Gender Differences in Responses to Competitive Organization? A Field Experiment on Differences Between STEM and Non-STEM Fields from an Internet-of-Things Platform

References

• Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Murgia G (2013) Gender differences in research collaboration. J. Informetrics 7(4):811–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ali M, Talib CA, Surif J, Ibrahim NH, Abdullah AH (2018) Effect of STEM competition on STEM career interest. IEEE 10th Internat. Conf. Engrg. Ed. (IEEE), 111–116.Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Ertac S, Gneezy U, List JA, Maximiano S (2013) Gender, competitiveness, and socialization at a young age: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(4):1438–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonovics K, Arcidiacono P, Walsh R (2009) The effects of gender interactions in the laboratory and in the field. Rev. Econom. Statist. 91(1):152–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apicella CL, Dreber A, Gray PB, Hoffman M, Little AC, Campbell BC (2011) Androgens and competitiveness in men. J. Neurosci. Psych. Econom. 4(1):54–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Fornwagner H, Sutter M (2018) Closing the gender gap in competitiveness through priming. Nat. Comm. 9(1):4359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Eggers JP, Stieglitz N (2019) Colleagues and competitors: How internal social comparisons shape organizational search and adaptation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):275–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boaler J (2016) Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students’ Potential Through Creative Math, Inspiring Messages and Innovative Teaching (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Booth A, Nolen P (2012) Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81(2):542–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boschini A, Dreber A, von Essen E, Muren A, Ranehill E (2019) Gender, risk preferences and willingness to compete in a random sample of the Swedish population. J. Behav. Experimental Econom. 83:101467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2017) Platform boundary choices & governance: Opening-up while still coordinating and orchestrating. Furman JL, Gawer A, Silverman BS, Stern S, eds. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 227–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, vol. 1 (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) Leaning out: How negative recruitment experiences shape women’s decisions to compete for executive roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):405–442.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (W. W. Norton and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Buckert M, Schwieren C, Kudielka BM, Fiebach CJ (2017) How stressful are economic competitions in the laboratory? An investigation with physiological measures. J. Econom. Psych. 62:231–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bui Q, Miller C (2018) The age that women have babies: How a gap divides America. New York Times (August 4), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/04/upshot/up-birth-age-gap.html.Google Scholar
• Buser T (2009) The impact of female sex hormones on competitiveness. Discussion paper, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Buser T (2016) The impact of losing in a competition on the willingness to seek further challenges. Management Sci. 62(12):3439–3449.Link, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness, and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1409–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2021) Can competitiveness predict education and labor market outcomes? Evidence from incentivized choice and survey measures. Working Paper No. w28916, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
• Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD (1999) Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 125(3):367–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casari M, Ham JC, Kagel JH (2007) Selection bias, demographic effects, and ability effects in common value auction experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1278–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cech E, Rubineau B, Silbey S, Seron C (2011) Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):641–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Plaut VC, Davies PG, Steele CM (2009) Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(6):1045.Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Ziegler SA, Montoya AK, Jiang L (2017) Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psych. Bull. 143(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi KS (2013) Evaluating gender significance within a pair programming context. Proc. 2013 46th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 4817–4825.Google Scholar
• Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.Google Scholar
• Comeig I, Grau-Grau A, Jaramillo-Gutiérrez A, Ramírez F (2016) Gender, self-confidence, sports, and preferences for competition. J. Bus. Res. 69(4):1418–1422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Lit. 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dargnies MP (2012) Men too sometimes shy away from competition: The case of team competition. Management Sci. 58(11):1982–2000.Link, Google Scholar
• Dato S, Nieken P (2014) Gender differences in competition and sabotage. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 100:64–80.Google Scholar
• Dittrich M, Knabe A, Leipold K (2014) Gender differences in experimental wage negotiations. Econom. Inquiry 52(2):862–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2011) Outrunning the gender gap—Boys and girls compete equally. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):560–582.Google Scholar
• Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2014) Gender and competition in adolescence: Task matters. Experiment. Econom. 17(1):154–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Plott CR, Smith VL, Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1061–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eswaran M (2015) Why we think the way we do about men, women and work. PBS News Hour (January 5), https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/the-lasting-impact-of-the-plow-on-our-attitudes-about-gender-and-work.Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H, Kemelgor C, Uzzi B (2000) Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Campero S (2017) Gender sorting and the glass ceiling in high-tech firms. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 70(1):73–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Kaplan S (2018) Gender and organization science: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1229–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foor CE, Walden SE, Shehab RL, Trytten DA (2013) “We weren’t intentionally excluding them … just old habits”: Women, (lack of) interest and an engineering student competition team. Proc. 2013 IEEE Frontiers Ed. Conf. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 349–355.Google Scholar
• Friesel A, Timcenko O (2011) Competition-motivated teamwork and narratives to motivate girls for engineering. Welzer T, Hoffmann M, eds. Proc. 22nd Eur. Assoc. Ed. Electrical Inform. Engrg. Annual Conf. (University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia).Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2004) Gender and competition at a young age. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):377–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2006) Gender Differences in Competition: The Role of Socialization (University of Chicago).Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118:1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Günther C, Ekinci NA, Schwieren C, Strobel M (2010) Women can’t jump?—An experiment on competitive attitudes and stereotype threat. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 75(3):395–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo J (2015) Why do some studies show that women are less competitive than men? Washington Post (January 2), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/storyline/wp/2015/01/02/why-do-some-studies-show-that-women-are-less-competitive-then-men/.Google Scholar
• Gupta ND, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2013) Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Econom. Inquiry 51(1):816–835.Google Scholar
• He JC, Kang SK, Lacetera N (2021) Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118(42).Google Scholar
• Healy A, Pate J (2011) Can teams help to close the gender competition gap? Econom. J. 121(555):1192–1204.Google Scholar
• Holland PW (1986) Statistics and causal inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81(396):945–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt-Lunstad J, Clayton CJ, Uchino BN (2001) Gender differences in cardiovascular reactivity to competitive stress: The impact of gender of competitor and competition outcome. Internat. J. Behav. Medicine 8(2):91–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt A, Samman E (2019) Gender and the gig economy. Working Paper 546, Overseas Dev. Institute, London.Google Scholar
• Inglehart M, Brown DR, Vida M (1994) Competition, achievement, and gender: A stress theoretical analysis. Pintrich PR, Brown DR, Weinstein CE, eds. Student Motivation, Cognition, and Learning: Essays in Honor of Wilbert. J. McKeachie (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 311–330.Google Scholar
• Iriberri N, Rey-Biel P (2019) Competitive pressure widens the gender gap in performance: Evidence from a two-stage competition in mathematics. Econom. J. 129(620):1863–1893.Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Google Scholar
• Kahn S, Ginther D (2017) Women and STEM. NBER Working Paper No. 23525, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kamas L, Preston A (2012) The importance of being confident; gender, career choice, and willingness to compete. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):82–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesebir S, Lee SY, Elliot AJ, Pillutla MM (2019) Lay beliefs about competition: Scale development and gender differences. Motivation Emotion 43(5):719–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivlighan KT, Granger DA, Booth A (2005) Gender differences in testosterone and cortisol response to competition. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30(1):58–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinjans KJ (2009) Do gender differences in preferences for competition matter for occupational expectations? J. Econom. Psych. 30(5):701–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight J (2002) Sexual Stereotypes (Nature Publishing Group, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Villeval MC (2015) Are women more attracted to co-operation than men? Econom. J. 125(582):115–140.Google Scholar
• Kuyath SJ, Yoder L (2004) Diversity in engineering technology: Competitions. Age (Melbourne, Vic.) 9:1.Google Scholar
• Kvande E (1999) “In the belly of the beast”: Constructing femininities in engineering organizations. Eur. J. Women's Stud. 6(3):305–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam A (2011) What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Res. Policy 40(10):1354–1368.Google Scholar
• Lee S, Puranam P (2017) Incentive redesign and collaboration in organizations: Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2333–2352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang C, Hong Y, Gu B, Peng J (2018) Gender wage gap in online gig economy and gender differences in job preferences. Preprint, submitted November 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266249.Google Scholar
• Lippa R (1998) Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people–things dimension. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(4):996–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundeberg MA, Fox PW, Punćcohaŕ J (1994) Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. J. Ed. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIlwee JS, Robinson JG (1992) Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture (SUNY Press, Albany, NY).Google Scholar
• Menekse M, Higashi R, Schunn CD, Baehr E (2017) The role of robotics teams’ collaboration quality on team performance in a robotics tournament. J. Engrg. Ed. 106(4):564–584.Google Scholar
• Morin LP (2015) Do men and women respond differently to competition? Evidence from a major education reform. J. Labor Econom. 33(2):443–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M (2014) Constructing the team: The antecedents and effects of membership model divergence. Organ. Sci. 25(3):909–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin CA, Sanzari C, Caluori N, Rabasco H (2018) Gender bias produces gender gaps in STEM engagement. Sex Roles 79(11–12):651–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murciano-Goroff R (2022) Missing women in tech: The labor market for highly skilled software engineers. Management Sci. 68(5):3262–3281.Link, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1060–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2010) Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):129–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annu. Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L (2013) How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Sci. 59(1):1–16.Google Scholar
• Notter KB (2010) Is competition making a comeback? Discovering methods to keep female adolescents engaged in STEM: A phenomenological approach. Working paper, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Banaji MR, Greenwald AG (2002) Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(1):44.Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Smyth FL, Sriram N, Lindner NM, Devos T, Ayala A, Bar-Anan Y, et al. (2009) National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(26):10593-10597.Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Zenger T (2017) Organization design, proximity, and productivity responses to upward social comparison. Organ. Sci. 28(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Ong M (2005) Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Soc. Problems 52(4):593–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page S (2008) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
• Paserman MD (2010) Gender differences in performance in competitive environments? Evidence from professional tennis players. NBER Working Paper No. 27154, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Powell A, Bagilhole B, Dainty A (2009) How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, Work Organ. 16(4):411–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pregaldini D, Backes-Gellner U, Eisenkopf G (2020) Girls’ preferences for STEM and the effects of classroom gender composition: New evidence from a natural experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 178:102–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price CR (2011) Gender, competition, and managerial decisions. Management Sci. 58(1):114–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2015) Taste for competition and the gender gap among young business professionals. NBER Working Paper No. 21695, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Saccardo S, Pietrasz A, Gneezy U (2017) On the size of the gender difference in competitiveness. Management Sci. 64(4):1541–1554.Link, Google Scholar
• Samek A (2019) Gender differences in job entry decisions: A university-wide field experiment. Management Sci. 65(7):3272–3281.Link, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Google Scholar
• Shurchkov O (2012) Under pressure: Gender differences in output quality and quantity under competition and time constraints. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 10(5):1189–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.Google Scholar
• Silbey SS (2015) The elephant in the room: Constraints and consequences of a four-year undergraduate engineering degree. Engrg. Stud. 7(2–3):164–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su R, Rounds J, Armstrong PI (2009) Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psych. Bull. 135(6):859–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Glätzle-Rützler D (2015) Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Management Sci. 61(10):2339–2354.Link, Google Scholar
• van Vugt M, Cremer DD, Janssen DP (2007) Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psych. Sci. 18(1):19–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villeval MC (2012) Ready, steady, compete. Sci. 335(6068):544–545.Google Scholar
• Wieland A, Sarin R (2012) Domain specificity of sex differences in competition. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):151–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams WM, Ceci SJ (2015) National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(17):5360–5365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodcock A, Hernandez PR, Estrada M, Schultz P (2012) The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and abandonment. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 103(4):635–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2014) The menstrual cycle and performance feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):161–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wynn AT, Correll SJ (2017) Gendered perceptions of cultural and skill alignment in technology companies. Soc. Sci. 6(2):45–73.Crossref, Google Scholar