Academic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Advisors and Their Advisees’ Outcomes

References

• Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Ferretti M, Parmentola A (2012) An individual-level assessment of the relationship between spin-off activities and research performance in universities. R&D Management 42(3):225–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acs ZJ, Audretsch D (1990) Innovation and Small Firms (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Henderson R (2002) Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. 48(1):44–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Cockburn I, McHale J (2006) Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. J. Econom. Geography 6(5):571–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anckaert P-E, Cassiman D, Cassiman B (2020) Fostering practice-oriented and use-inspired science in biomedical research. Res. Policy 49(2):103900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A, Suh J (2020) The changing structure of American innovation: Some cautionary remarks for economic growth. Innovative Policy Econom. 20:39–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Keilbach MC, Lehmann EE (2006) Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• AUTM (2017) AUTM US Licensing Activity Survey: FY2016 (Association of University Technology Managers).Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2007) The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):599–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output. J. Industry Econom. 57(4):637–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Liu CC, Stuart TE (2017) Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(4):1223–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behrens TR, Gray DO (2001) Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcomes. Res. Policy 30(2):179–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2014a) High-dimensional methods and inference on structural and treatment effects. J. Econom. Perspective 28(2):29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2014b) Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2 (287)):608–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskarabhatla A, Hegde D (2014) An organizational perspective on patenting and open innovation. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1744–1763.Link, Google Scholar
• BLS (2021) Occupational outlook handbook. Accessed April 17, 2022, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/.Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Epstein S, Maxwell J (1986) Commercializing university research. New England J. Medicine 314(25):1621–1626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouwma-Gearhart J, Lenhart C, Carter R, Mundorff K, Cho H, Knoch J (2020) Innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E) summit: A seismic shift in promotion & tenure. Accessed October 12, 2020, https://ptie.org/ptie-recommendations/.Google Scholar
• Boyack KW, Patek M, Ungar LH, Yoon P, Klavans R (2014) Classification of individual articles from all of science by research level. J. Informetrics 8(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang W-Y, Cheng W, Lane J, Weinberg B (2019) Federal funding of doctoral recipients: What can be learned from linked data. Res. Policy 48(6):1487–1492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Sauermann H, Stephan P (2020) Not in the job description: The commercial activities of academic scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 66(9):4108–4117.Link, Google Scholar
• Conti A, Guzman J (2019) What is the US comparative advantage in entrepreneurship? Evidence from Israeli migration to the United States. Preprint, submitted April 29, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3376131.Google Scholar
• Conti A, Liu CC (2015) Bringing the laboratory back in: Personnel composition and scientific output at the MIT Department of Biology. Res. Policy 44(9):1633–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti A, Roche M (2021) Lowering the bar? External conditions, opportunity costs, and high-tech start-up outcomes. Organ. Sci. 32(4):965–986.Link, Google Scholar
• Crespi G, D’Este P, Fontana R, Geuna A (2011) The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Res. Policy 40(1):55–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J. Tech. Transfer 36(3):316–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H (2003) Research groups as “quasi-firms”: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Res. Policy 32(1):109–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabrizio KR, Di Minin A (2008) Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Res. Policy 37(5):914–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Ozcan S, Reichstein T (2019) Falling not far from the tree: Entrepreneurs and organizational heritage. Organ. Sci. 30(2):337–360.Link, Google Scholar
• Fini R, Lacetera N (2010) Different yokes for different folks: Individual preferences, institutional logics, and the commercialization of academic research. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth (Emerald Group Publishing Limited), 1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franzoni C (2009) Do scientists get fundamental research ideas by solving practical problems? Industrial Corporate Change 18(4):671–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuller J, Langer C, Sigelman M (2022) Skills-based hiring is on the rise. Harvard Bus. Rev. https://hbr.org/2022/02/skills-based-hiring-is-on-the-rise.Google Scholar
• Gofman M, Jin Z (2019) Artificial intelligence, human capital, and innovation. Preprint, submitted September 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3449440.Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B, Marschke G, Smith A (2009) Scholarship and inventive activity in the university: Complements or substitutes? Econom. Innovative New Tech. 18(8):743–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graddy-Reed A, Lanahan L, Ross NMV (2018) The effect of R&D investment on graduate student productivity: Evidence from the life sciences. J. Policy Anal. Management 37(4):809–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellmann T (2007) When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Sci. 53(6):919–933.Link, Google Scholar
• Higgins M, Stephan P, Thursby J (2011) Conveying quality and value in emerging industries: Star scientists and the role of signals in biotechnology. Res. Policy 40(4):605–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Roberts EB, Eesley CE (2007) Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Res. Policy 36(5):768–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jensen R, Thursby M (2001) Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):240–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser U, Kongsted HC, Laursen K, Ejsing A (2018) Experience matters: The role of academic scientist mobility for industrial innovation. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1935–1958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenney M (1987) The ethical dilemmas of university-industry collaborations. J. Bus. Ethics 6(2):127–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoke D, Kalleberg AL (1994) Job training in U.S. organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 59(4):537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lach S, Schankerman M (2004) Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 2(2–3):252–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lach S, Schankerman M (2008) Incentives and invention in universities. RAND J. Econom. 39(2):403–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langin K (2019) A wave of graduate programs drops the GRE application requirement. Sci. Magazine 29. https://www.science.org/content/article/wave-graduate-programs-drop-gre-application-requirement.Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2005) Entrepreneurship. J. Labor Econom. 23(4):649–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YS (2000) The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. J. Tech. Transfer 25(2):111–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin SG, Stephan PE (1991) Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(1):114–132.Google Scholar
• Louis KS, Blumenthal D, Gluck ME, Stoto MA (1989) Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(1):110–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Fuegi A (2020) Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles. Strategic Management J. 41(9):1572–1594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mindruta D (2013) Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Strategic Management J. 34(6):644–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat B, Ziedonis A (2004) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation (Stanford Business Books, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Murray F, Stern S (2007) Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge?: An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):648–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narin F, Pinski G, Gee HH (1976) Structure of the biomedical literature. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 27(1):25–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Science Board (2018) Science and Engineering Indicators 2016 (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (2018) Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2017 (National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (2004) The market economy, and the scientific commons. Res. Policy 33(3):455–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oreopoulos P, von Wachter T, Heisz A (2012) The short-and long-term career effects of graduating in a recession. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 4(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (2006) Initial labor market conditions and long-term outcomes for economists. J. Econom. Perspective 20(3):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D’Este P, Fini R, et al. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Owen-Smith J (1998) Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. J. Policy Anal. Management 17(2):253–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Snellman K (2004) The knowledge economy. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30(1):199–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Haeussler C (2017) Authorship and contribution disclosures. Sci. Adv. 3(11).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Roach M (2016) Why pursue the postdoc path? Science 352(6286):663–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Shane SA (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shibayama S, Walsh JP, Baba Y (2012) Academic entrepreneurship and exchange of scientific resources: Material transfer in life and materials sciences in Japanese universities. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(5):804–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shichijo N, Sedita SR, Baba Y (2015) How does the entrepreneurial orientation of scientists affect their scientific performance? Evidence from the quadrant model. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 27(9):999–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan PE (2012) How Economics Shapes Science, vol. 1 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Ding W (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Economist (2016) Million-dollar babies: As Silicon Valley fights for talent, universities struggle to hold on to their stars. Accessed September 8, 2019, economist.com/business/2016/04/02/million-dollar-babies.Google Scholar
• Thursby JG, Thursby MC (2007) University licensing. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 23(4):620–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby JG, Thursby MC (2011) Has the Bayh-Dole Act compromised basic research? Res. Policy 40(8):1077–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toole AA, Czarnitzki D (2009) Exploring the relationship between scientist human capital and firm performance: The case of biomedical academic entrepreneurs in the SBIR program. Management Sci. 55(1):101–114.Link, Google Scholar
• Toole AA, Czarnitzki D (2010) Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? Management Sci. 56(9):1599–1614.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar