Social Purpose Formation and Evolution in Nonprofit Organizations

References

• Abdallah C, Langley A (2014) The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning. J. Management Stud. 51(2):235–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert S, Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:263–295.Google Scholar
• Alfes K, Langner N (2017) Paradoxical leadership: Understanding and managing conflicting tensions to foster volunteer engagement. Organ. Dynam. 46(2):96–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almandoz J (2023) Inside-out and outside-in perspectives on corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):139–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael FA (1996) Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. Adv. Strategic Management 13:19–64.Google Scholar
• Austin J, Stevenson H, Wei–Skillern J (2006) Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 30(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baek YM, Ihm J, Kang CH (2023) Does mission concreteness make a difference in nonprofit performance? Automated text analysis approach to the importance of concrete mission statements. Nonprofit Management Leadership 34(2):409–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Management J. 43(4):717–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1938) The Function of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer H, Micheli P, Besharov M (2022) Meaning, mission, and measurement: How organizational performance measurement shapes perceptions of work as worthy. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1923–1953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML, Khurana R (2015) Leading amidst competing technical and institutional demands: Revisiting Selznick’s conception of leadership. Kraatz MS, Lounsbury M, eds. Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 44 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 53–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML, Mitzinneck B (2023) The multiple facets of corporate purpose: An analytical typology. Strategy Sci. 8(2):233–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Beveridge AJ, Höllerer MA (2023) Theorizing organizational benevolence. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1864–1886.Link, Google Scholar
• Bort J (2025) A theory of the start-up workforce. Acad. Management Rev., ePub ahead of print March 6, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandtner C (2021) Decoupling under scrutiny: Consistency of managerial talk and action in the age of nonprofit accountability. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 50(5):1053–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Powell WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):483–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruder IM (2025) From Mission Drift to Practice Drift: Theorizing drift processes in social enterprises and beyond. Organ. Stud. 46(3):385–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM (2018) “I’m not mopping the floors, I’m putting a man on the moon”: How NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):323–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chalmers D (2021) Social entrepreneurship’s solutionism problem. J. Management Stud. 58(5):1363–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua N, Miska C, Mair J, Stahl GK (2024) Purpose in management research: Navigating a complex and fragmented area of study. Acad. Management Ann. 18(2):755–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg SR, Rhodes C, Kornberger M (2007) Desperately seeking legitimacy: Organizational identity and emerging industries. Organ. Stud. 28(4):495–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg S, Pina e Cunha M, Rego A, Santos F (2021) ‘Open purpose’: Embracing organizations as expressive systems. Organ. Theory 2(4):26317877211054860.Google Scholar
• Cloutier C, Ravasi D (2020) Identity trajectories: Explaining long-term patterns of continuity and change in organizational identities. Acad. Management J. 63(4):1196–1235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cloutier C, Ravasi D (2021) Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic Organ. 19(1):113–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Akemu O, Jonkman JG, Werner MD (2021) Building character: The formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. J. Management Stud. 58(5):1294–1330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin MT, Dacin PA, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1203–1213.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, White CJ (2015) Changing Your Company from the inside out: A Guide for Social Intrapreneurs (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• De Cuyper L, Clarysse B, Phillips N (2020) Imprinting beyond the founding phase: How sedimented imprints develop over time. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1579–1600.Link, Google Scholar
• Demuijnck G, Fasterling B (2016) The social license to operate. J. Bus. Ethics 136:675–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doherty B, Haugh H, Lyon F (2014) Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. Internat. J. Management Rev. 16(4):417–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberhart RN, Lounsbury M, Aldrich HE (2022) Entrepreneurialism and Society: New Theoretical Perspectives, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 81 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faletehan AF, van Burg E, Thompson NA, Wempe J (2021) Called to volunteer and stay longer: The significance of work calling for volunteering motivation and retention. Voluntary Sector Rev. 12(2):235–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farny S, Kibler E, Down S (2019a) Collective emotions in institutional creation work. Acad. Management J. 62(3):765–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farny S, Kibler E, Hai S, Landoni P (2019b) Volunteer retention in prosocial venturing: The role of emotional connectivity. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 43(6):1094–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Florian M, Costas J, Kärreman D (2019) Struggling with meaningfulness when context shifts: Volunteer work in a German refugee shelter. J. Management Stud. 56(3):589–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Follett MP (1940) Dynamic Administration (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Garner JT, Garner LT (2011) Volunteering an opinion: Organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 40(5):813–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Serafeim G (2023) Corporate purpose in public and private firms. Management Sci. 69(9):5087–5111.Link, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Prat A, Serafeim G (2019) Corporate purpose and financial performance. Organ. Sci. 30(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Schildt HA, Lant TK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1479–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• George G, Haas MR, McGahan AM, Schillebeeckx SJ, Tracey P (2023) Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. J. Management 49(6):1841–1869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Bartlett CA (1994) Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management J. 15(S2):91–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Schultz M, Corley KG (2000) Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):63–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Patvardhan SD, Hamilton AL, Corley KG (2013) Organizational identity formation and change. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):123–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Price KN, Hamilton AL, Thomas JB (2010) Forging an identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2010) Entrepreneurship, institutional emergence, and organizational leadership: Tuning in to “the next big thing” in satellite radio. Sine WD, David RJ, eds. Institutions and Entrepreneurship, Research in the Sociology of Work, vol. 21 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 257–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2013) Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2012) Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Acad. Management J. 55(2):458–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG (2018) The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1692–1717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, Williams TA, Zhao EY (2019) Anchors aweigh: The sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):819–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (2022) Deep Purpose: The Heart and Soul of High-Performance Companies (Penguin UK, London).Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Reinecke J (2022) Researching for desirable futures: From real utopias to imagining alternatives. J. Management Stud. 59(1):236–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gümüsay AA, Reinecke J (2024) Imagining desirable futures: A call for prospective theorizing with speculative rigour. Organ. Theory 5(1):26317877241235939.Google Scholar
• Hollensbe E, Wookey C, Hickey L, George G, Nichols CV (2014) Organizations with purpose. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1227–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hussain I, Pitesa M, Thau S, Schaerer M (2024) Pay suppression in social impact contexts: How framing work around the greater good inhibits job candidate compensation demands. Organ. Sci. 35(2):525–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Jasinenko A, Steuber J (2023) Perceived organizational purpose: Systematic literature review, construct definition, measurement and potential employee outcomes. J. Management Stud. 60(6):1415–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang WY (2021) Sustaining meaningful work in a crisis: Adopting and conveying a situational purpose. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(3):806–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2023) The promises and perils of corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):288–301.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim A (2025) Harambee! A triadic perspective on social impact: Organizations, evaluators, and target beneficiaries in Kenya. Admin. Sci. Quart. 70(1):246–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Clemens ES, Fry M (2011) Identity realization and organizational forms: Differentiation and consolidation of identities among Arizona’s charter schools. Organ. Sci. 22(3):554–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Kouamé S, Hafsi T, Oliver D, Langley A (2022) Creating and sustaining stakeholder emotional resonance with organizational identity in social mission-driven organizations. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1864–1893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz MS, Flores R, Chandler D (2020) The value of values for institutional analysis. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):474–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Abdallah C (2015) Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. Bergh DD, Ketchen DJ, eds. Building Methodological Bridges, Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, vol. 6 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 137–166.Google Scholar
• Langley A, Ravasi D (2019) Visual artifacts as tools for analysis and theorizing. Zilber TB, Amis JM, Mair J, eds. The Production of Managerial Knowledge and Organizational Theory: New Approaches to Writing, Producing and Consuming Theory, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 59 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 173–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lashitew AA, Branzei O, van Tulder R (2024) Community inclusion under systemic inequality: How for‐profit businesses pursue social purpose. J. Management Stud. 61(1):230–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lepisto DA, Pratt MG (2017) Meaningful work as realization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization. Organ. Psych. Rev. 7(2):99–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lleo A, Bastons M, Rey C, Ruiz-Perez F (2021) Purpose implementation: Conceptualization and measurement. Sustainability 13(4):1921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke KD (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Lucas DS, Park UD (2023) The nature and origins of social venture mission: An exploratory study of political ideology and moral foundations. J. Bus. Venturing 38(2):106271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minkoff DC, Powell WW (2006) Nonprofit mission: Constancy, responsiveness, or deflection. The Nonprofit Sector, 2nd ed. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT), 591–611.Google Scholar
• Mittermaier A, Shepherd DA, Patzelt H (2022) We cannot direct the wind, but we can adjust the sails: Prosocial ventures’ responses to potential resource threats. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1116–1141.Link, Google Scholar
• Morrison AD, Mota R (2023) A theory of organizational purpose. Acad. Management Rev. 48(2):203–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):479–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicholls A (2013) Heroes. J. Soc. Entrepreneurship 4(2):109–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Kraatz M, Chandler D (2023) Making sense of corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):123–138.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Neil I, Ucbasaran D (2016) Balancing “what matters to me” with “what matters to them”: Exploring the legitimation process of environmental entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 31(2):133–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton MQ (2014) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Ashforth BE (2003) Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco), 309–327.Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Hedden LN (2023) Accounts and accountability: On organizational purpose, organizational identity, and meaningful work. Strategy Sci. 8(2):182–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Schultz M (2006) Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Acad. Management J. 49(3):433–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renko M (2013) Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 37(5):1045–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ricoeur P (1984) Time and Narrative, vol. 3 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Martins LL (2023) Moral imagination, the collective desirable, and strategic purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):170–181.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosso BD, Dekas KH, Wrzesniewski A (2010) On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:91–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roundy P (2014) The stories of social entrepreneurs: Narrative discourse and social venture resource acquisition. J. Res. Marketing Entrepreneurship 16(2):200–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1953) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, Gruber M (2021) The lean startup framework: Closing the academic–practitioner divide. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 45(5):967–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, Patzelt H (2025) What about me? An essay on creating nonprofit ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 49(1):3–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sillince J, Jarzabkowski P, Shaw D (2012) Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 23(3):630–650.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Besharov ML (2019) Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Israelsen T, Robert Mitchell J, Lim DS (2023) Entrepreneurial visions as rhetorical history: A diegetic narrative model of stakeholder enrollment. Acad. Management Rev. 48(2):220–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor R, Roth S (2019) Exploring meaningful work in the third sector. Yeoman R, Bailey C, Madden A, Thompson M, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 257–273.Google Scholar
• Temple-West P, Pollard A, Platt E (2025) BlackRock and Vanguard halt meetings with companies after SEC cracks down on ESG. Financial Times (February 19), https://www.ft.com/content/533f9322-f098-4b82-823f-a7a8ef9350f1.Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):510–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varendh-Mansson C, Wry T, Szafarz A (2020) Anchors aweigh? Then time to head upstream: Why we need to theorize “mission” before “drift. Acad. Management Rev. 45(1):230–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss T, Eberhart R, Lounsbury M, Nelson A, Rindova V, Meyer J, Bromley P, Atkins R, Ruebottom T, Jennings J (2023) The social effects of entrepreneurship on society and some potential remedies: Four provocations. J. Management Inquiry 32(4):251–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten DA (2006) Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. J. Management Inquiry 15(3):219–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winner L (2018) The cult of innovation: Its myths and rituals. Subrahmanian E, Odumosu T, Tsao J, eds. Engineering a Better Future (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 61–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE (2001) Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):179–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Gedajlovic E, Neubaum DO, Shulman JM (2009) A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. J. Bus. Venturing 24(5):519–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia versus flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar