Corporate Hierarchy and Organizational Learning: Member Turnover, Code Change, and Innovation in the Multiunit Firm

References

• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22:1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. 10:162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Rios LA, Silverman BS (2020) Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 41:2015–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C (1977) Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Bus. Rev. 55(5):115–125.Google Scholar
• Baron R, Kenny D (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51:1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47:676–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg JM (2016) Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61:433–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bermiss YS, Murmann P (2015) Who matters more? The impact of functional background and top executive mobility on firm survival. Strategic Management J. 36:1697–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broschak, JP, Block ES (2014) With or without you: When does managerial exit matter for the dissolution of dyadic market ties? Acad. Management J. 57(3):743–765.Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (2002) Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47:325–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K (1992) Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ. Sci. 3:20–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Somaya D (2013) Alumni effects and relational advantage: The impact on outsourcing when a buyer hires employees from a supplier’s competitors. Acad. Management J. 56:1578–1600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17:197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cirillo B, Brusoni S, Valentini G (2014) The rejuvenation of inventors through corporate spinouts. Organ. Sci. 25:1764–1784.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33:611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24:1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59:2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.Google Scholar
• Davis J, Eisenhardt K (2011) Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56:159–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis J, Eisenhardt K, Bingham C (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54:413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dittrich K, Guérard S, Seidl D (2016) Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organ. Sci. 27:678–697.Link, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Wilk SL, Rothbard NP (2009) Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organ. Sci. 20:51–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA (2011) In praise of organizational forgetting. J. Management Inquiry 20:311–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20:461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Fabrizio KR (2009) Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Res. Policy 38(2):255–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahrenkopf E, Guo J, Argote L (2020) Personnel mobility and organizational performance: The effects of specialist vs. generalist experience and organizational work structure. Organ. Sci. 31:1601–1620.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47:117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30:1019–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25:909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folta TB, Helfat CE, Karim S, eds. (2016) Examining resource redeployment in multi-business firms. Resource Redeployment and Corporate Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 35 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foroughi H, Al-Amoudi I (2020) Collective forgetting in a changing organization: When memories become unusable and uprooted. Organ. Stud. 41:449–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Joseph J (2013) Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organ. Sci. 24:1102–1119.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Ocasio W (2015) Cognition and Strategy (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and restructuring for the future. Organ. Sci. 18:523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6:1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godart F, Shipilov A, Claes K (2014) Making the most of the revolving door: The impact of outward personnel mobility networks on organizational creativity. Organ. Sci. 25:377–400.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Manian VG, Monroe W, Potts C (2016) Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1190–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee L (2009) Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 20:740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Gruber M, Harhoff D, Hoisl K (2013) Knowledge recombination across technological boundaries: Scientists vs. engineers. Organ. Sci. 59:837–851.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hausknecht JP, Holwerda JA (2013) When does employee turnover matter? Dynamic member configurations, productive capacity, and collective performance. Organ. Sci. 24:210–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MC, Gulati R (2006) Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management J. 27:1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong JFL, Easterby-Smith M, Snell RS (2006) Transferring organizational learning systems to Japanese subsidiaries in China. J. Management Stud. 43:1027–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Lim K (2014) Knowledge brokering and organizational innovation: Founder imprinting effects. Organ. Sci. 25:1134–1153.Link, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2000) The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika 87:706–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG (2007) The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organ. Sci. 18:455–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Jain A (2016) Learning by hiring and change to organizational knowledge: Countering obsolescence as organizations age. Strategic Management J. 37:1667–1687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Wilson AJ (2018) The growth of the firm: An attention‐based view. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1779–1800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacmar KM, Andrews MC, Van Rooy DL, Steilberg RC, Cerrone S (2006) Sure everyone can be replaced . . . but at what cost? Turnover as a predictor of unit-level performance. Acad. Management J. 49:133–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19:729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2012) Exploring structural embeddedness of product market activities and resources within business units. Strategic Organ. 10:333–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Kaul A (2015) Structural recombination and innovation: Unlocking internal knowledge synergy through structural change. Organ. Sci. 26:439–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Williams C (2012) Structural knowledge: How executive experience with structural composition affects intrafirm mobility and unit reconfiguration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):681–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Carroll TN, Long CP (2016) Delaying change: Examining how industry and managerial turbulence impact structural realignment. Acad. Management J. 59:791–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45:1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Thatchenkery S, Christensen MQ, Zenios S (2017) Is there a doctor in the house? Expert product users, organizational roles, and innovation. Acad. Management J. 60:2415–2437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kehoe RR, Tzabbar D (2015) Lighting the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists’ effects on firm innovative performance. Strategic Management J. 36:709–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keum D, See K (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28:653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2001) The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. 47:430–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Knott AM, Turner SF (2019) An innovation theory of headquarters value in multibusiness firms. Organ. Sci. 30:19–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotter JP, Heskett JL (1992) Corporate Culture and Performance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kunisch S, Menz M, Collis D (2020) Corporate headquarters in the twenty-first century: An organization design perspective. J. Organ. Design 9:1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E, Puranam P (2016) The implementation imperative: Why one should implement even imperfect strategies perfectly. Strategic Management J. 37:1529–1546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lix K, Goldberg A, Srivastava S, Valentine MA (2022) Aligning differences: Discursive diversity and team performance. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print February 9, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4274.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein J, Ocasio W, Jones C (2012) Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: A new approach linking categories, practices, and institutions. Acad. Management Ann. 6:41–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long JS, Freese J (2005) Regression Models for Categorical Outcomes Using Stata, 2nd ed. (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG, Schultz M, Zhou X (2001) The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. Contemporary Sociol. 30:479–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK, Somaya D (2016) Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Management 42:85–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Porter ME (1997) How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management J. 18:15–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Zhao M, Calantone RJ (2006) Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March’s exploration-exploitation model. Acad. Management J. 49(4):709–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteverde K (1995) Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 41:1624–1638.Link, Google Scholar
• Neinstedt PR (1989) Effectively downsizing management structures. Human Resource Planning 12:155–164.Google Scholar
• O Crocket R (1998) How Motorola lost its way. Bloomberg (May 4), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/1998-05-03/how-motorola-lost-its-wayGoogle Scholar
• Ocasio W, Laamanen T, Vaara E (2018) Communication and attention dynamics: An attention-based view of strategic change. Strategic Management J. 39:155–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliveira N, Argyres N, Lumineau F (2022) The role of communication style in adaptation to interorganizational project disruptions. J. Oper. Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1183.Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Chung CK, Ireland M, Gonzalez A, Booth RJ (2007) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Technical report, LIWC.net, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Petrakis HM (2003) Reach Out . . . The Story of Motorola and Its People (Quebecor World, Kingsport, TN).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Maciejovsky B (2017) Organizational structure and organizational learning. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 521–534.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ. Sci. 27:323–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Rhee L, Ocasio W, Kim T (2019) Performance feedback in hierarchical business groups: The cross-level effects of cognitive accessibility on R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. 30:51–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49:751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Seshadri S, Shapira Z, Tucci C (2020) Are flatter organizations more innovative? Hierarchical depth and the importance of ideas. Working paper, Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Park TY, Kim E (2013) A resource-based perspective on human capital losses, HRM investments, and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 34:572–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14:650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49:779–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1976) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:125–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Singhal A (2001) Modern information retrieval: A brief overview. Quart. Bull. Comput. Soc. IEEE Tech. Comm. Data Engrg. 24:35–43.Google Scholar
• Somaya D, Williamson I, Lorinkova N (2008) Gone but not lost: The different performance impacts of employee mobility between cooperators vs. competitors. Acad. Management J. 51:936–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning–by–hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49:351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Fleming L (2004) Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Res. Policy 33(10):1615–1634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Goldberg A, Manian VG, Potts C (2018) Enculturation trajectories: Language, cultural adaptation, and individual outcomes in organizations. Management Sci. 64:1348–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Stadler C, Helfat CE, Verona G (2022) Transferring knowledge by transferring individuals: Innovative technology use and organizational performance in multiunit firms. Organ. Sci. 33:253–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Deng X, Chen G, Gao H (2021) The “butterfly effect” in strategic human capital: Mitigating the endogeneity concern about the relationship between turnover and performance. Strategic Management J. 42:2493–2510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stolpe M (2002) Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: The case of liquid crystal display technology. Res. Policy 31:1181–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Ton Z, Huckman RS (2008) Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. 19:56–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21:1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tzabbar D (2009) When does scientist recruitment affect technological repositioning? Acad. Management J. 52:873–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tzabbar D, Cirillo B (2020) Introduction: An integrated perspective of employee intra- and inter-firm mobility. Adv. Strategic Management 41:1–11.Google Scholar
• Vaara E, Monin P (2010) A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions. Organ. Sci. 21:3–22.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32:791–805.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang T, Zatzick CD (2019) Human capital acquisition and organizational innovation: A temporal perspective. Acad. Management J. 62:99–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM (2006) Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. 17(6):691–709.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiggenhorn W (1990) Motorola U: When training becomes an education. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(4):71–81.Google Scholar
• Wilson AJ, Joseph J (2015) Organizational attention and technological search in the multibusiness firm: Motorola from 1974 to 1997. Adv. Strategic Management 32:407–435.Google Scholar