Effective Information Infrastructures for Collaborative Organizing: The Case of Maasai Mara

References

• Adler PS, Heckscher C (2018) Collaboration as an organization design for shared purpose. Ringel L, Hiller P, Zietsma C, eds. Toward Permeable Boundaries of Organizations? (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 81–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics Soc. 29(4):485–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Bousquet F, Cardenas JC, Castillo D, Lopez MC, Wutich A (2011) The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance. Ecological Econom. 70(9):1571–1579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Araral E (2014) Ostrom, Hardin and the commons: A critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Environ. Sci. Policy 36:11–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1399–1417.Link, Google Scholar
• Bedelian C, Ogutu JO (2017) Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya. Pastoralism 7(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boles OJC, Schoemaker A, Mustaphi CJC, Petek N, Ekblom A, Lane PJ (2019) Historical ecologies of pastoralist overgrazing in Kenya: Long-term perspectives on cause and effect. Human Ecology 47:419–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Håkonsson DD, Nickerson J, Puranam P, Workiewicz M, Zenger T (2017) GitHub: Exploring the space between boss-less and hierarchical forms of organizing. J. Organ. Design 6(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Z, Lumineau F (2015) Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. J. Oper. Management 33:15–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardenas JC (2000) How do groups solve local commons dilemmas? Lessons from experimental economics in the field. Environ. Development Sustainability 2(2–3):305–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter S, Brock W, Hanson P (1999) Ecological and social dynamics in simple models of ecosystem management. Conservation Ecology 3(2):4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J, Rodrigues SB (2003) Corporate governance and new organizational forms: Issues of double and multiple agency. J. Management Governance 7(4):337–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CLS (2022) Data for oceanographic learning & fisheries intelligence needs. Retrieved June 22, https://fisheries.groupcls.com/fishermen/fisheries-intelligence/Google Scholar
• Croson R, Anand J, Agarwal R (2007) Using experiments in corporate strategy research. Eur. Management Rev. 4(3):173–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Laat PB (2007) Governance of open source software: State of the art. J. Management Governance 11(2):165–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907–1912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Endsley MR (1988) Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Proc. IEEE 1988 National Aerospace Electronics Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Endsley MR (2000) Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. Endsley MR, Garland DJ, eds. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Johnson SL (2011) Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1464–1480.Link, Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad ØD, Snow CC, Miles RE, Lettl C (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):734–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1994) Le jeu de Michel Foucault. Dits et écrits 3 (Gallimard, Paris), 298–329.Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Greenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F, Zhelyazkov P (2012) The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):531–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman JD (2010) Learning to share, thanks to the web. New York Times (September 27), https://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/weekinreview/26goodman.html.Google Scholar
• Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the Commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He VT, Puranam P (2020) Collaborative organizing: Managing conflict without hierarchy. Working paper, ETH and INSEAD, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Heckscher C, Adler P (2006) The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homewood K, Kristjanson P, Trench PC, eds. (2009) Staying Maasai? Livelihoods, conservation and development in East African rangelands (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Huho JM, Ngaira JK, Ogindo HO (2011) Living with drought: The case of the Maasai pastoralists of northern Kenya. Ed. Res. 2(1):779–789.Google Scholar
• Janssen MA, Carpenter SR (1999) Managing the resilience of lakes: A multi-agent modeling approach. Conservation Ecology 3(2):15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennrich RI (1970) An asymptotic χ2 test for the equality of two correlation matrices. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 65(330):904–912.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaoga J, Olago D, Ouma G, Ouma G, Onono J (2021) The evolving cultural values and their implication on the Maasai pastoralists, Kajiado County, Kenya. Sci. African 13:e00881.Google Scholar
• Kolbjørnsrud V (2017) Agency problems and governance mechanisms in collaborative communities. Strategic Organ. 15(2):141–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopelman S, Weber JM, Messick DM (2002) Factors influencing cooperation in commons dilemmas: A review of experimental psychological research. Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolzak N, Weber EU, eds. The Drama of the Commons: Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change (National Academies Press, Washington, DC), 113–156.Google Scholar
• Lakhani K, Von Hippel EA (2000) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):925–943.Google Scholar
• Lee GK, Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. 14(6):633–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee MY, Edmondson AC (2017) Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:35–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2014) Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1414–1433.Link, Google Scholar
• Lopez MC, Murphy JJ, Spraggon JM, Stranlund JK (2012) Comparing the effectiveness of regulation and pro-social emotions to enhance cooperation: Experimental evidence from fishing communities in Colombia. Econom. Inquiry 50(1):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Løvschal M, Gravesen ML (2021) De-/fencing grasslands: Ongoing boundary making and unmaking in postcolonial Kenya. Land 10(8):786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Løvschal M, Håkonsson DD, Amoke I (2019) Are goats the new elephants in the room? Changing land-use strategies in Greater Mara, Kenya. Land Use Policy 80:395–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, Zaggl MA (2021) How open crowds self-organize. Acad. Management Discovery 7(1):104–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massa FG, O’Mahony S (2021) Order from chaos: How networked activists self-organize by creating a participation architecture. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):1037–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Argyres NS (2004) Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. 15(4):394–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Meadows D (1998) Fish Banks game. Retrieved August 10, 2021, https://www.systemdynamics.org/fish-banks-game.Google Scholar
• Morecroft JD (2015) Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan J (2012) Collaborative Organization (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Moxnes E (1998) Not only the tragedy of the commons: Misperceptions of bioeconomics. Management Sci. 44(9):1234–1248.Link, Google Scholar
• Ogutu JO, Piepho HP, Said MY, Ojwang GO, Njino LW, Kifugo SC, Wargute PW (2016) Extreme wildlife declines and concurrent increase in livestock numbers in Kenya: What are the causes? PLoS One 11(9):e0163249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S (2007) The governance of open source initiatives: What does it mean to be community managed? J. Manag. Gov. 11(2):139–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1997) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 92(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2003) Toward a behavioral theory linking trust, reciprocity, and reputation. Ostrom E, Walker J, eds. Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research (Sage, New York), 9–79.Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Gardner R (1993) Coping with asymmetries in the commons: Self-governing irrigation systems can work. J. Econom. Perspect. 7(4):93–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Walker J (1989) Communication in a commons: Cooperation without external enforcement. Workshop Political Theory Policy Anal., August 31–September 3, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Håkonsson DD (2015) Valve’s way. J. Organ. Design 4(2):2–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved May 6, https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Silvestri L, Gulati R (2020) The role of interdependence in microfoundations of organization design: Task, goal and knowledge interdependence. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):828–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rege M, Telle K (2004) The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations. J. Public Econom. 88(7–8):1625–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Ariño A (2007) Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management J. 28(3):313–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Revelle W (2021) Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Retrieved October 11, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/index.html.Google Scholar
• Robertson BJ (2015) Holacracy: The New Management System for a Rapidly Changing World (Henry Holt, New York).Google Scholar
• Snow CC, Fjeldstad ØD (2022) Actor-oriented organizing. Snow CC, Fjeldstad ØD, eds. Designing Adaptive Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK). Google Scholar
• Snow CC, Fjeldstad ØD, Langer AM (2017) Designing the digital organization. J. Organ. Design 6(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow CC, Håkonsson DD, Obel B (2016) A smart city is a collaborative community: Lessons from Smart Aarhus. California Management Rev. 59(1):92–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• UNEP (2020) Urban air action platform. Retrieved June 20, 2022, https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/air/what-we-do/monitoring-air-quality/urban-air-action-platform.Google Scholar
• United Nations (2020) Sustainable development goals. Retrieved January 28, 2021, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sdg-moment/.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1990) Monitoring agents with other agents. J. Inst. Theoret. Econom. 146:153–174.Google Scholar
• Vollan B, Ostrom E (2010) Cooperation and the commons. Science 330(6006):923–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walters C (1994) Use of gaming procedures in evaluation of management experiments. Canadian J. Fish Aquatic Sci. 51(12):2705–2714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willer R, Flynn FJ, Zak S (2012) Structure, identity, and solidarity: A comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):119–155.Crossref, Google Scholar