Path Coherence and Disruption in Routine Dynamics

References

• Adams J, Faust K, Lovasi GS (2012) Capturing context: Integrating spatial and social network analyses. Soc. Networks 34(1):1–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler-Milstein J, Adelman JS, Tai-Seale M, Patel VL, Dymek C (2020) EHR audit logs: S new goldmine for health services research? J. Biomedical Inform. 101:103343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alter S (2014) Theory of workarounds. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 34(55):1041–1066.Google Scholar
• Avgerou C (2019) Contextual explanation: Alternative approaches and persistent challenges. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(3):977–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azadegan A, Dooley K (2021) A typology of supply network resilience strategies: Complex collaborations in a complex world. J. Supply Chain Management 57(1):17–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartelheimer C, Wolf V, Beverungen D (2023) Workarounds as generative mechanisms for bottom‐up process innovation—Insights from a multiple case study. Inform. Systems J. 33(5):1085–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beane M (2019) Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):87–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corp. Change 13(4):643–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC, Lazaric N, Nelson RR, Winter SG (2005) Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):775–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, King JL (2016) Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organ. Sci. 27(3):551–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Birnholtz JP, Cohen MD, Hoch SV (2007) Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. 18(2):315–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Blanche C, Feldman MS (2021) Bodies and routine dynamics. Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Dittrich K, Rerup C, Seidl D, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 343–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis (Wiley, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Burke K (1962) A Grammar of Motives, and a Rhetoric of Motives (Meridian, Cleveland, OH).Google Scholar
• Chao C-A (2016) The impact of electronic health records on collaborative work routines: A narrative network analysis. Internat. J. Medical Informatics 94:100–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Raynor ME, McDonald R (2015) What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(12):44–53.Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Anthony SD, Berstell G, Nitterhouse D (2007) Finding the right job for your product. MIT Sloan Management Review (April 1), https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/finding-the-right-job-for-your-product/.Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L, Warglien M, Winter S (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Indust. Corp. Change 5(3):653–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R, March J (1963) Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• D’Adderio L (2011) Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. J. Institutional. Econom. 7(2):197–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danner-Schröder A, Ostermann SM (2022) Toward a processual understanding of task complexity: Constructing task complexity in practice. Organ. Stud. 43(3):437–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JA (1970) Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 35(5):843–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Benedictis L, Vitale MP, Wasserman S (2015) Examining the literature on “networks in space and in time.” An introduction. Network Sci. 3(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Bleser L, Depreitere R, Waele KD, Vanhaecht K, Vlayen J, Sermeus W (2006) Defining pathways. J. Nursing Management 14(7):553–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2):121–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2016) Routines as process: Past, present, and future. Howard-Grenville J, Rerup C, Langly A, Tsoukas H, eds. Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Lazaric N (2016) Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):505–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Dittrich K, Rerup C, Seidl D (2021) What is routine dynamics? Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Dittrich K, Rerup C, Seidl D, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Følstad A, Kvale K (2018) Customer journeys: A systematic literature review. J. Service Theory Practice 28(2):196–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA, Maroulis SJ, Duong MQ, Kelcey BM (2013) What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Ed. Eval. Policy Anal. 35(4):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA, Lin Q, Xu R, Maroulis S, Mueller A (2023) Quantifying the robustness of causal inferences: Sensitivity analysis for pragmatic social science. Soc. Sci. Res. 110:102815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh KT, Pentland BT (2019) From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1901–1929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh JM, Gao G, Agarwal R (2011) Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):565–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Grote G, Weichbrodt JC, Günter H, Zala-Mezö E, Künzle B (2009) Coordination in high-risk organizations: The need for flexible routines. Cognition Tech Work 11(1):17–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hägerstraand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Papers Regional Sci. 24(1):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammond KR (2000) Coherence and correspondence theories in judgment and decision making. Connolly T, Arkes HR, Hammond KR, eds. Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York), 53–65.Google Scholar
• Hansson M, Hærem T, Pentland BT (2023) The effect of repertoire, routinization and enacted complexity: Explaining task performance through patterns of action. Organ. Stud. 44(3):473–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes GR, Lee CP, Dourish P (2011) Organizational routines, innovation, and flexibility: The application of narrative networks to dynamic workflow. Internat. J. Medical Informatics 80(8):e161–e177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidenstrøm N, Kvarnlöf L (2018) Coping with blackouts: A practice theory approach to household preparedness. J. Contingencies Crisis Management 26(2):272–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoff PD (2005) Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100(469):286–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoff PD (2009) Multiplicative latent factor models for description and prediction of social networks. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 15(4):261–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1977) A dynamic model for social networks. J. Math. Sociol. 5(1):5–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied Logistic Regression (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. 16(6):618–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Amburgey TL (1991) Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Acad. Management J. 34(3):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Chen Y-S, Linderman K (2015) Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective. J. Oper. Management 33:43–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klijn EL, Mannhardt F, Fahland D (2022) Aggregating event knowledge graphs for task analysis. Montali M, Senderovich A, Weidlich M, eds. Internat. Conf. Process Mining (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 493–505.Google Scholar
• Kremser W, Geiger D (2024) Granularity matters! Toward a methodological framework for understanding routine dynamics. Mahringer CA, Pentland BT, Renzl B, Sele K, Spee P, eds. Routine Dynamics: Organizing for a World in Flux, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 88 (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Sablynski CJ (1999) Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. J. Vocational Behav. 55(2):161–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BY, McGlone SM, Song Y, Avery TR, Eubank S, Chang C-C, Bailey RR, Wagener DK, Burke DS, Platt R (2011) Social network analysis of patient sharing among hospitals in Orange County, California. Amer. J. Public Health 101(4):707–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney J, Schensul D (2006) Historical context and path dependence. Goodin RE, Tilly C, eds. Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 454–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClean ST, Koopman J, Yim J, Klotz AC (2021) Stumbling out of the gate: The energy‐based implications of morning routine disruption. Personality Psych. 74(3):411–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merz E, Saberski E, Gilarranz LJ, Isles PD, Sugihara G, Berger C, Pomati F (2023) Disruption of ecological networks in lakes by climate change and nutrient fluctuations. Nature Climate Change 13(4):389–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minhas S, Hoff PD, Ward MD (2016) A new approach to analyzing coevolving longitudinal networks in international relations. J. Peace Res. 53(3):491–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery AL, Li S, Srinivasan K, Liechty JC (2004) Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Sci. 23(4):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Mitchell TR, Liu D (2015) Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Acad. Management Rev. 40(4):515–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narvaiz S, Lin Q, Rosenberg JM, Frank KA, Maroulis SJ, Wang W, Xu R (2024) KONFOUND: An R sensitivity analysis package to quantify the robustness of causal inferences. J. Open Source Software 9(95):5779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Page SE (2006) Path dependence. Quart. J. Political Sci. 1(1):87–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parreira MR, Machado KB, Logares R, Diniz-Filho JAF, Nabout JC (2017) The roles of geographic distance and socioeconomic factors on international collaboration among ecologists. Scientometrics 113:1539–1550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2005) Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change 14(5):793–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Feldman MS (2007) Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):781–795.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Kim I (2021) Narrative networks in routine dynamics. Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Dittrich D, Rerup C, Seidl D, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Recker J, Wyner G (2017) Rediscovering handoffs. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(3):284–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Vaast E, Wolf JR (2021) Theorizing process dynamics with directed graphs: A diachronic analysis of digital trace data. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(2):967–984s.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Yoo Y, Recker J, Kim I (2022) From lock-in to transformation: A path-centric theory of emerging technology and organizing. Organ. Sci. 33(1):194–211.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Mahringer CA, Dittrich K, Feldman MS, Wolf JR (2020) Process multiplicity and process dynamics: Weaving the space of possible paths. Organ. Theory 1(3):1–21.Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM (2012) Context and action in the transformation of the firm: A reprise. J. Management Stud. 49(7):1304–1328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole MS, Lambert N, Murase T, Asencio R, McDonald J (2017) Sequential analysis of processes. Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies (SAGE, London), 254–270.Google Scholar
• Reijneveld JC, Ponten SC, Berendse HW, Stam CJ (2007) The application of graph theoretical analysis to complex networks in the brain. Clinical Neurophysiology 118(11):2317–2331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards M, Anderson M, Carter P, Ebert BL, Mossialos E (2020) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care. Nature Cancer 1(6):565–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosemann M, Recker JC, Flender C (2008) Contextualisation of business processes. Internat. J. Bus. Process Integration Management 3(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothenberg R, Muth SQ, Malone S, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE (2005) Social and geographic distance in HIV risk. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 32(8):506–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sailer K (2021) Routine action networks: An architectural study of spatial layouts and performativity in outpatient clinics. Soc. Networks 77:17–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schatzki TR (2002) The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change (Penn State University Press, State College, PA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schegloff E (2000) On granularity. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26(1):715–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulz M (2008) Staying on track: A voyage to the internal mechanisms of routine reproduction. Becker MC, ed. Handbook of Organizational Routines (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 228–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York), 82–85.Google Scholar
• Sergeeva AV, Faraj S, Huysman M (2020) Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1248–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Su NM, Brdiczka O, Begole B (2013) The routineness of routines: Measuring rhythms of media interaction. Human Comput. Interactions 28(4):287–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman LA (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):689–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2020) On the theory of organizational path dependence: Clarifications, replies to objections, and extensions. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):717–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Rumelt R, Dosi G, Winter S (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 23(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Aalst W, van Hee KM (2004) Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Vogus TJ, Sutcliffe KM (2007) Organizational resilience: Toward a theory and research agenda. 2007 IEEE Internat. Conf. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3418–3422.Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, vol. 8 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webber CL, Marwan N, eds. (2015) Recurrence Quantification Analysis: Theory and Best Practices (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood W, Tam L, Witt MG (2005) Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(6):918–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright RE (1995) Logistic regression. Grimm LG, Yarnold PR, eds. Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 217–244.Google Scholar
• Yeow A, Faraj S (2011) Using narrative networks to study enterprise systems and organizational change. Internat. J. Accounting Inform. Systems 12(2):116–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zilber TB (2024) Narrating institutional logics into effect: Coherence across cognitive, political, and emotional elements. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(1):172–221.Crossref, Google Scholar