The Power to Reward vs. the Power to Punish: The Influence of Power Framing on Individual-Level Exploration

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1672

References

  • Aguinis H, Bradley KJ (2014) Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organ. Res. Methods 17(4):351–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmadi S, Khanagha S, Berchicci L, Jansen JJP (2017) Are managers motivated to explore in the face of a new technological change? The role of regulatory focus, fit, and complexity of decision-making. J. Management Stud. 54(2):209–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alexiev AS, Jansen JJP, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2010) Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. J. Management Stud. 47(7):1343–1364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 123–167.Google Scholar
  • Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Auh S, Menguc B (2005) Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. J. Bus. Res. 58(12):1652–1661.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aycan Z (2006) Paternalism: Toward conceptual refinement and operationalization. Yang KS, Hwang KK, Kim U, eds. Scientific Advances in Indigenous Psychologies: Empirical, Philosophical, and Cultural Contributions (Sage, London), 445–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bachmann R (2001) Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organ. Stud. 22(2):337–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (Prentice-Hall, New York).Google Scholar
  • Baumann O, Stieglitz N (2014) Rewarding value-creating ideas in organizations: The power of low-powered incentives. Strategic Management J. 35(3):358–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Boisot MH (1995) Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Brandon DM, Long JH, Loraas TM, Mueller-Phillips J, Vansant B (2013) Online instrument delivery and participant recruitment services: Emerging opportunities for behavioral accounting research. Behav. Res. Accounting 26(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brusoni S, Rosenkranz NA (2014) Reading between the lines: Learning as a process between organizational context and individuals’ proclivities. Eur. Management J. 32(1):147–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brusoni S, Laureiro-Martínez D, Canessa N, Zollo M (2020) Exploring exploration: The role of affective states as forces that hinder change. Industrial Corporate Change 29(1):207–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. 2(3):239–262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman RA, Grove AS (2007) Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—Repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management J. 28(10):965–979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgoon JK (1993) Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. J. Language Soc. Psych. 12(1–2):30–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgoon JK, Le Poire BA (1993) Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Comm. Res. 20(1):67–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clugston M, Howell JP, Dorfman PW (2000) Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment? J. Management 26(1):5–30.Google Scholar
  • Cole MS, Carter MZ, Zhang Z (2013) Leader–team congruence in power distance values and team effectiveness: The mediating role of procedural justice climate. J. Appl. Psych. 98(6):962–973.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA, Rodell JB (2011) Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1183–1206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA, Long DM, Rodell JB, Halvorsen-Ganepola MDK (2015) Adding the “in” to justice: A qualitative and quantitative investigation of the differential effects of justice rule adherence and violation. J. Appl. Psych. 100(2):278–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook KS, Cheshire C, Gerbasi A (2006) Power, dependence, and social exchange. Burke PJ, ed. Contemporary Social Psychological Theories (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 194–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crano WD, Brewer MB, Lac A (2014) Principles and Methods of Social Research, 3rd ed. (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Currall SC, Judge TA (1995) Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 64(2):151–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16(4):332–343.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Di Stefano G, Gutierrez C (2019) Under a magnifying glass: On the use of experiments in strategy research. Strategic Organ. 17(4):497–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di Stefano G, Micheli MR (2022) To stem the tide: Organizational climate and the locus of knowledge transfer. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print February 3, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1551.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Phillips KW, Rothbard NP (2013) Getting closer at the company party: Integration experiences, racial dissimilarity, and workplace relationships. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1377–1401.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(5):31–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1351–1374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Berdahl J (2007) Social power. Kruglansk AW, Higgins ET, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, vol. 2 (Guilford, New York), 678–692.Google Scholar
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):382–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss NJ (2003) Selective intervention and internal hybrids: Interpreting and learning from the rise and decline of the Oticon spaghetti organization. Organ. Sci. 14(3):331–349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL (2003) The value of positive emotions: The emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it’s good to feel good. Amer. Sci. 91(4):330–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman LC (2004) The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science (Empirical Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada).Google Scholar
  • French JRP, Raven B (1959) The Bases of Social Power (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
  • Friedman RS, Förster J (2001) The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1001–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabriel AS, Podsakoff NP, Beal DJ, Scott BA, Sonnentag S, Trougakos JP, Butts MM (2019) Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organ. Res. Methods 22(4):969–1006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC (2003) From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3):453–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G (2011) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):209–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Margolis JD (2011) Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (un)ethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(2):145–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (2007) Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial Corporate Change 16(5):945–975.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Håkonsson DD, Eskildsen JK, Argote L, Mønster D, Burton RM, Obel B (2016) Exploration vs. exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions. Strategic Management J. 37(6):985–1001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamstra MRW, Bolderdijk JW, Veldstra JL (2011) Everyday risk taking as a function of regulatory focus. J. Res. Personality 45(1):134–137.Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Higgins ET (1998) Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 30:1–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET (2002) How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. J. Consumer Psych. 12(3):177–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Judge TA, Piccolo RF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J. Appl. Psych. 89(5):755–768.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1984) Choices, values, and frames. Amer. Psych. 39(4):341–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2):265–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keum DD, See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2010) Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):317–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M, Tsai W (2003) Social Networks and Organizations (Sage, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkman BL, Chen G, Farh J-L, Chen ZX, Lowe KB (2009) Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Acad. Management J. 52(4):744–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S (2018) Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision‐making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1031–1058.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration-exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D (2021) Alliances and networks. Duhaime I, Hitt MA, Lyles M, eds. Strategic Management: State of the Field and Its Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 261–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EJ, Yoon J (1998) Network structure and emotion in exchange relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(6):871–894.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazer D, Friedman A (2007) The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):667–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee S (2019) Learning-by-moving: Can reconfiguring spatial proximity between organizational members promote individual-level exploration? Organ. Sci. 30(3):467–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee S, Meyer-Doyle P (2017) How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from microdata. Organ. Sci. 28(1):19–38.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levine EE, Schweitzer ME (2015) Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 126:88–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Xing L (2021) When does benevolent leadership inhibit silence? The joint moderating roles of perceived employee agreement and cultural value orientations. J. Management Psych. 36(7):562–575.Google Scholar
  • Lin W, Wang L, Chen S (2013) Abusive supervision and employee well-being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Appl. Psych. 62(2):308–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin W, Ma J, Zhang Q, Li JC, Jiang F (2018) How is benevolent leadership linked to employee creativity? The mediating role of leader–member exchange and the moderating role of power distance orientation. J. Bus. Ethics 152(4):1099–1115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lord RG, Brown DJ, Harvey JL, Hall RJ (2001) Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. Leadership. Quart. 12(3):311–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Løvås B, Ghoshal S (2000) Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management J. 21(9):875–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas JW (2003) Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(3):464–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luhmann N (1979) Trust and Power (Wiley, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra D, Murnighan JK (2002) The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):534–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mantere S, Vaara E (2008) On the problem of participation in strategy: A critical discursive perspective. Organ. Sci. 19(2):341–358.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1966) The power of power. Easton D, ed. Varieties of Political Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 39–70.Google Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Olsen JP (1975) The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur. J. Political Res. 3(2):147–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marino A, Aversa P, Mesquita L, Anand J (2015) Driving performance via exploration in changing environments: Evidence from Formula One Racing. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1079–1100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer RC, Davis JH (1999) The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 84(1):123–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. 44(1):118–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNallie J (2017) Debriefing of participants. Allen M, ed. The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (Sage, London), 356–359.Google Scholar
  • Mehlhorn K, Newell BR, Todd PM, Lee MD, Morgan K, Braithwaite VA, Hausmann D, et al. (2015) Unpacking the exploration-exploitation tradeoff: A synthesis of human and animal literatures. Decision (Washington DC) 2(3):191–215.Google Scholar
  • Milgram S (1965) Liberating effects of group pressure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 1(2):127–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm LD (1988) The structure and use of power: A comparison of reward and punishment power. Soc. Psych. Quart. 51(2):108–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm LD (1989) Punishment power: A balancing process in power-dependence relations. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(6):1392–1418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm LD (1990) Structure, action, and outcomes: The dynamics of power in social exchange. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 55(3):427–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm LD (1997) Coercive Power in Social Exchange (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm LD, Quist TM, Wiseley PA (1994) Imbalanced structures, unfair strategies: Power and justice in social exchange. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 59(1):98–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mom TJM, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2007) Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. J. Management Stud. 44(6):910–931.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mom TJM, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2009) Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):812–828.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mom TJM, van Neerijnen P, Reinmoeller P, Verwaal E (2015) Relational capital and individual exploration: Unravelling the influence of goal alignment and knowledge acquisition. Organ. Stud. 36(6):809–829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moran P (2005) Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management J. 26(12):1129–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W, Laamanen T, Vaara E (2018) Communication and attention dynamics: An attention-based view of strategic change. Strategic Management J. 39(1):155–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palan S, Schitter C (2018) Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 17:22–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 70:153–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pellegrini EK, Scandura TA (2008) Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. J. Management 34(3):566–593.Google Scholar
  • Pennington GL, Roese NJ (2003) Regulatory focus and temporal distance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 39(6):563–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piezunka H, Schilke O (2023) The dual function of organizational structure: Aggregating and shaping individuals’ votes. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print February 16, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1653.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pirson M, Malhotra D (2011) Foundations of organizational trust: What matters to different stakeholders? Organ. Sci. 22(4):1087–1104.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff NP, Podsakoff PM, Kuskova VV (2010) Dispelling misconceptions and providing guidelines for leader reward and punishment behavior. Bus. Horizons 53(3):291–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, Bommer WH, Podsakoff NP, MacKenzie SB (2006) Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):113–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell TC, Lovallo D, Fox CR (2011) Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1369–1386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raveendran M, Puranam P, Warglien M (2016) Object salience in the division of labor: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 62(7):2110–2128.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raveendran M, Srikanth K, Zhang G (2021) Aspiration levels and exploration-exploitation: An adaptive learning approach. Accessed September 2, 2021, https://eller.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/ASPIRATION%20LEVELS%20AND%20EXPLORATION-EXPLOITATION-%20AN%20ADAPTIVE%20LEARNING%20APPROACH.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Reypens C, Levine SS (2018) Behavior in behavioral strategy: Capturing, measuring, analyzing. Adv. Strategic Management 39:221–246.Google Scholar
  • Reyt J-N, Wiesenfeld BM (2015) Seeing the forest for the trees: Exploratory learning, mobile technology, and knowledge workers’ role integration behaviors. Acad. Management J. 58(3):739–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogan M, Mors ML (2014) A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1860–1877.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rogan M, Mors ML (2017) Managerial networks and exploration in a professional service firm. Organ. Stud. 38(2):225–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G (2000) Visionaries, managers, and strategic direction. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):693–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin RS, Bommer WH, Bachrach DG (2010) Operant leadership and employee citizenship: A question of trust? Leadership Quart. 21(3):400–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilke O (2018) A micro-institutional inquiry into resistance to environmental pressures. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1431–1466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilke O, Cook KS (2015) Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives. Strategic Management J. 36(2):276–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilke O, Reimann M, Cook KS (2015) Power decreases trust in social exchange. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 112(42):12950–12955.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilke O, Levine SS, Kacperczyk O, Zucker LG (2019) Call for papers-special issue on experiments in organizational theory. Organ. Sci. 30(1):232–234.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shen X, Li H, Tolbert PS (2021) Converging tides lift all boats: Consensus in evaluation criteria boosts investments in firms in nascent technology sectors. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print September 27, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1493.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):456–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1951) A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica 19(3):293–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin SB, See KE, Miller CC, Lawless MW, Carton AM (2011) The paradox of stretch goals: Organizations in pursuit of the seemingly impossible. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):544–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun S (2022) Is political skill always beneficial? Why and when politically skilled employees become targets of coworker social undermining. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1142–1162.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Svare H, Gausdal AH, Möllering G (2020) The function of ability, benevolence, and integrity-based trust in innovation networks. Ind. Innov. 27(6):585–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tempelaar MP, Rosenkranz NA (2019) Switching hats: The effect of role transition on individual ambidexterity. J. Management 45(4):1517–1539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thibaut J (1950) An experimental study of the cohesiveness of underprivileged groups. Human Relations 3(3):251–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thibaut JW, Kelley HH (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tichy NM, Tushman ML, Fombrun C (1979) Social network analysis for organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 4(4):507–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuncdogan A, Van Den Bosch F, Volberda H (2015) Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leaders’ exploration and exploitation activities. Leadership Quart. 26(5):838–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. 38(4):8–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler TR (1989) The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(5):830–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler TR (1994) Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(5):850–863.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler TR, Lind EA, Huo YJ (2000) Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures. Psych. Public Policy Law 6(4):1138–1163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang AC, Cheng BS (2010) When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. J. Organ. Behav. 31(1):106–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Mao J, Wu W, Liu J (2012) Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: The mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance. Asia Pacific J. Human Resources 50(1):43–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Weber B, Bauman CW (2019) The cognitive and behavioral impact of promotion and prevention contracts on trust in repeated exchanges. Acad. Management J. 62(2):361–382.Google Scholar
  • Weber L, Mayer KJ (2011) Designing effective contracts: Exploring the influence of framing and expectations. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):53–75.Google Scholar
  • Wilson TD, Aronson E, Carlsmith K (2010) The art of laboratory experimentation. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill, Boston), 51–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge B, Floyd SW (1990) The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 11(3):231–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoo B, Donthu N, Lenartowicz T (2011) Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. J. Internat. Consumer Marketing 23(3–4):193–210.Google Scholar
  • Yudkin DA, Pick R, Hur EY, Liberman N, Trope Y (2019) Psychological distance promotes exploration in search of a global maximum. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 45(6):893–906.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J, George JM (2003) Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. Leadership Quart. 14(4–5):545–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker LG, Schilke O (2020) Toward a theory of micro-institutional processes: Forgotten roots, links to social-psychological research, and new ideas. Haack P, Sieweke J, Wessel L, eds. Microfoundations of Institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 371–390.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.