From Compliance to Progress: A Sensemaking Perspective on the Governance of Corruption

References

• ACN (2014) Collective action against corruption. Business and anti-corruption initiatives in ASEAN. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.asean-csr-network.org/c/images/AIMPublication-CollectiveActionAgainstCorruptionRVR-CVStarr-1.pdf.Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Aragón-Correa JA, Marano V, Tashman PA (2021) The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. J. Management 47(6):1468–1497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Filatotchev I, Gospel H, Jackson G (2008) An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organ. Sci. 19(3):475–492.Link, Google Scholar
• Anand V, Ashforth BE, Joshi M (2004) Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Acad. Management Executive 18(2):39–53.Google Scholar
• Anderson PJ, Blatt R, Christianson MK, Grant AM, Marquis C, Neuman EJ, Sonenshein S (2006) Understanding mechanisms in organizational research: Reflections from a collective journey. J. Management Inquiry 15(2):102–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson S, Heywood PM (2009) The politics of perception: Use and abuse of Transparency International’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Stud. 57(4):746–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aravind D, Christmann P (2011) Decoupling of standard implementation from certification: Does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental performance? Bus. Ethics Quart. 21(1):73–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arenas D, Albareda L, Goodman J (2020) Contestation in multi-stakeholder initiatives: Enhancing the democratic quality of transnational governance. Bus. Ethics Quart. 30(2):169–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashcraft KL, Kuhn TR, Cooren F (2009) Constitutional amendments:“Materializing” organizational communication. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):1–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacq S, Aguilera RV (2022) Stakeholder governance for responsible innovation: A theory of value creation, appropriation, and distribution. J. Management Stud. 59(1):29–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley T, Egels-Zandén N (2016) Beyond decoupling: Unions and the leveraging of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. Socio-Economic Rev. 14(2):231–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartunek JM (1984) Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(3):355–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Begley TM, Tan W-L (2001) The socio-cultural environment for entrepreneurship: A comparison between East Asian and Anglo-Saxon countries. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 32(3):537–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum E, Battilana J (2005) Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organ. 3(4):355–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum E, Jonsson S (2017) Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. Greenwood R, Lawrence TB, Oliver C, Meyer R, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (SAGE, London), 59–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Powell WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):483–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AD (2000) Making sense of inquiry sensemaking. J. Management Stud. 37(1):45–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucher S, Langley A (2016) The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):594–613.Link, Google Scholar
• Bunge M (1997) Mechanism and explanation. Philos. Soc. Sci. 27(4):410–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castro A, Phillips N, Ansari S (2020) Corporate corruption: A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):935–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers S (2003) Deliberative democratic theory. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 6(1):307–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang EC, Chu Y-h (2006) Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies? J. Politics 68(2):259–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen LT, Morsing M, Thyssen O (2013) CSR as aspirational talk. Organization 20(3):372–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen LT, Morsing M, Thyssen O (2015) Discursive closure and discursive openings in sustainability. Management Comm. Quart. 29(1):135–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen LT, Morsing M, Thyssen O (2017) License to critique: A communication perspective on sustainability standards. Bus. Ethics Quart. 27(2):239–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockcroft L, Wegener A-C (2016) Unmasked: Corruption in the West (IB Tauris, London).Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Durand R, Fiss PC, Lammers JC, Vaara E (2015) Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 40(1):10–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cortez JSB, Ramos AJOS (2015) The sustainability of a business culture based on integrity. MBC research report. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://mbc.com.ph/wp-content/uploads/MBCRR-120.pdf.Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Zollo M, Hansen MT (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1429–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Bree M, Stoopendaal A (2020) De- and recoupling and public regulation. Organ. Stud. 41(5):599–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dick P, Coule T (2020) Nonconformance with regulatory codes in the nonprofit sector: Accountability and the discursive coupling of means and ends. Bus. Soc. 59(4):749–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doty DH, Glick WH (1994) Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Acad. Management Rev. 19(2):230–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dryzek JS, Bächtiger A, Chambers S, Cohen J, Druckman JN, Felicetti A, Fishkin JS (2019) The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Sci. 363(6432):1144–1146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dryzek JS, Pickering J (2017) Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecology Econom. 131:353–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):962–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ensign RL (2013, May 29) How Daimler got “A Very Good Report Card.” Wall Street Journal. Accessed January 18, 2016, http://blogs.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2013/05/29/how-daimler-got-a-very-good-report-card/tab/print/.Google Scholar
• Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2018) Geld waschen mit der Credit Suisse. (September 18).Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Etzion D, Gehman J (2015) Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organ. Stud. 36(3):363–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flyverbom M, Deibert R, Matten D (2019) The governance of digital technology, big Data, and the Internet: New roles and responsibilities for business. Bus. Soc. 58(1):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forum for African Investigative Reporters (2012) Transnational investigation: The FAIRTRADE chocolate ripoff. Accessed October 4, 2018, https://fairreporters.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/the-fairtrade-chocolate-ripoff-investigation-20122.pdf.Google Scholar
• Freitag M, Katzensteiner T (2011) Angst & Schrecken. Korruptionsjäger Debevoise & Plimpton. Manager Magazine Online. Accessed July 11, 2022, http://www.manager-magazin.de/magazin/artikel/a-746295.html.Google Scholar
• Fung A (2003) Deliberative democracy and international labor standards. Governance (Oxford) 16(1):51–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Admin. Rev. 66:66–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gephart RP (1993) The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1465–1514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson Dunn (2008) 2007 year-end FCPA update. Accessed December 11, 2018, https://www.gibsondunn.com/2007-year-end-fcpa-update./Google Scholar
• Gibson Dunn (2011) 2010 year-end FCPA update. Accessed December 14, 2018, https://www.gibsondunn.com/2010-year-end-fcpa-update/.Google Scholar
• Gimmler A (2001) Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the Internet. Philos. Soc. Criticism 27(4):21–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gond JP, Cabantous L, Harding N, Learmonth M (2015) What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. Internat. J. Management Rev. 18(4):440–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greive M, Hartmann J (2012) “Zero Tolerance” verändert deutsche Firmenkultur. Die Welt. Accessed July 11, 2022, http://www.welt.de/112029066.Google Scholar
• Gunningham N, Sinclair D (2017) Smart regulation. Drahos P, ed. Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications (Australian National University Press, Canberra, Acton, Australia), 133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haack P, Schoeneborn D (2015) Is decoupling becoming decoupled from institutional theory? A commentary on Wijen. Acad. Management Rev. 40(2):307–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haack P, Martignoni D, Schoeneborn D (2021) A bait-and-switch model of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):440–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haack P, Schoeneborn D, Wickert C (2012) Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organ. Stud. 33(5–6):815–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallett T (2010) The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(1):52–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess D, Dunfee TW (2000) Fighting corruption: A principled approach: The C principles (combating corruption). Cornell Internat. Law J. 33(593):593–626.Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO (1994) Social conflicts as pillars of democratic market society. Political Theory 22(2):203–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (1980) Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organ. Dynamics 9(1):42–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Höpner A (2010) Siemens Saubermann und Söhne. Handelsblatt. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/industrie/vier-jahre-korruptionsskandal-siemens-saubermann-und-soehne/3574096.html.Google Scholar
• Kahn RA (2005) Cross-burning, Holocaust denial, and the development of hate speech law in the United States and Germany. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 83:163–194.Google Scholar
• Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management J. 56(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ. Sci. 1(3):248–266.Link, Google Scholar
• LexisNexis (2019) ISO 37001. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.lexisnexis.nl/blog/iso-37001.Google Scholar
• Lindblom CE (1959) The science of “muddling through.” Public Admin. Rev. 19:79–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke R, Amengual M, Mangla A (2009) Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Political Soc. 37(3):319–351.Google Scholar
• Lombardo E, Meier P, Verloo M (2010) Discursive dynamics in gender equality politics: What about ‘feminist taboos’? Eur. J. Womens Stud. 17(2):105–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo Y (2002) Corruption and organization in Asian management systems. Asia Pacific J. Management 19(2):405–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacLean TL, Behnam M (2010) The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1499–1520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mair J, Marti I, Ventresca MJ (2012) Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Acad. Management J. 55(4):819–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maitlis S (2005) The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 48(1):21–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maitlis S, Christianson M (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):57–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maitlis S, Vogus TJ, Lawrence TB (2013) Sensemaking and emotion in organizations. Organ. Psych. Rev. 3(3):222–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mauzy DK (1997) The human rights and ‘Asian values’ debate in Southeast Asia: Trying to clarify the key issues. Pacific Rev. 10(2):210–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer RE, Vaara E (2020) Institutions and actorhood as co‐constitutive and co‐constructed: The argument and areas for future research. J. Management Stud. 57(4):898–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer RE, Jancsary D, Höllerer MA, Boxenbaum E (2018) The role of verbal and visual text in the process of institutionalization. Acad. Management Rev. 43(3):392–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milne MJ, Kearins K, Walton S (2006) Creating adventures in wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization 13(6):801–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moody PR (1996) Asian values. J. Internet. Affairs 50(1):166–192.Google Scholar
• Mouffe C (2008) Critique as Counter-Hegemonic Intervention (European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies, Vienna).Google Scholar
• Nigam A, Ocasio W (2010) Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s healthcare reform initiative. Organ. Sci. 21(4):823–841.Link, Google Scholar
• NVivo (2018) Code sources and manage nodes. Accessed December 21, 2018, http://help-nv11.qsrinternational.com/desktop/concepts/code_sources_and_manage_nodes.htm#MiniTOCBookMark6.Google Scholar
• OECD (2011) Working Group on Bribery: Annual Report 2010. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/45460981.pdf.Google Scholar
• Paine LS (1994) Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 72(2):106–117.Google Scholar
• Palermo T, Power M, Ashby S (2017) Navigating institutional complexity: The production of risk culture in the financial sector. J. Management Stud. 54(2):154–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieth M (2012) Multistakeholder initiatives to combat money laundering and bribery. Working paper, Basel Institute on Governance, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Ansari S (2015) What is a “fair” price? Ethics as sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 26(3):867–888.Link, Google Scholar
• Rieger D, Schmitt JB, Frischlich L (2018) Hate and counter-voices in the Internet: Introduction to the special issue. SCM Stud. Comm. Media 7(4):459–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman S (2018) Corruption in international business. The obligations of multinational firms. zfwu. Z. Wirtsch. Unternehmethik 19(1):6–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman S, Palifka BJ (2016) Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schembera S, Scherer AG (2017) Organizational strategies in the context of legitimacy loss: Radical vs. gradual responses to disclosed corruption. Strategic Organ. 15(3):301–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Baumann-Pauly D, Schneider A (2013) Democratizing corporate governance: Compensating for the democratic deficit of corporate political activity and corporate citizenship. Bus. Soc. 52(3):473–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2011) The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. J. Management Stud. 48(4):899–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Voegtlin C (2020) Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Acad. Management Perspective 34(2):182–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmutzler J, Andonova V, Diaz-Serrano L (2019) How context shapes entrepreneurial self-efficacy as a driver of entrepreneurial intentions: A multilevel approach. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 43(5):880–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd ed. (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Siemens (2010) Annual Report 2009. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.siemens.com/investor/pool/en/investor_relations/e09_00_gb2009.pdf.Google Scholar
• Siemens (2012) Annual Report 2011. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.siemens.com/investor/pool/en/investor_relations/siemens_ar_2011.pdf.Google Scholar
• Siemens (2013) Annual Report 2012. Accessed May 29, 2013, https://www.siemens.com/investor/pool/en/investor_relations/siemens_ar_2012.pdf.Google Scholar
• Siemens (2016a) Annual Report 2015. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.siemens.com/investor/pool/en/investor_relations/Siemens_AR2015.pdf.Google Scholar
• Siemens (2016b) Siemens Integrity Initiative Annual Report 2015. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://baselgovernance.org/publications/siemens-integrity-initiative-annual-report-2015.pdf.Google Scholar
• Siemens (2017) Siemens Integrity Initiative Annual Report 2016. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://baselgovernance.org/publications/siemens-integrity-initiative-annual-report-2016.pdf.Google Scholar
• Spencer-Cooke A, van Dijk F (2017) Creating a Culture of Integrity: Business Ethics for the 21st Century (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• St˚l HI, Corvellec H (2021) Organizing means-ends decoupling: Core-compartment separations in fast fashion. Bus. Soc. 61(4):857–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2010) From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1474–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Transparency International (2009) The Integrity Pact: A powerful tool for clean bidding. Accessed March 22, 2014, http://www.transparency.org/files/content/tool/IntegrityPacts_Brochure_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
• Transparency International (2012) Corruption Perceptions Index 2012. Accessed February 6, 2013, http://www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results.Google Scholar
• UNGC (2010) Collective action in the fight against corruption. Accessed February 6, 2013, https://www.globalcompact.de/migrated_files/wAssets/docs/Korruptionspraevention/Publikationen/collective_action_in_the_fight_against_corruption.pdf.Google Scholar
• UNGC (2022) Principle Ten: Anti-Corruption. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles/principle-10.Google Scholar
• United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on September 25, 2015. A/RES/70/1. Accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Sørensen JB, Mitchell TR (2007) The interplay between theory and method. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1145–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Cochran PL (1999) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad. Management J. 42(5):539–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K (2006) From nuts and bolts to toolkits: Theorizing with mechanisms. J. Management Inquiry 15(2):119–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Glynn MA (2006) Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organ. Stud. 27(11):1639–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 1 (University of California Press).Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1984) Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. Amer. Psych. 39(1):40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, vol. 3 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Weick KE (2012) Organized sensemaking: A commentary on processes of interpretive work. Human Relations 65(1):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Wibeck V, Linnér B-O (2021) Sense-making analysis: A framework for multi-strategy and cross-country research. Internat. J. Qual. Methods 20:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wijen F (2014) Means vs. ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):302–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright C, Nyberg D, De Cock C, Whiteman G (2013) Future imaginings: Organizing in response to climate change. Organization 20(5):647–658.Crossref, Google Scholar