) The mark of a woman’s record: Gender and academic performance in hiring. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(2):331–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A, Shivaram R (2020) Getting their hands dirty: How female managers motivate female worker productivity through subordinate scut work. Management Sci. 67(5):3299–3320.Link, Google Scholar
• Reid E (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.Link, Google Scholar
• Reskin BF (2000) The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contempory Sociol. 29(2):319–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2015) Founder or joiner? The role of preferences and context in shaping different entrepreneurkal interests. Management Sci. 61(9):2160–2184.Link, Google Scholar
• Rocha V, van Praag M (2020) Mind the gap: The role of gender in entrepreneurial career choice and social influence by founders. Strategic Management J. 41(5):841–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudert SC, Greifeneder R (2016) When it’s okay that I don’t play: Social norms and the situated construal of social exclusion. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 42(7):955–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H (2018) Fire in the belly? Employee motives and innovative performance in start-ups vs. established firms. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 12(4):423–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Semmer N, Tschan F, Meier L, Facchin S, Jacobshagen N (2010) Illegitimate tasks and counterproductive work behavior. Appl. Psych. 59(1):70–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Meier LL, Elfering A, Beehr TA, Kaelin W, Tschan F (2015) Illegitimate tasks as a source of work stress. Work Stress 29(1):32–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Mitsuhashi H, Kirsch DA (2006) Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Acad. Management J. 49:121–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solal I, Snellman K (2019) Women don’t mean business? Gender penalty in board composition. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1270–1288.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Dahl MS, Canales R, Burton MD (2021) Do startup employees earn more in the long run? Organ. Sci. 32(3):587–604.Link, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Sherman EL (2015) Agents of change or cogs in the machine? Reexamining the influence of female managers on the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(6):1778–1808.Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. J. March, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 153–193.Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2010) Gender and entrepreneurship as a career choice. Soc. Psych. Quart. 73(3):288–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015a) Business as Plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015b) Status beliefs and the spirit of capitalism: Accounting for gender biases in entrepreneurship and innovation. Soc. Forces 94(1):61–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thébaud S, Sharkey AJ (2016) Unequal hard times: The influence of the great recession on gender bias in entrepreneurial financing. Sociol. Sci. 3(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, David RJ, Sine WD (2011) Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1332–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2014) An experimental investigation of intrinsic motivations for giving. Theory Decision 76(1):47–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuscherer T, Sacco DF, Wirth JH, Claypool HM, Hugenberg K, Wesselmann ED (2015) Responses to exclusion are moderated by its perceived fairness. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 46(3):280–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Aldrich H (2014) Who’s the boss? Explaining gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):303–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Kacperczyk A, Naldi L (2021) Career antecedents of female entrepreneruship. Working paper.Google Scholar