Uniting Through Difference: Rich Cultural-Identity Expression as a Conduit to Inclusion

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1648

References

  • Allport GW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Anderson C, Kraus MW, Galinsky AD, Keltner D (2012) The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psych. Sci. 23(7):764–771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apfelbaum EP, Norton MI, Sommers SR (2012) Racial color blindness: Emergence, practice, and implications. Curr. Dir. Psych. Sci. 21(3):205–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnett RD, Sidanius J (2018) Sacrificing status for social harmony: Concealing relatively high status identities from one’s peers. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 147:108–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(4):596–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aron A, Aron EN, Tudor M, Nelson G (1991) Close relationships as including other in the self. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 60(2):241–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aron A, Melinat E, Aron EN, Vallone RD, Bator RJ (1997) The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23(4):363–377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barron LG, Hebl M, King EB (2011) Effects of manifest ethnic identification on employment discrimination. Cultural Diversity Ethnic Minority Psych. 17(1):23–30.Google Scholar
  • Bell ELJ, Nkomo SM (2001) Our Separate Ways: Black and White Women and the Struggle for Professional Identity (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3):241–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergsieker HB, Shelton JN, Richeson JA (2010) To be liked vs. respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(2):248–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Google Scholar
  • Blader SL, Yu S (2017) Are status and respect different or two sides of the same coin? Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brannon TN, Walton GM (2013) Enacting cultural interests: How intergroup contact reduces prejudice by sparking interest in an out-group’s culture. Psych. Sci. 24(10):1947–1957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruneau EG, Saxe R (2012) The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(4):855–866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):655–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2015) Affective primacy in intraorganizational task networks. Organ. Sci. 26(2):373–389.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cha SE, Roberts LM (2019) Leveraging minority identities at work: An individual-level framework of the identity mobilization process. Organ. Sci. 30(4):735–760.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cha SE, Hewlin PF, Roberts LM, Buckman BR, Leroy H, Steckler EL, Ostermeier K, Cooper D (2019) Being your true self at work: Integrating the fragmented research on authenticity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):633–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Neale MA (1998) Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):749–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clair JA, Beatty JE, MacLean T (2005) Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):78–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark MS, Reis HT (1988) Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Rev. Psych. 39(1):609–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox TH (1993) Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Practice (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Creary SJ, Caza BB, Roberts LM (2015) Out of the box? How managing a subordinate’s multiple identities affects the quality of a manager-subordinate relationship. Acad. Management Rev. 40(4):538–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creed WED, Scully MA (2000) Songs of ourselves: Employees’ deployment of social identity in workplace encounters. J. Management Inquiry 9(4):391–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Glick P (2008) Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40:61–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derlega VJ, Harris MS, Chaikin AL (1973) Self-disclosure reciprocity, liking and the deviant. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 9(4):277–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ditlmann RK, Purdie-Vaughns V, Dovidio JF, Naft MJ (2017) The Implicit power motive in intergroup dialogues about the history of slavery. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 112(1):116–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Saguy T (2007) Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 18(1):296–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Kawakami K, Hodson G (2002) Why can’t we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cultural Diversity Ethnic Minority Psych. 8(2):88–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doyle SP, Lount RB, Wilk SL, Pettit NC (2016) Helping others most when they are not too close: Status distance as a determinant of interpersonal helping in organizations. Acad. Management Discoveries 2(2):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Phillips KW, Rothbard NP (2013) Getting closer at the company party: Integration experiences, racial dissimilarity, and workplace relationships. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1377–1401.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Rothbard NP, Phillips KW (2008) Self-disclosure: Beneficial for cohesion in demographically diverse work groups? Res. Managing Groups Teams 11:143–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):229–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ensari N, Miller N (2002) The out-group must not be so bad after all: The effects of disclosure, typicality, and salience on intergroup bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(2):313–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2):175–191. Google Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 33:1–74.Google Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):878–902.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn FJ, Chatman JA, Spataro SE (2001) Getting to know you: The influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):414–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Moskowitz GB (2000) Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(4):708–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Ku G, Wang CS (2005) Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 8(2):109–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson KR, Harari D, Marr JC (2018) When sharing hurts: How and why self-disclosing weakness undermines the task-oriented relationships of higher status disclosers. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 144:25–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Moore DA (2007) Effects of task difficulty on use of advice. J. Behav. Decision Making 20(1):21–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goff PA, Steele CM, Davies PG (2008) The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(1):91–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. 2nd ed. (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hewlin PF (2003) And the award for best actor goes to…: Facades of conformity in organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 28(4):633–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Carley KM, Krackhardt D, Wholey D (2000) Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 81(2):226–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holoien DS (2016) Whites’ desire to affiliate and perceived understanding in interracial interactions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 62:7–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H (1995) Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Acad. Management J. 38(3):673–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jourard SM (1959) Self-disclosure and other-cathexis. J. Abnormal Soc. Psychol. 59(3):428–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jourard SM (1964) The Transparent Self (Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Kaiser CR, Pratt-Hyatt JS (2009) Distributing prejudice unequally: Do Whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(2):432–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kang SK, DeCelles KA, Tilcsik A, Jun S (2016) Whitened resumes: Race and self-presentation in the labor market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):469–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirgios EL, Rai A, Chang EH, Milkman KL (2022) When seeking help, women and racial/ethnic minorities benefit from explicitly stating their identity. Nature Human Behav. 6(3):383–391.Google Scholar
  • Koval CZ, Rosette AS (2020) The natural hair bias in job recruitment. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 12(5):741–750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary K (1999) Passing, posing, and “keeping it real.” Constellations 6(1):85–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary MR, Jongman-Sereno KP, Diebels KJ (2014) The pursuit of status: A self-presentational perspective on the quest for social value. Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Anderson C, eds. The Psychology of Social Status (Springer, New York), 159–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCluney CL, Durkee MI, Smith R, Robotham KJ, Lee SSL (2021) To be, or not to be…Black: The effects of racial codeswitching on perceived professionalism in the workplace. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 97:104199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyerson DE, Scully MA (1995) Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organ. Sci. 6(5):585–600.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milkman KL, Akinola M, Chugh D (2015) What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1678–1712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller N (2002) Personalization and the promise of contact theory. J. Soc. Issues 58(2):387–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mor Barak ME, Cherin DA, Berkman S (1998) Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate. J. Appl. Behvav. Sci. 34(1):82–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nishii LH (2013) The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1754–1774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nishii LH, Mayer DM (2009) Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader-member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. J. Appl. Psych. 94(6):1412–1426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nkomo SM (1992) The emperor has no clothes: Rewriting “race in organizations.” Acad. Management Rev. 17(3):487–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Opie TR, Phillips KW (2015) Hair penalties: The negative influence of Afrocentric hair on ratings of Black women’s dominance and professionalism. Frontiers Psych. 6:1–14.Google Scholar
  • Pearce JL, Randel AE (2004) Expectations of organizational mobility, workplace social inclusion, and employee job performance. J. Organ. Behav. 25(1):81–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled LH, Ledford GE, Mohrman SA (1999) Demographic dissimilarity and workplace inclusion. J. Management Stud. 36(7):1013–1031.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew TF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Rev. Psych. 49:65–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips KW, Rothbard NP, Dumas TL (2009) To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):710–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plant EA (2004) Responses to interracial interactions over time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(11):1458–1471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plaut VC, Garnett FG, Buffardi LE, Sanchez-Burks J (2011) “What about me?” Perceptions of exclusion and whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(2):337–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer JT, Milton LP, Swann WB (2002) Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):296–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Purdie-Vaughns V, Steele CM, Davies PG, Ditlmann R, Crosby JR (2008) Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(4):615–630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramarajan L, Reid E (2013) Shattering the myth of separate worlds: Negotiating nonwork identities at work. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):621–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reis HT, Shaver P (1988) Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Duck S, ed. Handbook of Personal Relationships (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 367–389.Google Scholar
  • Roberson QM (2006) Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group Organ. Management 31(2):212–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts LM (2005) Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):685–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan CS, Hunt JS, Weible JA, Peterson CR, Casas JF (2007) Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 10(4):617–637.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez KL, Kalkstein DA, Walton GM (2021) A threatening opportunity: The prospect of conversations about race-related experiences between Black and White friends. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 122(5):1–20.Google Scholar
  • Shelton JN, Richeson JA (2005) Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(1):91–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shelton JN, West TV, Trail TE (2010a) Concerns about appearing prejudiced: Implications for anxiety during daily interracial interactions. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 13(3):329–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shelton JN, Trail TE, West TV, Bergsieker HB (2010b) From strangers to friends: The interpersonal process model of intimacy in developing interracial friendships. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 27(1):71–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shore LM, Randel AE, Chung BG, Dean MA, Ehrhart KH, Singh G (2011) Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. J. Management 37(4):1262–1289.Google Scholar
  • Stephan WG, Stephan CW (1985) Intergroup anxiety. J. Soc. Issues 41(3):157–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevens FG, Plaut VC, Sanchez-Burks J (2008) Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 44(1):116–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swann WB, Milton LP, Polzer JT (2000) Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(2):238–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swencionis JK, Dupree CH, Fiske ST (2017) Warmth-competence tradeoffs in impression management across race and social-class divides. J. Soc. Issues 73(1):175–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Worchel S, Austin WG, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relation (Hall Publishers, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
  • Todd AR, Bodenhausen GV, Galinsky AD (2012a) Perspective taking combats the denial of intergroup discrimination. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(3):738–745.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todd AR, Galinsky AD, Bodenhausen GV (2012b) Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: Evidence from social memory, behavior explanation, and information solicitation. Soc. Cognition 30(1):94–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trawalter S, Richeson JA (2008) Let’s talk about race, baby! When Whites’ and Blacks’ interracial contact experiences diverge. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44(4):1214–1217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner RN, Hewstone M, Voci A (2007) Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. J. Perspect. Soc. Psych. 93(3):369–388.Google Scholar
  • van Dijk H, Meyer B, van Engen M, Loyd DL (2017) Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):517–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verkuyten M (2005) Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(1):121–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vescio TK, Sechrist GB, Paolucci MP (2003) Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 33(4):455–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vorauer JD, Gagnon A, Sasaki SJ (2009) Salient intergroup ideology and intergroup interaction. Psych. Sci. 20(7):838–845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vorauer JD, Main KJ, O’Connell GB (1998) How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(4):917–937.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vorauer JD, Hunter AJ, Main KJ, Roy SA (2000) Meta-stereotype activation: Evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluative concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in intergroup interaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(4):690–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb TL, Sheeran P (2006) Does changing behavioural intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psych. Bull. 132(2):249–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
  • Wingfield AH (2010) Are some emotions marked “whites only”? Racialized feeling rules in professional workplaces. Soc. Problems 57(2):251–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolsko C, Park B, Judd CM (2006) Considering the Tower of Babel: Correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United States. Soc. Justice Res. 19(3):277–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yaniv I (2004) Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 93(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.