Recruiting Talent Through Entrepreneurs’ Social Vision Communication

References

• Abraham M, Burbano V (2022) Congruence between leadership gender and organizational claims affects the gender composition of the applicant pool: Field experimental evidence. Organ. Sci. 33(1):393–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Kim S, Moeen M (2021) Leveraging private enterprise: Incubation of new industries to address the public sector’s mission-oriented grand challenges. Strategy Sci. 6(4):385–411.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ohyama A (2013) Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Sci. 59(4):950–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):932–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiman-Smith L, Bauer TN, Cable DM (2001) Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. J. Bus. Psych. 16(2):219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Backhaus KB, Stone BA, Heiner K (2002) Exploringthe relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus. Soc. 41(3):292–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacq S, Lumpkin GT (2014) Can social entrepreneurship researchers learn from family business scholarship? A theory-based future research agenda. J. Soc. Entrepreneurship 5(3):270–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber AE, Wesson MJ, Roberson QM, Taylor MS (1999) A tale of two job markets: Organizational size and its effects on hiring practices and job search behavior. Personality Psych. 52(4):841–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JR, Locke EA (2004) The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. J. Appl. Psych. 89(4):587–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JR, Locke EA, Kirkpatrick SA (1998) A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. J. Appl. Psych. 83(1):43–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beach LR (1993) Broadening the definition of decision making: The role of prechoice screening of options. Psych. Sci. 4(4):215–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berson Y, Halevy N, Shamir B, Erez M (2015) Leading from different psychological distances: A construal-level perspective on vision communication, goal setting, and follower motivation. Leadership Quart. 26(2):143–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya CB, Sen S, Korschun D (2008) Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(2):37–44.Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Briscoe F (2010) The dynamics of interorganizational careers. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1034–1053.Link, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Mollick E (2015) Shifts and ladders: Comparing the role of internal and external mobility in managerial careers. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1629–1645.Link, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Singh J, Rogan M (2015) Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1702–1720.Link, Google Scholar
• Bohlmann C, Krumbholz L, Zacher H (2018) The triple bottom line and organizational attractiveness ratings: The role of pro-environmental attitude. Corporate Soc. Responsibility Environment. Managment 25(5):912–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branzei O, Parker SC, Moroz PW, Gamble E (2018) Going pro-social: Extending the individual-venture nexus to the collective level. J. Bus. Venturing 33(5):551–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breaugh JA (2013) Employee recruitment. Annu. Rev. Psych. 64:389–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briggs E, Jaramillo F, Weeks WA (2012) Perceived barriers to career advancement and organizational commitment in sales. J. Bus. Res. 65(7):937–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruton GD, Ketchen DJ, Ireland RD (2013) Entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty. J. Bus. Venturing 28(6):683–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021) The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform. Management Sci. 67(2):1004–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Dahl MS, Sorenson O (2018) Do start-ups pay less? Industry Labor Related Rev. 71(5):1179–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, DeRue DS (2002) The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. J. Appl. Psych. 87(5):875–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Judge TA (1994) Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personality Psych. 47(2):317–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Judge TA (1996) Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(3):294–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Turban DB (2003) The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand-equity perspective. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 33(11):2244–2266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardon MS, Stevens CE (2004) Managing human resources in small organizations: What do we know? Human Resources Management Rev. 14(3):295–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM, Murphy C, Clark JR (2014) A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1544–1570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman DS, Uggerslev KL, Carroll SA, Piasentin KA, Jones DA (2005) Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):928–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung SHD, Parker SC (2022) Founder affiliations: Jobseeker reactions and impact on employee recruitment by start-up ventures. Small Bus. Econom. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00694-7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke JS, Cornelissen JP, Healey MP (2019) Actions speak louder than words: How figurative language and gesturing in entrepreneurial pitches influences investment judgments. Acad. Management J. 62(2):335–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Fang TP, Bala Vissa B, Wu A (2019) Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities? Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):240–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham CJL (2009) Keeping work in perspective: Work-nonwork considerations and applicant decision making. Employee Responsibility Rights J. 21(2):89–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin MT, Dacin PA, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1203–1213.Link, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Nauta A (2009) Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: Implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. J. Appl. Psych. 94(4):913–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delignette-Muller ML, Dutang C (2015) fitdistrplus: An R package for fitting distributions. J. Statist. Software 64(4):1–34.Google Scholar
• den Besten ML (2020) Crunchbase research: Monitoring entrepreneurship research in the age of big data. Preprint, submitted November 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724395.Google Scholar
• DiCiccio TJ, Efron B (1996) Bootstrap confidence intervals. Statist. Sci. 11(3):189–212.Google Scholar
• Dineen BR, Ash SR, Noe RA (2002) A web of applicant attraction: Person-organization fit in the context of web-based recruitment. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):723–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Huysentruyt M (2022) Communication frames and beneficiary engagement in corporate social initiatives: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in France. Strategic Management J. 43(9):1823–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards J, Billsberry J (2010) Testing a multidimensional theory of person-environment fit. J. Managment Issue 22(4):476–493.Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Hamilton BH, Zenger TR (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 56(4):659–681.Link, Google Scholar
• Engel PY, Lewis DT, Cardon DMS, Hentschel PT (2022) Signaling diversity debt: Startup gender composition and the gender gap in joiners’ interest. Acad. Management J. Preprint, submitted November 10, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2021.1197.Google Scholar
• Evans WR, Davis WD (2011) An examination of perceived corporate citizenship, job applicant attraction, and CSR work role definition. Bus. Soc. 50(3):456–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans WR, Davis WD, Frink DD (2011) An examination of employee reactions to perceived corporate citizenship. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 41(4):938–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faberman J, Kudlyak M (2016) What does online job search tell us about the labor market? Econom. Perspective 40(1):1–15.Google Scholar
• Fackler D, Hölscher L, Schnabel C, Weyh A (2021) Does working at a start-up pay off? Small Bus. Econom. 58:2211–2233.Google Scholar
• Friendly M, Franklin PE, Hoffman D, Rubin DC (1982) The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments 14(4):375–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganguli I, Huysentruyt M, Le Coq C (2021) How do nascent social entrepreneurs respond to rewards? A field experiment on motivations in a grant competition. Management Sci. 67(10):6294–6316.Link, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Prat A, Serafeim G (2019) Corporate purpose and financial performance. Organ. Sci. 30(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Serafeim G (2022) Corporate purpose in public and private firms. Management Sci. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.461.Link, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Schildt HA, Lant TK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1479–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2008) Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. 39(3):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan Y, Deng H, Fan L, Zhou X (2021) Theorizing person-environment fit in a changing career world: Interdisciplinary integration and future directions. J. Vocation Behav. 126:103557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Oh JJ, Sen A (2020) What motivates innovative entrepreneurs? Evidence from a global field experiment. Management Sci. 66(10):4808–4819.Link, Google Scholar
• Highhouse S, Thornbury EE, Little IS (2007) Social-identity functions of attraction to organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):134–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honoré F, Ganco M (2023) Entrepreneurial teams’ acquisition of talent: Evidence from technology manufacturing industries using a two-sided approach. Strategic Management J. 44(1):141–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Staples DS (2001) Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(1):151–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones DA, Willness CR, Madey S (2014) Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 57(2):383–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Iyengar SS (2017) Startups that seek to “disrupt” get more funding than those that seek to “build.” Harvard Bus. Rev. November:2–6.Google Scholar
• Kouretsis A, Bampouris A, Morfiris P, Papageorgiou K (2020) labourR: Classify Multilingual Labour Market Free-Text to Standardized Hierarchical Occupations. Accessed May 20, 2021, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/labourR/index.html.Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor FIT. Personality Psych. 58(2):281–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Pierce L, Gino F (2012) The psychological costs of pay-for-performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1194–1214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee M, Huang L (2018) Gender bias, social impact framing, and evaluation of entrepreneurial ventures. Organ. Sci. 29(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Lumpkin GT, Moss TW, Gras DM, Kato S, Amezcua AS (2013) Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different, if at all? Small Bus. Econom. 40(3):761–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markman GD, Russo M, Lumpkin GT, Jennings PDD, Mair J (2016) Entrepreneurship as a platform for pursuing multiple goals: A special issue on sustainability, ethics, and entrepreneurship. J. Management Stud. 53(5):673–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMullen JS (2018) Organizational hybrids as biological hybrids: Insights for research on the relationship between social enterprise and the entrepreneurial ecosystem. J. Bus. Venturing 33(5):575–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller TL, Grimes MG, McMullen JS, Vogus TJ (2012) Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Rev. 37(4):616–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mindruta D (2013) Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Strategic Management J. 34(6):644–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mindruta D, Moeen M, Agarwal R (2016) A two-sided matching approach for partner selection and assessing complementarities in partners’ attributes in inter-firm alliances. Strategic Management J. 37(1):206–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mize TD (2019) Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociol. Sci. 6:81–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moizer J, Tracey P (2010) Strategy making in social enterprise: The role of resource allocation and its effects on organizational sustainability. Systems Res. Behav. Sci. 27(3):252–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2020) The Unicorn’s Shadow: Combating the Dangerous Myths that Hold Back Startups, Founders, and Investors (Wharton School Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Moser KJ, Tumasjan A, Welpe IM (2017) Small but attractive: Dimensions of new venture employer attractiveness and the moderating role of applicants’ entrepreneurial behaviors. J. Bus. Venturing 32(5):588–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nejati M, Brown ME, Shafaei A, Seet PS (2021) Employees’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Are they uniquely related to turnover intention? Soc. Responsibility J. 17(2):181–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng TWH, Yam KC, Aguinis H (2019) Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Personality Psych. 72(1):107–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Non A, Rohde I, de Grip A, Dohmen T (2022) Mission of the company, prosocial attitudes and job preferences: A discrete choice experiment. Labour Econom. 74:102087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyström K (2021) Working for an entrepreneur: Heaven or hell? Small Bus. Econom. 56(2):919–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouimet P, Zarutskie R (2014) Who works for startups? The relation between firm age, employee age, and growth. J. Financial Econom. 112(3):386–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parhankangas A, Renko M (2017) Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 32(2):215–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SC (2009) Why do small firms produce the entrepreneurs? J. Soc. Econom. 38(3):484–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazza M, Mazzola E, Perrone G, Vanhaverbeke W (2023) How do startups influence the resources commitment of different venture capital investors by communicating disruptiveness? Long Range Planning 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ployhart RE (2006) Staffing in the 21st century: New challenges and strategic opportunities. J. Management 32(6):868–897.Google Scholar
• Ployhart RE, Schmitt N, Tippins NT (2017) Solving the supreme problem: 100 Years of selection and recruitment at the Journal of Applied Psychology. J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):291–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rauch A, Frese M, Utsch A (2005) Effects of human capital and long-term human resources development and utilization on employment growth of small-scale businesses: A causal analysis. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 29(6):681–698.Google Scholar
• Retterath A, Braun R (2020) Benchmarking venture capital databases. Preprint, submitted September 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3706108.Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2015) Founder or joiner? The role of preferences and context in shaping different entrepreneurial interests. Management Sci. 61(9):2160–2184.Link, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H (2018) Fire in the belly? Employee motives and innovative performance in start-ups vs. established firms. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 12(4):423–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savickas ML (2020) Career construction theory and counseling model. Brown SD, Lent RW, eds. Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 165–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH, Bardi A (2001) Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. J. Cross Culture Psych. 32(3):268–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Besharov ML (2019) Bowing Before Dual Gods: How Structured Flexibility Sustains Organizational Hybridity.Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Gonin M, Besharov ML (2013) Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Bus. Ethics Quart. 23(3):407–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Dahl MS, Canales R, Burton MD (2021) Do startup employees earn more in the long run? Organ. Sci. 32(3):587–604.Link, Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1442–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stam D, Lord RG, van Knippenberg D, Wisse B (2014) An image of who we might become: Vision communication, possible selves, and vision pursuit. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1172–1194.Link, Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (2000) Social structure and organizations. Baum JAC, Dobbin F, ed. Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management, vol. 17 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley), 229–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swider BW, Zimmerman RD, Barrick MR (2015) Searching for the right fit: Development of applicant person-organization fit perceptions during the recruitment process. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):880–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan WL, Williams J, Tan TM (2005) Defining the ‘social’ in ‘social entrepreneurship’: Altruism and entrepreneurship. Internat. Entrepreneurial Management J. 1(3):353–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K (2014) Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J. Statist. Software 59(5).Google Scholar
• Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad. Management J. 40(3):658–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Balen T, Tarakci M, Sood A (2019) Do disruptive visions pay off? The impact of disruptive entrepreneurial visions on venture funding. J. Management Stud. 56(2):303–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Stam D (2014) Visionary leadership. Oxford Handbook of Leadership in Organizations (Oxford University Press, New York), 241–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Vianen AEM (2018) Person-environment fit: A review of its basic tenets. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5:75–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Werven R, Bouwmeester O, Cornelissen JP (2015) The power of arguments: How entrepreneurs convince stakeholders of the legitimate distinctiveness of their ventures. J. Bus. Venturing 30(4):616–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom VH (1966) Organizational choice: A study of pre- and postdecision processes. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 1(2):212–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waddoups CJ (2007) Employer size-wage effects in Australia. Labour 21(4–5):809–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wanous JP, Poland TD, Premack SL, Davis KS (1992) The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: A review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 77(3):288–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weerawardena J, Mort GS (2006) Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. J. World Bus. 41(1):21–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weller I, Hymer CB, Nyberg AJ, Ebert J (2019) How matching creates value: Cogs and wheels for human capital resources research. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):188–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson IO (2000) Employer legitimacy and recruitment success in small businesses. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 25(1):27–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood MS, Bakker RM, Fisher G (2021) Back to the future: A time-calibrated theory of entrepreneurial action. Acad. Management Rev. 46(1):147–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright C, Nyberg D, Grant D (2012) “Hippies on the third floor”: Climate change, narrative identity and the micro-politics of corporate environmentalism. Organ. Stud. 33(11):1451–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Haugh H (2018) Brace for impact: Uniting our diverse voices through a social impact frame. J. Bus. Venturing 33(5):566–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, York JG (2017) An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 42(3):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar