Opening the Aperture: Explaining the Complementary Roles of Advice and Testing When Forming Entrepreneurial Strategy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1656

References

  • Agrawal A, Gans JS, Stern S (2021) Enabling entrepreneurial choice. Management Sci. 67(9):5510–5524.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Ruef M (2018) Unicorns, gazelles, and other distractions on the way to understanding real entrepreneurship in the United States. Acad. Management Perspect. 32(4):458–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen TJ (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization. 1st ed. (MIT Press Books, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Assenova VA (2020) Early stage venture incubation and mentoring promote learning, scaling, and profitability among disadvantaged entrepreneurs. Organ. Sci. 31(6):1560–1578.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bacon-Gerasymenko V, Eggers JP (2019) The dynamics of advice giving by venture capital firms: Antecedents of managerial cognitive effort. J. Management 45(4):1660–1688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003a) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003b) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3):720–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA, O’Mahony S (2015) Leveraging comparative field data for theory generation. Elsbach KD, Kramer R, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 168–176.Google Scholar
  • Bennett VM, Chatterji AK (2023) The entrepreneurial process: Evidence from a nationally representative survey. Strategic Management J. 44(1):86–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bryan KA, Tilcsik A, Zhu B (2017) Which entrepreneurs are coachable and why? Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):312–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton MD, Beckman CM (2007) Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(2):239–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR, Rebentisch ES (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9):1180–1195.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Chatterji A, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strategic Management J. 40(3):331–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciuchta MP, Letwin C, Stevenson R, McMahon S, Huvaj MN (2018) Betting on the coachable entrepreneur: Signaling and social exchange in entrepreneurial pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 42(6):860–885.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clough DR, Fang TP, Vissa B, Wu A (2019) Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities? Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):240–271.Google Scholar
  • Cohen SL, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2019a) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):810–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen SL, Fehder DC, Hochberg YV, Murray F (2019b) The design of startup accelerators. Res. Policy 48(7):1781–1797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contigiani A, Levinthal DA (2019) Situating the construct of lean start-up: Adjacent conversations and possible future directions. Indust. Corporate Change 28(3):551–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSantola A, Gulati R (2017) Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):640–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimitriadis S, Koning R (2022) Social skills improve business performance: Evidence from a randomized control trial with entrepreneurs in Togo. Management Sci. 69(12):8635–8657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman E, Kahn W (2019) When developers disagree: Divergent advice as a potential catalyst for protégé growth. Organ. Sci. 30(3):509–527.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Gambardella A, Stern S, Zenger T (2020) Lean startup and the business model: Experimentation revisited. Long Range Planning 53(4):101953.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fern MJ, Cardinal LB, O’Neill HM (2012) The genesis of strategy in new ventures: Escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge. Strategic Management J. 33(4):427–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Furr NR (2019) Product adaptation during new industry emergence: The role of start-up team preentry experience. Organ. Sci. 30(5):1076–1096.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gans JS, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management J. 40(5):736–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garg S, Eisenhardt KM (2017) Unpacking the CEO–board relationship: How strategy making happens in entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1828–1858.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Weidenfield and Nicolson, London).Google Scholar
  • Goffman E (1981) Forms of Talk (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Gornall W, Kaplan SN, Strebulaev IA (2020) How do venture capitalists make decisions? J. Financial Econom. 135(1):169–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graebner ME, Knott AM, Lieberman MB, Mitchell W (2023) Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question‐driven, phenomenon‐based approach to strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 44(1):3–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91:481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grimes MG (2018) The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1692–1717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grodal S, Nelson AJ, Siino RM (2015) Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Acad. Management J. 58(1):136–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M, Tal S (2017) Where to Play (FT Publishing International, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2008) Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Sci. 54(9):1652–1665.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2013) Escaping the prior knowledge corridor: What shapes the number and variety of market opportunities identified before market entry of technology start-ups? Organ. Sci. 24(1):280–300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen BL (2008) The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):685–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen BL, Cohen SL, Bingham CB (2020) Do accelerators work? If so, how? Organ. Sci. 31(2):378–414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Google Scholar
  • Harrison SH, Dossinger K (2017) Pliable guidance: A multilevel model of curiosity, feedback seeking, and feedback giving in creative work. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2051–2072.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2015) An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Acad. Management J. 58(2):375–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hasan S, Koning R (2019a) Prior ties and the limits of peer effects on startup team performance. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1394–1416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hasan S, Koning R (2019b) Conversations and idea generation: Evidence from a field experiment. Res. Policy 48(9):103811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):295–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R, Thatchenkery S, Christensen MQ, Zenios S (2017) Is there a doctor in the house? Expert product users, organizational roles, and innovation. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2415–2437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, Higgins ET (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Management J. 61(2):586–614.Google Scholar
  • Kim P, Wennberg K, Croidieu G (2016) Untapped riches of meso-level applications in multi-level entrepreneurship mechanisms. Acad. Management Perspect. 30(3):273–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirtley J, O’Mahony S (2020) What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot. Strategic Management J. 44(1):197–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koning R, Hasan S, Chatterji A (2022) Experimentation and start-up performance: Evidence from A/B testing. Management Sci. 68(9):6434–6453.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A, Ravasi D (2019) Visual artifacts as tools for analysis and theorizing. Zilber TB, Amis JM, Mair J, eds. The Production of Managerial Knowledge and Organizational Theory: New Approaches to Writing, Producing and Consuming Theory (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK, 173–199.Google Scholar
  • Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management J. 56(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leatherbee M, Katila R (2020) The lean startup method: Early‐stage teams and hypothesis‐based probing of business ideas. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 14(4):570–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2011) Location, decentralization, and knowledge sources for innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(3):641–658.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lifshitz-Assaf H (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):746–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim JH, Tai K, Bamberger PA, Morrison EW (2020) Soliciting resources from others: An integrative review. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):122–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke K (2002) The grounded theory approach to qualitative research. Drasgow F, Schmitt N, eds. Measuring and Analyzing Behavior in Organizations: Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis, The Jossey-Bass Business and Management Series (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 17–43.Google Scholar
  • Locke K (2011) Field research practice in management and organization studies: Reclaiming its tradition of discovery. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):613–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Long-Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma S, Kor YY, Seidl D (2020) CEO advice seeking: An integrative framework and future research agenda. J. Management 46(6):771–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2013) Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):195–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald R, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald RM, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):483–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management J. 6(3):257–272.Google Scholar
  • Murray F, O’Mahony S (2007) Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. Organ. Sci. 18(6):1006–1021.Google Scholar
  • Murray F, Tripsas M (2004) The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: The role of purposeful experimentation. Baum J, McGahan A, eds. Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle, vol. 21. Advances in Strategic Management (Elsevier, JAI), 45–75.Google Scholar
  • O’Mahony S, Cohen S (2022) Navigating the promises and perils of researching emerging phenomena in strategy and organizations. Strategic Organ. 20(4):872–885.Google Scholar
  • Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Decision weaving: Forming novel, complex strategy in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Management J. 41(12):2275–2314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):306–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker SC (2006) Learning about the unknown: How fast do entrepreneurs adjust their beliefs? J. Bus. Venturing 21(1):1–26.Google Scholar
  • Patton MQ (2002) Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Soc. Work 1(3):261–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT (1992) Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):527–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson A, Wu A (2021) Entrepreneurial learning and strategic foresight. Strategic Management J. 42(13):2357–2388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74:61–78.Google Scholar
  • Posen HE, Chen JS (2013) An advantage of newness: Vicarious learning despite limited absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1701–1716.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reyt JN, Wiesenfeld BM, Trope Y (2016) Big picture is better: The social implications of construal level for advice taking. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 135:22–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rindova V, Barry D, Ketchen DJ (2009) Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):477–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM (2004) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties and isolation among US entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69:195–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaerer M, Tost LP, Huang L, Gino F, Larrick R (2018) Advice giving: A subtle pathway to power. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 44(5):746–761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seidel VP, Packalen KA, O’Mahony S (2016) Help me do it on my own: How entrepreneurs manage autonomy and constraint within incubator organizations. Cohen LE, Burton MD, Lounsbury M, eds. The Structuring of Work in Organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 47 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 275–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4):448–469.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, McEvily S, Ren CR, Roy R (2006) Niche width revisited: Organizational scope, behavior and performance. Strategic Management J. 27(10):915–936.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social Structure and Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Sutton RI (2007) Weird Ideas That Work: How to Build a Creative Company (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Vissa B, Chacar AS (2009) Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1179–1191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waisberg I, Nelson A (2018) When the general meets the particular: The practices and challenges of interorganizational knowledge reuse. Organ. Sci. 29(3):432–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, vol. 5. Applied Social Research Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.