Hybrid Administrative Interfaces: Authority Delegation and Reversion in Strategic Alliances

References

• Aggarwal VA, Wu B (2015) Organizational constraints to adaptation: Intrafirm asymmetry in the locus of coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(1):218–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albers S, Wohlgezogen F, Zajac EJ (2016) Strategic alliance structures: An organization design perspective. J. Management 42(3):582–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(89):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Bercovitz JLE, Mayer KJ (2007) Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts. Organ. Sci. 18(1):3–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A, Magazzini L, Pammolli F (2009) A breath of fresh air? Firm type, scale, scope, and selection effects in drug development. Management Sci. 55(10):1638–1653.Link, Google Scholar
• Arruñada B, Garicano L, Vázquez L (2001) Contractual allocation of decision rights and incentives: The case of automobile distribution. J. Law Econom. Organ. 17(1):257–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P (2004) Capturing knowledge within and across firm boundaries: Evidence from clinical development. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1591–1612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker GP, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (1999) Informal authority in organizations. J. Law Econom. Organ. 15(1):56–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bester H (2009) Externalities, communication and the allocation of decision rights. Econom. Theory 41(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econom. J. 81(4):1347–1393.Google Scholar
• Bonn RL (1972) Arbitration: An alternative system for handling contract related disputes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(2):254–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borys B, Jemison DB (1989) Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Acad. Management Rev. 14(2):234–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois LJ III, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. 34(7):816–835.Link, Google Scholar
• Buis ML (2011) The consequences of unobserved heterogeneity in a sequential logit model. Res. Soc. Stratification Mobility 29(3):247–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byun H, Frake J, Agarwal R (2018) Leveraging who you know by what you know: Specialization and returns to relational capital. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1803–1833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson SJ, Madhok A, Wu T (2006) Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Acad. Management J. 49(5):1058–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2007) Strategic management of R&D pipelines with cospecialized investments and technology markets. Management Sci. 53(4):667–682.Link, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson RM (1994) Racing to invest? The dynamics of competition in ethical drug discovery. J. Econom. Management Strategy 3(3):481–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Henderson RM (2001) Scale and scope in drug development: Unpacking the advantages of size in pharmaceutical research. J. Health Econom. 20(6):1033–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crama P, Reyck BD, Degraeve Z (2008) Milestone payments or royalties? Contract design for R&D licensing. Oper. Res. 56(6):1539–1552.Link, Google Scholar
• Das TK, Teng B-S (1999) Managing risks in strategic alliances. Acad. Management Perspect. 13(4):50–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Day DV, Lord RG (1992) Expertise and problem categorization: The role expert processing in organizational sense-making. J. Management Stud. 29(1):35–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekker HC (2004) Control of inter-organizational relationships: Evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting Organ. Soc. 29(1):27–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1988) The theory of the firm revisisted. J. Law Econom. Organ. 4(1):141–161.Google Scholar
• Devarakonda SV, Reuer JJ (2018) Knowledge sharing and safeguarding in R&D collaborations: The role of steering committees in biotechnology alliances. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1912–1934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMasi JA (2002) The value of improving the productivity of the drug development process: Faster times and better decisions. PharmacoEconomics 20(3):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG (2007) The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: Is biotech different? Managerial Decision Econom. 28(4–5):469–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMasi JA, Feldman L, Seckler A, Wilson A (2010) Trends in risks associated with new drug development: Success rates for investigational drugs. Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics 87(3):272–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Eliashberg J (2002) Structuring the new product development pipeline. Management Sci. 48(3):343–363.Link, Google Scholar
• Dobrajska M, Billinger S, Karim S (2015) Delegation within hierarchies: How information processing and knowledge characteristics influence the allocation of formal and real decision authority. Organ. Sci. 26(3):687–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunlap-Hinkler D, Kotabe M, Mudambi R (2010) A story of breakthrough vs. incremental innovation: Corporate entrepreneurship in the global pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 4(2):106–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Lerner J (2003) Ownership and control rights in internet portal alliances, 1995–1999. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):356–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Lerner J (2012) Exclusivity, contingent control rights, and the design of internet portal alliances. J. Law Econom. Organ. 28(1):45–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Zhou YM (2019) Fight or flight? Market positions, submarket interdependencies, and strategic responses to entry threats. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1545–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faems D, Janssens M, Madhok A, van Looy B (2008) Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1053–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Weber L (2016) Moving opportunism to the back seat: Bounded rationality, costly conflict, and hierarchical forms. Acad. Management Rev. 41(1):61–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox J (2015) Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models, 3rd ed. (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Frank KA (2000) Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociol. Methods Res. 29(2):147–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JK (1973) Power and the useful economist. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(1):1–11.Google Scholar
• Gamache DL, McNamara G, Graffin SD, Kiley JT, Haleblian J, Devers CE (2019) Impression offsetting as an early warning signal of low CEO confidence in acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1307–1332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L (2000) Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econom. 108(5):874–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Wu Y (2012) Knowledge, communication, and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1382–1397.Link, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2007) Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. 53(9):1452–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldsby CM, Hanisch M (2022) The boon and bane of blockchain: Getting the governance right. Calif. Management Rev. 64(3):141–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabowski HG, Vernon JA (1986) Longer patents for lower imitation barriers: The 1984 Drug Act. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(2):195–198.Google Scholar
• Groot TL, Merchant KA (2000) Control of international joint ventures. Accounting Organ. Soc. 25(6):579–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence PR, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeussler C, Higgins MJ (2014) Strategic alliances: Trading ownership for capabilities. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(1):178–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res. Policy 31(4):477–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J, Link AN, Vonortas NS (2000) Research partnerships. Res. Policy 29(4–5):567–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanisch M, Goldsby CM, Fabian NE, Oehmichen J (2023) Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 162:1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart OD, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart OD, Moore J (2008) Contracts as reference points. Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev. Econom. Statist. 80(1):119–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewitt I (2005) Joint Ventures, 3rd ed. (Sweet & Maxwell, London).Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Rothaermel FT (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad. Management J. 48(2):332–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Rothaermel FT (2010) Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management J. 20(3):734–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2005) How much you know vs. how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management J. 26(1):75–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G, Mellewigt T (2009) Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1025–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC (2000) A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management J. 21(7):775–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Toward a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Johnson JP, Korsgaard MA, Sapienza HJ (2002) Perceived fairness, decision control, and commitment in international joint venture management teams. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1141–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Singh H (2009) Managing strategic alliances: What do we know now, and where do we go from here? Acad. Management Perspect. 23(3):45–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Strömberg P (2003) Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(2):281–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T (1998) The scope of alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3):340–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management J. 19(3):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1989) The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J. Indust. Econom. 38(2):183–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotha R, Crama P, Kim PH (2018) Experience and signaling value in technology licensing contract payment structures. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1307–1342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kownatzki M, Walter J, Floyd SW, Lechner C (2013) Corporate control and the speed of strategic business unit decision making. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1295–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krieger JL (2021) Trials and terminations: Learning from competitors’ R&D failures. Management Sci. 67(9):5525–5548.Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Seth A (1998) The design of coordination and control mechanisms for managing joint venture-parent relationships. Strategic Management J. 19(6):579–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Malmendier U (2010) Contractibility and the design of research agreements. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):214–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Merges RP (1998) The control of technology alliances: An empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):125–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Shane H, Tsai A (2003) Do equity financing cycles matter? Evidence from biotechnology alliances. J. Financial Econom. 67(3):411–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Eden L, Hitt MA, Ireland RD (2008) Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Acad. Management J. 51(2):315–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Eden L, Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Garrett RP (2012) Governance in multilateral R&D alliances. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1191–1210.Link, Google Scholar
• Lui SS-Y, Ngo H (2004) The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances. J. Management 30(4):471–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Oxley JE (2012) Let’s work it out (or we’ll see you in court): Litigation and private dispute resolution in vertical exchange relationships. Organ. Sci. 23(3):820–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Macher JT (2006) Technological development and the boundaries of the firm: A knowledge-based examination in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 52(6):826–843.Link, Google Scholar
• Marshall G, Parra Á (2019) Innovation and competition: The role of the product market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 65:221–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten SE, Crocker KJ (1985) Efficient adaptation in long-term contracts: Take-or-pay provisions for natural gas. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(5):1083–1093.Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Argyres NS (2004) Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. 15(4):394–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Mjoen H, Tallman SB (1997) Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organ. Sci. 8(3):257–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Narayanan VK (2007) Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management J. 28(3):243–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Balasubramanian S, Swaminathan JM (2009) A matter of balance: Specialization, task variety, and individual learning in a software maintenance environment. Management Sci. 55(11):1861–1876.Link, Google Scholar
• Needleman P (2001) The IRI medalist’s address: From a twinkle in the eye to a blockbuster drug. Res. Tech. Management 44(6):38–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE (1997) Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law Econom. Organ. 13(2):387–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE, Sampson RC (2004) The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 25(89):723–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE, Wada T (2009) Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer: Evidence from U.S.-Japan agreements. Management Sci. 55(4):635–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Palay TM (1984) Comparative institutional economics: The governance of rail freight contracting. J. Legal Stud. 13(2):265–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phene A, Tallman SB (2012) Complexity, context and governance in biotechnology alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(1):61–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinkham BC, Peng MW (2017) Overcoming institutional voids via arbitration. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 48(3):344–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1989) Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. J. Law Econom. Organ. 5(1):109–126.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao A (2020) Strategic research and development investment decisions in the pharmaceutical industry. Marketing Sci. 39(3):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Reinganum JF (1982) A dynamic game of R and D: Patent protection and competitive behavior. Econom. J. 50(3):671–688.Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Devarakonda SV (2016) Mechanisms of hybrid governance: Administrative committees in non-equity alliances. Acad. Management J. 59(2):510–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Klijn E, Lioukas CS (2014) Board involvement in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1626–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Zollo M, Singh H (2002) Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 23(2):135–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW (1999) Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 20(7):655–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DT, Stuart TE (2007) Financial contracting in biotech strategic alliances. J. Law Econom. 50(3):559–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross WH, Wieland C (1996) Effects of interpersonal trust and time pressure on managerial mediation strategy in a simulated organizational dispute. J. Appl. Psych. 81(3):228–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, Sampson RC (2009) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Sci. 55(6):906–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Ryu W, McCann BT, Reuer JJ (2018) Geographic co-location of partners and rivals: Implications for the design of R&D alliances. Acad. Management J. 61(3):945–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schepker DJ, Oh W-Y, Martynov A, Poppo L (2014) The many futures of contracts. Moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. J. Management 40(1):193–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2009) Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segal I (1999) Contracting with externalities. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):337–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengul M, Gimeno J, Dial J (2012) Strategic delegation: A review, theoretical integration, and research agenda. J. Management 38(1):375–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shishido Z, Fukuda M, Umetani M (2015) Joint Venture Strategies. Design, Bargaining, and the Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman BS, Baum JAC (2002) Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Acad. Management J. 45(4):791–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singleton S (2017) Joint Ventures and Shareholders’ Agreements (Bloomsbury, London).Google Scholar
• Smith DG (2005) The exit structure of strategic alliances. Univ. Illinois Law Rev. 1:303–317.Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action. Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanneste BS, Puranam P (2010) Repeated interactions and contractual detail: Identifying the learning effect. Organ. Sci. 21(1):186–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Vassolo RS, Anand J, Folta TB (2004) Non-additivity in portfolios of exploration activities: A real options-based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 25(11):1045–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walter J, Kellermanns FW, Lechner C (2012) Decision making within and between organizations: Rationality, politics, and alliance performance. J. Management 38(5):1582–1610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber L, Mayer KJ, Macher JT (2011) An analysis of extendibility and early termination provisions: The importance of framing duration safeguards. Acad. Management J. 54(1):182–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. J. Econom. Literature 38(3):595–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuyts S, Dutta S, Stremersch S (2004) Portfolios of interfirm agreements in technology-intensive markets: Consequences for innovation and profitability. J. Marketing 68(2):88–100.Crossref, Google Scholar