Unexpected Interruptions, Idle Time, and Creativity: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

References

• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A, Luo H (2018) Slack time and innovation. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1056–1073.Link, Google Scholar
• Altmann EM, Trafton JG (2002) Memory for goals: An activation‐based model. Cognitive Sci. 26(1):39–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Oldham GR (2006) The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):963–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baird B, Smallwood J, Mrazek MD, Kam JWY, Franklin MS, Schooler JW (2012) Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psych. Sci. 23(10):1117–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger P, Ang S (2016) The quantitative discovery: What is it and how to get it published. Acad. Management Discoveries 2(1):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger PA (2019) On the replicability of abductive research in management and organizations: Internal replication and its alternatives. Acad. Management Discoveries 5(2):103–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, Okhuysen GA (2011) Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Acad. Management J. 54(2):239–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beeftink F, Van Eerde W, Rutte CG (2008) The effect of interruptions and breaks on insight and impasses: Do you need a break right now? Creativity Res. J. 20(4):358–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar K, Okhuysen GA (2018) Perspective—Discovery within validation logic: Deliberately surfacing, complementing, and substituting abductive reasoning in hypothetico–deductive inquiry. Organ. Sci. 29(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Borst JP, Taatgen NA, van Rijn H (2015) What makes interruptions disruptive? A process–model account of the effects of the problem state bottleneck on task interruption and resumption. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea April 18–23, (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 2971–2980.Google Scholar
• Brodsky A, Amabile TM (2018) The downside of downtime: The prevalence and work pacing consequences of idle time at work. J. Appl. Psych. 103(5):496–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai X, Gong J, Lu Y, Zhong S (2017) Recover overnight? Work interruption and worker productivity. Management Sci. 64(8):3489–3500.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen JS, Garg P (2018) Dancing with the stars: Benefits of a star employee’s temporary absence for organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 39(5):1239–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christianson MK, Farkas MT, Sutcliffe KM, Weick KE (2009) Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum. Organ. Sci. 20(5):846–860.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen JR, Ferrari JR (2010) Take some time to think this over: The relation between rumination, indecision, and creativity. Creativity Res. J. 22(1):68–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti A, Roche MP (2021) Lowering the bar? External conditions, opportunity costs, and high-tech start-up outcomes. Organ. Sci. 32(4):965–986.Link, Google Scholar
• Cornelius PB, Gokpinar B, Sting FJ (2020) Sparking manufacturing innovation: How temporary interplant assignments increase employee idea values. Management Sci. 67(4):2231–2250.Link, Google Scholar
• Cunningham S (2020) Causal Inference: The Mixtape (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Cutter C (2020) Companies offer creative solutions to worker burnout during the pandemic. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/companies-offer-creative-solutions-to-worker-burnout-during-the-pandemic-11604836834.Google Scholar
• Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):579–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deichmann D, van den Ende J (2013) Rising from failure and learning from success: The role of past experience in radical initiative taking. Organ. Sci. 25(3):670–690.Link, Google Scholar
• de Jonge J, Spoor E, Sonnentag S, Dormann C, van den Tooren M (2012) “Take a break?!” Off-job recovery, job demands, and job resources as predictors of health, active learning, and creativity. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 21(3):321–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong L, Tang SY, Tomlin B (2018) Production chain disruptions: Inventory, preparedness, and insurance. Production Oper. Management 27(7):1251–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dye KC, Eggers J, Shapira Z (2014) Trade-offs in a tempest: Stakeholder influence on hurricane evacuation decisions. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1009–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Eliav E, Miron-Spektor E (2015) The recovery effect: The creative potential of frequent interruptions. Acad. Management Proc. 2015(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Hargadon AB (2006) Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organ. Sci. 17(4):470–483.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman E, Greenway D (2020) It’s a matter of time: The role of temporal perceptions in emotional experiences of work interruptions. Group Organ. Management 46(1):70–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foroughi CK, Werner NE, Nelson ET, Boehm-Davis DA (2014) Do interruptions affect quality of work? Human Factors 56(7):1262–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Imbens G (2013) Why ask why? Forward causal inference and reverse causal questions. NBER Working Paper No. 19614, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• George JM (2007) Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):439–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2004) The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. Econom. J. 7(1):98–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen BL, Cohen SL, Bingham CB (2020) Do accelerators work? If so, how? Organ. Sci. 31(2):378–414.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Wagner DT (2016) Spilling outside the box: The effects of individuals’ creative behaviors at work on time spent with their spouses at home. Acad. Management J. 59(3):841–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jett QR, George JM (2003) Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):494–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, Mantere S (2010) Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):315–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kistruck GM, Slade Shantz A (2022) Research on grand challenges: Adopting an abductive experimentation methodology. Organ. Stud. 43(9):1479–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolympiris C, Hoenen S, Klein PG (2018) Learning by seconding: Evidence from NSF rotators. Organ. Sci. 30(3):528–551.Link, Google Scholar
• Larcom S, Rauch F, Willems T (2017) The benefits of forced experimentation: Striking evidence from the London underground network. Quart. J. Econom. 132(4):2019–2055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2019) Learning-by-moving: Can reconfiguring spatial proximity between organizational members promote individual-level exploration? Organ. Sci. 30(3):467–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Leroy S (2009) Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(2):168–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leroy S, Glomb TM (2018) Tasks interrupted: How anticipating time pressure on resumption of an interrupted task causes attention residue and low performance on interrupting tasks and how a “ready-to-resume” plan mitigates the effects. Organ. Sci. 29(3):380–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Leroy S, Schmidt A, Madjar N (2020) Interruptions and task transitions: Understanding their characteristics, processes, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 16(4):661–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madjar N, Shalley CE (2008) Multiple tasks’ and multiple goals’ effect on creativity: Forced incubation or just a distraction? J. Management 34(4):786–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madjar N, Shalley CE, Herndon B (2019) Taking time to incubate: The moderating role of “what you do” and “when you do it” on creative performance. J. Creative Behav. 53(3):377–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantere S, Ketokivi M (2013) Reasoning in organization science. Acad. Management Rev. 38(1):70–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mochi F, Madjar N (2018) Interruptions and multitasking: Advantages and disadvantages for creativity at work. Reiter-Palmon R, Kennel VL, Kaufman JC, eds. Individual Creativity in the Workplace (Academic Press, Elsevier), 103–127.Google Scholar
• Pendem PK, Green PI Jr, Staats BR (2022) The microstructure of work: Understanding productivity benefits and costs of interruptions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(4):2202–2220.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranik H, Koopman J, Vough HC (2020) Pardon the interruption: An integrative review and future research agenda for research on work interruptions. J. Management 46(6):806–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sætre AS, Van de Ven AH (2021) Generating theory by abduction. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):684–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandler R (2021) LinkedIn surprises workers with a week off to help with burnout. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2021/04/02/linkedin-surprises-workers-with-a-week-off-to-help-with-burnout/?sh=5f9d2115217a.Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA, Suddaby R (2016) Theory building: A review and integration. J. Management 43(1):59–86.Google Scholar
• Shin J, Grant AM (2021) When putting work off pays off: The curvilinear relationship between procrastination and creativity. Acad. Management J. 64(3):772–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sio UN, Ormerod TC (2009) Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 135(1):94–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Dahl MS, Canales R, Burton MD (2021) Do startup employees earn more in the long run? Organ. Sci. 32(3):587–604.Link, Google Scholar
• Teodoridis F, Bikard M, Vakili K (2019) Creativity at the knowledge frontier: The impact of specialization in fast- and slow-paced domains. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):894–927.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vahle-Hinz T, Mauno S, de Bloom J, Kinnunen U (2017) Rumination for innovation? Analysing the longitudinal effects of work-related rumination on creativity at work and off-job recovery. Work Stress 31(4):315–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van de Ven AH, Ang S, Arino A, Bamberger P, LeBaron C, Miller C, Milliken F (2015) Welcome to the Academy of Management Discoveries (AMD). Acad. Management Discoveries 1(1):1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Sørensen JB, Mitchell TR (2007) The interplay between theory and method. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1145–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson J, MacGarvie M, McKeon J (2022) It was 50 years ago today: Recording copyright term and the supply of music. Management Sci. 69(1):351–376.Link, Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn ME (2003) Interruptive events and team knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 49(4):514–528.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Wang XM, Bavato D, Tasselli S, Wu J (2019) Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multidisciplinary review and implications for management research. J. Management 45(6):2570–2595.Crossref, Google Scholar