Clean up Your Theory! Invest in Theoretical Clarity and Consistency for Higher-Impact Research

References

• Adner R, Pólos L, Ryall M, Sorenson O (2009) The case for formal theory. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):201–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arend RJ, Bromiley P (2009) Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: Spare change, everyone? Strategic Organ. 7(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astley WG, Zammuto RF (1992) Organization science, managers, and language games. Organ. Sci. 3(4):443–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Bacharach SB (1989) Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):496–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cartwright N (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conger K (2020) Uber and Lyft drivers in California will remain contractors. New York Times (November 4), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/04/technology/california-uber-lyft-prop-22.html.Google Scholar
• Corley KG, Gioia DA (2011) Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen J (2017) Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delbridge R, Fiss PC (2013) Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):325–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1995) Comments on “what theory is not.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):391–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doellgast V, Bidwell M, Colvin AJS (2021) New directions in employment relations theory: Understanding fragmentation, identity, and legitimacy. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 74(3):555–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty DH, Glick WH (1994) Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Acad. Management Rev. 19(2):230–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21:1105–1121.Google Scholar
• Englert C, Bertrams A (2021) Again, no evidence for or against the existence of ego depletion: Opinion on “a multi-site preregistered paradigmatic test of the ego depletion effect.” Frontiers Human Neuroscience 15:658890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JSBT, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 8(3):223–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman DC (2004) What are we talking about when we talk about theory? J. Management 30(5):565–567.Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (1999) Taking Coase seriously. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):145–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould SJ (1981) Evolution as fact and theory. Discover 2(5):34–37.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Acad. Management J. 50(6):1346–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Mahoney JT, Mannix EB (2019) Editors’ comments: The role of theory in management research. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):241–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsch PM, Levin DZ (1999) Umbrella advocates vs. validity police: A life-cycle model. Organ. Sci. 10(2):199–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow, 1st ed. (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kilduff M (2006) Editor’s comments: Publishing theory. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):252–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lurquin JH, Miyake A (2017) Challenges to ego-depletion research go beyond the replication crisis: A need for tackling the conceptual crisis. Frontiers Psych. 8:568.Google Scholar
• Makadok R, Burton R, Barney J (2018) A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1530–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mento AJ, Martinelli P, Jones RM (1999) Mind mapping in executive education: Applications and outcomes. J. Management Development 18(4):390–416.Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster I (1991) Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (Merriam-Webster, Springfield, MA).Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Burke LM, Glick WH (1998) Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management J. 19(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popper K (1983) Two kinds of definitions (1945). Burke TE, ed. The Philosophy of Popper (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK), 87–100.Google Scholar
• Popper KR (2014) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Google Scholar
• Priem RL, Butler JE (2001) Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):22–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quine WV, Ullian JS (1998) Hypothesis. Klemke ED, Hollinger R, Wyss Rudge D, eds. Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science (Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY), 404–414.Google Scholar
• Ragins BR (2012) Editor’s comments: Reflections on the craft of clear writing. Acad. Management Rev. 37(4):493–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds PD (1971) A Primer in Theory Construction (Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Silvia PJ (2007) How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Starbuck W (1999) Fussy Professor Starbuck’s cookbook of handy-dandy prescriptions for ambitious academic authors. Working paper, University of Oregon, Eugene. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/William-Starbuck/publication/240011826_Fussy_Professor_Starbuck''s_Cookbook_of_Handy-Dandy_Prescriptions_for_Ambitious_Academic_Authors/links/00b49521678d8c56df000000/Fussy-Professor-Starbucks-Cookbook-of-Handy-Dandy-Prescriptions-for-Ambitious-Academic-Authors.pdf.Google Scholar
• Suddaby R (2010) Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):346–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas DC, Cuervo-Cazurra A, Brannen MY (2011) From the editors: Explaining theoretical relationships in international business research: Focusing on the arrows, NOT the boxes. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42(9):1073–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorngate W (1976) “In general” vs. “it depends”: Some comments of the Gergen-Schlenker debate. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 2(4):404–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van De Ven AH (1999) The buzzing, blooming, confusing world of organization and management theory: A view from Lake Wobegon University. J. Management Inquiry 8(2):118–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1995) Crossroads style as theory. Organ. Sci. 6(1):133–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Sørensen JB, Mitchell TR (2007) The interplay between theory and method. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1145–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wacker JG (1998) A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J. Oper. Management 16(4):361–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):516–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1999) Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):797–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zikmund WG (2009) Business Research Methods (Cengage Learning, Mason, OH).Google Scholar