Microfoundations of Adaptive Search in Complex Tasks: The Role of Cognitive Abilities and Styles

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1654

References

  • Ahuja G, Lampert MC, Tandon V (2008) Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):1–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alessandretti L, Lehman S, Baronchelli A (2018) Understanding the interplay between social and spatial behaviour. EPJ Data Sci. 7:36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann O, Schmidt J, Stieglitz N (2019) Effective search in rugged performance landscapes: A review and outlook. J. Management 45(1):285–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benito-Ostolaza JM, Hernandez P, Sanchis L (2016) Do individuals with higher cognitive ability play more strategically? J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 64:5–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Polit. Anal. 20(3):351–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billinger S, Stieglitz N, Schumacher TR (2014) Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organ. Sci. 25(1):93–108.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Billinger S, Srikanth K, Stieglitz N, Schumacher TR (2021) Searching for superior alternatives: How human agents balance exploration and exploitation in complex search tasks. Strategic Management J. 42(2):361–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR (2015) “Open” disclosure of innovations, incentives and follow-on reuse: Theory on processes of cumulative innovation and a field experiment in computational biology. Res. Policy 44:4–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brändle F, Binz M, Schulz E (2021) Exploration beyond bandits. Preprint, submitted February 19, https://psyarxiv.com/9fnmj/.Google Scholar
  • Browne MW, Cudeck R (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 21(2):230–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 42(1):116–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnabuci G, Dioszegi B (2015) Social networks, cognitive style, and innovative performance: A contingency perspective. Acad. Management J. 58(3):881–905.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll JB (2003) The higher-stratum structure of cognitive abilities: Current evidence supports g and about ten broad factors. Nyborg H, ed. The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (Pergamon Press, New York), 5–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casaletto KB, Heaton RK (2017) Neuropsychological assessment: Past and future. J. Internat. Neuropsych. Soc. 23(9–10):778–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan D (1996) Cognitive misfit of problem-solving style at work: A facet of person-organization fit. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 68:194–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan T, Wang I, Ybarra O (2021) Leading and managing the workplace: The role of executive functions. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(1):142–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dams-O’Connor K, Gordon WA (2013) Integrating interventions after traumatic brain injury: A synergistic approach to neurorehabilitation. Brain Impairment 14(1):51–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):480–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Jong ED, Watson RA, Thierens D (2005) A generator for hierarchical problems. Proc. 2005 Workshops GECCO’05 (ACM Press, New York), 321–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denckla MB (1994) Measurement of executive function. Lyon GR, ed. Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues (Paul H Brookes, Baltimore), 117–142.Google Scholar
  • Derex M, Boyd R (2015) The foundations of the human cultural niche. Nat. Commun. 6(1):1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond A (2013) Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psych. 64(1):135–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond A, Ling DS (2016) Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Develoopmenta Cognitive Neurosci. 18:34–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickinson D, McElroy T (2012) Circadian effects on strategic reasoning. Experiment. Econom. 15:444–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll BB, Simon DA, Daw ND (2012) The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22(6):1075–1081.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dörner D, Funke J (2017) Complex problem solving: What it is and what it is not. Frontiers Psych. 8:1153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Døjbak DH, Eskildsen JK, Argote L, Mønster D, Burton RM, Obel B (2016) Exploration vs. exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions. Strategic Management J. 37(6):985–1001.Google Scholar
  • Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE (2015) The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):575–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L (2002) Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: The story of Hewlett‐Packard’s thermal ink‐jet. Indust. Corporate Change 11(5):1059–1084.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25:909–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frensch PA, Funke J (2014) Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective (Psychology Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia R (2005) Uses of agent‐based modeling in innovation/new product development research. J. Product Innovation Management 22(5):380–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gershman SJ (2019) Uncertainty and exploration. Decision 6(3):277–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gershman SJ, Niv Y (2010) Learning latent structure: Carving nature at its joints. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20(2):251–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldsmith RE (1985) Adaption-innovation and cognitive complexity. J. Psych. 119(5):461–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Good D, Michel EJ (2013) Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. J. Psych. 147(5):435–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF (1989) Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Ed. Evaluation Policy Anal. 11(3):255–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. 21(3):203–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halekoh U, Højsgaard S, Yan J (2006) The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J. Statist. Software 15(2):1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser DJ, Paolacci G, Chandler JJ (2019) Common concerns with MTurk as a participant pool: Evidence and solutions. Kardes FR, Herr PP, Schwarz N, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Consumer Psychology (Routledge, New York), 319–337.Google Scholar
  • Hayes J, Allinson CW (1998) Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations 51(7):847–871.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heaton RK (1993) Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Computer Version-2 Research Edition (Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL).Google Scholar
  • Heck R, Vuculescu O, Sørensen JJ, Zoller J, Andreasen MG, Bason MG, Ejlertsen P, et al. (2018) Remote optimization of an ultra-cold atoms experiment by experts and citizen scientists. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 27(115):e11231–e11237.Google Scholar
  • Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36:831–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hills TT, Hertwig R (2010) Information search in decisions from experience: Do our patterns of sampling foreshadow our decisions? Psych. Sci. 21(12):1787–1792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hills TT, Todd PM, Lazer D, Redish AD, Couzin ID, Cognitive Science Research Group (2015) Exploration vs. exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends Cognitive Sci. 19(1):46–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG, eds. (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (Oxford University Press, Oxford).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iclanzan D, Dumitrescu D (2007) Overcoming hierarchical difficulty by hill-climbing the building block structure. Proc. 9th Ann. Conf. GECCO’07 (ACM Press, New York), 1256–1263.Google Scholar
  • Kaish S, Gilad B (1991) Characteristics of opportunities search for entrepreneurs vs. executives: Sources, interests, general alertness. J. Bus. Venturing 6(1):45–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirton M (1976) Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. J. Appl. Psych. 61(5):622–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirton M (2003) Adaptation and Innovation in the Context of Diversity and Change (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Kiss AN, Libaers D, Barr PS, Wang T, Zachary MA (2020) CEO cognitive flexibility, information search, and organizational ambidexterity. Strategic Management J. 41:2200–2233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kneeland MK, Schilling MA, Aharonson BS (2020) Exploring uncharted territory: Knowledge search processes in the origination of outlier innovation. Organ. Sci. 31(3):535–557.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen T, Levinthal DA, Puranam P (2019) Editorial: A model is a model. Strategy Sci. 4(1):1–3.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kühnel J, Bledow R, Kiefer M (2022) There is a time to be creative: The alignment between chronotype and time of day. Acad. Management J. 65(1):218–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laureiro-Martinez D, Brusoni S, Tata A, Zollo M (2019) The manager’s notepad: Working memory, exploration, and performance. J. Management Stud. 56(8):1655–1682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazer D, Friedman A (2007) The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):667–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee S, Meyer-Doyle P (2017) How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from micro-data. Organ. Sci. 28(1):19–38.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levine SS, Bernard M, Nagel R (2017) Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behavior. Strategic Management J. 38:2390–2423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaption on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, Workiewicz M (2018) When two bosses are better than one: Nearly decomposable systems and organizational adaptation. Organ. Sci. 29(2):207–224.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D (2012) Neuropsychological Assessment, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lomberg C, Kollmann T, Stöckmann C (2017) Different styles for different needs: The effect of cognitive styles on idea generation. Creativity Innovation Management 26:49–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luria AR (1976) The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • MacAulay S, Steen J, Kastelle T (2020) The search environment is not (always) benign: Reassessing the risks of organizational search. Indust. Corporate Change 29(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maggitti PG, Smith KG, Katila R (2013) The complex search process of invention. Res. Policy 42:90–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marengo L, Dosi G, Legrenzi P, Pasquali C (2000) The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organizations. Indust. Corporate Change 9(4):757–788.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin M, Rubin R (1995) A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psych. Rep. 76(2):623–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martins LL, Sohn W (2022) How does diversity affect team cognitive processes? Understanding the cognitive pathways underlying the diversity dividend in teams. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):134–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason W, Watts DJ (2012) Collaborative learning in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(3):764–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNab F, Zeidman P, Rutledge RB, Smittenaar P, Brown HR, Adams RA, Dolan RJ (2015) Age-related changes in working memory and the ability to ignore distraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(20):6515–6518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehlhorn K, Newell BR, Todd PM, Lee MD, Morgan K, Braithwaite VA, Hausmann D, Fiedler K, Gonzales C (2015) Unpacking the exploration–exploitation tradeoff: A synthesis of human and animal literatures. Decision 2(3):191–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miron E, Erez M, Naveh E (2004) Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? J. Organ. Behav. 25:175–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miron-Spektor E, Erez M, Naveh E (2011) The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Acad. Management J. 54(4):740–760.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray J, Jaramillo J, Wang X (2017) Working memory and decision-making in a frontoparietal circuit model. J. Neurosci. 37(50):12167–12186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • O’Doherty JP, Cockburn J, Pauli WM (2017) Learning, reward, and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psych. 68:73–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pedersen MK, Díaz CMC, Wang QJ, Alba-Marrugo MA, Amidi A, Basaiawmoit RV, Bergenholtz C, et al. (2023) Cognitive abilities in the wild: Population-scale game-based cognitive assessment. Preprint, submitted January 11, https://psyarxiv.com/m6awp/.Google Scholar
  • Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search: A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmandad H, Denrell J, Prelec D (2021) What makes dynamic strategic problems difficult? Evidence from an experimental study. Strateg. Manage. J. 42(5):865–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reitan RM (1958) Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual Motor Skills 8:271–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reypens C, Levine SS (2018) Behavior in behavioral strategy: Capturing, measuring, analyzing, behavioral strategy in perspective. Adv. Strategic Management 39:221–246.Google Scholar
  • Ritchie S (2015) Intelligence: All That Matters (Hodder & Stoughton, London).Google Scholar
  • Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salgado JF, Moscoso S (2019) Meta-analysis of the validity of general mental ability for five performance criteria: Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited. Frontiers Psych. 10:2227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt FL, Hunter JE (1998) The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psych. Bull. 124(2):262–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt M (1986) Auditory and Verbal Learning Test. A Handbook (Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Schulz E, Franklin NT, Gershman SJ (2020) Finding structure in multi-armed bandits. Cognit. Psychol. 119:101261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz E, Bhui R, Love BC, et al. (2019a) Structured, uncertainty-driven exploration in real-world consumer choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(28):13903–13908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz E, Wu CM, Ruggeri A, Meder B (2019b) Searching for rewards like a child means less generalization and more directed exploration. Psych. Sci. 30(11):1561–1572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1990) Invariants of human behavior. Annu. Rev. Psych. 41:1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (2000) Can there be a science of complex systems? Bar Yam Y, ed. Unifying Themes in Complex Systems: Proceedings of the International Conference on Complex Systems, Vol. 1 (Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA), 3–14.Google Scholar
  • Smaldino PE, Richerson PJ (2012) The origins of options. Frontiers Neurosci. 6(50):1–11.Google Scholar
  • Smith EB, Rand W (2018) Simulating macro-level effects from micro-level observations. Management Sci. 64(11):5405–5421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko E (1997) Are cognitive styles still in style? Amer. Psych. 52:700–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steyvers M, Lee MD, Wagenmakers E-J (2009) A Bayesian analysis of human decision-making on bandit problems. J. Math. Psych. 53:168–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor JA (1994) Stability of schoolchildren’s cognitive style: A longitudinal-study of the Kirton Adaption–Innovation Inventory. Psych. Rep. 74:1008–1010.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todd PM, Hills TT (2020) Foraging in mind. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 29(3):309–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomov MS, Yagati S, Kumar A, Yang W, Gershman SJ (2020) Discovery of hierarchical representations for efficient planning. PLOS Comput. Biol. 16(4):e1007594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toplak ME, Sorge GB, Benoit A, West RF, Stanovich KE (2010) Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clin. Psych. Rev. 30:562–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuncdogan A, Van Den Bosch F, Volberda H (2015) Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leaders’ exploration and exploitation activities. Leadership Quart. 26(5):838–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volk S, Pearsall MJ, Christian MS, Becker WJ (2017) Chronotype diversity in teams: Toward a theory of team energetic asynchrony. Acad. Management Rev. 42(4):683–702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Helversen B, Mata R, Samanez-Larkin GR, Wilke A (2018) Foraging, exploration, or search? On the (lack of) convergent validity between three behavioral paradigms. Evolutionary Behav. Sci. 12(3):152–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Wittich D, Antonakis J (2011) The KAI cognitive style inventory: Was it personality all along? Personality Individual Differences 50(7):1044–1049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vuculescu O (2017) Searching far away from the lamp-post: An agent-based model. Strategic Organ. 15(2):242–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vuculescu O, Beretta M, Bergenholtz C (2021) The IKEA effect in collective problem‐solving: When individuals prioritize their own solutions. Creativity Innovation Management 30(1):116–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vuculescu O, Pedersen MK, Sherson JF, Bergenholtz C (2020) Human search in a fitness landscape: How to assess the difficulty of a search problem. Complexity 2020:7802169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson RA, Pollack B (1999) Hierarchically consistent test problems for genetic algorithms. Proc.1999 Congress Evolutionary Comput. 1406–1413.Google Scholar
  • Watson RA, Pollack JB (2005) Modular interdependency in complex dynamical systems. Artif. Life. 11(4):445–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wechsler D (2008) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th ed. (Pearson, San Antonio, TX).Google Scholar
  • Wiens AN, Fuller KH, Crossen JR (1997) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test: Adult norms and moderator variables. J. Clin. Experiment. Neuropsych. 19:473–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilden R, Hohberger J, Devinney TM, Lavie D (2018) Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation. Strategic Organ. 16(3):352–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson RC, Geana A, White JM, Ludvig EA, Cohen JD (2014) Humans use directed and random exploration to solve the explore–exploit dilemma. J. Experiment. Psych. General 143(6):2074–2081.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Witkin HA, Goodenough DR (1977) Field dependence revisited. ETS Res. Bull. Ser. 1977(2):1–53.Google Scholar
  • Wright KP Jr, Hull JT, Hughes RJ, Ronda JM, Czeisler CA (2006) Sleep and wakefulness out of phase with internal biological time impairs learning in humans. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 18(4):508–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zelazo PD, Carter A, Reznick SJ, Frye D (1997) Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Rev. Gen. Psych. 1(2):198–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang S, Yu AJ (2013) Forgetful Bayes and myopic planning: Human learning and decision-making in a bandit setting. NIPS’13 Proc 26th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, 2607–2615.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.