Do Lower-Power Individuals Really Compete Less? An Investigation of Covert Competition

References

• Anderson C, Ames DR, Gosling SD (2008) Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one’s status in a group. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(1):90–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Srivastava S, Beer JS, Spataro SE, Chatman JA (2006) Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6):1094–1110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. 103(3):411–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anicich EM, Fast NJ, Halevy N, Galinsky AD (2016) When the bases of social hierarchy collide: Power without status drives interpersonal conflict. Organ. Sci. 27(1):123–140.Link, Google Scholar
• Aquino K (2000) Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. J. Management 26(2):171–193.Google Scholar
• Balliet D, Tybur JM, Van Lange PAM (2017) Functional interdependence theory: An evolutionary account of social situations. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 21(4):361–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett RJ, Robinson SL (2000) Development of a measure of workplace deviance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(3):349–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry CM, Ones DS, Sackett PR (2007) Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 92(2):410–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berscheid E, Graziano W, Monson T, Dermer M (1976) Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 34(5):978–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biron M, Bamberger P (2012) Abusive workplace conditions and absenteeism: Taking referent group norms and supervisor support into account. J. Appl. Psych. 97(4):901–912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Chen Y (2012) Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(5):994–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brady DL, Brown DJ, Liang LH (2017) Moving beyond assumptions of deviance: The reconceptualization and measurement of workplace gossip. J. Appl. Psych. 102(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR (1998) Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. Simpson JA, Rholes WS, eds. Attachment Theory and Close Relationships (Guilford Press, New York), 46–76.Google Scholar
• Case CR, Maner JK (2014) Divide and conquer: When and why leaders undermine the cohesive fabric of their group. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(6):1033–1050.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan ME, McAllister DJ (2014) Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia. Acad. Management Rev. 39(1):44–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cherry TL, Frykblom P, Shogren JF (2002) Hardnose the dictator. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):1218–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Harrison DA (2008) Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 93(5):1082–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho Y, Fast NJ (2012) Power, defensive denigration, and the assuaging effect of gratitude expression. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(3):778–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cislak A, Cichocka A, Wojcik AD, Frankowska N (2018) Power corrupts, but control does not: What stands behind the effects of holding high positions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 44(6):944–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Cain DM, Dawes RM (2006) What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100(2):193–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis AC, Dufort C, Desrochers J, Vaillancourt T, Arnocky S (2018) Gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: Sex differences in gossip frequency, content, and attitudes. Evolutionary Psych. Sci. 4:141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Cremer D, van Dijk E (2005) When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behaviour in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 35(4):553–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy MK, Ganster DC, Pagon M (2002) Social undermining in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 45(2):331–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebenbach DH, Keltner D (1998) Power, emotion, and judgmental accuracy in social conflict: Motivating the cognitive miser. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 20(1):7–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fath S, Kay AC (2018) “If hierarchical, then corrupt”: Exploring people’s tendency to associate hierarchy with corruption in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 149:145–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fenigstein A, Vanable PA (1992) Paranoia and self-consciousness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 62(1):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris DL, Brown DJ, Berry JW, Lian H (2008) The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. J. Appl. Psych. 93(6):1348–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman D, Garety PA (2000) Comments on the content of persecutory delusions: Does the definition need clarification? British J. Clinical Psych. 39(4):407–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC (2003) From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3):453–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Rucker DD, Magee JC (2015) Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Simpson JA, Dovidio JF, eds. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology. Volume 3: Interpersonal Relations (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 421–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Inesi ME, Gruenfeld DH (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psych. Sci. 17(12):1068–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Gruenfeld DH, Whitson JA, Liljenquist KA (2008) Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(6):1450–1466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgesen J, Harris MJ (2006) Holding onto power: Effects of powerholders’ positional instability and expectancies on interactions with subordinates. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(4):451–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B (1990) Voluntary turnover and alternative job opportunities. J. Appl. Psych. 75(5):467–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerpott FH, Balliet D, Columbus S, Molho C, de Vries RE (2018) How do people think about interdependence? A multidimensional model of subjective outcome interdependence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 115(4):716–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giardini F, Wittek R (2019) The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green VA (1998) Gender and social competence as predictors of social interaction in a limited resource situation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Van Bunderen L, Yu S (2017) The dysfunctions of power in teams: A review and emergent conflict perspective. Res. Organ. Behav. 37:103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, de Jong BA, Schouten ME, Dannals JE (2018) Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. J. Appl. Psych. 103(6):591–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greitermeyer T, Sagioglou C (2019) The impact of personal relative deprivation on aggression over time. J. Soc. Psych. 159(6):664–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Inesi ME, Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Power and the objectification of social targets. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(1):111–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guinote A (2004) Group size, outcome dependency, and power: Effects on perceived and actual group variability. Yzerbyt VY, Judd CM, Corneille O, eds. The Psychology of Group Perception: Contributions to the Study of Homogeneity, Entitavity, and Essentialism, 5th ed. (Psychology Press, New York), 221–236.Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Preacher KJ (2014) Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. 67(3):451–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hays NA, Bendersky C (2015) Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status vs. power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(6):867–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hays NA, Goldstein NJ (2015) Power and legitimacy influence conformity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 60:17–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helmreich RL, Beane W, Lucker GW, Spence JT (1978) Achievement motivation and scientific attainment. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 4(2):222–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinkin TR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ. Res. Methods 1(1):104–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoijtink H, Gu X, Mulder J (2019) Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses for multiple populations. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. 72(2):219–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard MC, Cogswell JE, Smith MB (2020) The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 105(6):577–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson S (2021) Amazon reportedly evaluates its office workers with a tiered system that targets 6% of them leaving every year. Retrieved January 5, 2023, https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-performance-review-6-percent-of-office-workers-2021-6.Google Scholar
• Jensen JM, Patel PC, Raver JL (2014) Is it better to be average? High and low performance as predictors of employee victimization. J. Appl. Psych. 99(2):296–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson MD, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Ilgen DR, Jundt D, Meyer CJ (2006) Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Acad. Management J. 49(1):103–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan J, Sivanathan N, Galinsky AD (2011) Something to lose and nothing to gain: The role of stress in the interactive effect of power and stability on risk taking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(4):530–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley HH, Thibaut JW (1978) Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Kelley HH, Holmes JG, Kerr NL, Reis HT, Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM (2003) An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2):265–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim KH, Guinote A (2021) Cheating at the top: Trait dominance explains dishonesty more consistently than social power. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 48(12):1651–1666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koning L, Steinel W, van Beest I, van Dijk E (2011) Power and deception in ultimatum bargaining. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lammers J, Galinsky AD, Gordijn EH, Otten S (2008) Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psych. Sci. 19(6):558–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laurin K, Shepherd S, Kay AC (2010) Restricted emigration, system inescapability and defense of the status quo: System-justifying consequences of restricted exit opportunities. Psych. Sci. 21(8):1075–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiter MP, Laschinger HKS, Day A, Oore DG (2011) The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. J. Appl. Psych. 96(6):1258–1274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Chen YR, Hildreth JA (2022) Powerlessness also corrupts: Lower power increases self-promotional lying. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print September 21, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1630.Link, Google Scholar
• Macleod M (2018) Covert competition: Are women holding each other back at work? Retrieved March 18, 2022, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/covert-competition-women-holding-each-other-back-work-macleod.Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH (2007) Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(2):200–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makowski D, Ben-Shachar MS, Chen SHA, Lüdecke D (2019) Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian framework. Frontiers Psych. 10:2767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maner JK, Mead NL (2010) The essential tension between leadership and power: When leads sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(3):482–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Marcus B (2016) The dark side of female rivalry in the workplace and what to do about it. Retrieved March 18, 2023, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bonniemarcus/2016/01/13/the-dark-side-of-female-rivalry-in-the-workplace-and-what-to-do-about-it/?sh=6b8a9e8b5255.Google Scholar
• Marr JC, Thau S, Aquino K, Barclay LJ (2012) Do I want to know? How the motivation to acquire relationship-threatening information in groups contributes to paranoid thought, suspicion behavior, and social rejection. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 117(2):285–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (2007) Attachment Patterns in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Pai J, Whitson J, Kim J, Lee S (2021) A relational account of low power: The role of the attachment system in reduced proactivity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 167:28–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson E, Thompson L (1997) Negotiation teamwork: The impact of information distribution and accountability on performance depends on the relationship among team members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 72(3):364–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petkanopoulou K, Rodríguez‐Bailón R, Willis GB, van Kleef GA (2019) Powerless people don’t yell but tell: The effects of social power on direct and indirect expression of anger. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 49(3):533–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Yong K, Spataro SE (2010) Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(2):396–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proudfoot D, Kay AC (2014) System justification in organization contexts: How a motivated preference for the status quo can affect organizational attitudes and behaviors. Res. Organ. Behav. 34:173–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proudfoot D, Kay AC, Mann H (2015) Motivated employee blindness: The impact of labor market instability on judgment of organization inefficiencies. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 130:108–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson SL, Bennett RJ (1995) A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Acad. Management J. 38(2):555–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Galinsky AD, Dubois D (2012) Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. J. Consumer Psych. 22(3):352–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM (2008) Why we need interdependence theory. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 2(5):2049–2070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaerer M, Swaab RI, Galinsky AD (2015) Anchors weigh more than power: Why absolute powerlessness liberates negotiators to achieve better outcomes. Psych Sci. 26(2):170–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaerer M, du Plessis C, Tu MH, Krishnan S (2021) Just because you’re powerless doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you: Low power, paranoia, and aggression. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 165:1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaerer M, du Plessis C, Yap AJ, Thau S (2018) Low power individuals in social power research: A quantitative review, theoretical framework, and empirical test. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 149:73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilpzand P, De Pater IE, Erez A (2016) Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. J. Organ. Behav. 37:57–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson JA, Rholes WS, Phillips D (1996) Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(5):899–914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Folger R (1997) Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psych. 82(3):434–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith PK, Hofmann W (2016) Power in everyday life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(36):10043–10048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith PK, Magee JC (2015) The interpersonal nature of power and status. Current Opinions Behav. Sci. 3:152–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Westphal JD (2010) Stealthy footsteps to the boardroom: Executives’ backgrounds, sophisticated interpersonal influence behavior, and board appointments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):278–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swisher K (2013) “Because Marissa said so”—Yahoos bristle at Mayer’s QPR ranking system and “silent layoffs.” Retrived January 5, 2023, https://allthingsd.com/20131108/because-marissa-said-so-yahoos-bristle-at-mayers-new-qpr-ranking-system-and-silent-layoffs/.Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D (1985) Power and social context in superior–subordinate interaction. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 35(3):281–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• To C, Kilduff GJ, Rosikiewicz BL (2020) When interpersonal competition helps and when it harms: An integration via challenge and threat. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):908–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk E, de Cremer D (2006) Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(10):1352–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Kleef GA, Oveis C, van der Löwe I, LuoKogan A, Goetz J, Keltner, D (2008) Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psych. Sci. 19(12):1315–1322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vriend T, Jordan J, Janssen O (2016) Reaching the top and avoiding the bottom: How ranking motivates unethical intentions and behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137:142–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L, Northcraft GB, Van Kleef GA (2012) Beyond negotiated outcomes: The hidden costs of anger expression in dyadic negotiation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 119(1):54–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wee EXM, Liao H, Liu D, Liu J (2017) Moving from abuse to reconciliation: A power-dependence perspective on when and how a follower can break the spiral of abuse. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2352–2380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu E, Huang X, Jia R, Xu J, Liu W, Graham L, Snape E (2020) The “evil pleasure”: Abusive supervision and third-party observers’ malicious reactions toward victims. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1115–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Yap AJ, Mason MF, Ames DR (2013) The powerful size others down: The link between power and estimates of others’ size. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(3):591–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yarow J (2012) Microsoft was destroyed by its “stack review” process, according to new vanity fair expose. Retrieved January 5, 2023, https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-was-destroyed-by-its-stack-review-process-according-to-new-vanity-fair-expose-2012-7.Google Scholar