Do Investors Value Workforce Gender Diversity?

References

• Abebe M, Dadanlar H (2021) From tokens to key players: The influence of board gender and ethnic diversity on corporate discrimination lawsuits. Human Relations 74(4):527–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, de Haan J, Terjesen S, Van Ees H (2015) Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corporate Governance 23(2):77–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adhikari BK, Agrawal A, Malm J (2019) Do women managers keep firms out of trouble? Evidence from corporate litigation and policies. J. Accounting Econom. 67(1):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal I, Woolley AW (2013) Do you see what I see? The effect of members’ cognitive styles on team processes and errors in task execution. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(1):92–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akimoto M, Anwar O, Broome M, Diac D, Peterson RS, Plekhanov S, Osborne S, Rollins V (2021) Board diversity and effectiveness in FTSE 350 companies. Financial Reporting Council. Accessed October 20, 2022, https://www.london.edu/faculty-and-research/leadership-institute/research/board-diversity-and-effectiveness.Google Scholar
• Allen F, Morris S, Shin HS (2006) Beauty contests and iterated expectations in asset markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 19(3):719–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai X, Ramos MR, Fiske ST (2020) As diversity increases, people paradoxically perceive social groups as more similar. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(23):12741–12749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binder J (1998) The event study methodology since 1969. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting 11(2):111–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black BS, Khanna VS (2007) Can corporate governance reforms increase firm market values? Event study evidence from India. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 4(4):749–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanche A (2017) Tech firms striving for diversity fixate on the wrong metric. Wired (April 5), https://web.archive.org/web/20210116000817/https://www.wired.com/2017/04/tech-firms-striving-diversity-fixate-wrong-metric/.Google Scholar
• Bridoux F, Stoelhorst JW (2016) Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Acad. Management Rev. 41(2):229–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broome LL, Krawiec KD (2008) Signaling through board diversity: Is anyone listening? University Cincinnati Law Rev. 77:431.Google Scholar
• Bullock JG, Green DP, Ha SE (2010) Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98(4):550.Google Scholar
• Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cargile AC, Bradac JJ, Cole T (2006) Theories of intergroup conflict: A report of lay attributions. J. Language Soc. Psych. 25(1):47–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter DA, Souza FD, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2010) The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance 18(5):396–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM, Lucas BJ (2018) How can leaders overcome the blurry vision bias? Identifying an antidote to the paradox of vision communication. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2106–2129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalan J (2014) Google admits lack of diversity in newly released report. Fair360 (May 29), https://web.archive.org/web/20240417060359/https://www.fair360.com/google-admits-lack-diversity-newly-released-report/.Google Scholar
• Chan WS (2003) Stock price reaction to news and no-news: Drift and reversal after headlines. J. Financial Econom. 70(2):223–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Milkman KL, Chugh D, Akinola M (2019) Diversity thresholds: How social norms, visibility, and scrutiny relate to group composition. Acad. Management J. 62(1):144–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman K (2018) Earnings notifications, investor attention, and the earnings announcement premium. J. Accounting Econom. 66(1):222–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Flynn FJ (2001) The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Acad. Management J. 44(5):956–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Flynn FJ (2005) Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):434–447.Link, Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse (2021) The CS gender 3000 in 2021: Broadening the diversity discussion. Accessed October 31, 2021, https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/csri-2021-gender-3000.pdf.Google Scholar
• D’Onfro J (2018) Google is still overwhelmingly white and male, diversity report shows. CNBC (June 15), https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/google-diversity-report-2018-numbers-reactions.html.Google Scholar
• Daniels DP, Kupor D (2023) The magnitude heuristic: Larger differences increase perceived causality. J. Consum. Res. 49(6):1140–1159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniels DP, Zlatev JJ (2019) Choice architects reveal a bias toward positivity and certainty. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 151:132–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniels DP, Neale MA, Greer LL (2017) Spillover bias in diversity judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 139:92–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demmitt J (2015) Microsoft’s female workforce drops 2%, but company boosts diversity among top execs. GeekWire (November 23), https://www.geekwire.com/2015/microsoft-now-employs-2-percent-fewer-women-than-it-did-last-year-despite-focus-on-diversity/.Google Scholar
• Dezsö CL, Ross DG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1072–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Jung J (2011) Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Rev. 89(3):809–839.Google Scholar
• Donnelly G (2017) Google diversity report: Company adds women, few minorities. Fortune (June 29), https://fortune.com/2017/06/29/google-2017-diversity-report/.Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE, Nygaard K, Thorburn KS (2022) Valuation effects of Norway’s board gender-quota law revisited. Management Sci. 68(6):4112–4134.Google Scholar
• Edmans A (2023) Applying economics—not gut feel—to ESG. Financial Anal. J. 79(4):16–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):229–273.Google Scholar
• Farrell KA, Hersch PL (2005) Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. J. Corp. Finance 11(1–2):85–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fedyk A (2024) Front-page news: The effect of news positioning on financial markets. J. Finance 79(1):5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2006) Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Finance 61(2):689–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2013) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Management J. 56(3):758–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Bansal P (2017) Does a long-term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1827–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Todd AR, Homan AC, Phillips KW, Apfelbaum EP, Sasaki SJ, Richeson JA, Olayon JB, Maddux WW (2015) Maximizing the gains and minimizing the pains of diversity: A policy perspective. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 10(6):742–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Global Capital Markets (2011) Global capital markets survey 2011. Accessed October 25, 2020, https://web.archive.org/web/20131015044909/http://www.gcmsurvey.com/Media.html.Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Dannals JE (2017) Conflict in teams. Salas E, Rico R, Passmore J, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Team Working and Collaborative Processes (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ), 317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregoire V, Martineau C (2022) How is earnings news transmitted to stock prices? J. Accounting Res. 60(1):261–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Jun S, Chou EY (2020) Intergroup conflict is our business: CEOs’ ethical intergroup leadership fuels stakeholder support for corporate intergroup responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 162(1):229–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Chou EY, Cohen TR, Livingston RW (2012) Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(2):351–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawn O, Chatterji AK, Mitchell W (2018) Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Strategic Management J. 39(4):949–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C (1999) On the social psychology of agency relationships: Lay theories of motivation overemphasize extrinsic incentives. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 78(1):25–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1998) Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances Experiment. Soc. Psych. 30:1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, Van Praag M (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 59(7):1514–1528.Google Scholar
• Hui S (2014) Google’s stunning lack of diversity in two pie charts. Accessed September 1, 2019, https://www.straight.com/blogra/654991/googles-stunning-lack-diversity-two-pie-charts.Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Shivdasani A, Simintzi E (2019) Mandating women on boards: Evidence from the United States. Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise Research Paper, Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
• Jacobson M (2014) Google finally discloses its diversity record, and it’s not good. Accessed September 1, 2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20190727202429/https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/google-discloses-workforce-diversity-data-good.Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones KP, King EB, Nelson J, Geller DS, Bowes‐Sperry L (2013) Beyond the business case: An ethical perspective of diversity training. Human Resource Management 52(1):55–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Roh H (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Management J. 52(3):599–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kang P, Daniels DP, Schweitzer ME (2022) The streak-end rule: How past experiences shape decisions about future behaviors in a large-scale natural field experiment with volunteer crisis counselors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(45):e2204460119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang E, Ding DK, Charoenwong C (2010) Investor reaction to women directors. J. Bus. Res. 63(8):888–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):965–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kark R, Van Dijk D (2007) Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):500–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Soule SA (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP (1996) The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Sci. 42(8):1199–1214.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein K (2017) Does gender diversity on boards really boost company performance? Knowledge@Wharton (May 18), https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/will-gender-diversity-boards-really-boost-company-performance/.Google Scholar
• Kokalitcheva K (2015) Google’s workplace diversity still has a long way to go. Time (June 1), https://time.com/3904408/google-workplace-diversity/.Google Scholar
• Koning R, Samila S, Ferguson JP (2021) Who do we invent for? Patents by women focus more on women’s health, but few women get to invent. Science 372(6548):1345–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP (2001) Capital markets research in accounting. J. Accounting Econom. 31(1–3):105–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Warner JB (2007) Econometrics of event studies. Eckbo BE, ed. Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 3–36.Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Tayan B (2020) Board of directors: Duties and liabilities. Accessed September 17, 2021, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/gsb/files/publication-pdf/cgri-quick-guide-03-board-directors-duties-liabilities.pdf.Google Scholar
• Lee PM, James EH (2007) She’‐e‐os: Gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management J. 28(3):227–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM (2019) Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):538–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Flynn E, Foster-Gimbel OA, Manchester CF (2024) Happy talk: Is common diversity rhetoric effective diversity rhetoric? Acad. Management J. 67(3):595–624.Google Scholar
• Levy SR, Chiu CY, Hong YY (2006) Lay theories and intergroup relations. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 9(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lys T, Vincent L (1995) An analysis of value destruction in AT&T’s acquisition of NCR. J. Financial Econom. 39(2–3):353–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinlay AC (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. J. Econom. Lit. 35(1):13–39.Google Scholar
• Macleod I (2014) Yahoo to begin running Tumblr’s sponsored post ads. The Drum (June 17), https://www.thedrum.com/news/2014/06/17/yahoo-begin-running-tumblrs-sponsored-post-ads.Google Scholar
• Mannix E, Neale MA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 6(2):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5(3):136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Berdahl JL, Arrow H (1995) Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups. Jackson SE, Ruderman MN, eds. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 17–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (1997) Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Acad. Management J. 40(3):626–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CC (2014) Google releases employee data, illustrating tech’s diversity challenge. New York Times (May 28), https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/05/28/google-releases-employee-data-illustrating-techs-diversity-challenge/.Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Bazerman MH (2022) Decision Leadership: Empowering Others To Make Better Choices (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Nakashima NA, Daniels DP, Laurin K (2017) It’s about time: Divergent evaluations of restrictive policies in the near and distant future. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 142:12–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisbett RE, Ross L (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nishii LH (2013) The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Acad. Management J. 56:1754–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noonan L, Smith A, Blood D, Stabe M (2017) Women still miss out on management in finance. Financial Times (April 4), https://ig.ft.com/managements-missing-women-data.Google Scholar
• Ongena S, Smith DC, Michalsen D (2003) Firms and their distressed banks: Lessons from the Norwegian banking crisis. J. Financial Econom. 67(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page SE (2007) Making the difference: Applying a logic of diversity. Acad. Management Perspect. 21(4):6–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patell JM, Wolfson MA (1984) The intraday speed of adjustment of stock prices to earnings and dividend reports. J. Financial Econom. 13(2):223–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 70:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pepitone J (2013) Diversity in Silicon Valley - Black, female, and a Silicon Valley ‘trade secret.’ CNN (March 18), https://money.cnn.com/2013/03/17/technology/diversity-silicon-valley/index.html.Google Scholar
• Phillips KW (2014) How diversity makes us smarter. Scientific American (October 1), https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-diversity-makes-us-smarter.Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Loyd DL (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Kim-Jun SY, Shim SH (2011) The value of diversity in organizations: A social psychological perspective. De Cremer D, van Dick D, Murnighan JK, eds. Social Psychology and Organizations (Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York), 253–271).Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (2006) Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes Intergroup Relations 9(4):467–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pletzer JL, Nikolova R, Kedzior KK, Voelpel SC (2015) Does gender matter? Female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance-a meta-analysis. PLoS One 10(6):e0130005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post C, Byron K (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1546–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proudfoot D, Kay AC, Koval CZ (2015) A gender bias in the attribution of creativity: Archival and experimental evidence for the perceived association between masculinity and creative thinking. Psych. Sci. 26(11):1751–1761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proudfoot D, Berry Z, Chang EH, Kay MB (2024) The diversity heuristic: How team demographic composition influences judgments of team creativity. Management Sci. 70(6):3879–3901.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberson QM, Park HJ (2007) Examining the link between diversity and firm performance: The effects of diversity reputation and leader racial diversity. Group Organ. Management 32(5):548–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Dechant K (1997) Building a business case for diversity. Acad. Management Executive 11(3), 21–31.Google Scholar
• Rosenstein S, Wyatt JG (1990) Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 26(2):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shahani A (2016) Intel discloses diversity data, challenges tech sector to follow suit. NPR (February 3), https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/02/03/465270938/intel-discloses-diversity-data-challenges-tech-sector-to-follow-suit.Google Scholar
• Solal I, Snellman K (2019) Women don’t mean business? Gender penalty in board composition. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1270–1288.Link, Google Scholar
• Starks L, Venkat P, Zhu Q (2023) Corporate ESG profiles and investor horizons. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Tekleab AG, Quigley NR, Tesluk PE (2009) A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group Organ. Management 34(2):170–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui AS, Egan TD, O’Reilly III CA (1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):549–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
• Twitter (2014) Building a Twitter we can be proud of. Twitter (July 23), https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/a/2014/building-a-twitter-we-can-be-proud-of.html.Google Scholar
• Van Dijk H, Van Engen ML, Van Knippenberg D (2012) Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 119(1):38–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58:515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams KYK, O’Reilly CAC (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Busenbark JR, Hambrick DC (2022) How do employees react when their CEO speaks out? Intra-and extra-firm implications of CEO sociopolitical activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):553–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright P, Ferris SP, Hiller JS, Kroll M (1995) Competitiveness through management of diversity: Effects on stock price valuation. Acad. Management J. 38(1):272–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2006) Board members and company value. Financial Markets Portfolio Management 20(1):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zanoni P, Janssens M (2004) Deconstructing difference: The rhetoric of human resource managers’ diversity discourses. Organ. Stud. 25(1):55–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2020) An institutional approach to gender diversity and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 31(2):439–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Zlatev JJ, Daniels DP, Kim H, Neale MA (2017) Default neglect in attempts at social influence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(52):13643–13648.Crossref, Google Scholar