Bringing Politics Back In: The Role of Power and Coalitions in Organizational Adaptation

References

• Aghion P, Stein JC (2008) Growth vs. margins: Destabilizing consequences of giving the stock market what it wants. J. Finance 63(3):1025–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R (1991) Interorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field evidence. Organ. Sci. 2(3):239–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17:197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (1984) Conflict and complexity: Goal diversity and organizational search effectiveness. Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 78(2):435–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational decision-making. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crozier M (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dosi G, Levinthal DA, Marengo L (2003) Bridging contested terrain: Linking incentive-based and learning perspectives on organizational evolution. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):413–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Ganz SC (2024) Conflict, chaos, and the art of institutional design. Organ. Sci. 35(1):138–158.Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2007) Perspective—Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ (1991) Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):10–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(6):1420–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hickson DJ, Hinings CR, Lee CA, Schneck RE, Pennings JM (1971) A strategic contingencies’ theory of interorganizational power. Admin. Sci. Quart. 16(2):216–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Ocasio W (2012) Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management J. 33(6):633–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuran T (1989) Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution. Public Choice 61:41–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P, Lorsch J (1969) Organization and Environment (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2017) Mendel in the C-Suite: Design and the evolution of strategies. Strategy Sci. 2(4):282–287.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D (2021) Evolutionary Processes and Organizational Adaptation: A Mendelian Perspective on Strategic Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Workiewicz M (2018) When two bosses are better than one: Nearly decomposable systems and organizational adaptation. Organ. Sci. 29(2):207–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. J. Political 24(4):662–678.Google Scholar
• March JG (1966) The power of power. Easton D, ed. Var. Polit. Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 39–70.Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1994) A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Marengo L, Pasquali C (2012) How to get what you want when you do not know what you want: A model of incentives, organizational structure, and learning. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1298–1310.Link, Google Scholar
• Merton R (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Miller D, Friesen PH (1980) Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. 23(4):591–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1994) Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):285–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Kim H (1999) The circulation of corporate control: Selection of the functional background of new CEOs in large manufacturing firms, 1981–1992. Admin. Sci. 44:532–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C (1970) Department power and perspectives in industrial firms. Zald M, ed. Power in Organizations (Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN), 59–89.Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A (1985) The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries (Basil Blackwell Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Pitman, Marshfield, MA).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1974) Organizational decision-making as a political process: The case of a university budget. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(2):135–151.Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Aggarwal VA, Posen HE (2022) The aggregation-learning trade-off. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1094–1115.Link, Google Scholar
• Rhee L, Ocasio W, Kim TH (2019) Performance feedback in hierarchal business groups: The cross-level effects of cognitive accessibility on R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. 30(1):51–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Romanelli E, Tushman ML (1994) Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1141–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49(4):779–795.Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:171–222.Google Scholar
• Zhang CM, Greve HR (2019) Dominant coalitions directing acquisitions: Different decision makers, different decisions. Acad. Management J. 62(1):44–65.Crossref, Google Scholar