The Agency to Implement Voice: How Target Hierarchical Position and Competence Changes the Relationship Between Voice and Individual Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1640

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1154–1184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C, Kilduff GJ (2009) Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(2):491–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashford SJ, Barton M (2007) Identity-based issue selling. Bartel CA, Blader SL, Wrzesniewski A, eds. Identity and the Modern Organization (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 223–244.Google Scholar
  • Ashford SJ, Rothbard NP, Piderit SK, Dutton JE (1998) Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):23–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baer M (2012) Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1102–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bamberger PA, Geller D, Doveh E (2017) Assisting upon entry: Helping type and approach as moderators of how role conflict affects newcomer resource drain. J. Appl. Psych. 102(12):1719–1732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bandura A (1998) Exploration of fortuitous determinants of life paths. Psych. Inquiry 9(2):95–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. 52(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (2006) Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 1(2):164–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker TE (2005) Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organ. Res. Methods 8(3):274–289.Google Scholar
  • Bentler PM, Dudgeon P (1996) Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, and directions. Annual Rev. Psych. 47(1):563–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Fisek MH, Norman RZ, Zelditch M Jr (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction (Elsevier, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
  • Brandtstädter J (1992) Personal control over development: Some developmental implications of self-efficacy. Schwarzer R, ed. Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action (Hemisphere Publishing Corp., London), 127–145.Google Scholar
  • Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burris ER (2012) The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Acad. Management J. 55(4):851–875.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burris ER, Detert JR, Romney AC (2013) Speaking up vs. being heard: The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice. Organ. Sci. 24(1):22–38.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burris ER, Rockmann KW, Kimmons YS (2017) The value of voice to managers: Employee identification and the content of voice. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2099–2125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlson KD, Wu J (2012) The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organ. Res. Methods 15(3):413–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman JA, Flynn FJ (2005) Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):434–447.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen YR, Peterson RS, Phillips DJ, Podolny JM, Ridgeway C (2012) Bringing status to the table—Attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organ. Sci. 23(2):299–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chiaburu DS, Peng AC, Van Dyne L (2015) Does it matter how I say it? J. Personnel Psych. 14(2):104–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Beninger A (2011) The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Staw BM, Brief AP, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 31 (Elsevier, New York), 73–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis JH, Laughlin PR, Komorita SS (1976) The social psychology of small groups: Cooperative and mixed-motive interaction. Annual Rev. Psych. 27(1):501–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dearborn DC, Simon HA (1958) Selective perceptions: A note on the departmental identification of executives. Sociometry 21(2):140–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CK, West MA (2001) Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1191–1201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detert JR, Burris ER (2007) Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Acad. Management J. 50(4):869–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detert JR, Treviño LK (2010) Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organ. Sci. 21(1):249–270.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Detert JR, Burris ER, Harrison DA, Martin SR (2013) Voice flows to and around leaders: Understanding when units are helped or hurt by employee voice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(4):624–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Ashford SJ (1993) Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3):397–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, Lawrence KA, Miner-Rubino K (2002) Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organ. Sci. 13(4):355–369.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, O’Neill RM, Hayes E, Wierba EE (1997) Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management J. 18(5):407–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Driskell JE, Olmstead B, Salas E (1993) Task cues, dominance cues, and influence in task groups. J. Appl. Psych. 78(1):51–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elliott AJ, Dweck CS (1995) Handbook of Competence and Motivation (The Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):229–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farh CI, Oh JK, Hollenbeck JR, Yu A, Lee SM, King DD (2020) Token female voice enactment in traditionally male-dominated teams: Facilitating conditions and consequences for performance. Acad. Management J. 63(3):832–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fast NJ, Burris ER, Bartel CA (2014) Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1013–1034.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(2):77–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George JM, Bettenhausen K (1990) Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. J. Appl. Psych. 75(6):698–709.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (University of California, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Graen G, Cashman JF, Ginsburg S, Schiemann W (1977) Effects of linking-pin quality on the quality of working life of lower participants. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(3):491–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Mayer DM (2009) Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. J. Appl. Psych. 94(4):900–912.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (The Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hershcovis MS (2011) “Incivility, social undermining, bullying…oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within the workplace aggression research. J. Organ. Behav. 32(3):499–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hofmann DA, Lei Z, Grant AM (2009) Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: The sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1261.Google Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville JA (2007) Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing. Organ. Sci. 18(4):560–577.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howell TM, Harrison DM, Burris ER, Detert JR (2015) Who gets credit or input? Demographic and structural status cues in voice recognition. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1765–1784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge TA, Thoresen CJ, Bono JE, Patton GK (2001) The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psych. Bull. 127(3):376–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter RM (1988) When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Res. Organ. Behav. 10:169–211.Google Scholar
  • Kowalski RM (1996) Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psych. Bull. 119(2):179–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee F (1997) When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 72(3):336–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LePine JA, Van Dyne L (1998) Predicting voice behavior in work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 83(6):853–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Acad. Management J. 55(1):71–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littlepage GE, Schmidt GW, Whisler EW, Frost AG (1995) An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5):877–889.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu W, Tangirala S, Ramanujam R (2013) The relational antecedents of voice targeted at different leaders. J. Appl. Psych. 98(5):841.Google Scholar
  • Liu W, Zhu R, Yang Y (2010) I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. Leadership Quart. 21(1):189–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu W, Song Z, Li X, Liao Z (2017) Why and when leaders’ affective states influence employee upward voice. Acad. Management J. 60(1):238–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu W, Tangirala S, Lam W, Chen Z, Jia RT, Huang X (2015) How and when peers’ positive mood influences employees’ voice. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):976–989.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: Do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line? Personnel Psych. 64(3):559–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer RC, Davis JH (1999) The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 84(1):123–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maynes TD, Podsakoff PM (2014) Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. J. Appl. Psych. 99(1):87–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClean EJ, Burris ER, Detert JR (2013) When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Acad. Management J. 56(2):525–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClean EJ, Martin SR, Emich KJ, Woodruff T (2018) The social consequences of voice: An examination of voice type and gender on status and subsequent leader emergence. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1869–1891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKay PF, Avery DR, Morris MA (2008) Mean racial-ethnic differences in employee sales performance: The moderating role of diversity climate. Personnel Psych. 61(2):349–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milliken FJ, Morrison EW, Hewlin PF (2003) An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1453–1476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H (2009) Managing (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Mitchell M, Vogel R, Folger R (2015) Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. J. Appl. Psych. 100(4):1040–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison EW (2011) Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):373–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison EW (2014) Employee voice and silence. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1:173–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison EW, Milliken FJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):706–725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison EW, Phelps CC (1999) Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad. Management J. 42(4):403–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison EW, Vancouver JB (2000) Within-person analysis of information seeking: The effects of perceived costs and benefits. J. Management 26(1):119–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in healthcare teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27(7):941–966.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ng TW, Feldman DC (2012) Employee voice behavior: A meta‐analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. J. Organ. Behav. 33(2):216–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Organ DW, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB (2006) Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearce JL, Gregersen HB (1991) Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. J. Appl. Psych. 76(6):838.Google Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):53–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J (1998) The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Paine JB, Bachrach DG (2000) Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J. Management 26(3):513–563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Ryan KD, Oestreich DK (1998) Driving Fear out of the Workplace: Creating the High-Trust, High-Performance Organization, 2nd ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ (1994) Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  • Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Crant JM (1999) Proactive personality and career success. J. Appl. Psych. 84(3):416–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro DL (1993) Reconciling theoretical differences among procedural justice researchers by re-evaluating what it means to have one’s views “considered”: Implications for third-party managers. Cropanzano R, ed. Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management (Erlbaum, New York), 51–78.Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1442–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM, Boettger RD (1990) Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Acad. Management J. 33(3):534–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone EF, Hollenbeck JR (1989) Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. J. Appl. Psych. 74(1):3–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone-Romero EF, Anderson LE (1994) Relative power of moderated multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup correlation coefficients for detecting moderating effects. J. Appl. Psych. 79(3):354–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stroebe W, Diehl M, Abakoumkin G (1992) The illusion of group effectivity. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 18(5):643–650.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas JP, Whitman DS, Viswesvaran C (2010) Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 83(2):275–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van der Vegt GS, Bunderson S, Oosterhof A (2006) Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Acad. Management J. 49(5):877–893.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Dyne L, LePine JA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad. Management J. 41(1):108–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkataramani V, Tangirala S (2010) When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. J. Appl. Psych. 95(3):582–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wheeler L, Reis HT (1991) Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. J. Personality 59(3):339–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Pierce JR (2008) Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):125–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whiting SW, Maynes TD, Podsakoff NP, Podsakoff PM (2012) Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):159–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood R, Bandura A (1989) Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):361–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.