Conflict, Chaos, and the Art of Institutional Design

References

• Albers J (2013) Interaction of Color, 4th ed. (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Battaglini M (2002) Multiple referrals and multidimensional cheap talk. Econometrica 70(4):1379–1401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar KJ, Mannix EA, Peterson RS, Trochim WM (2011) Conflict in small groups: The meaning and consequences of process conflict. Small Group Res. 42(2):127–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendor J, Meirowitz A (2004) Spatial models of delegation. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 98(2):293–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendor J, Shotts KW (2012) Chance, preferences, and predictions in garbage can theory. Lomi A, Harrison JR, eds. The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 99–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendor J, Glazer A, Hammond T (2001) Theories of delegation. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 4(1):235–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billinger S, Stieglitz N, Schumacher TR (2014) Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organ. Sci. 25(1):93–108.Link, Google Scholar
• Bivand R, Pebesma EJ, Gómez-Rubio V (2013) Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R Use R!, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1966) The Management of Innovation (Tavistock Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Callander S (2011) Searching and learning by trial and error. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:2277–2308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision-making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (1984) Conflict and complexity: Goal diversity and organizational search effectiveness. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 78(2):435–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(1):1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (2012) A garbage can model at forty: A solution that still attracts problems. Lomi A, Harrison RJ, eds. The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, vol. 36 of Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018a) Limits to the wisdom of the crowd in idea selection. Joseph J, Baumann O, Burton R, Srikanth K, eds. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 40 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 275–297.Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018b) A note on how NK landscapes work. J. Organ. Design 7(1):15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Diermeier D, Krehbiel K (2003) Institutionalism as a methodology. J. Theoretical Politics 15(2):123–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Van de Vliert E, eds. (1997) Using Conflict in Organizations (SAGE, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Bourgeois LJ (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. 31(4):737–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ (1992) Strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. 13(S2):17–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Kahwajy JL, Bourgeois LJ (1997) How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75:77–86.Google Scholar
• Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Rev. 36(2):90–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enelow JM, Hinich MJ (1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Feddersen TJ (2004) Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting. J. Econom. Perspective 18(1):99–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1990) The Transformation of Corporate Control (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ganz SC (2018) Ignorant decision making and educated inertia: Some political pathologies of organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 29(1):39–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Ganz SC (2020) Hyperopic search: Organizations learning about managers learning about strategies. Organ. Sci. 31(4):821–838.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Perspective–Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilligan TW, Krehbiel K (1989) Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous. Amer. J. Political Sci. 33(2):459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (1992) Digital Image Processing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH (1995) Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(1):5–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econom. J. (London) 39(153):41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA (1997) Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. Using Conflict in Organizations (SAGE, London), 9–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kingdon JW (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Little Brown, Boston).Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Krehbiel K (1988) Spatial models of legislative choice. Legislative Stud. Quart. 13(3):259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krehbiel K (1997) Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Apfelbaum EP, Bernard M, Bartelt VL, Zajac EJ, Stark D (2014) Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 111(52):18524–18529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2012) From the ivy tower to the C-suite: Garbage can processes and corporate strategic decision making. Lomi A, Harrison JR, eds. The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 349–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Csaszar FA (2019) Government as landscape designer: A behavioral view of industrial policy. Strategy Sci. 4(3):175–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Lomi A, Harrison RJ (2012) The garbage can model of organizational choice: Looking forward at forty. Lomi A, Harrison JR, eds. The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, vol. 36 of Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing Limited), 3–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen).Google Scholar
• Marengo L (2020) Organizational politics and complexity: Coase vs. Arrow, March, and Simon. Industrial Corporate Change 29(1):95–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey RD (1976) Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. J. Econom. Theory 12(3):472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles RE (1978) The origin and meaning of Miles’ law. Public Admin. Rev. 38(5):399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1983) Power In and Around Organizations. The Theory of Management Policy Series (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mithani MA, O’Brien JP (2021) So what exactly is a “coalition” within an organization? A review and organizing framework. J. Management 47(1):171–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moch MK, Pondy LR (1977) The structure of chaos: Organized anarchy as a response to ambiguity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(2):351–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Acad. Management Perspective 27(4):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF (1980a) Bounded rationality in budgetary research. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 74(2):354–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF (1980b) Managing garbage can hierarchies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(4):583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF (2013) Alessandro Lomi and J. Richard Harrison, eds.: Research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 36: The garbage can model of organizational choice: Looking forward at forty. Administrative Sci. Quart. 58(3):472–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213500231.Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Liljenquist KA, Neale MA (2009) Is the pain worth the gain? The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with socially distinct newcomers. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 35(3):336–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pondy LR (1992) Reflections on organizational conflict. J. Organ. Behav. 13(3):257–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole KT (2001) The geometry of multidimensional quadratic utility in models of parliamentary roll call voting. Political Anal. 9(3):211–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole KT, Rosenthal H, Koford K (1991) On dimensionalizing roll call votes in the U.S. Congress. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 85(3):955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman EW (2001) Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Zbaracki MJ (2021) The politics of learning from rare events. Organ. Sci. 32(6):1391–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Riker WH (1980) Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 74(2):432–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Shepsle KA, Weingast BR (1981) Structure induced equilibrium and legislative choice. Public Choice 37:503–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.Link, Google Scholar