Coordination in Dynamic Teams: Investigating a Learning–Productivity Trade-Off

References

• Alaraj A, Hussein AE, Esfahani DR, Amin-Hanjani S, Aletich VA, Charbel FT (2017) Reducing length of stay in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A three year institutional experience. J. Clinical Neurosci. 42:66–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG (1990) Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Acad. Management J. 33(2):334–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Bresman H (2007) X-Teams: How to Build Teams That Lead, Innovate, and Succeed (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1988) Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Organ. Stud. 13(4):468–494.Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):634–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Bresman H, Kaeufer K (2002) The comparative advantage of X-teams. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 43(3):33–39.Google Scholar
• Andersen TJ (2015) Interactive strategy-making: Combining central reasoning with ongoing learning from decentralised responses. J. General Management 40(4):69–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JR (1993) Knowledge representation. Anderson JR, ed. Rules of the Mind (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ), 17–44.Google Scholar
• Argote L (2013) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Ayaad O, Alloubani A, ALhajaa EA, Farhan M, Abuseif S, Al Hroub A, Akhu-Zaheya L (2019) The role of electronic medical records in improving the quality of healthcare services: Comparative study. Internat. J. Medical Inform. 127:63–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1971) Social Learning Theory (General Learning Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bernstein E, Leonardi PM, Mortensen M (2018) Unbounded attention: The benefits of an attention-based lens on work relationships. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Bersin J, Zao-Sanders M (2019) Making learning a part of everyday work. Harvard Bus. Rev. (February 19), https://hbr.org/2019/02/making-learning-a-part-of-everyday-work.Google Scholar
• Bollen KA (2005) Structural Equation Models (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Bonafide CP, Localio AR, Stemler S, Ahumada L, Dewan M, Ely E, Keren R (2018) Safety huddle intervention for reducing physiologic monitor alarms: A hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized trial. J. Hospital Med. 13(9):609–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bransby DP, Mayo AT, Cronin MA, Park K, Yuan CT (2023) A systematic review of respect between acute care nurses and physicians. Health Care Management Rev. 48(3):237–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresman H (2010) External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organ. Sci. 21(1):81–96.Link, Google Scholar
• Bresman H, Zellmer-Bruhn M (2013) The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1120–1139.Link, Google Scholar
• Browne WJ, Goldstein H, Rasbash J (2001) Multiple membership multiple classification (MMMC) models. Statist. Model. 1(2):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capelli P (2020) Stop overengineering people management: The trend toward optimization in disempowering employees. Harvard Bus. Rev. (September–October), https://hbr.org/2020/09/stop-overengineering-people-management.Google Scholar
• Chidambaram L, Summers J, Miranda S, Young A, Bostrom RP (2021) Time, technology, and teams: From GSS to collective action. Kilgour DM, Eden C, eds. Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 1–22.Google Scholar
• Chisholm-Burns MA, Kim Lee J, Spivey CA, Slack M, Herrier RN, Hall-Lipsy E, Graff Zivin J, et al. (2010) US pharmacists’ effect as team members on patient care. Medical Care 48(10):923–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho K, Schunn CD (2007) Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Comput. Ed. 48(3):409–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JN (2002) External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Res. 33(2):181–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chreim S, Langley A, Comeau-Vallée M, Huq JL, Reay T (2013) Leadership as boundary work in healthcare teams. Leadership 9(2):201–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1988) The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Acad. Management Rev. 13(3):471–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2005) Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35(5):703–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings J, Pletcher C (2011) Why project networks beat project teams. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 52(52307):75–83.Google Scholar
• Dean BP (2021) Multiteam systems as integrated networks for engaging ambidexterity as dynamic capabilities. Internat. J. Organ. Theory Behav. 24(4):300–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AA, Cleland JA, Johnston P, Ker JS, Lough M, Rees CE (2014) Exploring stakeholders’ views of medical education research priorities: A national survey. Medical Ed. 48(11):1078–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, Zheng J, Rao SR, Shields AE, Donelan K, Rosenbaum S, Bristol SJ, Jha AK (2010) Electronic health records’ limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Affairs 29(4):639–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta B, Hwang HG (2020) The adoption of electronic medical record by physicians: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 99(8):e19290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (1996) Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 32(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2012) Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Harvey JF (2018) Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Hum. Resource Management Rev. 28(4):347–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Nembhard IM (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. J. Production Innovation Management 26(2):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS (2007) Three perspectives on team learning. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):269–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericksen J, Dyer L (2004) Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):438–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ervin JN, Kahn JM, Cohen TR, Weingart LR (2018) Teamwork in the intensive care unit. Amer. Psych. 73(4):468–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Franklin BJ, Gandhi TK, Bates DW, Huancahuari N, Morris CA, Pearson M, Bass MB, Goralnick E (2020) Impact of multidisciplinary team huddles on patient safety: A systematic review and proposed taxonomy. BMJ Quality Safety 29(10):844–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia AJ, Mollaoglu S, Frank KA, Duva M, Zhao D (2021) Emergence and evolution of network structures in complex interorganizational project teams. J. Management Engrg. 37(5):04021056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginnett RC (2010) Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership. Kanki B, Helmreich R, Anca J, eds. Crew Resource Management (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 79–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Manz CC (2011) Linking cognition and behavior: A script processing interpretation of vicarious learning. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3):527–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grippa F, Bucuvalas J, Booth A, Alessandrini E, Fronzetti Colladon A, Wade LM (2018) Measuring information exchange and brokerage capacity of healthcare teams. Management Decision 56(10):2239–2251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross PA, Cataruozolo P, DeMauro P, Eason P, Elliot M, Wallenstein S (1997) Severity adjustment for length of stay: Is it always necessary? Clinical Performance Quality Health Care 5(4):169–172.Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Woolley AW (2018) Productivity in an era of multi-teaming. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interaction (ACM, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. Lorsch J, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (2003) Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. J. Organ. Behav. 24(8):905–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (2011) Collaborative Intelligence (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Wageman R (2005) A theory of team coaching. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):269–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeussler C, Sauermann H (2020) Division of labor in collaborative knowledge production: The role of team size and interdisciplinarity. Res. Policy 49(6):103987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall P (2005) Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. J. Interprofessional Care 19(Suppl 1):188–196.Google Scholar
• Harvey JF, Bresman H, Edmondson AC, Pisano GP (2022) A strategic view of team learning in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 16(2):476–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG (2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(4):435–449.Link, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck JR, Ellis APJ, Humphrey SE, Garza AS, Ilgen DR (2011) Asymmetry in structural adaptation: The differential impact of centralizing vs. decentralizing team decision-making structures. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 114(1):64–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• House RJ, Rousseau DM, Thomas-Hunt M (1995) The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 17:71–114.Google Scholar
• Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 2(1):88–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Hughes AM, Gregory ME, Joseph DL, Sonesh SC, Marlow SL, Lacerenza CN, Benishek LE, King HB, Salas E (2016) Saving lives: A meta-analysis of team training in healthcare. J. Appl. Psych. 101(9):1266–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey SE, Aime F (2014) Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):443–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey SE, Morgeson FP, Mannor MJ (2009) Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 94(1):48–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inhelder B, Piaget J, eds. (1958) The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Google Scholar
• Jain AL, Jones KC, Simon J, Patterson MD (2015) The impact of a daily pre-operative surgical huddle on interruptions, delays, and surgeon satisfaction in an orthopedic operating room: A prospective study. Patient Safety Surgery 9(1):8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT (1975) Learning Together and Alone: Cooperation, Competition, and Individualization (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Joshi V, Lim C, Teng SG (2016) Simulation study: Improvement for non-urgent patient processes in the emergency department. Engrg. Management J. 28(3):145–157.Google Scholar
• Kahn JM, Goss CH, Heagerty PJ, Kramer AA, O’Brien CR, Rubenfeld GD (2006) Hospital volume and the outcomes of mechanical ventilation. New England J. Medicine 355(1):41–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny DA (2020) Measuring model fit. Retrieved July 19, 2023, http://www.davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm.Google Scholar
• Kerrissey MJ, Singer SJ (2020) Leading frontline Covid-19 teams: Research-informed strategies. NEJM Catalyst (May 11), https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/CAT.20.0192.Google Scholar
• Kerrissey MJ, Novikov Z, Tietschert M, Phillips R, Singer SJ (2023) The ambiguity of “we”: Perceptions of teaming in dynamic environments and their implications. Soc. Sci. Medicine 320:115678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Cummings JN (2002) What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. Hinds P, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick K, Paquette L, Jabbour M, Tchouaket E, Fernandez N, Al Hakim G, Landry V, Gauthier N, Beaulieu MD, Dubois CA (2020) Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams. PLoS One 15(6):e0234416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW (2020) Halos and egos: Rankings and interspecialty deference in multispecialty U.S. Hospitals. Management Sci. 66(5):2248–2268.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Song H, Valentine MA (2023) Learning in temporary teams: The varying effects of partner exposure by team member role. Organ. Sci. 34(1):433–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos KC, Bozionelos N (2011) Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group Organ. Management 36(3):385–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Lindberg K, Mørk BE, Nicolini D, Raviola E, Walter L (2019) Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):704–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson LE, Harris-Watson A, Carter D, Asencio R, DeChurch L, Kanfer R, Zaccaro SJ (2023) Staying apart to work better together: Team structure in cross-functional teams. Acad. Management Discoveries 9(3):320–338.Google Scholar
• Lee MY, Edmondson AC (2017) Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:35–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H, Lebovitz S, Zalmanson L (2021) Minimal and adaptive coordination: How hackathons’ projects accelerate innovation without killing it. Acad. Management J. 64(3):684–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long Y, Siau K (2007) Social network structures in open source software development teams. J. Database Management 18(2):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu M, Sajobi T, Lucyk K, Lorenzetti D, Quan H (2015) Systematic review of risk adjustment models of hospital length of stay (LOS). Medical Care 53(4):355–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa SL, Hollingshead AB (2007) Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. 18(1):147–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Maloney MM, Shah PP, Zellmer-Bruhn M, Jones SL (2019) The lasting benefits of teams: Tie vitality after teams disband. Organ. Sci. 30(2):260–279.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York).Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Zaccaro SJ, Mathieu JE (2000) Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. J. Appl. Psych. 85(6):971–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Rapp TL (2009) Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. J. Appl. Psych. 94(1):90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo AT (2022) Syncing up: A process model of emergent interdependence in dynamic teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(3):821–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo AT, Woolley AW (2021) Variance in group ability to transform resources into performance, and the role of coordinated attention. Acad. Management Discoveries 7(2):225–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McBeth CL, Durbin-Johnson B, Siegel EO (2017) Interprofessional huddle: One children’s hospital’s approach to improving patient flow. Pediatric Nursing 43(2):71–76.Google Scholar
• McGrath JL, Argote L (2004) Group processes in organizational contexts. Hogg MA, Tindale RS, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA), 603–627.Google Scholar
• Meier N (2015) Collaboration in healthcare through boundary work and boundary objects. Qualitative Sociol. Rev. 11(3):60–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michaelsen L, Sweet M (2011) Team-based learning. New Directions Teaching Learn. 2011(128):41–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M, Haas MR (2018) Rethinking teams: From bounded membership to dynamic participation. Organ. Sci. 29(2):341–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Murphy V (2023) Daily huddle best practice: An evidence-based guide. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nursing 20(5):513–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musaji S, Schulze WS, De Castro JO (2020) How long does it take to get to the learning curve? Acad. Management J. 63(1):205–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers CG (2018) Coactive vicarious learning: Toward a relational theory of vicarious learning in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):610–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers CG (2021) Performance benefits of reciprocal vicarious learning in teams. Acad. Management J. 64(3):926–947.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers CG (2022) Storytelling as a tool for vicarious learning among air medical transport crews. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):378–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2015) Enhancing the effectiveness of Team Science (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Nemanich LA, Keller RT, Vera D, Chin WW (2010) Absorptive capacity in R&D project teams: A conceptualization and empirical test. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 57(4):674–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nembhard IM, Tucker AL (2011) Deliberate learning to improve performance in dynamic service settings: Evidence from hospital intensive care units. Organ. Sci. 22(4):907–922.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Mortensen M, Woolley AW (2011) Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):461–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Woolley AW, Mortensen M (2012) Multiteam membership in relation to multiteam systems. Zaccaro SJ, Marks MA, DeChurch LA, eds. Multiteam Systems: An Organization Form for Dynamic and Complex Environments (Routledge, New York), 141–172.Google Scholar
• Pannick S, Athanasiou T, Long SJ, Beveridge I, Sevdalis N (2017) Translating staff experience into organisational improvement: The HEADS-UP stepped wedge, cluster controlled, non-randomised trial. BMJ Open 7(7):e014333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollack CE, Lemke KW, Roberts E, Weiner JP (2015) Patient sharing and quality of care: Measuring outcomes of care coordination using claims data. Medical Care 53(4):317–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz R, Farnan J, Hulland O, Kearns L, Long M, Monash B, Bhansali P, Fromme HB (2016) Rounds today: A qualitative study of internal medicine and pediatrics resident perceptions. J. Graduate Medical Ed. 8(4):523–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Silvestri L, Gulati R (2020) The role of interdependence in the microfoundations of organization design: Task, goal, and knowledge interdependence. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):828–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Riedl C, Woolley AW (2017) Teams vs. crowds: Incentives, member ability, and collective intelligence in temporary online team organizations. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(4):382–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rishani M, Schouten ME, Hoever IJ (2024) Navigating multiple team membership: A review and redirection of its influence on effectiveness outcomes. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 18(1):e12899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodriguez HP, Meredith LS, Hamilton AB, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV (2015) Huddle up! The adoption and use of structured team communication for VA medical home implementation. Health Care Management Rev. 40(4):286–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Statist. Software 48(2):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowan BL, Anjara S, De Brún A, MacDonald S, Kearns EC, Marnane M, McAuliffe E (2022) The impact of huddles on a multidisciplinary healthcare teams’ work engagement, teamwork and job satisfaction: A systematic review. Eval. Clinical Practice 28(3):382–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin S, McDermott C (2003) The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sci. 34(4):707–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh U (2020) Improving patient safety and team communication through daily huddles (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD). Retrieved January 29, 2020, https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/improving-patient-safety-and-team-communication-through-daily-huddles.Google Scholar
• Siachou E, Gkorezis P (2014) Do empowered employees absorb knowledge? An empirical investigation of the effects of psychological empowerment dimensions on absorptive capacity. Management Res. Rev. 37(2):130–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer SJ, Edmondson AC (2008) When learning and performance are at odds: Confronting the tension. Kumar P, Ramsey P, eds. Learning and Performance Matter (World Scientific, Singapore), 33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobrero M, Roberts EB (2001) The trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development. Management Sci. 47(4):493–511.Link, Google Scholar
• Stouten J, Rousseau DM, De Cremer D (2018) Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Acad. Management Annals 12(2):752–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum SI, Mathieu JE, Salas E, Cohen D (2012) Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Indust. Organ. Psych. 5(1):2–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw Hill, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
• Thorndike EL (1898) Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psych. Rev. Monograph Supplements 2(4):i–109.Google Scholar
• Tian AW, Soo C (2018) Enriching individual absorptive capacity. Personnel Rev. 47(5):1116–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Traylor AM, Tannenbaum SI, Thomas EJ, Salas E (2021) Helping healthcare teams save lives during COVID-19: Insights and countermeasures from team science. Amer. Psych. 76(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Rev. 45(2):55–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentine MA (2018) When equity seems unfair: The role of justice enforceability in temporary team coordination. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2081–2105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentine MA, Edmondson AC (2015) Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organ. Sci. 26(2):405–422.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Tang C (2024) When does external knowledge benefit team creativity? The role of internal team network structure and task complexity. Organ. Sci. 35(1):92–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Volberda HW, Foss NJ, Lyles MA (2010) Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. 21(4):931–951.Link, Google Scholar
• Wageman R (2001) The meaning of interdependence. Turner ME, ed. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 197–217.Google Scholar
• Wageman R, Gordon FM (2005) As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organ. Sci. 16(6):687–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Wageman R, Gardner H, Mortensen M (2012) The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research. J. Organ. Behav. 33(3):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh MM, Anderson JR (2012) Learning from experience: Event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36(8):1870–1884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GM (2014) The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 23(1):73–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GM, Wilson TD (2018) Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psych. Rev. 125(5):617–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weidmann B, Deming DJ (2021) Team players: How social skills improve team performance. Econometrica 89(6):2637–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiese CW, Burke CS, Tang Y, Hernandez C, Howell R (2022) Team learning behaviors and performance: A meta-analysis of direct effects and moderators. Group Organ. Management 47(3):571–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson JM, Goodman PS, Cronin MA (2007) Group learning. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1041–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wong SS (2004) Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organ. Sci. 15(6):645–656.Link, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW (2009) Putting first things first: Outcome and process focus in knowledge work teams. J. Organ. Behav. 30(3):427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Aggarwal I (2020) Collective intelligence and group learning. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, London), 491–506.Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Bear JB, Chang JW, DeCostanza AH (2013) The effects of team strategic orientation on team process and information search. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(2):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chow RM, Mayo AT, Riedl C, Chang JW (2023) Collective attention and collective intelligence: The role of hierarchy and team gender composition. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1315–1331.Link, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Gerbasi ME, Chabris CF, Kosslyn SM, Hackman JR (2008) Bringing in the experts: How team composition and work strategy jointly shape analytic effectiveness. Small Group Res. 39(3):352–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager S, Johnson RT, Johnson DW, Snider B (1986) The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups. J. Soc. Psych. 126(3):389–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Parker RMA, Charlton CMJ, Leckie G, Browne WJ (2016) R2MLwiN: A program to run MLwiN from within R. J. Statist. Software 72(10):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziegert JC, Knight AP, Resick CJ, Graham KA (2022) Addressing performance tensions in multiteam systems: Balancing informal mechanisms of coordination within and between teams. Acad. Management J. 65(1):158–185.Crossref, Google Scholar