Whistleblowing and Group Affiliation: The Role of Group Cohesion and the Locus of the Wrongdoer in Reporting Decisions

References

• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åkerström M (1988) The social construction of snitches. Deviant Behav. 9(2):155–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerstrom M (1991) Betrayal and Betrayers: The Sociology of Treachery (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Anvari F, Wenzel M, Woodyatt L, Haslam SA (2019) The social psychology of whistleblowing: An integrated model. Organ. Psych. Rev. 9(1):41–67.Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Anand V (2003) The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:1–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Johnson SA (2014) Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. Hogg MA, Terry DJ, eds. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (Psychology Press, New York), 45–62.Google Scholar
• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2018) Global study on occupational fraud and abuse. Report to the Nations, vol. 10, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Aven B (2015) The paradox of corrupt networks: An analysis of organizational crime at Enron. Organ. Sci. 26(4):980–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Neubert MJ, Mount MK, Stewart GL (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bella S, Fidler F, Williams J, Cumming G (2005) Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Psych. Methods 10(4):389–396.Google Scholar
• Bjørkelo B, Bye HH (2014) On the appropriateness of research design: Intended and actual whistleblowing. Brown AJ, Lewis D, Moberly R, Vandekerckhove W (eds.). International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 133–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brambilla M, Sacchi S, Pagliaro S, Ellemers N (2013) Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. J. Experiment Soc. Psych. 49(5):811–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1999) The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? J. Soc. Issues 55(3):429–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brief AP, Motowidlo SJ (1986) Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad. Management Rev. 11(4):710–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brysbaert M (2019) How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. J. Cognition 2(1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Champoux JE (2011) Organizational Behavior: Integrating Individuals, Groups and Organizations (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Hardin R, Levi M (2005) Cooperation Without Trust? (Russell Sage Foundation).Google Scholar
• Cortina LM, Magley VJ (2003) Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. J. Occupational Health Psych. 8(4):247–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culiberg B, Mihelič KK (2017) The evolution of whistleblowing studies: A critical review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ethics 146(4):787–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN, Cross R (2003) Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Soc. Networks 25(3):197–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curphy GJ, Gibson FW, Macomber G, Calhoun CJ, Wilbanks LA, Burger MJ (1998) Situational factors affecting peer reporting intentions at the U.S. Air Force Academy: A scenario-based investigation. Military Psych. 10(1):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Jong JP, Curşeu PL, Leenders RTAJ (2014) When do bad apples not spoil the barrel? Negative relationships in teams, team performance, and buffering mechanisms. J. Appl. Psych. 99(3):514–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donkin M, Smith R, Brown AJ (2008) How do officials report? Internal and external whistleblowing. Brown AJ, ed. Whistleblowing in the Australian Public Sector: Enhancing the Theory and Practice of Internal Witness Management in Public Sector Organisations (ANU Press, Canberra, Australia), 83–108.Google Scholar
• Dozier JB, Miceli MP (1985) Potential predictors of whistle-blowing. A prosocial behavior perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 10(4):823–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dungan JA, Young L, Waytz A (2019) The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 85:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dworkin TM, Baucus MS (1998) Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowering processes. J. Bus. Ethics 17(12):1281–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Morse A, Zingales L (2010) Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? J. Finance 65(6):2213–2253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck IJA, Morse A, Zingales L (2013) How pervasive is corporate fraud? Rotman School of Management Working paper no. 2222608. Accessed February 17, 2021, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2222608.Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2004) Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. Kramer RM, Cook KS, eds. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (Russell Sage Foundation), 239–272.Google Scholar
• Ellickson RC (1991) Order Without Law, vol. 68. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feld SL (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(5):1015–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman DC (1981) The multiple socialization of organization members. Acad. Management Rev. 6(2):309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer R, Milfont T (2010) Standardization in psychological research. Internat. J. Psych. Res. (Medellin) 3(1):88–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaertner L, Schopler J (1998) Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 28(6):963–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Ayal S, Ariely D (2009) Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psych. Sci. 20(3):393–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Palmer DA, Pozner J (2010) Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):53–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gundlach MJ, Douglas SC, Martinko MJ (2003) The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1):107–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess MF, Treviño LK, Chen A, Cross R (2019) Beyond silence or compliance: The complexities of reporting a friend for misconduct. Bus. Ethics 28(4):546–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huff T, Orr S, Appelbaum N, Lockeman K, Hogan C, Queen B (2017) The dynamics of power and psychological safety on team cohesion during interprofessional simulation-based education. Presentation, Emswiller Interprofessional Symposium on February 4, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
• Jeon SH (2017) Where to report wrongdoings? Exploring the determinants of internal vs. external whistleblowing. Internat. Rev. Public Admin. 22(2):153–171.Google Scholar
• King III G (1997) The effects of interpersonal closeness and issue seriousness on blowing the whistle. J. Bus. Commun. 34(4):419–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong F, Liu P, Weng J (2020) How and when group cohesiosn influences employee voice: A conservation of resources perspective. J. Management Psych. 35(3):142–154.Google Scholar
• Krzywinski M, Altman N (2013) Error bars: The meaning of error bars is often misinterpreted, as is the statistical significance of their overlap. Nature Methods 10(10):921–923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakens D, Stel M (2011) If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Soc. Cognition 29(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EJ (1992) Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice-process theory. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(3):327–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EJ, Yoon J (1996) Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(1):89–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EJ, Thye SR, Yoon J (2000) Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 10(3):616–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Heilmann SG, Near JP (2004) Blowing the whistle on sexual harassment: Test of a model of predictors and outcomes. Human Relations. 57(3):297–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Van Dyne L (1998) Predicting voice behavior in work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 83(6):853–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeVine RA, Campbell DT (1972) Ethnocentrism, Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes, and Group Behavior (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Levine JM, Moreland RL (2006) Socialization in organizations and work groups. Turner ME, ed. Small Groups: Key Readings (Lawrence Eribaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 469–498.Google Scholar
• Lewis D, Brown AJ, Moberly R (2014) Whistleblowing, its importance and the state of the research. Brown AJ, Lewis D, Moberly R, Vandekerckhove W, eds. International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang J, Tang J (2010) A multi-level study on employee voice: Evidence from a chain of retail stores. Frontiers Bus. Res. China 4(4):541–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Acad. Management J. 55(1):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman L, Robinson J, Abberbock T (2017) TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 49(2):433–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer DM, Nurmohamed S, Treviño LK, Shapiro DL, Schminke M (2013) Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(1):89–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L (2002) Cohesion and membership duration: Linking groups, relations, and individuals in an ecology of affiliation. Adv. Group Process. 19:1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus JR, Viswesvaran C (2005) Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. J. Bus. Ethics 62(3):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Near JP (1992) Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees (Lexington Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Near JP (1997) Whistle-blowing as antisocial behavior. Giacalone RA, Greenberg J, eds. Antisocial Behavior in Organizations (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 130–149.Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Near JP, Dworkin TM (2008) Whistle-Blowing in Organizations (Psychology Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miceli MP, Rehg M, Near JP, Ryan KC (1999) Can laws protect whistle-blowers? Work Occupation 26(1):129–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miethe TD (1999) Whistleblowing at Work: Tough Choices in Exposing Fraud, Waste, and Abuse on the Job (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Miethe TD, Rothschild J (1994) Whistleblowing and the control of organizational misconduct. Sociol. Inquiry 64(3):322–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohliver AC (2019) How misconduct spreads: Auditors’ role in the diffusion of stock-option backdating. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):310–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore C, Gino F (2013) Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Res. Organ. Behav. 33:53–77.Google Scholar
• Morrison R (2008) Negative relationships in the workplace: Associations with organisational commitment, cohesion, job satisfaction and intention to turnover. J. Management Organ. 14(4):330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):706–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller CW, Lawler EJ (1999) Commitment to nested organizational units: Some basic principles and preliminary findings. Soc. Psych. Quart. 62(4):325–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Near JP, Miceli MP (1985) Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. J. Bus. Ethics 4(1):153–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Near JP, Miceli MP (1996) Whistle-blowing: Myth and reality. J. Management 22(3):507–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyreröd T, Spagnolo G (2021) Myths and numbers on whistleblower rewards. Regulatory Government 15(1):82–97.Google Scholar
• Palmer DA (2012) Normal Organizational Wrongdoing: A Critical Analysis of Theories of Misconduct in and by Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Feldman V (2018) Comprehending the Incomprehensible: Organization Theory and Child Sexual Abuse in Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Yenkey CB (2015) Drugs, sweat, and gears: An organizational analysis of performance-enhancing drug use in the 2010 Tour de France. Soc. Forces 94(2):891–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer DA, Smith-Crowe K, Greenwood R, eds. (2016) Organizational Wrongdoing: Key Perspectives and New Directions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pershing JL (2003) To snitch or not to snitch? Applying the concept of neutralization techniques to the enforcement of occupational misconduct. Sociol. Perspective 46(2):149–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen LE, Dietz J, Frey D (2004) The effects of intragroup interaction and cohesion on intergoup bias. Group Processing Intergroup Relations 7(2):107–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Postmes T, Brooke D, Jetten J (2008) Social identity formation and team performance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Postmes T, Haslam SA, Jans L (2013) A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British J. Soc. Psych. 52(4):597–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rehg MT (1998) An examination of the retaliation process against whistleblowers: A study of federal government employees. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
• Rehg MT, Miceli MP, Near JP, Van Scotter JR (2008) Antecedents and outcomes of retaliation against whistleblowers: Gender differences and power relationships. Organ. Sci. 19(2):221–240.Link, Google Scholar
• Riketta M, Van Dick R (2005) Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup vs. organizational identification and commitment. J. Vocation Behav. 67(3):490–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts P (2014) Motivations for whistleblowing: Personal, private and public interests. Brown AJ, Moberly R, Vandekerckhove W, eds. International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research (EdwardElgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 207–229.Google Scholar
• Rothschild J, Miethe TD (1999) Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation. Work Occup. 26(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seashore SE (1954) Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group(University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• Sims RL, Keenan JP (1998) Predictors of external whistleblowing: Organizational and intrapersonal variables. J. Bus. Ethics 17(4):411–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skolnick J (2002) Corruption and the blue code of silence. Police Practice Res. 3(1):7–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith DB, Ellingson JE (2002) Substance vs. style: A new look at social desirability in motivating contexts. J. Appl. Psych. 87(2):211–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stroube BK (2021) Using allegations to understand selection bias in organizations: Misconduct in the Chicago Police Department. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 166:149–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1979) Individuals and groups in social psychology. British J. Soc. Clin. Psych. 18(2):183–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 1(2):149–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor EZ, Curtis MB (2018) Mentoring: A path to prosocial behavior. J. Bus. Ethics 152(4):1133–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thye SR, Yoon J (2015) Building organizational commitment in nested groups: Theory and new evidence from South Korea. Sociol. Focus 48(3):249–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trevino LK, Victor B (1992) Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Acad. Management J. 35(1):38–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Bingham JB (2011) When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organ. Sci. 22(3):621–640.Link, Google Scholar
• U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (2012) Federal employee engagement: The motivating potential of job characteristics and rewards. A Report to the President and the Congress of the United States, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. https://www.mspb.gov/studies/studies/Federal_Employee_Engagement_The_Motivating_Potential_of_Job_Characteristics_and_Rewards_780015.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Government Ethics (1965) Executive Order (11222):36.Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D, Van Schie ECM (2000) Foci and correlates of organizational identification. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 73(2):137–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe C, Bentein K, Stinglhamber F (2004) Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. J. Vocation Behav. 64(1):47–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wainberg J, Perreault S (2016) Whistleblowing in audit firms: Do explicit protections from retaliation activate implicit threats of reprisal? Behav. Res. Accounting 28(1):83–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waytz A, Dungan J, Young L (2013) The whistleblower’s dilemma and the fairness-loyalty tradeoff. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(6):1027–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitman JL, Davis RC (2007) Snitches Get Stitches: Youth, Gangs, and Witness Intimidation in Massachusetts (National Center for Victims of Crime, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Wombacher JC, Felfe J (2017) Dual commitment in the organization: Effects of the interplay of team and organizational commitment on employee citizenship behavior, efficacy beliefs, and turnover intentions. J. Vocation Behav. 102:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar