Executives’ Prior Employment Ties to Interlocking Directors and Interfirm Mobility

References

• Aldrich H, Herker D (1977) Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Acad. Management Rev. 2(2):217–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD (2014) Event History and Survival Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data, 2nd ed. (SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrus JL, Withers MC, Courtright SH, Boivie S (2019) Go your own way: Exploring the causes of top executive turnover. Strategic Management J. 40(7):1151–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker T, Miner AS, Eesley DT (2003) Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Res. Policy 32(2):255–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsam S, Miharjo S (2007) The effect of equity compensation on voluntary executive turnover. J. Accounting Econom. 43(1):95–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Nordqvist M, Hellerstedt K (2020) The role of the board chair: A literature review and suggestions for future research. Corporate Governance 28(6):372–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R (2015) The strength of many kinds of ties: Unpacking the role of social contacts across stages of the job search process. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1040–1058.Link, Google Scholar
• Bascle G (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 6(3):285–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH, Schoorman FD (1983) A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates. Acad. Management Rev. 8(2):206–217.Google Scholar
• Beatty D (2012) The role of the chair: Orchestrating the board. Rotman magazine (Spring):48–53.Google Scholar
• Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD, O’Reilly C (2007) Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22(2):147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belliveau MA, O’Reilly CA, Wade JB (1996) Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 39(6):1568–1593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Kick T, Koetter M, Schaeck K (2013) Does it pay to have friends? Social ties and executive appointments in banking. J. Banking Finance 37(6):2087–2105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bermiss YS, Murmann JP (2014) Who matters more? The impact of functional background and top executive mobility on firm survival. Strategic Management J. 36(11):1697–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berns KVD, Klarner P (2017) A review of the CEO succession literature and a future research program. Acad. Management Perspect. 31(2):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Graffin SD, Pollock TG (2012) Time for me to fly: Predicting director exit at large firms. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1334–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Graffin SD, Oliver AG, Withers MC (2016) Come aboard! Exploring the effects of directorships in the executive labor market. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1681–1706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Withers MC, Graffin SD, Corley KG (2021) Corporate directors’ implicit theories of the roles and duties of boards. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1662–1695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd BK (1994) Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management J. 15(5):335–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47(6):795–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown DW, Konrad AM (2001) Job-seeking in a turbulent economy: Social networks and the importance of cross-industry ties to an industry change. Human Relations 54(8):1015–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brymer RA, Chadwick C, Hill A, Molloy J (2019) Pipelines and their portfolios: A more holistic view of human capital heterogeneity via firm-wide employee sourcing. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(2):207–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, eds. Social Structure and Organizations Revisited (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 229–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Krause R, Boivie S, Graffin SD (2016) Toward a configurational perspective on the CEO a review and synthesis of the management literature. J. Management 42(1):234–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Yoon H, Gamache DL, Withers MC (2022) Omitted variable bias: Examining management research with the impact threshold of a confounding variable (ITCV). J. Management 48(1):17–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buyl T, Boone C, Wade JB (2015) Non-CEO executive mobility: The impact of poor firm performance and TMT attention. Eur. Management J. 33(4):257–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Hamori M (2005) The new road to the top. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(1):25–32.Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Hamori M (2014) Understanding executive job search. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1511–1529.Link, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management 30(6):749–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Westphal JD (2001) The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Acad. Management J. 44(4):639–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter ME, Franco F, Tuna İ (2019) Matching premiums in the executive labor market. Accounting Rev. 94(6):109–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo Hs, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2639–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman DS, Uggerslev KL, Carroll SA, Piasentin KA, Jones DA (2005) Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):928–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin MK, Semadeni M (2017) CEO political ideologies and pay egalitarianism within top management teams. Strategic Management J. 38(8):1608–1625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen DM, Dhaliwal DS, Boivie S, Graffin SD (2015) Top management conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers’ personal political orientation and corporate tax avoidance. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1918–1938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu JSG, Davis GF (2016) Who killed the inner circle? The decline of the American corporate interlock network. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(3):714–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Van Slyke EJ (2012) The power and peril of board interlocks. Bus. Horizons 55(5):403–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossland C, Jinyong Z, Hiller NJ, Hambrick DC (2014) CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Acad. Management J. 57(3):652–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Custódio C, Ferreira MA, Matos P (2013) Generalists vs. specialists: Lifetime work experience and chief executive officer pay. J. Financial Econom. 108(2):471–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Custódio C, Ferreira MA, Matos P (2017) Do general managerial skills spur innovation? Management Sci. 65(2):459–476.Link, Google Scholar
• DeNicola P (2021) A deeper dive into talent management: The new board imperative. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance (August 12), https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/08/12/a-deeper-dive-into-talent-management-the-new-board-imperative/.Google Scholar
• Devers CE, Cannella AA, Reilly GP, Yoder ME (2007) Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. J. Management 33(6):1016–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey D, March T, Berkman A (2001) Assimilating New Leaders: The Key to Executive Retention (AMACOM, New York).Google Scholar
• Dreher GF, Lee JY, Clerkin TA (2011) Mobility and cash compensation: The moderating effects of gender, race, and executive search firms. J. Management 37(3):651–681.Google Scholar
• Essman SM, Schepker DJ, Nyberg AJ, Ray C (2021) Signaling a successor? A theoretical and empirical analysis of the executive compensation‐chief executive officer succession relationship. Strategic Management J. 42(1):185–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahlenbrach R, Low A, Stulz RM (2010) Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors? J. Financial Econom. 97(1):12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang R, Landis B, Zhang Z, Anderson MH, Shaw JD, Kilduff M (2015) Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1243–1260.Link, Google Scholar
• Fee CE, Hadlock CJ (2004) Management turnover across the corporate hierarchy. J. Accounting Econom. 37(1):3–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Weinberg N (1997) Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(6):883–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Fong EA, Misangyi VF, Tosi HL (2010) The effect of CEO pay deviations on CEO withdrawal, firm size, and firm profits. Strategic Management J. 31(6):629–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA (2000) Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociol. Methods Res. 29(2):147–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA, Lin Q, Maroulis SJ, Mueller AS, Xu R, Rosenberg J, Hayter C, et al. (2021) Hypothetical case replacement can be used to quantify the robustness of trial results. J. Clinical Epidemiology 134:150–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA, Maroulis SJ, Duong MQ, Kelcey BM (2013) What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Educational Evaluation Policy Anal. 35(4):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman SD, Saul K (1991) A leader’s wake: Organization member reactions to CEO succession. J. Management 17(3):619–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gayle G-L, Golan L, Miller RA (2015) Promotion, turnover, and compensation in the executive labor market. Econometrica 83(6):2293–2369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentry RJ, Harrison JS, Quigley TJ, Boivie S (2021) A database of CEO turnover and dismissal in S&P 1500 firms, 2000–2018. Strategic Management J. 42(5):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Wade JB, Porac JF, McNamee RC (2008) The impact of CEO status diffusion on the economic outcomes of other senior managers. Organ. Sci. 19(3):457–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Collins R, ed. Sociological Theory (Josey-Bass, San Francisco), 201–233.Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guthrie G (2017) The Firm Divided: Manager-Shareholder Conflict and the Fight for Control of the Modern Corporation (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas A (2015) Crowding at the frontier: Boundary spanners, gatekeepers and knowledge brokers. J. Knowledge Management 19(5):1029–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Coombes S, Das D, Jalajas D (2012) Finding a good job: Academic network centrality and early occupational outcomes in management academia. J. Organ. Behav. 33(5):723–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1994) Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Res. Organ. Behav. 16:171–213.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2005) Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3):472–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Humphrey SE, Gupta A (2015) Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management J. 36(3):449–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Boivie S, Sharp NY, Gentry RJ (2018) Saving face: How exit in response to negative press and star analyst downgrades reflects reputation maintenance by directors. Acad. Management J. 61(3):1131–1157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild PR, Beckman CM (1998) When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):815–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1998) Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):96–118.Google Scholar
• Higgins MC, Gulati R (2003) Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organ. Sci. 14(3):244–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Dalziel T (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Nicholson G, Shropshire C (2008) Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organ. Sci. 19(3):441–456.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoitash U, Mkrtchyan A (2022) Internal governance and outside directors’ connections to non-director executives. J. Accounting Econom. 73(1):101436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1995) Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Acad. Management J. 38(3):673–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jack SL (2005) The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis. J. Management Stud. 42(6):1233–1259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson SE, Brett JF, Sessa VI, Cooper DM, Julin JA, Peyronnin K (1991) Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 76(5):675–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesner IF, Dalton DR (1985) The effect of board composition on CEO succession and organizational performance. Quart. J. Bus. Econom. 24(2):3–20.Google Scholar
• Kesner IF, Dalton DR (1994) Top management turnover and CEO succession: An investigation of the effects of turnover on performance. J. Management Stud. 31(5):701–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kesner IF, Sebora TC (1994) Executive succession: Past, present & future. J. Management 20(2):327–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna P, Jones CD, Boivie S (2014) Director human capital, information processing demands, and board effectiveness. J. Management 40(2):557–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiazad K, Kraimer ML, Seibert SE, Sargent L (2020) Understanding organizational embeddedness and career success: Who and what you know. J. Organ. Behav. 41(7):678–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JH (2014) Employee poaching: Why it can be predatory. Managerial Decision Econom. 35(5):309–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Cannella AA (2008) Social capital among corporate upper echelons and its impacts on executive promotion in Korea. J. World Bus. 43(1):85–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krause R (2017) Being the CEO’s boss: An examination of board chair orientations. Strategic Management J. 38(3):697–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krause R, Withers MC, Semadeni M (2017) Compromise on the board: Investigating the antecedents and consequences of lead independent director appointment. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2239–2265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai G, Lin N, Leung S-Y (1998) Network resources, contact resources, and status attainment. Soc. Networks 20(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley H, Coulter M, Can R (2021) The 15 most important execs who left Google in 2021—and the 11 who joined. Bus. Insider (December 22), https://www.businessinsider.com/google-power-players-execs-who-left-hired-alphabet-cloud-waymo-2021-12.Google Scholar
• Lin N (1999) Social networks and status attainment. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:467–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N, Ensel WM, Vaughn JC (1981a) Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 46(4):393–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N, Vaughn JC, Ensel WM (1981b) Social resources and occupational-status attainment. Soc. Forces 59(4):1163–1181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lublin JS (2010) Lead directors gain clout as counterweight to CEO. Wall Street J. (September 13), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704505804575484190531210932.Google Scholar
• Mackey A, Molloy JC, Morris SS (2014) Scarce human capital in managerial labor markets. J. Management 40(2):399–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Main BG, O’Reilly CA, Wade J (1995) The CEO, the board of directors and executive compensation: Economic and psychological perspectives. Indust. Corporate Change 4(2):293–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Messersmith JG, Guthrie JP, Yong-Yeon J, Jeong-Yeon L (2011) Executive turnover: The influence of dispersion and other pay system characteristics. J. Appl. Psych. 96(3):457–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills CW (1956) The Power Elite (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Montgomery JD (1992) Job search and network composition: Implications of the strength-of-weak-ties hypothesis. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(5):586–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2002) Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1149–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naveen L (2009) Organizational complexity and succession planning. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 41(3):661–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng D (2019) Fox scores a win over Netflix in dispute over executive poaching. Los Angeles Times (June 6), https://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-fox-netflix-lawsuit-decision-20190606-story.html.Google Scholar
• Nyberg AJ, Cragun OR, Schepker DJ (2020) Chief executive officer succession and board decision making: Review and suggestions for advancing industrial and organizational psychology, human resources management, and organizational behavior research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 8:173–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Higgins E (2009) The chairman of the board of directors: Role and contribution. Kakabadse A, Kakabadse N, eds. Global Boards: One Desire, Many Realities (Palgrave Macmillan, New York), 217–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pellegrin RJ (1957) Executives and supervisors—Contrasting definitions of career success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1(4):506–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1976) Beyond management and the worker: The institutional function of management. Acad. Management Rev. 1(2):36–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Leblebici H (1973) Executive recruitment and the development of interfirm organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 18(4):449–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Baron JN (1997) Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(5):673–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridge JW, Aime F, White MA (2015) When much more of a difference makes a difference: Social comparison and tournaments in the CEO’s top team. Strategic Management J. 36(4):618–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2012) Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(6):999–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2015) Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schepker DJ, Nyberg AJ, Ulrich MD, Wright PM (2018) Planning for future leadership: Procedural rationality, formalized succession processes, and CEO influence in CEO succession planning. Acad. Management J. 61(2):523–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. 44(2):219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Semadeni M, Withers MC, Certo ST (2014) The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management J. 35(7):1070–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Connelly BL (2018) Is regulatory adoption ceremonial? Evidence from lead director appointments. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2386–2413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shropshire C (2010) The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):246–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z, Veiga JF, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN (2005) Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Acad. Management J. 48(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soltis SM, Brass DJ, Lepak DP (2018) Social resource management: Integrating social network theory and human resource management. Acad. Management Ann. 12(2):537–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (1999) Executive migration and interorganizational competition. Soc. Sci. Res. 28(3):289–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinbach AL, Holcomb TR, Holmes RM, Devers CE, Cannella AA (2017) Top management team incentive heterogeneity, strategic investment behavior, and performance: A contingency theory of incentive alignment. Strategic Management J. 38(8):1701–1720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Overture Group (2018) The new look of executive tenure. The Overture Group (May 23), https://www.theoverturegroup.com/resources/blog/new-look-executive-tenure.Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Useem M (1984) The Inner Circle (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wagner WG, Pfeffer J, O’Reilly CA III (1984) Organizational demography and turnover in top-management group. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):74–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1988) Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 9(2):173–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Ellwood JW (1991) Mergers, acquisitions, and the pruning of managerial deadwood. Strategic Management J. 12(3):202–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegener B (1991) Job mobility and social ties: Social resources, prior job, and status attainment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56(1):60–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal J, Park SH (2020) Symbolic Management: Governance, Strategy, and Institutions (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zhu DH (2019) Under the radar: How firms manage competitive uncertainty by appointing friends of other chief executive officers to their boards. Strategic Management J. 40(1):79–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Boivie S, Chng DHM (2006) The strategic impetus for social network ties: Reconstituting broken CEO friendship ties. Strategic Management J. 27(5):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1993) Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management J. 14(7):485–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Nishimura Y, Suzuki K (2018) Executive succession: The importance of social capital in CEO appointments. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1473–1495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams C, Chen PL, Agarwal R (2017) Rookies and seasoned recruits: How experience in different levels, firms, and industries shapes strategic renewal in top management. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1391–1415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams J (2021) MongoDB poaches top Amazon executives to compete with AWS. Bloomberg (December 21), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-21/mongodb-poaches-top-amazon-executives-to-compete-with-aws.Google Scholar
• Williamson IO, Cable DM (2003) Organizational hiring patterns, interfirm network ties, and interorganizational imitation. Acad. Management J. 46(3):349–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu R, Frank KA, Maroulis SJ, Rosenberg JM (2019) Konfound: Command to quantify robustness of causal inferences. Stata J. 19(3):523–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yakubovich V (2005) Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(3):408–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zang XW (2003) Network resources and job search in urban China. J. Sociol. 39(2):115–129.Crossref, Google Scholar