Interim CEO Successions: Implications for CEO Successor Selection and Subsequent Firm Performance

References

• Aguinis H, Edwards JR, Bradley KJ (2017) Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organ. Res. Methods 20(4):665–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alam ZS, Chen MA, Ciccotello CS, Ryan HE (2014) Does the location of directors matter? Information acquisition and board decisions. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 49(1):131–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrus JL, Withers MC, Courtright SH, Boivie S (2019) Go your own way: Exploring the causes of top executive turnover. Strategic Management J. 40(7):1151–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballinger GA, Marcel JJ (2010) The use of an interim CEO during succession episodes and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 31(3):262–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron JM, Chulkov DV, Waddell GR (2011) Top management team turnover, CEO succession type, and strategic change. J. Bus. Res. 64(8):904–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 70(5):9–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergh DD, Lawless MW (1998) Portfolio restructuring and limits to hierarchical governance: The effects of environmental uncertainty and diversification strategy. Organ. Sci. 9(1):87–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Berns KV, Klarner P (2017) A review of the CEO succession literature and a future research program. Acad. Management Perspect. 31(2):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bezemer PJ, Nicholson G, Pugliese A (2018) The influence of board chairs on director engagement: A case‐based exploration of boardroom decision‐making. Corporate Governance 26(3):219–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigley GA, Wiersema MF (2002) New CEOs and corporate strategic refocusing: How experience as heir apparent influences the use of power. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):707–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W, Goodstein J (1993) Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. Acad. Management J. 36(1):172–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Bednar MK, Aguilera RV, Andrus JL (2016) Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):319–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Withers MC, Graffin SD, Corley KG (2021) Corporate directors’ implicit theories of the roles and duties of boards. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1662–1695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd BK (1995) CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management J. 16(4):301–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Lange D, Certo ST (2017) Foreshadowing as impression management: Illuminating the path for security analysts. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2486–2507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Graffin SD, Campbell RJ, Lee EY (2021a) A marginal effects approach to interpreting main effects and moderation. Organ. Res. Methods 25(1):147–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Yoon H, Gamache DL, Withers MC (2022) Omitted variable bias: Examining management research with the impact threshold of a confounding variable (ITCV). J. Management 48(1):17–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Frank KA, Maroulis SJ, Xu R, Lin Q (2021b) Quantifying the robustness of empirical inferences in strategic management: The impact threshold of a confounding variable and robustness of inference to replacement. Hill AD, Lê JK, McKenny AF, O’Kane P, Paroutis S, Smith AD, eds. Research in Times of Crisis: Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 123–150.Google Scholar
• Cannella AA, Lubatkin M (1993) Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Acad. Management J. 36(4):763–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannella AA, Shen W (2001) So close and yet so far: Promotion vs. exit for CEO heirs apparent. Acad. Management J. 44(2):252–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Sanders WG, Gregersen HB (2001) Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Acad. Management J. 44(3):493–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo H-S, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2639–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charan R (2005) Ending the CEO succession crisis. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(2):72–81.Google Scholar
• Chen G, Hambrick DC (2012) CEO replacement in turnaround situations: Executive (mis) fit and its performance implications. Organ. Sci. 23(1):225–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Huang S, Meyer‐Doyle P, Mindruta D (2021) Generalist vs. specialist CEOs and acquisitions: Two‐sided matching and the impact of CEO characteristics on firm outcomes. Strategic Management J. 42(6):1184–1214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Luo S, Tang Y, Tong JY (2015) Passing probation: Earnings management by interim CEOs and its effect on their promotion prospects. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1389–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick DC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Ketchen DJ Jr, Gangloff KA, Shook CL (2016) Investor perceptions of CEO successor selection in the wake of integrity and competence failures: A policy capturing study. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2135–2151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvijanović D, Gantchev N, Li R (2023) CEO succession roulette. Management Sci. 69(10):5794–5815.Link, Google Scholar
• Datta DK, Rajagopalan N (1998) Industry structure and CEO characteristics: An empirical study of succession events. Strategic Management J. 19(9):833–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai MN, Lockett A, Paton D (2018) Information asymmetries in the hiring process and the risk of new leader dismissal: Insights from English Premier League soccer organizations. British J. Management 29(1):26–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson L (2001) The Contingency Theory of Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson AJ, Cohen LE, Burton MD, Beckman CM (2016) Misfit and milestones: Structural elaboration and capability reinforcement in the evolution of entrepreneurial top management teams. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1430–1450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, D’aveni RA (1994) CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1079–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):484–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Friedman SD, Olk P (1995) Four ways to choose a CEO: Crown heir, horse race, coup d’etat, and comprehensive search. Human Resources Management 34(1):141–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman SD, Saul K (1991) A leader’s wake: Organization member reactions to CEO succession. J. Management 17(3):619–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gangloff KA, Connelly BL, Shook CL (2016) Of scapegoats and signals: Investor reactions to CEO succession in the aftermath of wrongdoing. J. Management 42(6):1614–1634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentry RJ, Harrison JS, Quigley TJ, Boivie S (2021) A database of CEO turnover and dismissal in S&P 1500 firms, 2000–2018. Strategic Management J. 42(5):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgakakis D, Buyl T (2020) Guardians of the previous regime: Post-CEO succession factional subgroups and firm performance. Long Range Planning 53(3):101971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Boivie S, Carpenter MA (2013) Examining CEO succession and the role of heuristics in early‐stage CEO evaluation. Strategic Management J. 34(4):383–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Carpenter MA, Boivie S (2011) What’s all that (strategic) noise? Anticipatory impression management in CEO succession. Strategic Management J. 32(7):748–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK (1988) Contingency perspectives on strategic leadership: Current knowledge and future research directions. Hambrick D, ed. The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers, vol. 141 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 141–178.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2004) CEOs who have COOs: Contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form. Strategic Management J. 25(10):959–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2005) Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3):472–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris D, Helfat C (1997) Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management J. 18(11):895–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haspeslagh PC, Jemison DB (1991) Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• He J, Wang HC (2009) Innovative knowledge assets and economic performance: The asymmetric roles of incentives and monitoring. Acad. Management J. 52(5):919–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He X, Zhu MR (2020) Are interim CEOs just caretakers? J. Corporate Finance 61:101420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helmich DL, Brown WB (1972) Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(3):371–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Fredrickson JW (1996) Information-processing demands as a determinant of CEO compensation. Acad. Management J. 39(3):575–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Miller D, Hambrick DC (2006) How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management J. 27(5):447–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoppmann J, Naegele F, Girod B (2019) Boards as a source of inertia: Examining the internal challenges and dynamics of boards of directors in times of environmental discontinuities. Acad. Management J. 62(2):437–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hymowitz C (2006) A growing number of interim CEOs add to companies’ turmoil. The Wall Street Journal (December 18), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB116639701958852918.Google Scholar
• Intintoli VJ, Zhang A, Davidson WN (2014) The impact of CEO turnover on firm performance around interim successions. J. Management Governance 18(2):541–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Josefy M, Kuban S, Ireland RD, Hitt MA (2015) All things great and small: Organizational size, boundaries of the firm, and a changing environment. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):715–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kavadis N, Heyden ML, Sidhu JS (2022) Fresh in the saddle: The influence of a new CEO’s vision and origin, and CEO succession type on market actors’ reactions. Long Range Planning 55(2):102050.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna P, Jones CD, Boivie S (2014) Director human capital, information processing demands, and board effectiveness. J. Management 40(2):557–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana R (2001) Finding the right CEO: Why boards often make poor choices. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 43(1):91–95.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, Bell BS (2013) Work groups and teams in organizations. Schmitt NW, Highhouse S, Weiner IB, eds. Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ), 412–469.Google Scholar
• Krause R, Semadeni M, Cannella AA (2014) CEO duality: A review and research agenda. J. Management 40(1):256–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krause R, Withers MC, Waller MMJ (2024) Reducing bias through board decision-making: An information-processing model of board decision synergy. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print March 6, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0271.Google Scholar
• Kunisch S, Menz M, Cannella AA (2019) The CEO as a key microfoundation of global strategy: Task demands, CEO origin, and the CEO’s international background. Global Strategy J. 9(1):19–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunisch S, Menz M, Langan R (2022) Chief digital officers: An exploratory analysis of their emergence, nature, and determinants. Long Range Planning 55(2):101999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langan R, Krause R, Menz M (2023) Executive board chairs: Examining the performance consequences of a corporate governance hybrid. J. Management 49(7):2218–2253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu X, Atinc G (2021) CEO selection, reference setting, and postsuccession strategic change. Management Decision 59(2):258–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackey A (2008) The effect of CEOs on firm performance. Strategic Management J. 29(12):1357–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcel JJ, Cowen AP (2014) Cleaning house or jumping ship? Understanding board upheaval following financial fraud. Strategic Management J. 35(6):926–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcel JJ, Cowen AP, Ballinger GA (2017) Are disruptive CEO successions viewed as a governance lapse? Evidence from board turnover. J. Management 43(5):1313–1334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menz M (2012) Functional top management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. J. Management 38(1):45–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menz M, Scheef C (2014) Chief strategy officers: Contingency analysis of their presence in top management teams. Strategic Management J. 35(3):461–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mooney CH, Semadeni M, Kesner IF (2012) Six ways companies use interim CEOs. Organ. Dynam. 1(41):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mooney CH, Semadeni M, Kesner IF (2013) Interim succession: Temporary leadership in the midst of the perfect storm. Bus. Horizons 56(5):621–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mooney CH, Semadeni M, Kesner IF (2017) The selection of an interim CEO: Boundary conditions and the pursuit of temporary leadership. J. Management 43(2):455–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KJ, Zabojnik J (2007) Managerial capital and the market for CEOs. Preprint, submitted May 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.984376.Google Scholar
• Narita K, Tena J, Detotto C (2023) Causal inference with observational data: A tutorial on propensity score analysis. Leadership Quart. 34(3):101678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyberg AJ, Cragun OR, Schepker DJ (2021) Chief executive officer succession and board decision making: Review and suggestions for advancing industrial and organizational psychology, human resources management, and organizational behavior research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 8:173–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. 6(3):239–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salincik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Quigley TJ, Hambrick DC (2015) Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management J. 36(6):821–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quigley TJ, Wowak AJ, Crossland C (2020) Board predictive accuracy in executive selection decisions: How do initial board perceptions of CEO quality correspond with subsequent CEO career performance? Organ. Sci. 31(3):720–741.Link, Google Scholar
• Quigley TJ, Hambrick DC, Misangyi VF, Rizzi GA (2019) CEO selection as risk‐taking: A new vantage on the debate about the consequences of insiders vs. outsiders. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1453–1470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schepker DJ, Nyberg AJ, Ulrich MD, Wright PM (2018) Planning for future leadership: Procedural rationality, formalized succession processes, and CEO influence in CEO succession planning. Acad. Management J. 61(2):523–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sebora TC, Kesner IF (1996) The CEO selection decision process: Bounded rationality and decision component ordering. J. Multi Criteria Decision Anal. 5(3):183–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sellers P (2011) How MacDonald’s got CEO succession right. Fortune Online (August 23), http://fortune.com/2011/08/23/how-mcdonalds-got-ceo-succession-right/.Google Scholar
• Semadeni M, Cannella AA Jr, Fraser DR, Lee DS (2008) Fight or flight: Managing stigma in executive careers. Strategic Management J. 29(5):557–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Shen W (2003) The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: An evolutionary perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):466–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen W, Cannella AA (2002a) Power dynamics within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1195–1206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen W, Cannella AA (2002b) Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Acad. Management J. 45(4):717–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen W, Cannella AA (2003) Will succession planning increase shareholder wealth? Evidence from investor reactions to relay CEO successions. Strategic Management J. 24(2):191–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tao R, Zhao H (2019) “Passing the baton”: The effects of CEO succession planning on firm performance and volatility. Corporate Governance 27(1):61–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vancil RF (1987) Passing the Baton: Managing the Process of CEO Succession (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Veltrop DB, Bezemer P-J, Nicholson G, Pugliese A (2021) Too unsafe to monitor? How board–CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring. Acad. Management J. 64(1):207–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Withers MC, Fitza MA (2017) Do board chairs matter? The influence of board chairs on firm performance. Strategic Management J. 38(6):1343–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ (1990) CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management J. 11(3):217–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y (2008) Information asymmetry and the dismissal of newly appointed CEOs: An empirical investigation. Strategic Management J. 29(8):859–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Rajagopalan N (2003) Explaining new CEO origin: Firm vs. industry antecedents. Acad. Management J. 46(3):327–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Rajagopalan N (2004) When the known devil is better than an unknown god: An empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. Acad. Management J. 47(4):483–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Rajagopalan N (2010) Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 31(3):334–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zorn ML, DeGhetto K, Ketchen DJ Jr, Combs JG (2020) The impact of hiring directors’ choice‐supportive bias and escalation of commitment on CEO compensation and dismissal following poor performance: A multimethod study. Strategic Management J. 41(2):308–339.Crossref, Google Scholar