The Reconnection Process: Mobilizing the Social Capital of Dormant Ties

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1685

References

  • Abrams LC, Cross R, Lesser E, Levin DZ (2003) Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Acad. Management Perspect. 17(4):64–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS, Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G, Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Aven BL, Kush J (2018) The effects of communication networks and turnover on transactive memory and group performance. Organ. Sci. 29(2):191–206.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baer MD, Frank EL, Matta FK, Luciano MM, Wellman N (2021) Undertrusted, overtrusted, or just right? The fairness of (in)congruence between trust wanted and trust received. Acad. Management J. 64(1):180–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal P, Smith WK, Vaara E (2018) New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1189–1195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bengtson A, Havila V, Åberg S (2018) Beyond project closure: Why some business relationships recur in subsequent projects. Proj. Management J. 49(2):89–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bensaou BM, Galunic C, Jonczyk-Sédès C (2014) Players and purists: Networking strategies and agency of service professionals. Organ. Sci. 25(1):29–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berman SL, Down J, Hill CW (2002) Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad. Management J. 45(1):13–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boase J, Kobayashi T, Schrock A, Suzuki T, Suzuki T (2015) Reconnecting here and there: The reactivation of dormant ties in the United States and Japan. Amer. Behav. Sci. 59(8):931–945.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradach J, Eccles R (1989) Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Amer. Rev. Sociol. 15:97–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass DJ (2022) New developments in social network analysis. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 9(1):1–22.Google Scholar
  • Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2002) Bridge decay. Soc. Networks 24(4):333–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2012) Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(3):543–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):655–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H, Mehra A, Tasselli S, Borgatti SP (2022) Network dynamics and organizations: A review and research agenda. J. Management 48(6):1602–1660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clegg S, Josserand E, Mehra A, Pitsis TS (2016) The transformative power of network dynamics: A research agenda. Organ. Stud. 37(3):277–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins R (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creswell JW (2009) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • De Jong BA, Dirks KT, Gillespie N (2016) Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. J. Appl. Psych. 101(8):1134–1150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2002) Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):611–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunbar RI (1993) Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behav. Brain Sci. 16(4):681–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easterby-Smith M, Thorpe R, Jackson PR (2012) Management Research, 4th ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1991) Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):620–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang R, Duffy MK, Shaw JD (2011) The organizational socialization process: Review and development of a social capital model. J. Management 37(1):127–152.Google Scholar
  • Fischer CS, Offer S (2020) Who is dropped and why? Methodological and substantive accounts for network loss. Soc. Networks 61:78–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh R (2014) Antecedents of mentoring support: A meta-analysis of individual, relational, and structural or organizational factors. J. Vocat. Behav. 84(3):367–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
  • Goffman E (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction (Aldine, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS (1992) Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Nohria N, Eccles RG, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 25–56.Google Scholar
  • Gulati R, Srivastava SB (2014) Bringing agency back into network research: Constrained agency and network action. Brass DJ, Labianca GJ, Mehra A, Halgin DS, Borgatti SP, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks (Research in the Sociology of Organizations) (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 73–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen BL, Eisenhardt KM (2012) Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Acad. Management J. 55(1):35–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen BL, Davis JP, Murray A (2020) Entrepreneurial network evolution: Explicating the structural localism and agentic network change distinction. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):1067–1102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Haythornthwaite C (2002) Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. Inf. Soc. 18(5):385–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirsh JB, Kang SK, Bodenhausen GV (2012) Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psych. Sci. 23(6):578–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jack SL (2005) The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis. J. Management Stud. 42(6):1233–1259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobsen DH, Stea D, Soda G (2022) Intraorganizational network dynamics: Past progress, current challenges, and new frontiers. Acad. Management Ann. 16(2):853–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauppila OP, Bizzi L, Obstfeld D (2018) Connecting and creating: tertius iungens, individual creativity, and strategic decision processes. Strategic Management J. 39(3):697–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Killworth PD, Johnsen EC, Bernard HR, Shelley GA, McCarty C (1990) Estimating the size of personal networks. Soc. Networks 12(4):289–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim HS, Sherman DK, Taylor SE (2008) Culture and social support. Amer. Psych. 63(6):518–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim HS, Sherman DK, Ko D, Taylor SE (2006) Pursuit of comfort and pursuit of harmony: Culture, relationships, and social support seeking. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(12):1595–1607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King MD, Kovács B (2021) Research: We’re losing touch with our networks. Harvard Business Review, Accessed February 2022, https://hbr.org/2021/02/research-were-losing-touch-with-our-networks.Google Scholar
  • Kleinbaum AM (2018) Reorganization and tie decay choices. Management Sci. 64(5):2219–2237.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klotz AC, da Motta Veiga SP, Buckley MR, Gavin MB (2013) The role of trustworthiness in recruitment and selection: A review and guide for future research. J. Organ. Behav. 34(S1):S104–S119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kong DT, Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2014) Interpersonal trust within negotiations: Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and directions for future research. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1235–1255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16(1):183–210.Google Scholar
  • Kuwabara K, Hildebrand CA, Zou X (2018) Lay theories of networking: How laypeople’s beliefs about networks affect their attitudes toward and engagement in instrumental networking. Acad. Management Rev. 43(1):50–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kvale S (1996) The 1,000-page question. Qual. Inq. 2(3):275–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kwon S-W, Adler PS (2014) Social capital: Maturation of a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):412–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kwon S-W, Rondi E, Levin DZ, De Massis A, Brass DJ (2020) Network brokerage: An integrative review and future research agenda. J. Management 46(6):1092–1120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management J. 56(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lechner C, Dowling M (2003) Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 15(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Walter J (2018) Is tie maintenance necessary? Acad. Management Discov. 4(4):497–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Walter J (2019) Before they were ties: Predicting the value of brand-new connections. J. Management 45(7):2861–2890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Walter J, Murnighan JK (2011a) Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organ. Sci. 22(4):923–939.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Walter J, Murnighan JK (2011b) The power of reconnection — How dormant ties can surprise you. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 52(3):45–50.Google Scholar
  • Lim JH, Tai K, Bamberger PA, Morrison EW (2020) Soliciting resources from others: An integrative review. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):122–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin N (1999) Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22(1):28–51.Google Scholar
  • Linder C, Lechner C, Pelzel F (2020) Many roads lead to Rome: How human, social, and financial capital are related to new venture survival. Entrep. Theory Pract. 44(5):909–932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Litman L, Robinson J, Abberbock T (2017) TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 49(2):433–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke KD (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Lubbers MJ, Molina JL, Lerner J, Brandes U, Ávila J, McCarty C (2010) Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Soc. Networks 32(1):91–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maoret M (2013) Reunited: Exploring the Performance Effects of Newcomers’ Tie Reactivation. Academy of Management Proceedings (Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, New York).Google Scholar
  • Marin A, Hampton KN (2019) Network instability in times of stability. Sociol. Forum 34(2):313–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mariotti F, Delbridge R (2012) Overcoming network overload and redundancy in interorganizational networks: The roles of potential and latent ties. Organ. Sci. 23(2):511–528.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden PV, Campbell KE (1984) Measuring tie strength. Soc. Forces 63(2):482–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason W, Suri S (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maurer I, Bartsch V, Ebers M (2011) The value of intra-organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organ. Stud. 32(2):157–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAllister DJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 38(1):24–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCarthy JE, Levin DZ (2019) Network residues: The enduring impact of intra-organizational dormant ties. J. Appl. Psych. 104(11):1434–1445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadyen MA, Cannella AA, Jr. (2004) Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 47(5):735–746.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Methot JR, Rosado-Solomon EH, Downes P, Gabriel AS (2021) Office chit-chat as a social ritual: The uplifting yet distracting effects of daily small talk at work. Acad. Management J. 64(5):1445–1471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Moore DA, Tetlock PE, Tanlu L, Bazerman MH (2006) Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):10–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nai J, Lin Y, Kotha R, Vissa B (2022) A foot in the door: Field experiments on entrepreneurs’ network activation strategies for investor referrals. Strategic Management J. 43(2):323–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Offer S, Fischer CS (2022) How new is “New”? Who gets added in a panel study of personal networks? Soc. Networks 70:284–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Omar SS, Higgs M (2015) Network change and development of Bumiputera entrepreneurs: The study of multiple-cases of small businesses in the southern region of Malaysia. J. Tech. Management Bus. 2(1):1–22.Google Scholar
  • Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qin F, Estrin S (2015) Does social influence span time and space? Evidence from Indian returnee entrepreneurs. Strategic Entrep. J. 9(3):226–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quinn K (2013) We haven’t talked in 30 years! Relationship reconnection and internet use at midlife. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16(3):397–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramirez AJ, Sumner EM, Spinda J (2017) The relational reconnection function of social network sites. New Media Soc. 19(6):807–825.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ray DG, Gomillion S, Pintea AI, Hamlin I (2019) On being forgotten: Memory and forgetting serve as signals of interpersonal importance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 116(2):259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roulet T, Laker B (2020) Now is the time to reconnect with your dormant social network. MIT Sloan Management Rev., Accessed April 2023, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/your-dormant-social-network.Google Scholar
  • Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaubroeck JM, Peng AC, Hannah ST (2013) Developing trust with peers and leaders: Impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry. Acad. Management J. 56(4):1148–1168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulte M, Cohen NA, Klein KJ (2012) The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organ. Sci. 23(2):564–581.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. 44(2):219–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shea CT, Lee J, Menon T, Im D-K (2019) Cheater’s hide and seek: Strategic cognitive network activation during ethical decision making. Soc. Networks 58:143–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Simonsohn U, Nelson LD, Simmons JP (2014) P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. J. Exp. Psych. Gen. 143(2):534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith EB, Brands RA, Brashears ME, Kleinbaum AM (2020) Social networks and cognition. Annual Rev. Sociol. 46(1):159–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith SS (2005) “Don’t put my name on it”: Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):1–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) A network perspective on organizational architecture: Performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization. Strategic Management J. 33(6):751–771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soda G, Usai A, Zaheer A (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. 47(6):893–906.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solarino AM, Aguinis H (2021) Challenges and best‐practice recommendations for designing and conducting interviews with elite informants. J. Management Stud. 58(3):649–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steier L, Greenwood R (2000) Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks. Organ. Stud. 21(1):163–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Sytch M, Kim YH (2021) Quo vadis? From the schoolyard to the courtroom. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(1):177–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tasselli S, Kilduff M (2021) Network agency. Acad. Management Ann. 15(1):68–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tinaglia F, Gandola G (2015) Sul filo della moda (SESAAB, Bergamo, Italy).Google Scholar
  • Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1):167–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uribe J, Sytch M, Kim YH (2020) When friends become foes: Collaboration as a catalyst for conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):751–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):37–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Burg E, Cornelissen J, Stam W, Jack S (2020) Advancing Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: Leveraging Methodological Plurality for Achieving Scholarly Impact (Sage, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Van Tubergen F, Volker B (2015) Inequality in access to social capital in the Netherlands. Sociology 49(3):521–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B (2011) A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Acad. Management J. 54(1):137–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B (2012) Agency in action: Entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organ. Sci. 23(2):492–510.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh IJ, Halgin DS, Huang Z (2018) Making old friends: Understanding the causes and consequences of maintaining former coworker relationships. Acad. Management Discov. 4(4):410–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walter J, Levin DZ, Murnighan JK (2015) Reconnection choices: Selecting the most valuable (vs. most preferred) dormant ties. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1447–1465.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal JD (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Acad. Management J. 42(1):7–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang SW, Soltis SM, Ross JR, Labianca GJ (2021) Dormant tie reactivation as an affiliative coping response to stressors during the COVID-19 crisis. J. Appl. Psych. 106(4):489–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin RK (2013) Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation 19(3):321–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young AW, Hay DC, Ellis AW (1985) The faces that launched a thousand slips: Everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people. Br. J. Psych. 76(4):495–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zettel LA, Rook KS (2004) Substitution and compensation in the social networks of older widowed women. Psych. Aging 19(3):433–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang V, King MD (2021) Tie decay and dissolution: Contentious prescribing practices in the prescription drug epidemic. Organ. Sci. 32(5):1149–1173.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou H, Fishbach A (2016) The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 111(4):493–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.