Two-Sided Cultural Fit: The Differing Behavioral Consequences of Cultural Congruence Based on Values Versus Perceptions

References

• Alba R, Nee V (2009) Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Alesina A, Algan Y, Cahuc P, Giuliano P (2015) Family values and the regulation of labor. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(4):599–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S, Van Dyne L, Koh C (2006) Personality correlates of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence. Group Organ. Management 31(1):100–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S, Van Dyne L, Koh C, Ng YK, Templer KJ, Tay C, Chandrasekar AN (2007) Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation, and task performance. Management Organ. Rev. 3(3):335–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bail CA, Brown TW, Mann M (2017) Channeling hearts and minds: Advocacy organizations, cognitive-emotional currents, and public conversation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82:1188–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balcetis E, Dunning D (2006) See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 91(4):612–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD (2001) Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. Am. J. Sociol. 106(4):960–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Block J (1961) The Q-sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research (Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boltanski L Thévenot L (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Judge TA (1996) Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(3):294–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T (1998) Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Soc. Netw. 20(4):331–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1989) Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1991) Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 36(3):459–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Barsade SG (1995) Personality, organizational culture, and cooperation: Evidence from a business simulation. Adm. Sci. Q. 40(3):423–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Boisnier AD, Spataro SE, Anderson C, Berdahl JL (2008) Being distinctive vs. being conspicuous: The effects of numeric status and sex-stereotyped tasks on individual performance in groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(2):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Caldwell DF, O’Reilly CA, Doerr B (2014) Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high-technology firms. J. Organ. Behav. 35(6):785–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, O’Reilly CA (2016) Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:199–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Ziegler SA, Montoya AK, Jiang L (2017) Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychol. Bull. 143(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Childress CC, Friedkin NE (2012) Cultural reception and production: The social construction of meaning in book clubs. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77(1):45–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corritore M, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 65(2):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremer J, Garicano L, Prat A (2007) Language and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 122(1):373–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis-Blake A, Pfeffer J (1989) Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):385–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawis RV (2005) The Minnesota theory of work adjustment. Brown SD, Lent RW, eds. Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work, 3–23 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Diehl D, McFarland D (2010) Toward a historical sociology of social situations. Am. J. Sociol. 115(6):1713–1752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Goldberg A (2018) Searching for homo economicus: Variation in Americans’ construals of and attitudes toward markets. Arch. Eur. Sociol. 59(2):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle G, Goldberg A, Srivastava S, Frank M (2017) Alignment at work: Using language to distinguish the internalization and self-regulation components of cultural fit in organizations. Proc. 55th Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Vol.1: Long Papers) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver), 603–612.Google Scholar
• Earley CP, Mosakowski E (2004) Cultural intelligence. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(10):139–146.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2008) Person-environment fit in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):167–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliasoph N, Lichterman P (2003) Culture in interaction. Am. J. Sociol. 108(4):735–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• England GW, Lee R (1974) The relationship between managerial values and managerial success in the United States, Japan, India, and Australia. J. Appl. Psychol. 59(4):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JA, Aceves P (2016) Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 42:21–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris GR, Bhawuk DP, Fedor DF, Judge TA (2018) Organizational politics and citizenship: Attributions of intentionality and construct definition. Attribution Theory. (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK), 231–252.Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Chatman JA (2001) Strong cultures and innovation: Oxymoron or opportunity. International Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate, 263–87.Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning, volume 1 (Springer Series in Statistics, New York).Google Scholar
• Gerald JH, George SH (2010) Self-report: Psychology’s four-letter word. Am. J. Psychol. 123(2):181–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson DR (2011) Avoiding catastrophe: The interactional production of possibility during the Cuban missile crisis. Am. J. Sociol. 117(2):361–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1979) An Ecological Theory of Perception (Houghton Miflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (2002) A theory of direct visual perception. Noë A, Thompson E, eds. Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception (Boston Review, Boston), 77–90.Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Manian GV, Monroe W, Potts C (2016) Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1190–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandey AA (2000) Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 5(1):95–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, Banaji MR (1995) Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 102(1):4–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall DT (1996) The Career Is Dead—Long Live the Career. A Relational Approach to Careers. The Jossey-Bass Business & Management Series (ERIC, San Francisco, CA).Google Scholar
• Harding DJ (2007) Cultural context, sexual behavior, and romantic relationships in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72(3):341–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harman WS, Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Felps W, Owens BP (2007) The psychology of voluntary employee turnover. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16(1):51–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrmann PA, Legare CH, Harris PL, Whitehouse H (2013) Stick to the script: The effect of witnessing multiple actors on children’s imitation. Cognition 129(3):536–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho TK (1995) Random decision forests. Document Analysis and Recognition, 1995. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Doc. Anal. Recognition (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 278–282.Google Scholar
• Hochschild AR (2012) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Inglehart R, Baker WE (2000) Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65(1):19–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John OP, Srivastava S (1999) The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, vol. 2 (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Cable DM (1997) Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Person. Psychol. 50(2):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keister LA (2008) Conservative Protestants and wealth: How religion perpetuates asset poverty. Am. J. Sociol. 113(5):1237–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Day DV (1994) Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Acad. Manage. J. 37(4):1047–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski AC, Taddy M, Evans JA (2019) The geometry of culture: Analyzing the meanings of class through word embeddings. American Sociological Review 84(5):905–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individual’s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Person. Psychol. 58:281–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22(1):79–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (1999) Culture and language. J. Political Econom. 107(S6):S95–S126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazer D, Radford J (2017) Data ex machina: Introduction to big data. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43:19–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW (2014) Why Employees Quit. Decision Making in the Workplace (Psychology Press, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK), 73–90.Google Scholar
• Leschziner V (2019) Dual-process models in sociology. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology, 169–191.Google Scholar
• Lewis D (2008) Convention: A Philosophical Study (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lin J (1991) Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 37(1):145–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lix K, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Valentine MA (2022) Aligning differences: Discursive diversity and team performance. Management Sci. 68(11):8430–8448.Link, Google Scholar
• Lizardo O (2017) Improving cultural analysis: Considering personal culture in its declarative and nondeclarative modes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82(1):88–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lizardo O, Mowry R, Sepulvado B, Stoltz DS, Taylor MA, Van Ness J, Wood M (2016) What are dual process models? Implications for cultural analysis in sociology. Sociol. Theory. 34(4):287–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lofquist LH, Dawis R (1978) Values as second-order needs in the theory of work adjustment. J. Vocat. Behav. 12(1):12–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer DM, Kuenzi M, Greenbaum R, Bardes M, Salvador RB (2009) How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes. 108(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFarland DA, Lewis K, Goldberg A (2016) Sociology in the era of big data: The ascent of forensic social science. Am. Sociol. 47(1):12–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mesulam MM (1998) From sensation to cognition. Brain. 121(6):1013–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Hecht TD, Gill H, Toplonytsky L (2010) Person–organization (culture) fit and employee commitment under conditions of organizational change: A longitudinal study. J. Vocat. Behav. 76(3):458–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michaels CE, Spector PE (1982) Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino model. J. Appl. Psychol. 67(1):53–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michel A (2011) Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Adm. Sci. Q. 56(3):325–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality, volume 26. Burges CJC, Bottou L, Welling M, Ghahramani Z, Weinberger KQ, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 3111–3119.Google Scholar
• Miles A (2015) The (re)genesis of values: Examining the importance of values for action. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80(4):680–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris MW, Chiu Cy, Liu Z (2015) Polycultural psychology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66:631–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisbett RE, Cohen D (1996) Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Chatman J (1986) Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 71(3):492–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Management J. 34(3):487–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons T (1968) The Structure of Social Action (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW (2013) The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us (Bloomsbury Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Chung CK, Ireland M, Gonzales A, Booth RJ (2007) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2007 (Austin, TX: LIWC.net).Google Scholar
• Pinker S (2007) The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window Into Human Nature (Viking, New York).Google Scholar
• Rafaeli A, Pratt MG (1993) Tailored meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):32–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2012) Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77(6):999–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rokeach M (1973) The Nature of Human Values (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ross L (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 10:173–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1974) The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Admin Sci. Quart. 19:453–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ (2017) Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)Google Scholar
• Sasovova Z, Mehra A, Borgatti SP, Schippers MC (2010) Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Admin Sci. Quart. 55(4):639–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries, volume 25. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 1–65.Google Scholar
• Scott BA, Barnes CM, Wagner DT (2012) Chameleonic or consistent? A multilevel investigation of emotional labor variability and self-monitoring. Acad. Management J. 55(4):905–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1979) Self-monitoring processes. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 12:85–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (2002) The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Admin Sci. Quart. 47(1):70–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Banaji MR (2011) Culture, cognition, and collaborative networks in organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76(2):207–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Goldberg A, Manian GV, Potts C (2018) Enculturation trajectories: Language, cultural adaptation, and individual outcomes in organizations. Management Sci. 64(3):1348–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29(1):24–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Transaction Publishers, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK).Google Scholar
• Vaisey S (2009) Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. Am. J. Sociol. 114(6):1675–1715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Ang S, Tan ML (2019) Cultural intelligence. Oxford Bibliographies (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Weber RA, Camerer CF (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. 49(4):400–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Weeks J (2004) Unpopular Culture: The Ritual of Complaint in a British Bank (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar