A Microstructural Approach to Self-Organizing: The Emergence of Attention Networks

References

• Aalen O, Borgan O, Gjessing H (2008) Survival and Event History Analysis: A Process Point of View (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy O, Poetz K, Puranam P, Reitzig M (2021) Adaptation or persistence? Emergence and revision of organization designs in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 32(6):1439–1472.Link, Google Scholar
• Andersen PK, Gill RD (1982) Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. Ann. Statist. 10(4):1100–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen PK, Keiding N (2002) Multi-state models for event history analysis. Statist. Methods Medical Res. 11(2):91–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen PK, Borgan O, Gill RD, Keiding N (2012) Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Apache Software Foundation (2022a) Apache community development. Accessed August 25, 2022, https://community.apache.org/.Google Scholar
• Apache Software Foundation (2022b) How it works. Accessed August 25, 2022, http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html.Google Scholar
• Arazy O, Lindberg A, Rezaei M, Samorani M (2020) The evolutionary trajectories of peer-produced artifacts: Group composition, the trajectories’ exploration, and the quality of artifacts. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(4):2013–2053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arazy O, Daxenberger J, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Nov O, Gurevych I (2016) Turbulent stability of emergent roles: The dualistic nature of self-organizing knowledge coproduction. Inform Systems Res. 27(4):792–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Arya D, Wang W, Guo, JLC, Cheng J (2019) Analysis and detection of information types of open source software issue discussions. Preprint, submitted February 2, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.0709.Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open-source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.Link, Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Sci. 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JAY, Felin T (2013) What are microfoundations? Acad. Management Perspect. 27(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearman PS, Moody J, Stovel K (2014) Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(1):44–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC, Knudsen T (2005) The role of routines in reducing pervasive uncertainty. J. Bus. Res. 58(6):746–757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C (2008) Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(3):593–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Le Mens G (2009) How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(20):8146–8150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergstrom TC (2003) The algebra of assortative encounters and the evolution of cooperation. Internat. Game Theory Rev. 5(3):211–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitzer J, Geishecker I, Schröder PJ (2017) Is there a wage premium for volunteer OSS engagement? Signalling, learning and noise. Appl. Econom. 49(14):1379–1394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1960) Structural effects. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):178–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boh W, Slaughter SA, Espinosa JA (2007) Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Sci. 53(8):1315–1331.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgan Ø, Goldstein L, Langholz B (1995) Methods for the analysis of sampled cohort data in the Cox proportional hazards model. Ann. Statist. 23(5):1749–1778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradach JL, Eccles RG (1989) Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociol. 15(1):97–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandes U, Lerner J, Snijders TA (2009) Networks evolving step by step: Statistical analysis of dyadic event data. Proc. 2009 Internat. Conf. Adv. Social Network Anal. Mining (IEEE), 200–205.Google Scholar
• Breiger R (1974) The duality of persons and groups. Soc. Forces 53(2):181–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiger RL, Mohr JW (2004) Institutional logics from the aggregation of organizational networks: Operational procedures for the analysis of counted data. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 10(1):17–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butts CT (2008) A relational event framework for social action. Sociol. Methodology 38(1):155–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butts CT, Lomi A, Snijders TAB, Stadtfeld C (2023) Relational event models in network science. Network Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Carley K (1991) A theory of group stability. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56(3):331–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellaneta F, Zollo M (2015) The dimensions of experiential learning in the management of activity load. Organ. Sci. 26(1):140–157.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision-making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2020) Division of roles and endogenous specialization. Indust. Corporate Change 29(1):105–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (2012) Perceiving and remembering routine action: Fundamental micro‐level origins. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1383–1388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (2012) “A garbage can model” at 40: A solution that still attracts attention. Lomi A, Harrison JR, eds. The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 36 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conaldi G, Lomi A (2013) The dual network structure of organizational problem solving: A case study on open-source software development. Soc. Networks 35(2):237–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conaldi G, Lomi A, Tonellato M (2012) Dynamic models of affiliation and the network structure of problem solving in an open source software project. Organ. Res. Methods 15(3):385–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlisk J (1996) Why bounded rationality? J. Econom. Literature 34(2):669–700.Google Scholar
• Cook RJ, Lawless J (2007) The Statistical Analysis of Recurrent Events (Springer Science & Business Media).Google Scholar
• Cox D (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 34(2):87–22.Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Dahlander L, Grohsjean T, Salter A (2017) Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Acad. Management J. 60(2):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cross R, Gardner HK, Crocker A (2021) For agile transformation, choose the right people. Harvard Bus. Rev. 99(2):60–71.Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Scozzi B (2008) Bug fixing practices within free/libre open source software development teams. J. Database Management 19(2):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Annabi H, Howison J (2003) Defining open-source software project success. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, 28.Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Wei K, Howison J, Wiggins A (2012) Free/libre open source software development: What we know and what we do not know. ACM Comput. Surveys 44(2):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of The Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Magnusson MG (2005) Relationships between open-source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy 34(4):481–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, McFarland DA (2013) Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):69–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S (2011) Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organ. Sci. 22(4):961–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Darley JM, Latané B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8(4):377–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deichmann D, Gillier T, Tonellato M (2021) Getting on board with new ideas: An analysis of idea commitments on a crowdsourcing platform. Res. Policy 50(9):104320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Eirich GM (2006) Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32:271–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everett MG, Borgatti SP (2013) The dual-projection approach for two-mode networks. Soc. Networks 35(2):204–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Johnson SL (2011) Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1464–1480.Link, Google Scholar
• Feld SL (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(5):1015–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fioretti G, Lomi A (2008) The garbage can model of organizational choice: An agent-based reconstruction. Simulation Model. Practice Theory 16(2):192–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fioretti G, Lomi A (2010) Passing the buck in the garbage can model of organizational choice. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 16(2):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad ØD, Snow CC, Miles RE, Lettl C (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):734–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A, Giarratana MS, Luzzi A (2008) The penguin has entered the building: The commercialization of open-source software products. Organ. Sci. 19(2):292–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson D, Moloche G, Weinberg S (2006) Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1043–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J (1973) Designing Complex Organizations (Reading, MA)Google Scholar
• Gibson DR (2012) Taking turns and talking ties: Networks and conversational interaction. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(6):1561–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grujić J, Mitrović M, Tadić B (2009) Mixing patterns and communities on bipartite graphs on web-based social interactions. 16th Internat. Conf. Digital Signal Processing (IEEE), 1–8.Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas MR, Criscuolo P, George G (2015) Which problems to solve? Attention allocation and online knowledge sharing in organizations. Acad. Management J. 58(3):680–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT, Haas MR (2001) Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hars A, Ou S (2002) Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 6(3):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Prasad A, Sethi SP (2003) Harvesting altruism in open-source software development. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 118(2):381–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Res. Policy 35(7):953–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman AJ, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.Link, Google Scholar
• Hooimeijer P, Weimer W (2007) Modeling bug report quality. Proc. 22nd IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Automated Software Engrg. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 34–43.Google Scholar
• Huberman BA, Romero DM, Wu F (2009) Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. J. Inform. Sci. 35(6):758–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung HJ, Lee JJ (2016) The qUEST for originality: A new typology of knowledge search and breakthrough inventions. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1725–1753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1973) Attention and Effort (Prentice Hall, NJ).Google Scholar
• Keren M, Levhari D (1979) The optimum span of control in a pure hierarchy. Management Sci. 25(11):1162–1172.Link, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2010) Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):317–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klapper H, Reitzig M (2018) On the effects of authority on peer motivation: L earning from Wikipedia. Strateg. Manag. J. 39(8):2178–2203.Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration: Organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Metiu A (2001) Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 17(2):248–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Puranam P (2008) Integration through incentives within differentiated organizations. Organ. Sci. 19(6):860–875.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, von Hippel E (2003) How open-source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Wolf RG (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GK, Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. 14(6):633–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee MY, Edmondson AC (2017) Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:35–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2015) Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(4):747–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Lomi A (2020a) The free encyclopedia that anyone can dispute: An analysis of the micro-structural dynamics of positive and negative relations in the production of contentious Wikipedia articles. Soc. Networks 60:11–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Lomi A (2020b) Reliability of relational event model estimates under sampling: How to fit a relational event model to 360 million dyadic events. Network Sci. 8(1):97–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2001) The open-source movement: Key research questions. Eur. Econom. Rev. 45(4–6):819–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open-source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Bussmann M, Snijders TA, Brandes U (2013) Modeling frequency and type of interaction in event networks. Corvinus J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 4(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin YR, Keegan B, Margolin D, Lazer D (2014) Rising tides or rising stars? Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. PloS One 9(5):e94093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open-source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, Zaggl MA (2021) How open crowds self-organize. Acad. Management Discoveries 7(1):104–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) How decisions happen in organizations. Human Comput. Interaction 6(2):95–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1976) Attention and the ambiguity of self-interest. March JG, Olsen JP, eds. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway), 38–53.Google Scholar
• March JG, Olsen JP (1984) The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 78(3):734–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1993) Introduction. Organizations, 2nd ed. (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA), 1–19.Google Scholar
• Massa FG, O’Mahony S (2021) Order from chaos: How networked activists self-organize by creating a participation architecture. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):1037–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Sci. 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Moffett MW, Garnier S, Eisenhardt KM, Furr NR, Warglien M, Sartoris C, Ocasio W, Knudsen T, Bach LA, Offenberg J (2021) Ant colonies: Building complex organizations with minuscule brains and no leaders. J. Organ. Design 10(1):55–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler D, Tushman M (1997) Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman ME (2002) Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(20):208701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman ME (2003) Mixing patterns in networks. Phys. Rev. E 67(2):026126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman ME, Park J (2003) Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Phys. Rev. E. 68(3):036122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2012) Situated attention, loose and tight coupling, and the garbage can model. Lomi A, Harrison JR, eds. The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 36 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2005) An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro-and macroperspectives in strategy processes. Strategy Process, 39–61.Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Yakis-Douglas B, Boynton D, Laamanen T, Rerup C, Vaara E, Whittington R (2022) It’s a different world: A dialog on the attention-based view in a post-Chandlerian world. J. Management Inquiry 32(2):107–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF (1980) Managing garbage can hierarchies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(2):583–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF (2018) Faulkner’s assembly of memories into history: Narrative networks in multiple times. Amer J. Sociol. 124(2):406–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Powell WW (2012) The problem of emergence. Padgett JF, Powell WW, eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Lee D, Collier N (2003) Economic production as chemistry. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):843–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastor-Satorras R, Vázquez A, Vespignani A (2001) Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(25):258701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pattison P, Robins G (2002) Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociol. Methodology 32(1):301–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry PO, Wolfe PJ (2013) Point process modelling for directed interaction networks. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 75(5):821–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen‐Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1132–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prat A, Dessein W (2016) Attention in organizations. Bramoullé Y, Galeotti A, Rogers B, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 675–697.Google Scholar
• Prato M, Stark D (2023) Observational learning in networks of competition: How structures of attention among rivals can bring interpretive advantage. Organ. Stud. 44(2):253–276Google Scholar
• Puranam P (2018) The Microstructure of Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Silvestri L, Gulati R (2020) The role of interdependence in the micro-foundations of organization design: Task, goal, and knowledge interdependence. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):828–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond E (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge Tech. Policy 12(3):23–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M (2022) How to get better at flatter designs: Considerations for shaping and leading organizations with less hierarchy. J. Organ. Des. Journal of Organization Design. 11(1):5–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rezgui A, Crowston K (2018) Stigmergic coordination in Wikipedia. Proc. 14th Internat. Sympos. Open Collaboration (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Rhee L, Leonardi PM (2018) Which pathway to good ideas? An attention‐based view of innovation in social networks. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1188–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera MT, Soderstrom SB, Uzzi B (2010) Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:91–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robertson BJ (2015) Holacracy: The New Management System for A Rapidly Changing World (Henry Holt and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Robles G, González-Barahona JM, Izquierdo-Cortazar D, Herraiz I (2009) Tools for the study of the usual data sources found in libre software projects. Internat. J. Open Source Software Processes 1(1):24–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rolandsson B, Bergquist M, Ljungberg J (2011) Open-source in the firm: Opening up professional practices of software development. Res. Policy 40(4):576–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Sci. 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1998) Social mechanisms and social dynamics. Hedström P, Swedberg R, eds. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York), 32–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open-source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Shang MS, Lu L, Zhang YC, Zhou T (2010) Empirical analysis of web-based user-object bipartite networks. Europhysics Lett. 90(4):48006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shore J, Bernstein E, Lazer D (2015) Facts and figuring: An experimental investigation of network structure and performance in information and solution spaces. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1432–1446.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Process in Administrative Organization, 2nd ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1959) Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Amer. Econom. Rev. 49(3):253–283.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1978) Rationality as process and as product of thought. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68(2):1–16.Google Scholar
• Smith EB (2011) Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spaeth S, Haefliger S, von Krogh G, Renzl B (2008) Communal resources in open-source software development. Inform. Res. 13(1).Google Scholar
• Stam W (2009) When does community participation enhance the performance of open-source software companies? Res. Policy 38(8):1288–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart D (2005) Social status in an open-source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(5):823–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Gosain S (2006) The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open-source software development teams. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(2):291–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Podolny JM (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart HC, Dabbish L, Kiesler S, Kinnaird P, Kang R (2012) Social transparency in networked information exchange: A theoretical framework. Proc. ACM 2012 Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work, 451–460.Google Scholar
• Sullivan BN (2010) Competition and beyond: Problems and attention allocation in organizational rulemaking processes. Organ. Sci. 21(2):432–450.Link, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Worchel S, Austin W, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Tasselli S, Caimo A (2019) Does it take three to dance the Tango? Organizational design, triadic structures and boundary spanning across subunits. Soc. Networks 59:10–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tasselli S, Kilduff M (2021) Network agency. Acad. Management Ann. 15(1):68–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tasselli S, Kilduff M, Menges JI (2015) The microfoundations of organizational social networks: A review and an agenda for future research. J. Management 41(5):1361–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Fiske ST (1978) Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 11(C):249–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Therneau TM (2022) Survival: A package for survival analysis in R (Version 3.4-0). Accessed August 25, 2022, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.Google Scholar
• Therneau TM, Grambsch PM (2013) Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model (Springer Science & Business Media).Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. 79(4):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Sci. 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2006) The promise of research on open-source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975–983.Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open-source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin MW (2012) Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open-source software development. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):649–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vu DQ, Hunter D, Smyth P, Asuncion AU (2011) Continuous-time regression models for longitudinal networks. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 24:2492–2500.Google Scholar
• Wang P, Pattison P, Robins G (2013) Exponential random graph model specifications for bipartite networks: A dependence hierarchy. Soc. Networks 35(2):211–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Kim S (2010) Monitoring software quality evolution for defects. IEEE Software 27(4):58–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2012) Construction, concentration, and (dis)continuities in social valuations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38(1):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar