Learning Strategic Representations: Exploring the Effects of Taking a Strategy Course

References

• Argote L (2013) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational Learning (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (2021) 2020 guiding principles and standards for business accreditation. Accessed August 22, 2021, https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/business/standards-and-tables/2020%20aacsb%20business%20accreditation%20standards%20july%202021.ashx.Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Ed. Psych. 28(2):117–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barden J, Petty RE (2008) The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(3):489–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr PS, Stimpert JL, Huff AS (1992) Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennis WG, O’Toole J (2005) How business schools lost their way. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(5):96–104.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis RA (1991) Strategic management and the straightjacket: An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. 2(3):315–319.Link, Google Scholar
• Beyer S (1990) Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(5):960–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The “simple rules” that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bransford J, Brown AL, Cocking RR (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, expanded ed. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Campbell-Hunt C (2000) What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta-analysis. Strategic Management J. 21(2):127–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Cavico FJ, Mujtaba BG (2010) An assessment of business schools’ student retention, accreditation, and faculty scholarship challenges. Contemporary Issues Ed. Res. 3(1):107–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler P, Sweller J (1991) Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition Instruction 8(4):293–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psych. 4(1):55–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strategic Management J. 40(3):331–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi MTH, Glaser R, Farr MJ, eds. (1988) The Nature of Expertise (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Churchman CW (1967) Wicked problems. Management Sci. 14(4):B141–B142.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement 20(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly M (2003) The end of the MBA as we know it? Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 2(4):365–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Laureiro-Martínez D (2018) Individual and organizational antecedents of strategic foresight: A representational approach. Strategy Sci. 3(3):513–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1198–1219.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lewin AY (1990) Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. 1(1):1–9.Link, Google Scholar
• Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Han S-K (2004) A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management J. 25(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David FR, David ME, David FR (2011) What are business schools doing for business today? Bus. Horizons 54(1):51–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Druckman D, Bjork RA (1994) Learning, Remembering, Believing: Enhancing Human Performance (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Emery CR, Kramer TR, Tian RG (2003) Return to academic standards: A critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Quality Assurance Ed. 11(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA (2006) The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 683–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Charness N (1994) Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. Amer. Psych. 49(8):725–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, eds. (2006) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Feltovich PJ, Prietula MJ, Ericsson KA (2006) Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 41–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (2017) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Frey MC, Detterman DK (2004) Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the Scholastic Assessment Test and general cognitive ability. Psych. Sci. 15(6):373–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garlick D (2002) Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: The role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism. Psych. Rev. 109(1):116–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gary MS, Wood RE (2011) Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management J. 32(6):569–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Porac J (2018) On the origin of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):352–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S (2005) Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 4(1):75–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Moran P (1996) Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):13–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson DE, Lawrence BS (2010) Women’s and men’s career referents: How gender composition and comparison level shape career expectations. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1159–1175.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C (2018) How to develop strategic management competency: Reconsidering the learning goals and knowledge requirements of the core strategy course. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 17(3):322–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grégoire DA, Barr PS, Shepherd DA (2010) Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organ. Sci. 21(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Haas C, Hadjar A (2020) Students’ trajectories through higher education: A review of quantitative research. Higher Ed. 79(6):1099–1118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris KR, Graham S, Mason LH (2006) Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. Amer. Ed. Res. J. 43(2):295–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häussler P, Hoffmann L (2002) An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. J. Res. Sci. Teaching 39(9):870–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hazenbush M (2019) The subjects most MBA candidates agree are must-haves in their ideal program. Accessed August 22, 2021, https://www.mba.com/articles-and-announcements/articles/attending-business-school/the-must-haves-in-an-mba-program.Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Sparrow P (2002) The Competent Organization: A Psychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK).Google Scholar
• Hubbard G (2019) The real value of business schools. Accessed August 22, 2021, https://bized.aacsb.edu/articles/2019/may/the-real-value-of-business-schools.Google Scholar
• Huff AS (1990) Mapping Strategic Thought (Wiley, Chichester, NY).Google Scholar
• Hyde J, Linn MC (1988) Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 104(1):53–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Khurana R, Spender JC (2012) Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: More than “a problem in organizational design.” J. Management Stud. 49(3):619–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(6):1121–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuncel NR, Hezlett SA, Ones DS (2004) Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(1):148–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley P, Simon HA (1981) The central role of learning in cognition. Anderson JR, ed. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 361–380.Google Scholar
• Leaper C, Robnett RD (2011) Women are more likely than men to use tentative language, aren’t they? A meta-analysis testing for gender differences and moderators. Psych. Women Quart. 35(1):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine JA (2005) Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. J. Appl. Psych. 90(6):1153–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons E, Zhang L (2017) The impact of entrepreneurship programs on minorities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):303–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield ER, Helms BP (1982) Detecting multicollinearity. Amer. Statist. 36(3a):158–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martignoni D, Menon A, Siggelkow N (2016) Consequences of misspecified mental models: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2545–2568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCutchen D (1996) A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Ed. Psych. Rev. 8(3):299–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand BW, Lampel J (1998) Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Théorêt A (1976) The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(2):246–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novick LR (1988) Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 14(3):510–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18:187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patel VL, Groen GJ (1991) The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look. Ericsson KA, Smith J, ed. Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 93–125.Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Boyd RL, Jordan K, Blackburn K (2015) The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015 (University of Texas, Austin).Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1984) The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 46(1):69–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Briñol P, Tormala ZL (2002) Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(5):722–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Fong CF (2004) The business school “business”: Some lessons from the US experience. J. Management Stud. 41(8):1501–1520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Rindova VP, Maggitti PG (2008) Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the US IPO market. Acad. Management J. 51(12):335–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem RL, Rosenstein J (2000) Is organization theory obvious to practitioners? A test of one established theory. Organ. Sci. 11(5):509–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Ransdell S, Levy CM (1996) Working memory constraints on writing quality and fluency. Levy CM, Ransdell S, eds. The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 93–105.Google Scholar
• Rasiel EM (1999) The McKinsey Way (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Reyes LH (1984) Affective variables and mathematics education. Elementary School J. 84(5):558–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Reger RK, Dalpiaz E (2012) The mind of the strategist and the eye of the beholder: The socio-cognitive perspective in strategy research. Dagnino GB, ed. Handbook of Research on Competitive Strategy (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 147–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ro H, Loya K (2015) The effect of gender and race intersectionality on student learning outcomes in engineering. Rev. Higher Ed. 38(3):359–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J. Experiment. Psych. General 104(3):192–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin RS, Dierdorff EC (2013) Building a better MBA: From a decade of critique toward a decennium of creation. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 12(1):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (1984) Toward a strategic theory of the firm. Lamb RL, ed. Competitive Strategic Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 556–570.Google Scholar
• Schmidt FL, Hunter J (2004) General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(1):162–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld AH (1992) Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. Grouws DA, ed. Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (Macmillan Library Reference, New York), 334–370.Google Scholar
• Schwartz MS, Sadler PM, Sonnert G, Tai RH (2009) Depth vs. breadth: How content coverage in high school science courses relates to later success in college science coursework. Sci. Ed. 93(5):798–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1967) The business school: A problem in organizational design. J. Management Stud. 4(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smallman HS, Hegarty M (2007) Expertise, spatial ability and intuition in the use of complex visual displays. Proc. Human Factors Ergonomics Soc. Annual Meeting, vol. 51 (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 200–204.Google Scholar
• Snyder TD, de Brey C, Dillow SA (2019) Digest of Education Statistics 2018 (National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Stemler S (2000) An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment Res. Evaluation 7:17.Google Scholar
• Sterling AD, Thompson ME, Wang S, Kusimo A, Gilmartin S, Sheppard S (2020) The confidence gap predicts the gender pay gap among STEM graduates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(48):30303–30308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sternberg RJ, Wagner RK (1993) The g-ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 2(1):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart M (2009) The Management Myth (W. W. Norton & Co, New York).Google Scholar
• Stewart TR, Heideman KF, Moninger WR, Reagan-Cirincione P (1992) Effects of improved information on the components of skill in weather forecasting. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 53(2):107–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strategic Management (2017) Academy of Management Strategic Management Division statement. Accessed August 22, 2021, http://strdiv.org/about/about-us.Google Scholar
• Tenison C, Anderson JR (2016) Modeling the distinct phases of skill acquisition. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 42(5):749–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas KW, Tymon WG (1982) Necessary properties of relevant research: Lessons from recent criticisms of the organizational sciences. Acad. Management Rev. 7(3):345–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vosniadou S, Brewer WF (1987) Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Rev. Ed. Res. 57(1):51–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber RP (1990) Basic Content Analysis, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Milton LP (2000) How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):366–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wigfield A, Turci L, Cambria J, Eccles JS (2019) Motivation in education. Ryan RM, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (Oxford University Press, New York), 442–462.Google Scholar
• Wiggins M, O’Hare D (1995) Expertise in aeronautical weather-related decision making: A cross-sectional analysis of general aviation pilots. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 1(4):305–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood R, Bandura A (1989) Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 56(3):407–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright RP, Paroutis SE, Blettner DP (2013) How useful are the strategic tools we teach in business schools? J. Management Stud. 50(1):92–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang M-J, Christensen M, Bloom N, Sadun R, Rivkin J (2020) How do CEOs make strategy? NBER Working Paper No. 27952, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Zarutskie R (2010) The role of top management team human capital in venture capital markets: Evidence from first-time funds. J. Bus. Venturing 25(1):155–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ (2000) Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Ed. Psych. 25(1):82–91.Crossref, Google Scholar