A Temporal Perspective on Boundary Spanning: Engagement Dynamics and Implications for Knowledge Transfer

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1677

References

  • Aiken L, West S (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H, Herker D (1977) Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Acad. Management Rev. 2(2):217–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen TJ, Tushman ML, Lee MS (1979) Technology transfer as function of position in the spectrum from research through development to technical services. Acad. Management J. 22(4):684–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baughn CC, Denekamp JG, Stevens JH, Osborn N (1997) Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances. J. World Bus. 32(2):103–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berry WD, DeMeritt JHR, Esarey J (2016) Bias and overconfidence in parametric models of interactive processes. Amer. J. Political Sci. 60(2):521–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birkinshaw J, Ambos TC, Bouquet C (2017) Boundary spanning activities of corporate HQ executives: Insights from a longitudinal study. J. Management Stud. 54(4):422–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bumpus A, Comello S (2017) Emerging clean energy technology investment trends. Natural Climate Change 7(6):382–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS, Merluzzi J (2016) Network oscillation. Acad. Managment Discovery 2(4):368–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chai S, Freeman RB (2019) Temporary colocation and collaborative discovery: Who confers at conferences. Strategic Management J. 40(13):2138–2164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H, Tucci CL (2020) The interplay between open innovation and lean startup, or, why large companies are not large versions of startups. Strategic Management Rev. 1(2):277–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi CJ, Lee SH (1997) A knowledge-based view of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Beamish P, Killings J, eds. Cooperative Strategies, European Perspectives (New Lexington Press, San Francisco), 33–58.Google Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornelissen JP, Durand R (2012) Beyond novelty: Conceptual blending and causality. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):152–154.Google Scholar
  • Cornelissen JP, Werner MD (2014) Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):181–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann D (2016) One foot in one foot out: How does individuals external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillman DA (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Dyer LM (1985) Structure and development of social schemata: Evidence from positive and negative transfer effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(4):839–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1180–1198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furr NR, O’Keefe K, Dyer H (2016) Managing multi-party innovation. Harvard. Bus. Rev. 94:76–83.Google Scholar
  • Gouldner AW (1957) Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 2(3):281–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Gutierrez-Huerter OG, Moon J, Gold S, Chapple W (2020) Micro-processes of translation in the transfer of practices from MNE headquarters to foreign subsidiaries: The role of subsidiary translators. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 51:389–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Ham W (2015) Microfoundations of knowledge recombination: Peripheral knowledge and breakthrough innovation in teams. Cognition and strategy. Adv. Strategic Management 32:47–87.Google Scholar
  • Hansen M (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing know-ledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M (2002) Knowledge networks: Explaining effecting knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. 13(3):232–248.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.Google Scholar
  • Harman HH (1976) Modern Factor Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Jensen R, Szulanski G (2004) Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 35:508–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson PO, Fay LC (1950) The Johnson–Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika 15:349–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2011) Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. J. Management Stud. 48(3):665–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management 12(1):7–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R, Holland W (1975) Boundary-spanning roles in a R&D organization: An empirical investigation. Acad. Management J. 18(2):388–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S, Anand J (2018) Knowledge complexity and the performance of inter-unit knowledge replication structures. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1959–1989.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klarner P, Raisch S (2013) Move to the beat: Rhythms of change and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 56(1):160–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kolympiris C, Hoenen S, Klein PG (2019) Learning by seconding: Evidence from National Science Foundation rotators. Organ. Sci. 30(3):528–551.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 19(5):461–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laureiro-Martinez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2015) Understanding the exploration-exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laureiro-Martinez D, Brusoni S, Tata A, Zollo M (2019) The manager’s notepad: Working memory, exploration, and performance. J. Management Stud. 56(8):1655–1682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lifshitz-Assaf H (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):746–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lingo E, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV (2000) Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Ann. Rev. Pysch. 51(1):93–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Cooper LP, Neece OE (2004) Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. 50(2):174–188.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marrone JA, Tesluk PE, Carson JB (2007) A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1423–1439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathias BD, Mckenny AF, Crook TR (2018) Managing the tensions between exploration and exploitation: The role of time. Strategic Entrepreneurial J. 12(3):316–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCabe CJ, Kim DS, King KM (2018) Improving present practices in the visual display of interactions. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 1(2):147–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monteiro F, Birkinshaw J (2017) The external knowledge sourcing process in multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. 38(2):342–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore DS, McCabe GP (1999) Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (W. H. Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
  • Murphey MR, Aguinis H (2022) Reporting interaction effects: Visualization, effect size, and interpretation. J. Management. 48(8):2159–2166.Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W, Joseph J (2005) An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro- and macroperspectives in strategy processes. Adv. Strategic Management 22:39–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ployhart RE, Vandenberg RJ (2010) Longitudinal research: The theory design and analysis of change. J. Management 36(1):94–120.Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psych. 63:539–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Postrel S (2002) Islands of shared knowledge: Specialization and mutual understanding in problem solving teams. Organ. Sci. 13(3):303–320.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ringberg T, Reihlen M (2008) Toward a socio-cognitive approach to knowledge transfer. J. Management Stud. 45(5):912–935.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2005) Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. 12(3):174–293.Google Scholar
  • Roberts JD, Beamish PW (2017) The scaffolding activities of international returnee executives: A learning based perspective of global boundary spanning. J. Management Stud. 54(4):511–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salter A, ter Wal A, Criscuolo P, Alexy O (2015) Open for ideation: Individual level openness and idea generation in R&D. J. Production Innovative Management 32(4):488–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schotter A, Beamish PW (2011) Performance effects of MNC headquarters: Subsidiary conflict and the role of boundary spanners: The case of headquarter initiative rejection. J. Internat. Management 17(3):243–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M (2001) The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Acad. Management J. 44(4):661–681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selig JP, Little TD (2012) Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. Laursen BP, Little TD, Card NA, eds. Handbook of Developmental Research Methods (Guilford, New York), 265–278.Google Scholar
  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
  • Simonin BL (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 20(7):595–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Google Scholar
  • Solt F, Hu Y (2021) Interplot: Plot the Effects of Variables in Interaction Terms (R Package, Vienna).Google Scholar
  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G, Ringov D, Jensen RJ (2016) Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of know-ledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty. Organ. Sci. 27(2):304–322.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tempelaar MP, Rosenkranz NA (2019) Switching hats: The effect of role transition on individual ambidexterity. J. Management 45(4):1517–1539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ter Wal ALJ, Criscuolo P, Salter A (2017) Making a marriage of materials: The role of gatekeepers and shepherds in the absorption of external knowledge and innovation performance. Res. Policy 46(5):1039–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tippmann E, Scott P, Parker A (2017) Boundary capabilities in MNCs: Knowledge transfor-mation for creative solution development. J. Management Stud. 54(4):455–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tortoriello M (2015) The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge. Strategic Management J. 36(4):586–597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simme-lian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1):167–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turkey JW (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA).Google Scholar
  • Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M, Scanlan T (1981) Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Acad. Management J. 24(2):289–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel W, Sekaquaptewa D, Vargas P (1995) On the role of encoding processes in stereotype maintenance. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 27:177–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel W, Jonides J, Hilton JL, Narayan S (1993) Inhibitory effect of schematic processing on perceptual encoding. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(6):921–935.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang D (2015) Activating brokering: Inter-organizational knowledge transfer through skilled return migration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):133–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76–92.Google Scholar
  • Zhao Z, Anand J (2009) A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: Evidence from the Chinese automotive industry. Strategic Management J. 30(9):959–983.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao Z, Anand J (2013) Beyond boundary spanners: The ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1513–1530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.