Mobilizing Conceptual Spaces: How Word Embedding Models Can Inform Measurement and Theory Within Organization Science

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1686

References

  • Aceves P, Evans JA (2021) Human languages with greater information density increase communication speed but decrease conversation breadth. Preprint, submitted December 15, https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08491.Google Scholar
  • Aceves P, Chambers C, Alves MFR (2022) Middle-status myopia. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  • Aharonson BS, Schilling MA (2016) Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution. Res. Policy 45(1):81–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M (2010) Markets, morals, and practices of trade: Jurisdictional disputes in the US commerce in cadavers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):606–638.Google Scholar
  • Arora S, Li Y, Liang Y, Ma T, Risteski A (2018) Linear algebraic structure of word senses, with applications to polysemy. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics 6:483–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arseniev-Koehler A, Cochran SD, Mays VM, Chang KW, Foster JG (2022) Integrating topic modeling and word embedding to characterize violent deaths. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 119(10):e2108801119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arts S, Cassiman B, Gomez JC (2018) Text matching to measure patent similarity. Strategic Management J. 39(1):62–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Saks AM (1996) Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Acad. Management J. 39(1):149–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bana SH (2022) job2vec: Using language models to understand wage premia. Working paper, Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Banerjee M, Ingram P (2022) Fame as an illusion of creativity: Evidence from pioneers of abstract art. Working paper, HEC Paris, France.Google Scholar
  • Banerjee M, Kaplan D (2022) The golden convergence: How elite producers become more famous by being less differentiated. Working paper. Working paper, HEC Paris, France.Google Scholar
  • Bergen B, Feldman J (2008) Embodied concept learning. Calvo P, Gomila A, eds. Handbook of Cognitive Science (Elsevier, San Diego), 313–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bojanowski P, Grave E, Joulin A, Mikolov T (2017) Enriching word vectors with subword information. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics 5:135–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolukbasi T, Chang KW, Zou JY, Saligrama V, Kalai AT (2016) Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 29:4349–4357.Google Scholar
  • Bosco FA, Aguinis H, Field JG, Pierce CA, Dalton DR (2016) HARKing’s threat to organizational research: Evidence from primary and meta-analytic sources. Personality Psych. 69(3):709–750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, et al. (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. Preprint, submitted May 28; last revised July 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165.Google Scholar
  • Burtch G, He Q, Hong Y, Lee D (2021) How do peer awards motivate creative content? Experimental evidence from Reddit. Management Sci. 68(5):3488–3506.Google Scholar
  • Caliskan A, Bryson JJ, Narayanan A (2017) Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 356(6334):183–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlson NA (2022) Differentiation in microenterprises. Strategic Management J.Google Scholar
  • Casasanto D, Lupyan G (2015) All concepts are ad hoc concepts. Margolis E, Laurence S, eds. The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chamberlain BP, Clough J, Deisenroth MP (2017) Neural embeddings of graphs in hyperbolic space. Preprint, submitted May 29, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10359.Google Scholar
  • Chambers C, Alves MFR, Aceves P (2022) When credit is due but not given: How insufficient recognition during status attainment shapes the amount and scope of knowledge contributions. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  • Cornelissen JP, Werner MD (2014) Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):181–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornelissen JP, Durand R, Fiss PC, Lammers JC, Vaara E (2015) Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 40(1):10–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corritore M, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):359–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox TH, Lobel SA, McLeod PL (1991) Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad. Management J. 34(4):827–847.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Steinberger T (2022) Organizations as artificial intelligences: The use of artificial intelligence analogies in organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cutler A, Breiman L (1994) Archetypal analysis. Technometrics 36(4):338–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damle A, Sun Y (2017) A geometric approach to archetypal analysis and nonnegative matrix factorization. Technometrics 59(3):361–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Saussure F (1986) Course in General Linguistics (Open Court).Google Scholar
  • DeDeo S (2016) Major transitions in political order. Walker SI, Davies Paul CW, Ellis G, eds. Chapter for From Matter to Life: Information and Causality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 393–429.Google Scholar
  • Delmestri G, Wezel FC, Goodrick E, Washington M (2020) The hidden paths of category research: Climbing new heights and slippery slopes. Organ. Stud. 41(7):909–920.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proc. 2019 Conf. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis), 4171–4186.Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P (1997) Culture and cognition. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23(1):263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durand R, Rao H, Monin P (2007) Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations. Strategic Management J. 28(5):455–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer L, Reeves T (1995) Human resource strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go? Internat. J. Human Resources Management 6(3):656–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eugster MJA (2012) Archetypal Analysis: Mining the Extreme, HIIT Seminar (Helsinki Institute for Information Technology).Google Scholar
  • Evans JA, Aceves P (2016) Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 42.Google Scholar
  • Fedus W, Zoph B, Shazeer N (2021) Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. Preprint, submitted January 11; last revised June 16 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03961.Google Scholar
  • Firth JR (1957) Papers in Linguistics, 1934-1951 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(89):909–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss NJ, Lyngsie J, Zahra SA (2013) The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation: External knowledge, organizational design and opportunity exploitation. Strategic Management J. 34(12):1453–1471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foucault M (2012) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group).Google Scholar
  • Gärdenfors P (2004) Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Gardenfors P (2014) The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garg N, Schiebinger L, Jurafsky D, Zou J (2018) Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 115(16):E3635–E3644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Tuertscher P, Van de Ven AH (2013) Perspectives on innovation processes. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):775–819.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geertz C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gentzkow M, Kelly B, Taddy M (2019) Text as data. J. Econom. Literature 57(3):535–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giorgi S, Lockwood C, Glynn MA (2015) The many faces of culture: Making sense of 30 years of research on culture in organization studies. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):1–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn MA (2000) When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organ. Sci. 11(3): 285–298.Google Scholar
  • Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Manian VG, Monroe W, Potts C (2016) Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1190–1222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Google (2013) Google news word embedding. Retrieved April 12, 2022, https://code.google.com/archive/p/word2vec/.Google Scholar
  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grave E, Bojanowski P, Gupta P, Joulin A, Mikolov T (2018) Learning word vectors for 157 languages. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (European Language Resources Association, Miyazaki, Japan).Google Scholar
  • Grimmer J, Stewart BM (2013) Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Anal. 21(3):267–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grodal S (2018) Field expansion and contraction: How communities shape social and symbolic boundaries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):783–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo W, Sengul M, Yu T (2020) The Impact of Executive Verbal Communication on the Convergence of Investors’ Opinions (AMJ).Google Scholar
  • Guzman J, Li A (2023) Measuring founding strategy. Management Sci. 69(1):101–118.Google Scholar
  • Habibian A, Mensink T, Snoek CGM (2017) Video2vec embeddings recognize events when examples are scarce. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 39(10):2089–2103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton WL, Leskovec J, Jurafsky D (2016) Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. Proc. 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany), 1489–1501.Google Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan MT, Le Mens G, Hsu G, Kovács B, Negro G, Pólos L, Pontikes EG, et al. (2019) Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological and Cultural Analysis (Columbia University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannigan TR, Haans RFJ, Vakili K, Tchalian H, Glaser VL, Wang MS, Kaplan S, et al. (2019) Topic modeling in management research: Rendering new theory from textual data. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):586–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris ZS (1954) Distributional structure. Word World 10(2–3):146–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hasan S, Ferguson JP, Koning R (2015) The lives and deaths of jobs: Technical interdependence and survival in a job structure. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1665–1681.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hershey S, Chaudhuri S, Ellis DPW, Gemmeke JF, Jansen A, Moore RC, Plakal M, et al. (2017) CNN architectures for large-scale audio classification. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 131–135.Google Scholar
  • Hinton GE (1986) Learning distributed representations of concepts. Proc. 8th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Sci. Soc, 12.Google Scholar
  • Hinton GE, McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE (1986) Distributed representations. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, eds. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hofstadter D, Sander E (2013) Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hofstra B, Kulkarni VV, Munoz-Najar Galvez S, He B, Jurafsky D, McFarland DA (2020) The diversity-innovation paradox in science. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 117(17):9284–9291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 101(46):16385–16389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hovy D (2020) Text Analysis in Python for Social Scientists: Discovery and Exploration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G, Koçak Ö, Hannan MT (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huo D, Motohashi K, Gong H (2019) Team diversity as dissimilarity and variety in organizational innovation. Res. Policy 48(6):1564–1572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichikawa JJ, Steup M (2018) The analysis of knowledge. Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis.Google Scholar
  • Johnson M, Schuster M, Le QV, Krikun M, Wu Y (2017) Google’s multilingual neural machine translation system: Enabling zero-shot translation. Trans. Association Comput. Linguistics 5:339–351.Google Scholar
  • Johnson WB, Lindenstrauss J (1984) Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space. Contempory Math. 26:189–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2011) Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future: Cognition and strategy. J. Management Stud. 48(3):665–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy MT (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(2):270–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirgil ZM, Voyer A (2022) “Do your part: Stay apart”: Collective intentionality and collective (in)action in US governor’s COVID-19 press conferences. Poetics 93:101668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight W (2017) The dark secret at the heart of AI. MITS Tech. Rev. 54–61.Google Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács B, Carroll GR, Lehman DW (2013) Authenticity and consumer value ratings: Empirical tests from the restaurant domain. Organ. Sci. 25(2):458–478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kozlowski AC, Taddy M, Evans JA (2019) The geometry of culture: Analyzing the meanings of class through word embeddings. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 84(5):905–949.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krioukov D, Papadopoulos F, Kitsak M, Vahdat A, Boguñá M (2010) Hyperbolic geometry of complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 82(3 Pt 2):036106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kusner M, Sun Y, Kolkin N, Weinberger K (2015) From word embeddings to document distances. Proc. 32nd International Conf. Machine Learning, vol. 37 (PMLR, New York), 957–966.Google Scholar
  • Lamont M, Small ML (2008) How culture matters: Enriching our understanding of poverty. Lin AC, Harris DR, eds. The Colors of Poverty: Why Racial and Ethnic Disparities Exist (Russell Sage).Google Scholar
  • Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawson MA, Martin AE, Huda I, Matz SC (2022) Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language. Proc. National. Acad. Sci. USA 119(9).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leavitt K, Schabram K, Hariharan P, Barnes CM (2021) Ghost in the machine: On organizational theory in the age of machine learning. AMRO 46(4):750–777.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (PMLR, New York), 1188–1196.Google Scholar
  • Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leung MD, Sharkey AJ (2014) Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence of perceptual factors in the multiple-category discount. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levi-Strauss C (2016) The Elementary Structures of Kinship (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Levy O, Goldberg Y (2014) Neural word embedding as implicit matrix factorization. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. on Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 2 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 2177–2185.Google Scholar
  • Liang H, Lei W, Chan PY, Yang Z, Sun M, Chua TS (2020) PiRhDy: Learning pitch-, rhythm-, and dynamics-aware embeddings for symbolic music. Proc. 28th ACM Internat. Conf. on Multimedia (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 574–582.Google Scholar
  • Lin Y, Evans JA, Wu L (2022) New directions in science emerge from disconnection and discord. J. Informetrics 16(1):101234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu F, Zheng L, Zheng J (2020) HieNN-DWE: A hierarchical neural network with dynamic word embeddings for document level sentiment classification. Neurocomputing 403:21–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, Du J, Joshi M, Chen D, Levy O, et al. (2019) RoBERTa: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. Preprint, submitted July 26, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692.Google Scholar
  • Lix K, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2022) Aligning differences: Discursive diversity and team performance. Management Sci. 68(11):8430–8448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ludwig J, Mullainathan S (2022) Algorithmic behavioral science: Machine learning as a tool for scientific discovery. Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 22-15.Google Scholar
  • Lupyan G, Bergen B (2015) How language programs the mind. Topics Cognitive Sci. 8(2):408–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE (1989) Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing: A Handbook of Models, Programs, and Exercises (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • McGrath M, Frank D (2020) Propositions. Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/propositions/.Google Scholar
  • Medin DL, Rips LJ (2005) Concepts and categories: Memory, meaning, and metaphysics. Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 37–72.Google Scholar
  • Michael Furr R (2021) Psychometrics: An Introduction (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013a) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Preprint, submitted January 16; last revised September 7 2013, https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.Google Scholar
  • Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013b) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. on Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 2 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 3111–3119.Google Scholar
  • Milbauer J, Mathew A, Evans J (2021) Aligning multidimensional worldviews and discovering ideological differences. Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics), 4832–4845.Google Scholar
  • Murphy GL (2002) The Big Book of Concepts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nalmpantis C, Vrakas D (2019) Signal2Vec: Time series embedding representation. Engineering Applications of Neural Networks (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 80–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2010) Categorical contrast and audience appeal: Niche width and critical success in winemaking. Industrial Corporate Change 19(5):1397–1425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson LK (2021) Leveraging the alignment between machine learning and intersectionality: Using word embeddings to measure intersectional experiences of the nineteenth century U.S. South. Poetics 88:101539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickel M, Kiela D (2017) Poincaré embeddings for learning hierarchical representations, vol. 30, Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 6338–6347.Google Scholar
  • Nisbett RE, Ross L (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osgood CE (1964) Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures 1. Amer. Anthropology 66(3):171–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paauwe J (2009) HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. J. Management Stud. 46(1):129–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papadopoulos F, Kitsak M, Serrano MÁ, Boguñá M, Krioukov D (2012) Popularity vs. similarity in growing networks. Nature 489(7417):537–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patel K, Bhattacharyya P (2017) Toward lower bounds on number of dimensions for word embeddings. Proc. 8th Internat. Joint Conf. on Natural Language Processing, vol. 2 (Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Taipei, Taiwan), 31–36.Google Scholar
  • Patterson O (2014) Making sense of culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40(1):1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng H, Ke Q, Budak C, Romero DM, Ahn YY (2021) Neural embeddings of scholarly periodicals reveal complex disciplinary organizations. Sci. Adv. 7(17):eabb9004.Google Scholar
  • Pennington J, Socher R, Manning C (2014) Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 1532–1543.Google Scholar
  • Pettigrew AM (1979) On studying organizational cultures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):570–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips N, Oswick C (2012) Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):435–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips N, Lawrence TB, Hardy C (2004) Discourse and institutions. Acad. Management Rev. 29(4):635–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plato Bloom A (1968) The Republic (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin how ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pontikes EG, Barnett WP (2015) The Persistence of lenient market categories. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1415–1431.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porac JF, Ventresca MJ, Mishina Y (2017) Interorganizational cognition and interpretation. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK), 579–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radford A, Narasimhan K, Salimans T, Sutskever I (2022) Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. Retrieved April 24, 2022, https://www.cs.ubc.ca/˜amuham01/LING530/papers/radford2018improving.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Radford A, Wu J, Child R, Luan D, Amodei D, Sutskever I (2019) Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog 1(8):9.Google Scholar
  • Rao H, Giorgi S (2006) Code breaking: How entrepreneurs exploit cultural logics to generate institutional change. Res. Organ. Behav. 27:269–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravasi D, Schultz M (2006) Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Acad. Management J. 49(3):433–458.Google Scholar
  • Reimers N, Gurevych I (2020) Making monolingual sentence embeddings multilingual using knowledge distillation. Proc. 2020 Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics), 4512–4525.Google Scholar
  • Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberson Q, Holmes O, Perry JL (2017) Transforming research on diversity and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):189–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodriguez PL, Spirling A (2022) Word embeddings: What works, what doesn’t, and how to tell the difference for applied research. J. Politics. 84(1):101–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(4, suppl 1):64–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosch EH (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psych. 4(3):328–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy A, Park Y, Pan S (2019) Incorporating domain knowledge in learning word embedding. Proc. IEEE 31st Internat. Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, PDP Research Group (1986a) Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, PDP Research Group (1986b) Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and Biological Models (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Sabharwal N, Agrawal A (2020) Chatbot enrichment. Cognitive Virtual Assistants Using Google Dialogflow (Apress, Berkeley, CA), 119–181.Google Scholar
  • Scott RW (2003) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Shaffer JA, DeGeest D, Li A (2016) Tackling the problem of construct proliferation: A guide to assessing the discriminant validity of conceptually related constructs. Organ. Res. Methods 19(1):80–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shi F, Evans J (2023) Surprising combinations of research contents and contexts are related to impact and emerge with scientific outsiders from distant disciplines. Nature Comm. 14, 1641.Google Scholar
  • Singh J, Agrawal A (2011) Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Sci. 57(1):129–150.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J, Marx M (2013) Geographic constraints on knowledge spillovers: Political borders vs. spatial proximity. Management Sci. 59(9):2056–2078.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Small ML, Harding DJ, Lamont M (2010) Reconsidering culture and poverty. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 629(1):6–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith EB (2011) Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith-Lovin L, Heise DR (1988) Analyzing Social Interaction: Advances in Affect Control Theory (Taylor & Francis).Google Scholar
  • Sourati J, Evans J (2021) Accelerating science with human vs. alien artificial intelligences. Preprint, submitted April 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05188.Google Scholar
  • Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Spradley JP (2016) The Ethnographic Interview (Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL).Google Scholar
  • Srikanth K, Harvey S, Peterson R (2016) A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: Moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):453–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava SB, Goldberg A, Manian VG, Potts C (2018) Enculturation trajectories: Language, cultural adaptation, and individual outcomes in organizations. Management Sci. 64(3):1348–1364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Steup M, Neta R (2020) Epistemology. Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/.Google Scholar
  • Stoltz DS, Taylor MA (2019) Concept mover’s distance: Measuring concept engagement via word embeddings in texts. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2(2):293–313.Google Scholar
  • Tagliasacchi M, Gfeller B, de Chaumont Quitry F, Roblek D (2020) Pre-training audio representations with self-supervision. IEEE Signal Processing Lett. 27:600–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor A, Greve HR (2006) Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. 49(4):723–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor MA, Stoltz DS (2020) Concept class analysis: A method for identifying cultural schemas in texts. Sociol. Sci. 7:544–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor MA, Stoltz DS (2021) Integrating semantic directions with concept mover’s distance to measure binary concept engagement. J. Comput. Soc. Sci. 4(1):231–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson P, Melanie Fox-Kean (2005) Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):450–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tshitoyan V, Dagdelen J, Weston L, Dunn A, Rong Z, Kononova O, Persson KA, et al. (2019) Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature. Nature 571(7763):95–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turing AM (1950) I—Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind LIX(236):433–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Dijk H, Meyer B, van Engen M, Loyd DL (2017) Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):517–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser ŁU, et al. (2017) Attention is all you need. Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 5998–6008.Google Scholar
  • Waller I, Anderson A (2021) Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. Nature 600(7888):264–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M (2011) Methodology of Social Sciences (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):516–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Welch C, Kummerfeld JK, Pérez-Rosas V, Mihalcea R (2020a) Compositional demographic word embeddings. Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.Google Scholar
  • Welch C, Kummerfeld JK, Pérez-Rosas V, Mihalcea R (2020b) Exploring the value of personalized word embeddings. Proc. 28th Internat. Conf. on Comput. Linguistics.Google Scholar
  • Weller I, Hymer CB, Nyberg AJ, Ebert J (2019) How matching creates value: Cogs and wheels for human capital resources research. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):188–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whalen R, Lungeanu A, DeChurch L, Contractor N (2020) Patent similarity data and innovation metrics. J. Empirical Legal Stud. 17(3):615–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams KY, O’Reilly CA III (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20:77–140.Google Scholar
  • Wittgenstein L (2010) Philosophical Investigations (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Wolpert DH, Grochow JA, Libby E, DeDeo S (2014) Optimal high-level descriptions of dynamical systems. Preprint, submitted September 25; last revised June 3, 2015, https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7403.Google Scholar
  • Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennings PD (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xie H, Virtanen T (2019) Zero-shot audio classification based on class label embeddings. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 264–267.Google Scholar
  • Yao Z, Sun Y, Ding W, Rao N, Xiong H (2018) Dynamic word embeddings for evolving semantic discovery. Proc. 11th ACM Internat. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 673–681.Google Scholar
  • Zellers R, Lu X, Hessel J, Yu Y, Park JS, Cao J, Farhadi A, et al. (2021) MERLOT: Multimodal Neural Script Knowledge Models. Preprint, submitted June 4; last revised October 21, 2021, https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02636.Google Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Jatowt A, Bhowmick SS, Tanaka K (2016) The past is not a foreign country: Detecting semantically similar terms across time. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 28(10):2793–2807.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.