Moving Beyond the Minimum Viable Product in Hyper-Constrained Contexts: The Generative Power of Constraints Work

References

• Acar OA, Tarakci M, van Knippenberg D (2019) Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. J. Management 45(1):96–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aerni P (2025) Innovation in times of crisis: A pragmatic and inclusive approach to cope with urgent global sustainability challenges. Frontiers Environ. Econom. 4:1498138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Oehler J, Brem A (2021) Constraint-based thinking: A structured approach for developing frugal innovations. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 68(3):739–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Hadley CN, Kramer SJ (2002) Creativity under the gun. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(8):52–61.Google Scholar
• Baer M, Oldham GR (2006) The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):963–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal PT, Reinecke J, Suddaby R, Langley A (2022) Temporal work: The strategic organization of time. Strategic Organ. 20(1):6–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battistella C, Fornasier A, Pessot E (2023) How can lean tools support the innovation process of SMEs? J. Manufacturing Tech. Management 34(6):1004–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, O’Mahony S (2015) Leveraging comparative field data for theory generation. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods (Routledge, New York), 168–176.Google Scholar
• Bennett M (2020) Coronavirus: “I made a ventilator from a coffee machine.” BBC News (May 26), https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-52677571.Google Scholar
• Beretta M, Obwegeser N, Bauer S (2024) An exploration of hackathons as time intense and collaborative forms of crowdsourcing. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 71:2403–2417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhatti YA, Prime M, Harris M, Wadge H, McQueen J, Patel H, Carter AW, Parston G, Darzi A (2017) The search for the Holy Grail: Frugal innovation in healthcare from low-income or middle-income countries for reverse innovation to developed countries. BMJ Innovations 3(4):212–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicen P, Johnson WHA (2015) Radical innovation with limited resources in high-turbulent markets: The role of lean innovation capability. Creativity Innovation Management 24(2):278–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blomsma F, Bauwens T, Weissbrod I, Kirchherr J (2023) The ‘need for speed’: Towards circular disruption—What it is, how to make it happen and how to know it’s happening. Bus. Strategy Environ. 32(3):1010–1031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):343–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caniëls MCJ, Rietzschel EF (2015) Organizing creativity: Creativity and innovation under constraints. Creativity Innovation Management 24(2):184–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Fabrizio K (2012) How do product users influence corporate invention? Organ. Sci. 23(4):971–987.Link, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H, Tucci CL (2020) The interplay between open innovation and lean startup, or, why large companies are not large versions of startups. Strategic Management Rev. 1(2):277–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cloutier C, Langley A (2020) What makes a process theoretical contribution? Organ. Theory, ePub ahead of print February 13, https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720902473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S (2013) What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations Tech. Governance Globalization 8(3–4):19–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG, Edgett SJ (2005) Lean, Rapid, and Profitable: New Product Development (Product Development Institute, Ancaster, Ontario).Google Scholar
• Cromwell JR (2024) How combinations of constraint affect creativity: A new typology of creative problem solving in organizations. Organ. Psych. Rev. 14(1):3–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D (2016) Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):347–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damadzic A, Winchester C, Medeiros KE, Griffith JA (2022) [Re]thinking outside the box: A meta-analysis of constraints and creative performance. J. Organ. Behav. 43(8):1330–1357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson JF (2014) Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. J. Bus. Psych. 29(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Rond M, Lok J, Marrison A (2022) To catch a predator: The lived experience of extreme practices. Acad. Management J. 65(3):870–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dey PK, Malesios C, De D, Chowdhury S, Abdelaziz FB (2019) Could lean practices and process innovation enhance supply chain sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises? Bus. Strategy Environ. 28(4):582–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Mcmanus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Nembhard IM (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. J. Product Innovation Management 26(2):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard AL (2024) Making time for social innovation: How to interweave clock time and event time in open social innovation to nurture idea generation and social impact. Organ. Sci. 35(3):1131–1156.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman E, Reid EM, Mazmanian M (2020) Signs of our time: Time-use as dedication, performance, identity, and power in contemporary workplaces. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):598–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Tuertscher P, Van de Ven AH (2013) Perspectives on innovation processes. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):775–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gegenhuber T, Mair J (2024) Open social innovation: Taking stock and moving forward. Indust. Innovation 31(1):130–157.Google Scholar
• Geurts A, Geerdink T, Sprenkeling M (2022) Accelerated innovation in crises: The role of collaboration in the development of alternative ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tech. Soc. 68:101923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gkeredakis M, Lifshitz H, Barrett M (2021) Crisis as opportunity, disruption and exposure: Exploring emergent responses to crisis through digital technology. Inform. Organ. 31(1):100344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine Publishing Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K, Locke K (2007) Composing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berry JW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 54(1):73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, O’Mahony S (2017) How does a grand challenge become displaced? Explaining the duality of field mobilization. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1801–1827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen BL, Cohen SL, Bingham CB (2020) Do accelerators work? If so, how? Organ. Sci. 31(2):378–414.Link, Google Scholar
• Hällgren M, Rouleau L, de Rond M (2018) A matter of life or death: How extreme context research matters for management and organization studies. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):111–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanlon WW (2015) Necessity is the mother of invention: Input supplies and directed technical change. Econometrica 83(1):67–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannah ST, Uhl-Bien M, Avolio BJ, Cavarretta FL (2009) A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. Leadership Quart. 20(6):897–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S, Berry JW (2023) Toward a meta-theory of creativity forms: How novelty and usefulness shape creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 48(3):504–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hattis PA (2020) Dr. Lee says COVID-19 patient counts down. Commonwealth Magazine (April 30), https://commonwealthmagazine.org/opinion/dr-lee-says-covid-19-patient-counts-down/.Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig JC, Bauer JC, Laamanen T, Wolff M (2025) Comprehensive versus speed: Investor reactions to due diligence length under varying industry conditions. Strategic Organ., ePub ahead of print September 10, https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270251381148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernes T, Schultz M (2020) Translating the distant into the present: How actors address distant past and future events through situated activity. Organ. Theory, ePub ahead of print February 13, https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719900999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar K, Bahl S, Vaishya R, Vaish A (2020) Challenges and solutions in meeting up the urgent requirement of ventilators for COVID-19 patients. DiabetesMetabolic Syndrome 14(4):499–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung OS, Satterstrom P, Singer SJ (2024a) Engaging interdisciplinary innovation teams in federally qualified health centers. Medical Care Res. Rev. 81(5):370–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung OS, Kyle MA, McCree P, Nadel HM (2024b) Patient-centered innovation: Involving patients in open social innovation. Medical Care 62(5):314–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karp R (2023) Gaining organizational adoption: Strategically pacing the position of digital innovations. Acad. Management J. 66(3):773–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan R (2016) How frugal innovation promotes social sustainability. Sustainability 8(10):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knapp J, Zeratsky J, Kowitz B (2016) Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days (Simon & Schuster, Inc, New York).Google Scholar
• Kolev KD, Dykes BJ, Kang S, Hughes-Morgan M, Ferrier WJ (2025) Fast or slow? A meta-analysis on the performance implications of decision, implementation, and response speed. J. Management Sci. Rep. 3(1):40–67.Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Webster DM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.” Psych. Rev. 103(2):263–283.Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management J. 56(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):760–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz H, Lebovitz S, Zalmanson L (2021) Minimal and adaptive coordination: How hackathons’ projects accelerate innovation without killing it. Acad. Management J. 64(3):684–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Bryan JF (1969) The directing function of goals in task performance. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 4(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mair J, Gegenhuber T (2021) Open social innovation. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 19(4):26–33.Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Lyytinen K (2021) Socio-technical affordances for large-scale collaborations: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 32(5):1371–1390.Link, Google Scholar
• Mannucci PV (2017) Drawing snow white and animating buzz lightyear: Technological toolkit characteristics and creativity in cross-disciplinary teams. Organ. Sci. 28(4):711–728.Google Scholar
• Marešová P, Klímová B, Honegr J, Kuča K, Ibrahim WNH, Selamat A (2020) Medical device development process, and associated risks and legislative aspects—Systematic review. Frontiers Public Health 8:308–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mariani M, Dwivedi YK (2024) Generative artificial intelligence in innovation management: A preview of future research developments. J. Bus. Res. 175:114542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massachusetts General Hospital (2020) Q&A with the co-director of the CoVent-19 challenge. Accessed May 13, 2022, https://www.massgeneral.org/anesthesia/news/covent-challenge.Google Scholar
• Meidute-Kavaliauskiene I, Cebeci HI, Ghorbani S, Činčikaitė R (2021) An integrated approach for evaluating lean innovation practices in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Logistics 5(4):74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Erez M, Naveh E (2011a) The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Acad. Management J. 54(4):740–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Gino F, Argote L (2011b) Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):229–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Emich KJ, Argote L, Smith WK (2022) Conceiving opposites together: Cultivating paradoxical frames and epistemic motivation fosters team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 171:104153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Ingram A, Keller J, Smith WK, Lewis MW (2018) Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Acad. Management J. 61(1):26–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monsell S, Sumner P, Waters H (2003) Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory Cognition 31(3):327–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicoletti B (2015) Optimizing innovation with the lean and digitize innovation process. Tech. Innovation Management Rev. 5(3):29–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2009) Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organ. Stud. 30(12):1391–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D, Korica M (2021) Attentional engagement as practice: A study of the attentional infrastructure of healthcare chief executive officers. Organ. Sci. 32(5):1273–1299.Link, Google Scholar
• Ohly S, Fritz C (2010) Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. J. Organ. Behav. 31(4):543–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olsen D (2015) The Lean Product Playbook (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onsongo EK, Knorringa P (2025) Comparing frugality and inclusion in innovation for development: Logic, process and outcome. Innovation Development 15(3):621–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2021) Liminal innovation in practice: Understanding the reconfiguration of digital work in crisis. Inform. Organ. 31(1):100336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2002) It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organ. Sci. 13(6):684–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Decision weaving: Forming novel, complex strategy in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Management J. 41(12):2275–2314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Hannah DP (2024) On the origin of entrepreneurial theories: How entrepreneurs craft complex causal models with theorizing and data. Strategy Sci. 9(4):461–482.Google Scholar
• Pacheco JN, Turro A, Urbano D (2025) Open social innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Tech. Forecasting Social Change 216:124160.Google Scholar
• Perlow LA (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):57–81.Google Scholar
• Peterson DR, Barrett JD, Hester KS, Robledo IC, Hougen DF, Day EA, Mumford MD (2013) Teaching people to manage constraints: Effects on creative problem-solving. Creativity Res. J. 25(3):335–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinkse J, Demirel P, Marino A (2024) Unlocking innovation for net zero: Constraints, enablers, and firm-level transition strategies. Industry Innovation 31(1):16–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisoni A, Michelini L, Martignoni G (2018) Frugal approach to innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. J. Cleaner Production 171:107–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prabhu J (2017) Frugal innovation: Doing more with less for more. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A Math. Physical Engrg. Sci. 375:20160372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK (2012) Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. J. Product Innovation Management 29(1):6–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radjou N, Prabhu J (2015) Frugal Innovation: How to Do More with Less (The Economist, London).Google Scholar
• Rietzschel EF, Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2014) Effects of problem scope and creativity instructions on idea generation and selection. Creativity Res. J. 26(2):185–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberson T, Bornstein S, Liivoja R, Ng S, Scholz J, Devitt K (2022) A method for ethical AI in defence: A case study on developing trustworthy autonomous systems. J. Responsible Tech. 11:100036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosso BD (2014) Creativity and constraints: Exploring the role of constraints in the creative processes of research and development teams. Organ. Stud. 35(4):551–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouse ED (2025) We’re not in Kansas anymore: Pragmatic adaptation in large-scale creative projects with underspecified product concepts. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print December 22, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.0418.Google Scholar
• Roy D (1959) “Banana time”: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organ. 18(4):158–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schad J, Lewis MW, Raisch S, Smith WK (2016) Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz M, Hernes T (2013) A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organ. Sci. 24(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Sehested C, Sonnenberg H (2010) Lean Innovation: A Fast Path from Knowledge to Value (Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg, Germany).Google Scholar
• Shalley CE (1991) Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 76(2):179–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management 30(6):933–958.Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2022) Both/And Thinking: Embracing Creative Tensions to Solve Your Toughest Problems (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S (2014) How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Acad. Management J. 57(3):814–848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolkamp G, Verwaeren B, Vriend T, Riekhoff A-J, Nijstad B (2025) Creativity as it unfolds: An examination of temporality in the creative process. Creativity Res. J. 37(1):22–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Lakhani KR, Lifshitz H (2012) Open innovation and organization design. J. Organ. Design 1(1):24–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ukbaeva Z, Wöllner T, Bican PM (2025) Constraint-based thinking and the early stages of the new product development process. Acad. Management Proc. 2025(1):12725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Polley D, Garud R, Venkataraman S (1999) The Innovation Journey (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• van Maanen J, ed. (1998) Qualitative Studies of Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (2017) Free Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Von Krogh G, Kucukkeles B, Ben-Menahem SM (2020) Lessons in rapid innovation from the COVID-19 pandemic. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 61(4):8–10.Google Scholar
• Walsh I, Holton JA, Bailyn L, Fernandez W, Levina N, Glaser B (2015) What grounded theory is … a critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organ. Res. Methods 18(4):581–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss M, Hoegl M, Gibbert M (2017) How does material resource adequacy affect innovation project performance? A meta-analysis. J. Product Innovation Management 34(6):842–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welo T, Olsen TO, Gudem M (2012) Enhancing product innovation through a customer-centered, lean framework. Internat. J. Innovation Tech. Management 09(06):1250041.Google Scholar
• Wilson M (2020) This $2,500 ventilator is a master class in designing for the COVID-19 era. Fast Company (July 2), https://www.fastcompany.com/90523017/this-2500-ventilator-is-a-masterclass-in-designing-for-the-covid-19-era.Google Scholar
• Winch GM, Cao D, Maytorena-Sanchez E, Pinto J, Sergeeva N, Zhang S (2021) Operation Warp Speed: Projects responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Project Leadership Soc. 2:100019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yakura EK (2002) Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. Acad. Management J. 45(5):956–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (1994) Case Study Research Design and Methods (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zerubavel E (1981) Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar