The Downside of Displaying Agentic Values: Evidence from Shareholder Activism

References

• Abele AE, Wojciszke B (2014) Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Elsevier, New York), 195–255.Google Scholar
• Abele AE, Uchronski M, Suitner C, Wojciszke B (2008) Toward an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 38(7):1202–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acharya AG, Gras D, Krause R (2022) Socially oriented shareholder activism targets: Explaining activists’ corporate target selection using corporate opportunity structures. J. Bus. Ethics 178(2):307–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Desender K, Bednar MK, Lee JH (2015) Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):483–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahn A, Wiersema M (2021) Activist hedge funds: Beware the new titans. Acad. Management Perspective 35(1):96–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Novelli E (2017) Activity overinvestment: The case of R&D. J. Management 43(8):2456–2468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anglin AH, Wolfe MT, Short JC, McKenny AF, Pidduck RJ (2018) Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: A social role theory perspective. J. Bus. Venturing 33(6):780–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appel IR, Gormley TA, Keim DB (2019) Standing on the shoulders of giants: The effect of passive investors on activism. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(7):2720–2774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakan D (1966) The Duality of Human Existence: Isolation and Communion in Western Man (Beacon, Boston).Google Scholar
• Bakker RM, Josefy M (2018) More than just a number? The conceptualization and measurement of firm age in an era of temporary organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 12(2):510–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Haunschild PR (2002) Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):92–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Weitz BA (1983) Attributions in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2):165–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitter ME, Gardner WL III (1995) A mid-range theory of the leader/member attribution process in professional service organizations: The role of the organizational environment and impression management. Martinko MJ, ed. Attribution Theory: An Organizational Perspective (St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL), 171–192.Google Scholar
• Borghesi R, Houston JF, Naranjo A (2014) Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. J. Corporate Finance 26:164–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyson NM, Mooradian RM (2011) Corporate governance and hedge fund activism. Rev. Derivative Res. 14(2):169–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Millington A (2008) Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 29(12):1325–1343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Kim H (2010) Hedge fund activism: A review. Foundations Trends Finance 4(3):185–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Partnoy F, Thomas R (2008) Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. J. Finance 63(4):1729–1775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Withers MC, Semadeni M (2017) A tale of two effects: Using longitudinal data to compare within‐ and between‐firm effects. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1536–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC (2007) It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):351–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Durand R, Levine DI, Touboul S (2016) Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1597–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Feldman ER (2018) Activist‐impelled divestitures and shareholder value. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2726–2744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Crossland C, Huang S (2016) Female board representation and corporate acquisition intensity. Strategic Management J. 37(2):303–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Crossland C, Luo S (2015) Making the same mistake all over again: CEO overconfidence and corporate resistance to corrective feedback. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1513–1535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Harford J, Li K (2007) Monitoring: Which institutions matter? J. Financial Econom. 86(2):279–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management J. 35(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chikh S, Filbien J-Y (2011) Acquisitions and CEO power: Evidence from French networks. J. Corporate Finance 17(5):1221–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clifford CP (2008) Value creation or destruction? Hedge funds as shareholder activists. J. Corporate Finance 14(4):323–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Shi W, Hoskisson RE, Koka BR (2019) Shareholder influence on joint venture exploration. J. Management 45(8):3178–3203.Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Tihanyi L, Certo ST, Hitt MA (2010) Marching to the beat of different drummers: The influence of institutional owners on competitive actions. Acad. Management J. 53(4):723–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cragun OR, Olsen KJ, Wright PM (2020) Making CEO narcissism research great: A review and meta-analysis of CEO narcissism. J. Management 46(6):908–936.Google Scholar
• Cremers KM, Litov LP, Sepe SM (2017) Staggered boards and long-term firm value, revisited. J. Financial Econom. 126(2):422–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Ni N, Jiang Y (2016) Do‐no‐harm vs. do‐good social responsibility: Attributional thinking and the liability of foreignness. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1316–1329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasborough MT, Ashkanasy NM (2002) Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader–member relationships. Leadership Quart. 13(5):615–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasborough M, Ashkanasy N (2004) Follower attributions of leader manipulative and sincere intentionality: A laboratory test of determinants and affective covariates. Martinko MJ, ed. Attribution Theory in the Organizational Sciences (Information Age Publishing), 203–224.Google Scholar
• David P, Bloom M, Hillman AJ (2007) Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management J. 28(1):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis AK, Piger JM, Sedor LM (2012) Beyond the numbers: Measuring the information content of earnings press release language. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29(3):845–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Donaldson L (1997) Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad. Management Rev. 22:20–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis AK, Ge W, Matsumoto D, Zhang JL (2015) The effect of manager-specific optimism on the tone of earnings conference calls. Rev. Accounting Stud. 20(2):639–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Angelis D, Grinstein Y (2020) Relative performance evaluation in CEO compensation: A talent-retention explanation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 55(7):2099–2123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Décaire P, Sosyura D (2020) CEO pet projects. Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
• Denes MR, Karpoff JM, McWilliams VB (2017) Thirty years of shareholder activism: A survey of empirical research. J. Corporate Finance 44:405–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine M, Durand R (2020) Disentangling the effects of hedge fund activism on firm financial and social performance. Strategic Management J. 41(6):1054–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Shi W (2021) How temporal focus shapes the influence of executive compensation on risk taking. Acad. Management J. 64(1):265–292.Google Scholar
• DesJardine M, Marti E, Durand R (2021) Why activist hedge funds target socially responsible firms: The reaction costs of signaling corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management J. 64(3):851–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Zhang M, Shi W (2022) How shareholders impact stakeholder interests: A review and map for future research. J. Management, ePub ahead of print October 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221126707.Google Scholar
• Dienesch RM, Liden RC (1986) Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Acad. Management Rev. 11(3):618–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Do MH, Minbashian A (2014) A meta-analytic examination of the effects of the agentic and affiliative aspects of extraversion on leadership outcomes. Leadership Quart. 25(5):1040–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberly MB, Fong CT (2013) Leading via the heart and mind: The roles of leader and follower emotions, attributions and interdependence. Leadership Quart. 24(5):696–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichenauer CJ, Ryan AM, Alanis JM (2022) Leadership during crisis: An examination of supervisory leadership behavior and gender during COVID-19. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 29(2):190–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliott WB, Rennekamp KM, White BJ (2015) Does concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest? Rev. Accounting Stud. 20(2):839–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertimur Y, Ferri F, Muslu V (2011) Shareholder activism and CEO pay. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(2):535–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fatfouta R (2021) What do they really want? Effects of the wording of job advertisements on narcissists’ perceptions of organizational attraction. Current Psych. 1–11.Google Scholar
• Ferris GR, Bhawuk DP, Fedor DF, Judge TA (1995) Organizational politics and citizenship: Attributions of intentionality and construct definition. Martinko MJ, ed. Attribution Theory: An Organizational Perspective (St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL), 231–252.Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Whitehead J, Campbell A (2009) Think Again: Why Good Leaders Make Bad Decisions and How to Keep It from Happening to You (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Sci. 61(11):2549–2568.Link, Google Scholar
• Gantchev N, Jotikasthira C (2017) Institutional trading and hedge fund activism. Management Sci. 64(6):2930–2950.Link, Google Scholar
• Gond JP, El Akremi A, Swaen V, Babu N (2017) The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person‐centric systematic review. J. Organ. Behav. 38(2):225–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goranova M, Ryan LV (2014) Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. J. Management 40(5):1230–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goranova M, Abouk R, Nystrom PC, Soofi ES (2017) Corporate governance antecedents to shareholder activism: A zero-inflated process. Strategic Management J. 38(2):415–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green SG, Mitchell TR (1979) Attributional processes of leaders in leader–member interactions. Organ. Behav. Human Performace 23(3):429–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Schor M (2009) Investor activism and takeovers. J. Financial Econom. 92(3):362–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo W, Sengul M, Yu T (2021a) The impact of executive verbal communication on the convergence of investors’ opinions. Acad. Management J. 64(6):1763–1792.Google Scholar
• Guo F, Lin C, Masli A, Wilkins MS (2021b) Auditor responses to shareholder activism. Contempory Accounting Res. 38(1):63–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Han S, Mortal SC, Silveri SD, Turban DB (2018) Do women CEOs face greater threat of shareholder activism compared with male CEOs? A role congruity perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 103(2):228–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guttentag MD (2014) On requiring public companies to disclose political spending. Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 2014(3):593–663.Google Scholar
• Hafenbrädl S, Waeger D (2017) Ideology and the micro-foundations of CSR: Why executives believe in the business case for CSR and how this affects their CSR engagements. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1582–1606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Quigley TJ (2014) Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management J. 35(4):473–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Thurgood GR, Boivie S, Pfarrer MD (2019) Measuring CEO personality: Developing, validating, and testing a linguistic tool. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1316–1330.Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Thurgood GR, Boivie S, Pfarrer MD (2020) Perception is reality: How CEOs’ observed personality influences market perceptions of firm risk and shareholder returns. Acad. Management J. 63(4):1166–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey P, Madison K, Martinko M, Crook TR, Crook TA (2014) Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: The road traveled and the path ahead. Acad. Management Perspective 28(2):128–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Wiley, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobson JL, Mayew WJ, Venkatachalam M (2012) Analyzing speech to detect financial misreporting. J. Accounting Res. 50(2):349–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Johnson RA, Moesel DD (1993) Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management J. 14(3):215–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang X, Teoh SH, Zhang Y (2014) Tone management. Accounting Rev. 89(3):1083–1113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard TD, Christensen DM, Graffin SD (2017) Higher highs and lower lows: The role of corporate social responsibility in CEO dismissal. Strategic Management J. 38(11):2255–2265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am. Econom. Rev. 76(2):323–329.Google Scholar
• Kark R, Waismel-Manor R, Shamir B (2012) Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identification. Leadership Quart. 23(3):620–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelleher K (2012) Reed Hastings, meet Carl Icahn. And good luck. Pando (November 1), https://pandodaily.com/2012/11/01/reed-hastings-meet-carl-icahn-and-good-luck.Google Scholar
• Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A (2016) Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Rev. 91(6):1697–1724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana IK, Li Y, Wang W (2018) The effects of hedge fund interventions on strategic firm behavior. Management Sci. 64(9):4094–4117.Link, Google Scholar
• Kimbrough MD (2005) The effect of conference calls on analyst and market underreaction to earnings announcements. Accounting Rev. 80(1):189–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein A, Zur E (2009) Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. J. Finance 64(1):187–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krause R, Semadeni M, Cannella AA (2014) CEO duality: A review and research agenda. J. Management 40(1):256–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Zakolyukina AA (2012) Detecting deceptive discussions in conference calls. J. Accounting Res. 50(2):495–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J (2016) Can investors detect managers’ lack of spontaneity? Adherence to predetermined scripts during earnings conference calls. Accounting Rev. 91(1):229–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Wu K, Johnson DE, Avey J (2017) Going against the grain works: An attributional perspective of perceived ethical leadership. J. Bus. Ethics 141(1):87–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran TIM, McDonald B (2011) When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks. J. Finance 66(1):35–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, McDonald B (2016) Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. J. Accounting Res. 54(4):1187–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2016) Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1325–1341.Link, Google Scholar
• Martinko MJ, Harvey P, Dasborough MT (2011) Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. J. Organ. Behav. 32(1):144–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masulis RW, Reza SW (2014) Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(2):592–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):117–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morf CC, Torchetti L, Schürch E (2011) Narcissism from the perspective of the dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Campbell WK, Miller JD, eds. The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Findings, and Treatments (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 56–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldford E, Fiset J (2021) Decoding bias: Gendered language in finance internship job postings. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 31:100544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan L, McNamara G, Lee JJ, Haleblian J, Devers CE (2018) Give it to us straight (most of the time): Top managers’ use of concrete language and its effect on investor reactions. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2204–2225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pendola R (2012) Netflix, Hastings have a history of ignoring shareholders: Opinion. TheStreet (November 5), https://www.thestreet.com/opinion/netflix-hastings-have-a-history-of-ignoring-shareholders-opinion-11757208.Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrenko OV, Aime F, Ridge J, Hill A (2016) Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 37(2):262–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pietraszkiewicz A, Formanowicz M, Gustafsson Sendén M, Boyd RL, Sikström S, Sczesny S (2019) The big two dictionaries: Capturing agency and communion in natural language. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 49(5):871–887.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post JM (1993) Current concepts of the narcissistic personality: Implications for political psychology. Political Psych. 14(1):99–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranik H, Koopman J, Vough HC, Gamache DL (2019) They want what I’ve got (I think): The causes and consequences of attributing coworker behavior to envy. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):424–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quigley TJ, Hambrick DC (2015) Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management J. 36(6):821–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal SA, Pittinsky TL (2006) Narcissistic leadership. Leadership Quart. 17(6):617–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Galinsky AD, Magee JC (2018) The agentic–communal model of advantage and disadvantage: How inequality produces similarities in the psychology of power, social class, gender, and race. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 58:71–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders WMG, Hambrick DC (2007) Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1055–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schepker DJ, Kim Y, Patel PC, Thatcher SM, Campion MC (2017) CEO succession, strategic change, and post-succession performance: A meta-analysis. Leadership Quart. 28(6):701–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Hoskisson R (2021). Understanding and Managing Strategic Governance (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Shi W, Zhang Y, Hoskisson RE (2017) Ripple effects of CEO awards: Investigating the acquisition activities of superstar CEOs’ competitors. Strategic Management J. 38(10):2080–2102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Zhang Y, Hoskisson RE (2019b) Examination of CEO–CFO social interaction through language style matching: Outcomes for the CFO and the organization. Acad. Management J. 62(2):383–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Connelly BL, Hoskisson R, Ketchen D (2020) Portfolio spillover of institutional investor activism: An awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1865–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Connelly B, Mackey J, Gupta A (2019a) Placing their bets: The influence of strategic investment on CEO pay‐for‐performance. Strategic Management J. 40(12):2047–2077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin T, You J (2017) Pay for talk: How the use of shareholder‐value language affects CEO compensation. J. Management Stud. 54(1):88–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souder D, Reilly G, Bromiley P, Mitchell S (2016) A behavioral understanding of investment horizon and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1202–1218.Link, Google Scholar
• Sundaram AK, Inkpen AC (2004) The corporate objective revisited. Organ. Sci. 15(3):350–363.Link, Google Scholar
• Trapnell PD, Paulhus DL (2012) Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. J. Personality Assessment 94(1):39–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler BB, Caner T (2016) New product introductions below aspirations, slack and R&D alliances: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Management J. 37(5):896–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Um CT, Guo SL, Lumineau F, Shi W, Song R (2021) The downside of CFO function-based language incongruity. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print September 10, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0943.Google Scholar
• Vlachos PA, Panagopoulos NG, Bachrach DG, Morgeson FP (2017) The effects of managerial and employee attributions for corporate social responsibility initiatives. J. Organ. Behav. 38(7):1111–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Seward JK (1990) On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 15(3):421–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber L, Wiersema M (2017) Dismissing a tarnished CEO? Psychological mechanisms and unconscious biases in the board’s evaluation. California Management Rev. 59(3):22–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal J, Park SH (2020) Symbolic Management: Governance, Strategy, and Institutions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):60–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bowen HP (2009) The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management J. 30(6):679–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Zhang Y (2011) CEO dismissal: The role of investment analysts. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1161–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zachary MA, Connelly BL, Payne GT, Tribble LL (2021) Virtue rhetoric in investor communications: Setting up for a letdown? J. Management, ePub ahead of print April 5, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211002622.Google Scholar
• Zhu DH, Chen G (2015) Narcissism, director selection, and risk‐taking spending. Strategic Management J. 36(13):2075–2098.Crossref, Google Scholar