Work (Un)Interrupted: How Non-territorial Space Shapes Worker Control over Social Interaction

References

• Altman I (1975) The Environment and Social Behavior (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA).Google Scholar
• Altmann EM, Trafton JG (2007) Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 14(6):1079–1084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altmann EM, Trafton JG, Hambrick DZ (2014) Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. J. Experiment. Psych. General 143(1):215–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anteby M (2013) Perspective—Relaxing the taboo on telling our own stories: Upholding professional distance and personal involvement. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1277–1290.Link, Google Scholar
• Anteby M, Chan CK (2018) A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: Workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organ. Sci. 29(2):247–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Caza BB, Meister A (2022) My place: How workers become identified with their workplaces and why it matters. Acad. Management Rev. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beane M, Orlikowski WJ (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1553–1573.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109:720–752.Google Scholar
• Becker FD, Gield B, Gaylin K, Sayer S (1983) Office design in a community college effect on work and communication patterns. Environ. Behav. 15(6):699–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar K, Okhuysen GA (2018) Perspective—Discovery within validation logic: Deliberately surfacing, complementing, and substituting abductive reasoning in hypothetico-deductive inquiry. Organ. Sci. 29(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Bennett D (2014) Saving introverts from the soul-destroying open-plan office. Bus. Week, July10.Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein E (2014) The transparency trap. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(10):58–66.Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2017) Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):217–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES, Turban S (2018) The impact of the ‘open’ workspace on human collaboration. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373(1753):20170239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein E, Shore J, Lazer D (2018) How intermittent breaks in interaction improve collective intelligence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(35):8734–8739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolino MC (1999) Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):82–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown G (2009) Claiming a corner at work: Measuring employee territoriality in their workspaces. J. Environ. Psych. 29(1):44–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown G, Robinson SL (2011) Reactions to territorial infringement. Organ. Sci. 22(1):210–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown G, Lawrence TB, Robinson SL (2005) Territoriality in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3):577–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Horton JJ, Ozimek A, Rock D, Sharma G, TuYe HY (2020) COVID-19 and remote work: An early look at US data. NBER Working Paper No. w27344, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byron K, Laurence GA (2015) Diplomas, photos, and tchotchkes as symbolic self-representations: Understanding employees’ individual use of symbols. Acad. Management J. 58(1):298–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carton AM, Aiello JR (2009) Control and anticipation of social interruptions: Reduced stress and improved task performance. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 39(1):169–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Barsade SG, Edmondson AC, Gibson CB, Krackhardt D, Labianca G (2015) The integration of psychological and network perspectives in organizational scholarship. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1162–1176.Link, Google Scholar
• CBRE (2021) 2021 CBRE global occupancy insights. (November), https://www.cbre.com/-/media/a4f858b8d1b647fe83fd1eb43d2e1499.ashx.Google Scholar
• Chown JD, Liu CC (2015) Geography and power in an organizational forum: Evidence from the U.S. Senate chamber. Strategic Management J. 36(2):177–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Kelly EL, O’Connor LT, Williams JC (2014) Redesigning, redefining work. Work Occupations 41(1):3–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, McFarland DA (2013) Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):69–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis MC, Leach DJ, Clegg CW (2011) The physical environment of the office: Contemporary and emerging issues. Internat. Rev. Indust. Organ. Psych. 26(1):193–237.Google Scholar
• De Been I, Beijer M (2014) The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. J. Facilities Management 12(2):142–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD (2003) Relating physical environment to self-categorizations: Identity threat and affirmation in a non-territorial office space. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):622–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Pratt MG (2007) The physical environment in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):181–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Goodwin J (1994) Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6):1411–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Back KW, Schachter S (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finnegan DA (2008) The spatial turn: Geographical approaches in the history of science. J. History Biol. 41:369–388.Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ (2003) How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Management J. 46(5):539–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foroughi CK, Werner NE, Barragán D, Boehm-Davis DA (2015) Interruptions disrupt reading comprehension. J. Experiment. Psych. General 144(3):704–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fried Y (1990) Workspace characteristics, behavioral interferences, and screening ability as joint predictors of employee reactions: An examination of the intensification approach. J. Organ. Behav. 11(4):267–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonsalves L (2020) From face time to flex time: The role of physical space in worker temporal flexibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):1058–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Parker SK (2009) Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 3:317–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Srivastava SB (2014) Bringing agency back into network research: Constrained agency and network action. Borgatti SP, Brass DJ, Halgin DS, Labianca G, Mehra A, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 40 (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK), 1–29.Google Scholar
• Huising R, Silbey SS (2016) Surveillance and regulation of laboratory practices. Felt U, Fouche R, Miller CA, Smith-Doerr L. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 793–822.Google Scholar
• Jett QR, George JM (2003) Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. 28:494–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly E, Moen P (2021) How to keep hybrid work from burning everyone out. Boston Globe (May 30), https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/05/28/opinion/how-keep-hybrid-work-burning-everyone-out/.Google Scholar
• Khazanchi S, Sprinkle TA, Masterson SS, Tong N (2018) A spatial model of work relationships: The relationship-building and relationship-straining effects of workspace design. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):590–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, de Dear R (2013) Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. J. Environ. Psych. 36:18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirmeyer SL (1988) Coping with competing demands: Interruption and the type A pattern. J. Appl. Psych. 73(4):621–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Koopman J, Lanaj K, Scott BA (2016) Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Acad. Management J. 59(2):414–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G, Brass DJ (2006) Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):596–614. 10.2307/20159231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M (2009) How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Swidler A (2014) Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing. Qual. Sociol. 37(2):153–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Meziani N (2020) Making interviews meaningful. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 56(3):370–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laurence GA, Fried Y, Slowik LH (2013) “My space”: A moderated mediation model of the effect of architectural and experienced privacy and workspace personalization on emotional exhaustion at work. J. Environ. Psych. 36:144–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Dover G (2015) Place and institutional work creating housing for the hard-to-house. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):371–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Brand JL (2005) Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. J. Environ. Psych. 25(3):323–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leroy S (2009) Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(2):168–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leroy S, Glomb TM (2018) Tasks interrupted: How anticipating time pressure on resumption of an interrupted task causes attention residue and low performance on interrupting tasks and how a “ready-to- resume” plan mitigates the effects. Organ. Sci. 29:380–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Leroy S, Schmidt AM (2016) The effect of regulatory focus on attention residue and performance during interruptions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137:218–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leroy S, Schmidt A, Madjar N (2020) Interruptions and task transitions: Understanding their characteristics, processes, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):661–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K (2011) Field research practice in management and organization studies: Reclaiming its tradition of discovery. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):613–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K, Feldman MS (2008) Perspective—Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6):907–918.Link, Google Scholar
• Mark G, Gudith D, Klocke U (2008) The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems, 107–110.Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2013) The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1337–1357.Link, Google Scholar
• Metiu A, Rothbard NP (2013) Task bubbles, artifacts, shared emotion, and mutual focus of attention: A comparative study of the microprocesses of group engagement. Organ. Sci. 24(2):455–475.Link, Google Scholar
• Millward LJ, Haslam SA, Postmes T (2007) Putting employees in their place: The impact of hot desking on organizational and team identification. Organ. Sci. 18(4):547–559.Link, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Needleman S (2009) Theory & practice: Office personal space is crowded out—Workstations become smaller to save costs, taking a toll on employee privacy. Wall Street J. (December 7), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703735004574576510304934876.Google Scholar
• Newark DA, Flynn FJ, Bohns VK (2014) Once bitten, twice shy: The effect of a past refusal on expectations of future compliance. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(2):218–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nohria N (2022) The post-pandemic office should be a clubhouse. Wall Street J. (January 8), https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-post-pandemic-office-should-be-a-clubhouse-11641482830.Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Hackman JR (2010) Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. J. Organ. Behav. 31:463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Rotchford NL (1983) Relationships between office characteristics and employee reactions: A study of the physical environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(4):542–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldroyd JB, Morris SS (2012) Catching falling stars: A human resource response to social capital's detrimental effect of information overload on star employees. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):396–418.Google Scholar
• Parigi P, Bergemann P (2016) Strange bedfellows: Informal relationships and political preference formation within boardinghouses, 1825–1841. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(2):501–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park C (2014) The problem with open offices, and a solution by Susan Cain and Steelcase. Forbes (November 3), https://www.forbes.com/sites/christinapark/2014/11/03/the-problem-with-open-offices-and-a-solution-by-susan-cain-and-steelcase.Google Scholar
• Perlow LA (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):57–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlow LA (2012) Sleeping with Your Smartphone: How to Break the 24/7 Habit and Change the Way You Work (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Portes A (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1132–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt MG (2000) The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):456–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raval A, Edgecliffe-Johnson A (2022) Summer is over. Will everyone now go back to the office? Financial Times (September 2), https://www.ft.com/content/1709fb0d-48b6-493a-b649-4c0c6d5ece38.Google Scholar
• Reagans R (2011) Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organ. Sci. 22(4):835–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Reid E (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivera MT, Soderstrom SB, Uzzi B (2010) Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:91–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg P, Campbell K (2014) An open office experiment that actually worked. Harvard Bus. Rev. (October 3), https://hbr.org/2014/10/an-open-office-experiment-that-actually-worked.Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1939) Management and the Worker (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sailer K, McCulloh I (2012) Social networks and spatial configuration—How office layouts drive social interaction. Soc. Networks 34(1):47–58.Google Scholar
• Small ML (2017) Someone to Talk to (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small ML, Adler L (2019) The role of space in the formation of social ties. Annual Rev. Sociol. 45:111–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Speier C, Vessey I, Valacich JS (2003) The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer‐supported decision‐making performance. Decision Sci. 34(4):771–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanko TL, Beckman CM (2015) Watching you watching me: Boundary control and capturing attention in the context of ubiquitous technology use. Acad. Management J. 58(3)712–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephenson KA, Kuismin A, Putnam LL, Sivunen A (2020) Process studies of organizational space. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2): 797–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Sundstrom E, Burt RE, Kamp D (1980) Privacy at work: Architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance. Acad. Management J. 23(1):101–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tasselli S, Kilduff M (2021) Network agency. Acad. Management Ann. 15(1):68–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tavory I, Timmermans S (2014) Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Telford T (2022) Workers are back in offices. Why does it feel so weird? Washington Post (April 19), https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/04/14/back-to-office-awkward-weird.Google Scholar
• Tewfik B, Kundro T, Tetlock P (2018) The help-decliner’s dilemma: How to decline requests for help at work without hurting one’s image. Acad. Management Proc. 2018(1):11364.Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. 2nd ed. (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K (2000) The Psychology of Survey Response (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weigl M, Beck J, Wehler M, Schneider A (2017) Workflow interruptions and stress at work: a mixed-methods study among physicians and nurses of a multidisciplinary emergency department. BMJ Open 7(12):e019074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White L (2021) Working from home? It’s an aberration, says boss of Goldman Sachs. Daily Mail (February 26), https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20210226/281642487896144.Google Scholar
• Wineman J, Hwang Y, Kabo F, Owen-Smith J, Davis GF (2014) Spatial layout, social structure, and innovation in organizations. Environ. Planning B Planning Design 14:1–14.Google Scholar
• Young-Hyman T (2017) Cooperating without co-laboring: How formal organizational power moderates cross-functional interaction in project teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):179–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn ME (2003) Interruptive events and team knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 49(4):514–528.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhong CB, House J (2012) Hawthorne revisited: Organizational implications of the physical work environment. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:3–22.Google Scholar
• Zijlstra FR, Roe RA, Leonora AB, Krediet I (1999) Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 72(2):163–185.Crossref, Google Scholar