A Cognitive Network Perspective on Creativity: Theorizing Network Mobilization Scripts

References

• Acar S, Runco MA (2015) Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psych. Aesthetics Creative Arts 9:41–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahrweiler P, Keane MT (2013) Innovation networks. Mind Soc. 12:73–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T (2018) Creativity in Context: Updates to the Social Psychology of Creativity (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer J (2012a) Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. J. Creative Behav. 46(1):16–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M (2012b) Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1102–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Biscaro C, Bruni E (2024) Metaphors in the creative journey: Using metaphors in practice. Örtenblad A, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Metaphor in Organization Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 329–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biscaro C, Comacchio A (2018) Knowledge creation across worldviews: How metaphors impact and orient group creativity. Organ. Sci. 29(1):58–79.Link, Google Scholar
• Blake M (2010) Is This the Real Life?: The Untold Story of Queen (Aurum, London).Google Scholar
• Boden MA (2004) The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (Psychology Press, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA (2013) Cognitive social structures in social network research: A review. J. Organ. Behav. 34:S82–S103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Kilduff M (2014) Just like a woman? Effects of gender-biased perceptions of friendship network brokerage on attributions and performance. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1530–1548.Link, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Mehra A (2019) Gender, brokerage, and performance: A construal approach. Acad. Management J. 62(1):196–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Menges JI, Kilduff M (2015) The leader-in-social-network schema: Perceptions of network structure affect gendered attributions of charisma. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1210–1225.Link, Google Scholar
• Brashears ME (2013) Humans use compression heuristics to improve the recall of social networks. Sci. Rep. 3(1):1513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Dioszegi B (2015) Social networks, cognitive style, and innovative performance: A contingency perspective. Acad. Management J. 58(3):881–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Quintane E (2023) When people build networks that hurt their performance: Structural holes, cognitive style, and the unintended consequences of person–network fit. Acad. Management J. 66(5):1360–1383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T (1998) Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Soc. Networks 20(4):331–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Barsade SG, Edmondson AC, Gibson CB, Krackhardt D, Labianca G (2015) The integration of psychological and network perspectives in organizational scholarship. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1162–1176.Link, Google Scholar
• Catmull E, Wallace A (2014) Creativity, Inc: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration (Bantam Press, London).Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human-capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropley A (2006) In praise of convergent thinking. Creative Res. J. 18(3):391–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M (1996) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention (Harper Collins, New York).Google Scholar
• Delmestri G, Montanari F, Usai A (2005) Reputation and strength of ties in predicting commercial success and artistic merit of independents in the Italian feature film industry. J. Management Stud. 42(5):975–1002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dessi R, Gallo E, Goyal S (2016) Network cognition. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 123:78–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (2019) The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case-study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everett W (2001) The Beatles as Musicians: The Quarry Men Through Rubber Soul (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Fayard AL, Metiu A (2014) The role of writing in distributed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1391–1413.Link, Google Scholar
• Furnari S (2014) Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):439–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrett LE, Spreitzer GM, Bacevice PA (2017) Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organ. Stud. 38(6):821–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Poole PP (1984) Scripts in organizational-behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 9(3):449–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic-action and social-structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosser TJ, Obstfeld D, Labianca G, Borgatti S (2019) Measuring mediation and separation brokerage orientations: A further step toward studying the social network brokerage process. Acad. Management Discovery 5(2):114–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gubrium JF, Holstein JA (2001) Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Kacperczyk A, Davis JP (2016) Knowledge asymmetry and brokerage: Linking network perception to position in structural holes. Strategic Organ. 14(2):118–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hua MY, Harvey S, Rietzschel EF (2022) Unpacking “ideas” in creative work: A multidisciplinary review. Acad. Management Annals 16(2):621–656.Google Scholar
• Iorio A (2022) Brokers in disguise: The joint effect of actual brokerage and socially perceived brokerage on network advantage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(3):769–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janicik GA, Larrick RP (2005) Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(2):348–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Allen Lane, London).Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Crossland C, Tsai W, Krackhardt D (2008) Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1):15–28.Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Kim J (2020) Does negative feedback benefit (or harm) recipient creativity? The role of the direction of feedback flow. Acad. Management J. 63(2):584–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM (2018) Reorganization and tie decay choices. Management Sci. 64(5):2219–2237.Link, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1987) Cognitive social-structures. Soc. Networks 9(2):109–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1990) Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2):342–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D, Porter LW (1986) The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication-networks. J. Appl. Psych. 71(1):50–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis B, Kilduff M, Menges JI, Kilduff GJ (2018) The paradox of agency: Feeling powerful reduces brokerage opportunity recognition yet increases willingness to broker. J. Appl. Psych. 103(8):929–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord RG, Kernan MC (1987) Scripts as determinants of purposeful behavior in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 12(2):265–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, More PHB, Faraj S (2012) Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23(4):951–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Mannucci PV, Perry-Smith JE (2022) “Who are you going to call?” Network activation in creative idea generation and elaboration. Acad. Management J. 65(4):1192–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marotto M, Roos J, Victor B (2007) Collective virtuosity in organizations: A study of peak performance in an orchestra. J. Management Stud. 44(3):388–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Borgatti Stephen P, Soltis S, Floyd T, Halgin Daniel S, Ofem B, Lopez-Kidwell V (2014) Imaginary worlds: Using visual network scales to capture perceptions of social networks. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks, vol. 40 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 315–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montanari F, Scapolan A, Gianecchini M (2016) ‘Absolutely free’? The role of relational work in sustaining artistic innovation. Organ. Stud. 37(6):797–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nebus J (2006) Building collegial information networks: A theory of advice network generation. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):615–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nersessian NJ (2008) Creating Scientific Concepts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the Tertius lungens and orientation involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2017) Getting New Things Done: Networks, Brokerage, and the Assembly of Innovative Action (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Parke MR, Seo MG, Hu X, Jin S (2022) The creative and cross-functional benefits of wearing hearts on sleeves: Authentic affect climate, information elaboration, and team creativity. Organ. Sci. 33(2):600–623.Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE (2014) Social network ties beyond nonredundancy: An experimental investigation of the effect of knowledge content and tie strength on creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 99(5):831–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):53–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1):89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson DR, Pattie MW (2024) Think outside and inside the box: The role of dual-pathway divergent thinking in creative idea generation. Creativity Res. J. 36(2):272–290.Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT (2003) The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Rev. General Psych. 7(1):84–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden‐Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee L, Leonardi PM (2018) Which pathway to good ideas? An attention-based view of innovation in social networks. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1188–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rondi E, Levin DZ, De Massis A (2024) The reconnection process: Mobilizing the social capital of dormant ties. Organization Sci. 35(2):573–600.Google Scholar
• Rouse E (2013) Kill Your Darlings? Experiencing, Maintaining, and Changing Psychological Ownership in Creative Work (Boston College, Boston).Google Scholar
• Rouse ED (2020) Where you end and I begin: Understanding intimate co-creation. Acad. Management Rev. 45(1):181–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schön DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner How Professionals Think in Action (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Schulte M, Cohen NA, Klein KJ (2012) The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organ. Sci. 23(2):564–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Shea CT, Menon T, Smith EB, Emich K (2015) The affective antecedents of cognitive social network activation. Soc. Networks 43:91–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Menon T, Thompson L (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23(1):67–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith EB, Brands RA, Brashears ME, Kleinbaum AM (2020) Social networks and cognition. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 46:159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soda G, Usai A, Zaheer A (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. 47(6):893–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME (2011) Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ. Sci. 22(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Tasselli S, Kilduff M, Menges JI (2015) The microfoundations of organizational social networks: A review and an agenda for future research. J. Management 41(5):1361–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ter Wal ALJ, Criscuolo P, Salter A (2023) Inside-out, outside-in, or all-in-one? The role of network sequencing in the elaboration of ideas. Acad. Management J. 66(2):432–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thagard P, Stewart TC (2011) The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Sci. 35(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson L (2003) Improving the creativity of organizational work groups. Acad. Management Perspective 17(1):96–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toivonen T, Idoko O, Jha HK, Harvey S (2023) Creative jolts: Exploring how entrepreneurs let go of ideas during creative revision. Acad. Management J. 66(3):829–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(6):941–957.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 41–74.Google Scholar
• Xiao ZX, Tsui AS (2007) When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Soda G (2009) Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G (2004) Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: Scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. J. Appl. Psych. 89(2):322–333.Crossref, Google Scholar