Caught in the Revolving Door: Firm-Government Employee Mobility as a Fleeting Regulatory Advantage

References

• Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Kermani A, Kwak J, Mitton T (2016) The value of connections in turbulent times: Evidence from the United States. J. Financial Econom. 121(2):368–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Meschke F, Wang T (2012) Corporate political donations: Investment or agency? Bus. Politics 14(1):3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2003) Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Res. Policy 32(2):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Oversight (2019) USDA emails from senior advisor Rebeckah Adcock from April to November 2017. Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.americanoversight.org/document/usda-emails-from-senior-advisor-rebeckah-adcock-from-april-to-november-2017%E2%80%A8.Google Scholar
• Ang YY, Jia N (2014) Perverse complementarity: Political connections and the use of courts among private firms in China. J. Politics 76(2):318–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, de Figueiredo JM, Snyder JM (2003) Why is there so little money in US politics? J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Faulkner RR (1993) The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 58(6):837–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B, Diestre L (2019) Pushing for speed or scope? Pharmaceutical lobbying and Food and Drug Administration drug review. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1194–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner FR, Berry JM, Hojnacki M, Kimball DC, Leech BL (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckert J, Wehinger FP (2013) In the shadow: Illegal markets and economic sociology. Socio-Econom. Rev. 11(1):5–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2014) Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3885–3920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biotechnology Regulatory Services (2018a) BRS permit and notification data. Accessed August 24, 2018, https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/data/BRS_public_apps.csv.Google Scholar
• Biotechnology Regulatory Services (2018b) Petitions for determination of nonregulated status. Accessed November 26, 2018, https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/regulatory-processes/petitions/petition-status/petitions-table.Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal J, Draca M, Fons-Rosen C (2012) Revolving door lobbyists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3731–3748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life, vol. J (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Bó ED (2006) Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 22(2):203–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi J-P, Holburn GLF, Vanden Bergh RG (2006) Nonmarket strategy performance: Evidence from U.S. electric utilities. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1209–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bottemiller Evich H, Sanchez L (2017) Politico Q&A: Al Almanza, newly retired FSIS administrator. Politico (August 2), https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2017/08/politico-pro-q-a-al-almanza-160338.Google Scholar
• Braun M, Raddatz C (2010) Banking on politics: When former high-ranking politicians become bank directors. World Bank Econom. Rev. 24(2):234–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brezis ES (2012) Promiscuous elites and economic development. Working paper No. 2012-09, Azrieli Center for Economic Policy, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.Google Scholar
• Bruening G, Lyons J (2000) The case of the FLAVR SAVR tomato. Calif. Agriculture 54(4):6–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter DP (2002) Groups, the media, agency waiting costs, and FDA drug approval. Amer. J. Political Sci. 46(3):490–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter D, Chattopadhyay J, Moffit S, Nall C (2012) The complications of controlling agency time discretion: FDA review deadlines and postmarket drug safety. Amer. J. Political Sci. 56(1):98–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Center for Responsive Politics (2018) Lobbying database. Accessed August 6, 2018, https://www.opensecrets.org/.Google Scholar
• Chari M, Steensma H, Connaughton C (2020) Previous and prospective career mobility, client capture, and compromised professional judgment: The withholding of known relevant prior art by patent lawyers on behalf of their clients. Organ. Sci. 31(2):489–507.Link, Google Scholar
• Che Y-K (1995) Revolving doors and the optimal tolerance for agency collusion. RAND J. Econom. 26(3):378–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coates JC (2012) Corporate politics, governance, and value before and after Citizens United. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 9(4):657–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1986) The dynamics of the revolving door on the FCC. Amer. J. Political Sci. 30(4):689–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SN, Chang ACY, Boyer HW, Helling RB (1973) Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in-vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70(11):3240–3244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• deHaan E, Kedia S, Koh K, Rajgopal S (2015) The revolving door and the SEC’s enforcement outcomes: Initial evidence from civil litigation. J. Accounting Econom. 60(2–3):65–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2002) The regulation of entry. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2010) Social capital for hire? Mobility of technical professionals and firm influence in wireless standards committees. Organ. Sci. 21(3):677–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Drutman L (2015) The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckert RD (1981) The life-cycle of regulatory commissioners. J. Law Econom. 24(1):113–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa M (2021) Labor boundaries and skills: The case of lobbyists. Management Sci. 67(3):1586–1607.Link, Google Scholar
• Etzion D, Davis GF (2008) Revolving doors? A network analysis of corporate officers and U.S. government officials. J. Management Inquiry 17(3):157–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson T, Voth H-J (2008) Betting on Hitler—The value of political connections in Nazi Germany. Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):101–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrara J (1998) Revolving doors: Monsanto and the regulators. Ecologist 28(5):280–286.Google Scholar
• Fisman R (2001) Estimating the value of political connections. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):1095–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldman E, Rocholl J, So J (2009) Do politically connected boards affect firm value? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(6):2331–2360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez S (2014) What’s behind the delay in biotech approvals? Agri-Pulse (May 28), https://www.agri-pulse.com/articles/4067-what-s-behind-the-delay-in-biotech-approvals.Google Scholar
• Gormley WTJ (1979) Test of the revolving door hypothesis at the FCC. Amer. J. Political Sci. 23(4):665–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grace MF, Phillips RD (2008) Regulator performance, regulatory environment and outcomes: An examination of insurance regulator career incentives on state insurance markets. J. Banking Finance 32(1):116–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadani M, Schuler DA (2013) In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments. Strategic Management J. 34(2):165–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RL, Deardorff AV (2006) Lobbying as legislative subsidy. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 100(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen W, Mitchell N (2000) Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporations in national politics. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 94(4):891–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Jia N, Shi J, Wang YX (2017) The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):67–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heisey P, Schimmelpfennig D (2006) Regulation and the structure of biotechnology industries. Just RE, Alston JM, Zilberman D, eds. Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy (Springer-Verlag, New York), 421–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins MC, Gulati R (2003) Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organ. Sci. 14(3):244–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Higgins MC, Gulati R (2006) Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management J. 27(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ (2005) Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? J. Management 31(3):464–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L (1999) Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management J. 20(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong S, Lim J (2016) Capture and the bureaucratic mafia: Does the revolving door erode bureaucratic integrity? Public Choice 166(1–2):69–86.Google Scholar
• Horiuchi A, Shimizu K (2001) Did amakudari undermine the effectiveness of regulator monitoring in Japan? J. Banking Finance 25(3):573–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igan D, Mishra P (2014) Wall Street, Capitol Hill, and K Street: Political influence and financial regulation. J. Law Econom. 57(4):1063–1084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia N (2018) The “Make and/or Buy” decisions of corporate political lobbying: Integrating the economic efficiency and legitimacy perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 43(2):307–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Lincoln WF, Mishra P (2014) The dynamics of firm lobbying. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 6(4):343–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW (2012) Arbiter of science: Institutionalization and status effects in FDA drug review 1990-2004. Strategic Organ. 10(2):128–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Higgins MC (2007) Where do alliances come from? The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Res. Policy 36(4):499–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kravitz D, Holden E (2020) These emails show a Trump official helping her former chemical industry colleagues. ProPublica (January 14), https://www.propublica.org/article/these-emails-show-a-trump-official-helping-her-former-chemical-industry-colleagues.Google Scholar
• Kwak J (2014) Cultural capture and the financial crisis. Carpenter D, Moss D, eds. Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 71–98.Google Scholar
• LaPira TM, Thomas HF (2014) Revolving door lobbyists and interest representation. Interest Groups Advocacy 3(1):4–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaPira TM, Thomas HF, Baumgartner F (2014) The two worlds of lobbying: Washington lobbyists in the core and on the periphery. Interest Groups Advocacy 3(2):219–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester RH, Hillman AJ, Zardkoohi A, Cannella AA (2008) Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human and social capital. Acad. Management J. 51(5):999–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li HB, Meng LS, Wang Q, Zhou LA (2008) Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. J. Development Econom. 87(2):283–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowery D, Marchetti, K (2012) You don’t know Jack: Principals, agents and lobbying. Interest Groups Advocacy 1(2):139–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luechinger S, Moser C (2014) The value of the revolving door: Political appointees and the stock market. J. Public Econom. 119(November):93–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lux S, Crook TR, Woehr DJ (2011) Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. J. Management 37(1):223–247.Google Scholar
• Makkai T, Braithwaite J (1992) In and out of the revolving door: Making sense of regulatory capture. J. Public Policy 12(1):61–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattera P (2004) USDA Inc.: How agribusiness has hijacked regulatory policy at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Report. Accessed November 1, 2018, http://www.competitivemarkets.com/wp-content/uploads/2004/07/USDAINC_AG_HIJACKING.pdf.Google Scholar
• Maxwell J (2017) USDA Inc.: JBS is the latest in scandalous job swapping between government and meat industry. Organization for Competitive Markets Blog (August 4), https://competitivemarkets.com/usda-inc-jbs-is-the-latest-in-scandalous-job-swapping-between-government-and-meat-industry/.Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H (2016) Radical repertoires: The incidence and impact of corporate-sponsored social activism. Organ. Sci. 27(1):53–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Minefee I, McDonnell M-H, Werner T (2021) Reexamining investor reaction to covert corporate political activity: A replication and extension of Werner (2017). Strategic Management J. 42(6):1139–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi MS (1989) Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations. Amer. J. Sociol. 95(2):401–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson MK (1997) Firm characteristics and the speed of FDA approval. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(1):377–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng MW, Luo YD (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Acad. Management J. 43(3):486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Project on Government Oversight (2013) Dangerous liaisons: Revolving door at SEC creates risk of regulatory capture. Project on Government Oversight (POGO) Report. Accessed October 26, 2021, https://docs.pogo.org/report/2013/20130211-dangerous-liaisons-sec-revolving-door.pdf?_ga=2.87588573.451894705.1679597269-1501230256.1679597269.Google Scholar
• Quinn DP, Shapiro RY (1991) Business political power: The case of taxation. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 85(3):851–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quirk PJ (1981) Industry Influence in Federal Regulatory Agencies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richter BK, Samphantharak K, Timmons JF (2009) Lobbying and taxes. Amer. J. Political Sci. 53(4):893–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roscoe D, Jenkins S (2005) A meta-analysis of campaign contributions’ impact on roll call voting. Soc. Sci. Quart. 86(1):52–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal A (2001) The Third House: Lobbyists and Lobbying in the States (Cq Press, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schurman R, Munro WA (2010) Fighting for the Future of Food: Activists Vs. Agribusiness in the Struggle over Biotechnology (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Shive SA, Forster MM (2017) The revolving door for financial regulators. Rev. Finance 21(4):1445–1484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Corruption. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):599–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smithberger M (2018) Brass parachutes: The problem of the Pentagon revolving door. Project on Government Oversight (POGO) Report. Accessed October 22, 2021, https://www.pogo.org/report/2018/11/brass-parachutes/.Google Scholar
• Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4):351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Spiller PT (1990) Politicians, interest groups, and regulators—a multiple principals agency theory of regulation, or let them be bribed. J. Law Econom. 33(1):65–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1971) Theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 2(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun P, Mellahi K, Wright M (2012) The contingent value of corporate political ties. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(3):68–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tabakovic H, Wollmann TG (2018) From revolving doors to regulatory capture? Evidence from patent examiners. NBER Working Paper No. 24638, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Tsukuyama H (2011) FCC commissioner Meredith Baker to join Comcast-NBC. Washington Post (May 12), https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/fcc-commissioner-meredith-baker-to-join-comcast-nbc/2011/05/11/AFYfl1rG_blog.html.Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress (1995) Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) of 1995. 2 U.S.C. §1601.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service (2018) Recent trends in GE adoption. Accessed March 9, 2019, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption.aspx.Google Scholar
• U. S. Government Accountability Office (2002) Genetically modified foods: Experts view regimen of safety tests as adequate, but FDA’s evaluation process could be enhanced. Accessed March 6, 2019, https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-02-566.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2008) Genetically engineered crops: Agencies are proposing changes to improve oversight, but could take additional steps to enhance coordination and monitoring. Accessed March 6, 2019, https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0960.pdf.Google Scholar
• Walker ET (2014) Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker ET, Rea CM (2014) The political mobilization of firms and industries. Annual Rev. Sociol. 40(1):281–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Jia N, Bonardi J-P (2022) Corporate political connections: A multidisciplinary review. J. Management, ePub ahead of print November 27, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221136839.Google Scholar
• Werner T (2017) Investor reaction to covert corporate political activity. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2424–2443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang JJ, Marquis C, Qiao KY (2016) Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1307–1324.Link, Google Scholar