Regulation and Innovation Revisited: How Restrictive Environments Can Promote Destabilizing New Technologies

References

• Adner R, Levinthal D (2008) Doing vs. seeing: Acts of exploitation and perceptions of exploration. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2(1):43–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Bergeaud A, Van Reenen J (2023) The impact of regulation on innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 113(11):2894–2936.Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Tandon V (2008) 1 Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):1–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al‐Ubaydli O, McLaughlin PA (2017) RegData: A numerical database on industry‐specific regulations for all United States industries and federal regulations, 1997–2012. Regulation Governance 11(1):109–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev. Environ. Econom. Policy 7(1):2–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aversa P, Guillotin O (2018) Firm technological responses to regulatory changes: A longitudinal study in the Le Mans Prototype racing. Res. Policy 47(9):1655–1673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Fons-Rosen C, Graff Zivin JS (2019) Does science advance one funeral at a time? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(8):2889–2920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey JB, Thomas DW (2017) Regulating away competition: The effect of regulation on entrepreneurship and employment. J. Regulatory Econom. 52(3):237–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey JB, Thomas DW, Anderson JR (2019) Regressive effects of regulation on wages. Public Choice 180(1):91–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2017) Independent boards and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 123(3):536–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):238–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein MH (2015) Regulating Business by Independent Commission (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, Gomez‐Mejia LR (2013) Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management J. 34(8):891–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Marx M (2020) Bridging academia and industry: How geographic hubs connect university science and corporate technology. Management Sci. 66(8):3425–3443.Link, Google Scholar
• Blind K, Petersen SS, Riillo CAF (2017) The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets. Res. Policy 46(1):249–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi JP (1999) Market and nonmarket strategies during deregulation: The case of British Telecom. Bus. Politics 1(2):203–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley D, Gokkaya S, Liu X, Michaely R (2023) Washington policy analysts and the propagation of political information. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 26, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4919.Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J. Environ. Econom. Management 45(2):278–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Business Wire (1993) BT North America files comments to FCC rebutting opposition to recent filing. Accessed November 25, 2020, https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/5w619947ywfftllt34kci/bt_1993.pdf?rlkey=o798ibohn1vyql9ktlhwa8g78&st=gxtg5zo1&dl=0.Google Scholar
• Business Wire (1995) PRIMESTAR Partners Statement: FCC action on Advanced Communications’ DBS application. Accessed November 25, 2020, https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/xnce1e91nztssmszgharg/primestar_1995.pdf?rlkey=ccjcq06k6l8krpvlrdsmylfyg&st=vypc21l0&dl=0.Google Scholar
• Business Wire (2007) Xerox redesigns products for lower energy use, meeting tough new EPA ENERGY STAR criteria. Accessed September 17, 2020, https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7x4r3nd1f0fc4bp99ni4q/xerox_2007.pdf?rlkey=mr95dxp7yn4xkrafv0w2nqjwz&st=0lf8429q&dl=0.Google Scholar
• Business Wire (2010) Q2 2010 The McGraw Hill Companies earnings conference call - final. Accessed September 17, 2020, https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ckmp4p3dtkdp54gawhibg/mcgraw_ 2010.pdf?rlkey=iamudzzttpioi0353extxd2c5&st=zkfjr5yh&dl=0.Google Scholar
• Cainelli G, D’Amato A, Mazzanti M (2020) Resource efficient eco-innovations for a circular economy: Evidence from EU firms. Res. Policy 49(1):103827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carey MP (2016) Counting regulations: An overview of rulemaking, types of federal regulations, and pages in the Federal Register. CRS report. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chambers D, McLaughlin PA, Stanley L (2019) Regulation and poverty: An empirical examination of the relationship between the incidence of federal regulation and the occurrence of poverty across the US states. Public Choice 180(1):131–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick DC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (2013) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Coffey B, McLaughlin PA, Peretto P (2020) The cumulative cost of regulations. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 38:1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levin RC (1989) Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Schmalensee R, Willig R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1059–1107.Google Scholar
• Colliard JE, Georg CP (2020) Measuring regulatory complexity. Preprint, submitted January 24, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3523824.Google Scholar
• Conti R, Gambardella A, Novelli E (2019) Specializing in generality: Firm strategies when intermediate markets work. Organ. Sci. 30(1):126–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Cook K, Shortell SM, Conrad DA, Morrisey MA (1983) A theory of organizational response to regulation: The case of hospitals. Acad. Management Rev. 8(2):193–205.Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Alexy O, Sharapov D, Salter A (2019) Lifting the veil: Using a quasi‐replication approach to assess sample selection bias in patent‐based studies. Strategic Management J. 40(2):230–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• De Figueiredo JM, Richter BK (2014) Advancing the empirical research on lobbying. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 17(1):163–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Russo MV, Montes‐Sancho MJ (2007) Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management J. 28(2):189–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donelson DC, Garfinkel JA, Roudini S (2023) Regulatory policy enforcement and corporate performance. Preprint, submitted March 14, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4388696.Google Scholar
• Dorobantu S, Kaul A, Zelner B (2017) Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management J. 38(1):114–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey HK, Slocum JW (1975) Uncertainty: Measures, research, and sources of variation. Acad. Management J. 18(3):562–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan RB (1972) Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(3):313–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman LB, Suchman MC (1997) The legal environments of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 23(1):479–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falcão F, Andrade N, Figueiredo F, Silva D, Morais F (2020) Measuring disruption in song similarity networks. Proc. 21st Internat. Soc. Music Inform. Retrieval Conf.Google Scholar
• Figueiredo F, Andrade N (2019) Quantifying disruptive influence in the AllMusic Guide. 20th Internat. Soc. Music Inform. Retrieval Conf. (Delft, Netherlands), 832–838.Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2013) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Management J. 56(3):758–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ (2014) Making the most of where you are: Geography, networks, and innovation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 57(1):193–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ, Hirschman D (2014) Derivatives and deregulation: Financial innovation and the demise of Glass–Steagall. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):669–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ, Hirschman D (2017) Beyond nonmarket strategy: Market actions as corporate political activity. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):32–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funk RJ, Owen-Smith J (2017) A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Sci. 63(3):791–817.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao C, McDonald R (2022) Shaping nascent industries: Innovation strategy and regulatory uncertainty in personal genomics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(4):915–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldschlag N, Tabarrok A (2018) Is regulation to blame for the decline in American entrepreneurship? Econom. Policy 33(93):5–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1998) R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassan TA, Hollander S, van Lent L, Tahoun A (2019) Firm-level political risk: Measurement and effects. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2135–2202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA (1993) Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(1):20–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Russo MV, Meyer AD (2001) Organizational environments in flux: The impact of regulatory punctuations on organizational domains, CEO succession, and performance. Organ. Sci. 12(3):253–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holburn GLF, Zelner BA (2010) Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power generation industry. Strategic Management J. 31(12):1290–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Rev. Econom. Statist. 79(4):610–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Peterson SR, Portney PR, Stavins RN (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? J. Econom. Literature 33(1):132–163.Google Scholar
• Jia Y, Gao X, Julian S (2020) Do firms use corporate social responsibility to insure against stock price risk? Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management J. 41(2):290–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D (2010) Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resource Econom. 45(1):133–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Julio B, Yook Y (2012) Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. J. Finance 67(1):45–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jurkovich R (1974) A core typology of organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(3):380–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalmenovitz J (2023) Regulatory intensity and firm-specific exposure. Rev. Financial Stud. 36(8):3311–3347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double‐edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplow L (1992) Rules vs. standards: An economic analysis. Duke Law J. 42(3):557–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim IS (2017) Political cleavages within industry: Firm-level lobbying for trade liberalization. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 111(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim IS (2018) LobbyView: Firm-level lobbying & congressional bills database. Accessed December 19, 2018, https://www.lobbyview.org/#!/.Google Scholar
• Klepper S (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):562–583.Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh Y, Lee GM (2023) R&D subsidies in permissive and restrictive environment: Evidence from Korea. Res. Policy 52(1):104620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn J, Younge K, Marco A (2020) Patent citations reexamined. RAND J. Econom. 51(1):109–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Zaheer A (2019) Ego-network stability and innovation in alliances. Acad. Management J. 62(3):691–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanjouw JO, Mody A (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Res. Policy 25(4):549–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leahey E (2016) From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration. Annual Rev. Sociol. 42:81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Q, Maggitti PG, Smith KG, Tesluk PE, Katila R (2013) Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Acad. Management J. 56(3):893–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahon JF, Murray EA (1981) Strategic planning for regulated companies. Strategic Management J. 2(3):251–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mairesse J, Mohnen P (2010) Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of Economic Innovation, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1129–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majumdar SK, Marcus AA (2001) Rules vs. discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Acad. Management J. 44(1):170–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malen J, Marcus AA (2019) Environmental externalities and weak appropriability: Influences on firm pollution reduction technology development. Bus. Soc. 58(8):1599–1633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. J. Politics 24(4):662–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Marcus AA (1981) Policy uncertainty and technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. 6(3):443–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcus AA (1988) Implementing externally induced innovations: A comparison of rule-bound and autonomous approaches. Acad. Management J. 31(2):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcus AA, Geffen DA, Sexton K (2002) Reinventing Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Project XL (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Link, Google Scholar
• McLaughlin PA, Sherouse O (2018) RegData US 3.1 annual (data set). QuantGov. Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Arlington, VA. https://quantgov.org/regdata-us/.Google Scholar
• McLaughlin PA, Sherouse O (2019) RegData 2.2: A panel data set on US federal regulations. Public Choice 180(1):43–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier KJ (1985) Regulation: Politics, Bureaucracy, and Economics (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 1(6):894–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ (1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):133–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi R, Swift T (2014) Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management J. 35(1):126–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullin M, Daley DM (2009) Working with the state: Exploring interagency collaboration within a federalist system. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 20(4):757–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oberholzer-Gee F, Yao DA (2018) Integrated strategy: Residual market and exchange imperfections as the foundation of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategy Sci. 3(2):463–480.Link, Google Scholar
• Ody‐Brasier A, Sharkey A (2019) Under pressure: Reputation, ratings, and inaccurate self‐reporting in the nursing home industry. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1517–1544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Office of the Federal Register (2021) Federal register. Accessed September 28, 2021, https://www.federalregister.gov/.Google Scholar
• Packard MD, Clark BB (2020) On the mitigability of uncertainty and the choice between predictive and nonpredictive strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 45(4):766–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park M (2022) Caring but sharing unintentionally: Lobbying for innovations and the leakage of knowledge. Acad. Management., ePub ahead of print July 6, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.16377abstract.Google Scholar
• Park M (2023) Essays on the politics of innovation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Park M, Leahey E, Funk RJ (2023) Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature 613(7942):138–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paternoster R, Simpson S (1996) Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law Soc. Rev. 30(3):549–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peltzman S (1976) Toward a more general theory of regulation. J. Law Econom. 19(2):211–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci. Amer. 264(4):168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995a) Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(5):120–134.Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995b) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econom. Perspect. 9(4):97–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (2007) 10th annual global CEO survey. Was: Within borders. Is: Across borders Will be: Without borders? Accessed October 30, 2023, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/pdf/pwc_10th_annual_global_ceo_survey_e.pdf.Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (2014) 17th annual global CEO survey: Fit for the future. Capitalising on global trends. Accessed October 30, 2023, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/2014/assets/pwc-17th-annual-global-ceo-survey-jan-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (2021) PwC’s 24th annual global CEO survey: A leadership agenda to take on tomorrow. Accessed October 30, 2023, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/2021/reports/pwc-24th-global-ceo-survey.pdf.Google Scholar
• Reger RK, Duhaime IM, Stimpert JL (1992) Deregulation, strategic choice, risk and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 13(3):189–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridge JW, Ingram A, Hill AD (2017) Beyond lobbying expenditures: How lobbying breadth and political connectedness affect firm outcomes. Acad. Management J. 60(3):1138–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW (1999) Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 20(7):655–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo MV (2001) Institutions, exchange relations, and the emergence of new fields: Regulatory policies and independent power production in America, 1978–1992. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):57–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholz JT (1984) Cooperation, deterrence, and the ecology of regulatory enforcement. Law Soc. Rev. 18(2):179–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy (Harper and Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Grimm CM (1987) Environmental variation, strategic change and firm performance: A study of railroad deregulation. Strategic Management J. 8(4):363–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staples AJ, Chambers D, Malone T (2022) How many regulations does it take to get a beer? The geography of beer regulations. Regulation Governance 16(4):1197–1210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart RB (1992) Environmental regulation and international competitiveness. Yale Law J. 102:2039–2106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 2(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas CW (2002) Bureaucratic Landscapes: Interagency Cooperation and the Preservation of Biodiversity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM, Allen TJ, Holloman JH, Sirbu MA (1977) The process of innovation in five industries in Europe and Japan. Stroetmann KA, ed. Innovation, Economic Change and Technology Policies (Springer, Berlin), 251–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vadakkepatt GG, Arora S, Martin KD, Paharia N (2022) Shedding light on the dark side of firm lobbying: A customer perspective. J. Marketing 86(3):79–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Zaheer A, Hernandez E (2013) The embeddedness of networks: Institutions, structural holes, and innovativeness in the fuel cell industry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):645–663.Link, Google Scholar
• Ward KD, Varda DM, Epstein D, Lane B (2018) Institutional factors and processes in interagency collaboration: The case of FEMA Corps. Amer. Rev. Public Admin. 48(8):852–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wardell WM (1978) The drug lag revisited: Comparison by therapeutic area of patterns of drugs marketed in the United States and Great Britain from 1972 through 1976. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 24(5):499–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Werner T (2015) Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policy making. Management Sci. 61(8):1989–2011.Link, Google Scholar
• Werner T (2017) Investor reaction to covert corporate political activity. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2424–2443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson JQ (2019) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (Hachette UK, London).Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wang D, Evans JA (2019) Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566(7744):378–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yue LQ, Wang J (2023) Policy learning in nascent industries’ venue shifting: A study of the US small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) industry. Bus. Soc. 63(5):1203–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yue L, Wen Y (2024) Elite conflict and industry regulation: How political polarization affects local restriction and state preemption of the US hydraulic fracturing industry. Political Power Soc. Theory. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar