Anchoring on Historical Round Number Reference Points: Evidence from Durable Goods Resale Prices

References

• Adair WL, Brett JM (2005) The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organ. Sci. 16(1):33–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen MT, Dare WH (2004) The effects of charm listing prices on house transaction prices. Real Estate Econom. 32(4):695–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen EJ, Dechow PM, Pope DG, Wu G (2016) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners. Management Sci. 63(6):1657–1672.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester DI (2003) Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: Evidence from field experiments. Quant. Mark. Econom. 1(1):93–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Spinu V (2020) Searching for the reference point. Management Sci. 66(1):93–112.Link, Google Scholar
• Basu K (1997) Why are so many goods priced to end in nine? And why this practice hurts the producers? Econom. Lett. 53(1):41–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Weber M, Welfens F (2011) Reference-point formation and updating. Management Sci. 57(3):506–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 70(5, Part 2):9–49.Google Scholar
• Beggs A, Graddy K (2009) Anchoring in art auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):1027–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Curhan JR (2009) Cognitive dissonance in negotiation: Free choice or justification? Soc. Cognition 27(3):455–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bokhari S, Geltner D (2011) Loss aversion and anchoring in commercial real estate pricing: Empirical evidence and price index implications. Real Estate Econom. 39(4):635–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucchianeri GW, Minson JA (2013) A homeowner’s dilemma: Anchoring in residential real estate transactions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 89:76–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardella E, Seiler MJ (2016) The effect of listing price strategy on real estate negotiations: An experimental study. J. Econom. Psych. 52:71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Chaiken S (1999) The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. Chaiken SL, Trope Y, eds. Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology (Guilford, New York), 73–96.Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Starr E, Agarwal R (2020) Machine learning and human capital complementarities: Experimental evidence on bias mitigation. Strategic Management J. 41(8):1381–1411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1997) Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):374–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crook RT, Todd SY, Combs JG, Woehr DJ, Ketchen DJ Jr (2011) Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. J. Appl. Psych. 96(3):443–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai H, Milkman KL, Riis J (2014) The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Sci. 60(10):2563–2582.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diekmann KA, Tenbrunsel AE, Shah PP, Schroth HA, Bazerman MH (1996) The descriptive and prescriptive use of previous purchase price in negotiations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 66(2):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreyfuss E (2018) A bot panic hits Mechanical Turk. Wired (August 17), https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-mechanical-turk-bot-panic/.Google Scholar
• Dulleck U, Kerschbamer R (2006) On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. J. Econom. Literature 44(1):5–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einiö M, Kaustia M, Puttonen V (2008) Price setting and the reluctance to realize losses in apartment markets. J. Econom. Psych. 29(1):19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englich B (2005) “Geben Sie ihm doch einfach fünf Jahre!”—Einflüsse parteiischer Zwischenrufer auf richterliche Urteile. Zeitschrift Sozialpsychologie 36:215–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englich B, Mussweiler T, Strack F (2006) Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(2):188–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Schmöller A, Stowasser T (2017) Price discontinuities in an online market for used cars. Management Sci. 64(6):2754–2766.Link, Google Scholar
• Furnham A, Boo HC (2011) A literature review of the anchoring effect. J. Socio-Econom. 40(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Mussweiler T (2001) First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking in negotiator focus. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(4):657–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gendall P, Holdershaw J, Garland R (1997) The effect of odd pricing on demand. Eur. J. Marketing 31(11/12):799–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Genesove D, Mayer C (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1233–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graddy K, Loewenstein L, Mei J, Moses M, Pownall RAJ (2014) Anchoring or loss aversion? Empirical evidence from art auctions. Preprint, submitted September 25, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2501520.Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, Agarwal R, Gopal A (2019) The role of individual and organizational expertise in the adoption of new practices. Organ. Sci. 30(1):191–213.Google Scholar
• Gubler T (2019) Connected, but qualified? Social affiliations, human capital, and service professional performance. Organ. Sci. 30(5):912–936.Link, Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Cooper R (2019) Socially advantaged? How social affiliations influence access to valuable service professional transactions. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2287–2314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunia BC, Swaab RI, Sivanathan N, Galinsky AD (2013) The remarkable robustness of the first-offer effect: Across culture, power, and issues. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 39(12):1547–1558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haurin D, Haurin J, Nadauld T, Sanders A (2010) List prices, sale prices, and marketing time: An application to U.S. housing markets. Real Estate Econom. 38(4):659–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35(4):519–530.Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Bierman L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Pisano GP (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52(4):473–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C, Uy D (2008) Precision of the anchor influences the amount of adjustment. Psych. Sci. 19(2):121–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung MH, Perfecto H, Nelson LD (2016) Anchoring in payment: Evaluating a judgmental heuristic in field experimental settings. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):354–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1992) Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):296–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic Data Analysis (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Kristensen H, Gärling T (2000) Anchor points, reference points, and counteroffers in negotiations. Group Decision Negotiation 9(6):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2012) Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2206–2236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence M (2018) Taking stock of the ability to change: The effect of prior experience. Organ. Sci. 29(3):489–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Literature 48(2):281–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AJ, Loschelder DD, Schweinsberg M, Mason MF, Galinsky AD (2018) Too precise to pursue: How precise first offers create barriers-to-entry in negotiations and markets. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 148:87–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2014) Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1414–1433.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, Syverson C (2008) Market distortions when agents are better informed: The value of information in real estate transactions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(4):599–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List J (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):41–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loschelder DD, Friese M, Schaerer M, Galinsky AD (2016) The too-much-precision effect: When and why precise anchors backfire with experts. Psych. Sci. 27(12):1573–1587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markle A, Wu G, White R, Sackett A (2018) Goals as reference points in marathon running: A novel test of reference dependence. J. Risk Uncertainity 56(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason MF, Lee AJ, Wiley EA, Ames DR (2013) Precise offers are potent anchors: Conciliatory counteroffers and attributions of knowledge in negotations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(4):759–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T (2002) The malleability of anchoring effects. Experiment. Psych. 49(1):67–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Strack F (1999) Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 10(1):135–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neale MA, Bazerman MH (1991) Rationality and Cognition in Negotiation (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1987) Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(1):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orr D, Guthrie C (2006) Anchoring, information, expertise, and negotiation: New insights from meta-analysis. Ohio State J. Dispute Resolution 597:625–628.Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope D, Simonsohn U (2011) Round numbers as goals: Evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the laboratory. Psych. Sci. 22(1):71–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Pope JC, Sydnor JR (2015) Focal points and bargaining in housing markets. Games Econom. Behav. 93:89–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rader CA, Soll JB, Larrick RP (2015) Pushing away from representative advice: Advice taking, anchoring, and adjustment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 130:26–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repetto L, Solís A (2019) The price of inattention: Evidence from the Swedish housing market. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 18(6):3261–3304.Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1983) Specialization and human capital. J. Labor Econom. 1(1):43–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutherford RC, Springer TM, Yavas A (2005) Conflicts between principals and agents: Evidence from residential brokerage. J. Financial Econom. 76(3):627–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schochet PZ (2009) Statistical power for regression discontinuity designs in education evaluations. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 34(2):238–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):125–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Loewenstein G (2006) Mistake: The effect of previously encountered prices on current housing demand. Econom. J. 116(508):175–199.Google Scholar
• Sokolova T, Seenivasan S, Thomas M (2020) The left-digit bias: When and why are consumers penny wise and pound foolish? J. Marketing Res. 57(4):771–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokel-Walker C (2018) Bots on Mechanical Turk are ruining psychology studies. New Scientist (August 10), https://www.newscientist.com/article/2176436-bots-on-amazons-mechanical-turk-are-ruining-psychology-studies/.Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe KM, McNamara G (2001) Controlling decision-making practice in organizations. Organ. Sci. 12(4):484–501.Link, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2003) Expert talent and the design of (professional services) firms. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):895–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Morwitz V (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):54–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton RA, Thompson P (2001) Learning from experience and learning from others: An exploration of learning and spillovers in wartime shipbuilding. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1350–1368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2021) National Comprehensive Housing Market Analysis. Accessed April 19, 2022, https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdf/National-CHMA-21.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wallace SG, Etkin J (2018) How goal specificity shapes motivation: A reference points perspective. J. Consumer Res. 44(5):1033–1051.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss SE (1993) Analysis of complex negotiations in international business: The RBC perspective. Organ. Sci. 4(2):269–300.Google Scholar