The Misfit Bias

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17462

References

  • Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
  • Andrews JC, Netemeyer RG, Burton S (1998) Consumer generalization of nutrient content claims in advertising. J. Marketing 62(4):62–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Askin N, Mauskapf M (2017) What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82 (5):910–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikard M, Vakili K, Teodoridis F (2019) When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university: Industry collaboration on academic productivity. Organ. Sci. 30(2):426–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Guinan EC, Karim RL, Riedl C (2016) Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Sci. 62(10):2765–2783.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bowers A (2015) Relative comparison and category membership: The case of equity analysts. Organ. Sci. 26(2):571–583.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chai S (2017) Near misses in the breakthrough discovery process. Organ. Sci. 28(3):411–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S (2023) Two faces of decomposability in organizational search: Evidence from singles versus albums in the music industry 1995–2015. Strategic Management J. 44(7):1616–1652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Covert A (2013) A decade of iTunes singles killed the music industry. CNNMoney (April 25), https://money.cnn.com/2013/04/25/technology/itunes-music-decline/index.html.Google Scholar
  • Cutolo D, Ferriani S (2024) Atypicality: Toward an integrative framework in organizational and market settings. Acad. Management Ann. 18(1):157–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiCrescenzo B (2000) Radiohead: Kid A. Retrieved December 5, 2024, https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/6656-kid-a/.Google Scholar
  • Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Enis E (2020) Everything in its right place: How a perfect 10.0 review of Radiohead’s ‘Kid A’ changed music criticism 20 years ago. Billboard (March 26), https://www.billboard.com/music/rock/radiohead-kid-a-pitchfork-review-brent-discrescenzo-2000-9342543/.Google Scholar
  • Feingold A (1992) Good-looking people are not what we think. Psych. Bull. 111(2):304–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisicaro SA, Lance CE (1990) Implications of three causal models for the measurement of halo error. Appl. Psych. Measurement 14(4):419–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fricke D (2000) Kid A. Rolling Stone (October 12), https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-album-reviews/kid-a-185607/.Google Scholar
  • Gilfillan SC (1935) Inventing the Ship (Follett, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Guinness World Records (2015) Biggest-selling studio album by a female solo artist. Accessed March 12, 2015, https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/383776-biggest-selling-studio-album-by-a-female-solo-artist.Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A, Sutton R (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42 (4):716–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hussey A (2021) Shania Twain: Come on over. Pitchfork (October 31), https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/shania-twain-come-on-over/.Google Scholar
  • Johansson F (2004) The Medici Effect: Breakthrough Insights at the Intersection of Ideas, Concepts, and Cultures (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Jones C, Maoret M, Massa FG, Svejenova S (2012) Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category ‘modern architecture,’ 1870–1975. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1523–1545.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács B, Hannan MT (2010) The consequences of category spanning depend on contrast. Hsu G, Negro G, Koçak Ö, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, vol. 31 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 175–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lance CE, LaPointe JA, Fisicaro SA (1994a) Tests of three causal models of Halo rater error. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 57(1):83–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lance CE, LaPointe JA, Stewart AM (1994b) A test of the context dependency of three causal models of Halo rater error. J. Appl. Psych. 79(3):332–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leahey E, Beckman CM, Stanko TL (2017) Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):105–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lena JC (2006) Social context and musical content of rap music, 1979–1995. Soc. Forces 85(1):479–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leung MD, Sharkey AJ (2014) Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence of perceptual factors in the multiple-category discount. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Negro G, Leung MD (2013) ‘Actual’ and perceptual effects of category spanning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):684–696.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Negro G, Koçak Ö, Hsu G (2010) Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Hsu G, Negro G, Koçak Ö, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, vol. 31 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 3–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisbett RE, Wilson TD (1977) The Halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(4):250–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roe B, Levy AS, Derby BM (1999) The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: Results from FDA experimental data. J. Public Policy Marketing 18(1):89–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossman G, Schilke O (2014) Close, but no cigar: The bimodal rewards to prize-seeking. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):86–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian AL (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sharkey AJ, Kovács B, Hsu G (2023) Expert critics, rankings, and review aggregators: The changing nature of intermediation and the rise of markets with multiple intermediaries. Acad. Management Ann. 17(1):1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thorndike EL (1920) A constant error in psychological ratings. J. Appl. Psych. 4(1):25–29.Google Scholar
  • Troutman CM, Shanteau J (1976) Do consumers evaluate products by adding or averaging attribute information? J. Consumer Res. 3:101–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Sattath S, Slovic P (1988) Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. 95(3):371–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uribe J, Carnahan S, Meluso J, Austin-Breneman J (2022) How do managers evaluate individual contributions to team production? A theory and empirical test. Strategic Management J. 43(12):2577–2601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vakili K, Zhang L (2018) High on creativity: The impact of social liberalization policies on innovation. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1860–1886.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vakili K, Teodoridis F, Bikard M (2022) Detrimental collaborations in creative work: Evidence from economics. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1741–1755.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weaver K, Garcia SM, Schwarz N (2012) The presenter’s paradox. J. Consumer Res. 39(3):445–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wikipedia (2022) Kid A. Accessed November 30, 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kid_A&oldid=1142624514.Google Scholar
  • Zanella P, Cillo P, Verona G (2022) Whatever you want, whatever you like: How incumbents respond to changes in market information regimes. Strategic Management J. 43(7):1258–1286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.