Difference in Deference: When Competitors Do Not Give in Despite Having Lost

References

• Askin N, Bothner MS (2016) Status-aspirational pricing: The “Chivas Regal” strategy in US higher education, 2006–2012. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):217–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aversa P, Furnari S, Haefliger S (2015) Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013. Indust. Corporate Change 24(3):655–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Mezias SJ (1992) Localized competition and organizational failure in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):580–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Ridgeway CL, Fisek MH, Norman RZ (1998) The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3):379–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kang JH, Stuart TE (2007) Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):208–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kim YK, Smith EB (2012) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 23(2):416–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) Why corporate demography matters: Policy implications of organizational diversity. Calif. Management Rev. 42(3):148–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellucci F, Ertug G (2010) What’s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 53(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellucci F, Podolny JM (2017) The dynamics of position, capability, and market competition. Indust. Corporate Change 26(1):21–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Allison PD (2014) Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):258–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo HS, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2639–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clough DR, Piezunka H (2020) Tie dissolution in market networks: A theory of vicarious performance feedback. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):972–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collantine K (2016) 2016 Japanese Grand Prix team radio transcript. Racefans (October 17), https://www.racefans.net/2016/10/17/2016-japanese-grand-prix-team-radio-transcript/.Google Scholar
• Converse BA, Reinhard DA (2016) On rivalry and goal pursuit: Shared competitive history, legacy concerns, and strategy selection. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 110(2):191–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coser LA (1961) The termination of conflict. J. Conflict Resolution 5(4):347–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Sousa J, Hollard G (2023) From micro to macro gender differences: Evidence from field tournaments. Management Sci. 69(6):3358–3399.Link, Google Scholar
• Durand R (2006) Organizational Evolution and Strategic Management (Sage Publishers, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Kremp PA (2016) Classical deviation: Organizational and individual status as antecedents of conformity. Acad. Management J. 59(1):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faris R, Felmlee D, McMillan C (2020) With friends like these: Aggression from amity and equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. 126(3):673–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FIA (2020a) Appendix H to the International Sporting Code. FIA (October 3), https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/appendix_h_2020_published_10_03_2020.pdf.Google Scholar
• FIA (2020b) Appendix L to the International Sporting Code. FIA (June 20), https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/appendix_l_2020_publie_le_20_juin_2020.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fisher B (2018) F1: Lewis Hamilton wins the Singapore Grand Prix—As it happened. Guardian (September 16), https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/2018/sep/16/f1-singapore-grand-prix-live.Google Scholar
• Fonti F, Ross J-M, Aversa P (2023) Using sports data to advance management research: A review and a guide for future studies. J. Management 49(1):325–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Formula1.com (2018) Grosjean closer to race ban after Singapore blue-flag penalty. (September 17), https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/grosjean-closer-to-race-ban-after-singapore-blue-flag-penalty.6k8oYb6W76UuYkuG468sAS.Google Scholar
• Fragale AR, Sumanth JJ, Tiedens LZ, Northcraft GB (2012) Appeasing equals: Lateral deference in organizational communication. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):373–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeland RE, Hoey J (2018) The structure of deference: Modeling occupational status using affect control theory. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(2):243–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaessler F, Piezunka H (2023) Training with AI: Evidence from chess computers. Strategic Management J. 44(11):2724–2750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1956) The nature of deference and demeanor. Amer. Anthropologist 58(3):473–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2003) Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity About Social Rank Breeds Conflict (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grohsjean T, Piezunka H, Mickeler M (2024) When colleagues compete outside the firm. Strategic Management J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Grohsjean T, Kober P, Zucchini L (2016) Coming back to Edmonton: Competing with former employers and colleagues. Acad. Management J. 59(2):394–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW (2014) The denigration of heroes? How the status attainment process shapes attributions of considerateness and authenticity. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):504–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallila P, Frankort HT, Aversa P (2024) Revving up or backing down? Cross-level effects of firm-level tournaments on employees’ competitive actions. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print January 18, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han JY, Shipilov AV, Greve HR (2017) Unequal bedfellows: Gender role-based deference in multiplex ties between Korean business groups. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1531–1553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution Human Behav. 22(3):165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen M, Pierce L, Snyder J, Nguyen H (2024) Product sales incentive spillovers to the lending market: Evidence from subprime auto loan defaults. Management Sci. 70(8):5463–5480.Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Knight AP (2015) Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic deference to team effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 58(1):59–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jourdan J, Durand R, Thornton PH (2017) The price of admission: Organizational deference as strategic behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 123(1):232–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ (2014) Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Social Psych. Personality Sci. 5(8):944–952.Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Gallo E, Reade JJ (2016) Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1508–1534.Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Wang K, Lee SY, Tsai W, Chuang YT, Tsai FS (2024) Hiding and seeking knowledge-providing ties from rivals: A strategic perspective on network perceptions. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print January 4, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreager DA (2007) Unnecessary roughness? School sports, peer networks, and male adolescent violence. Amer. J. Sociol. 72(5):705–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D (2010) The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(2):139–146.Google Scholar
• Marino A, Aversa P, Mesquita L, Anand J (2015) Driving performance via exploration in changing environments: Evidence from Formula One racing. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1079–1100.Link, Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK, Paolella L, Durand R (2023) A rivalry‐based theory of gender diversity. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1254–1291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medland C (2020) 2020 Turkish Grand Prix report: Hamilton’s sensational win clinches 7th F1 title. Motorsport (November 15), https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/2020-turkish-grand-prix-report-sensational-hamilton-victory-to-clinch-7th-title.Google Scholar
• Naumovska I, Lavie D (2021) When an industry peer is accused of financial misconduct: Stigma vs. competition effects on non-accused firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):1130–1172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Operti E, Lampronti SY, Sgourev SV (2020) Hold your horses: Temporal multiplexity and conflict moderation in the Palio di Siena (1743–2010). Organ. Sci. 31(1):85–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Piazza A, Bergemann P, Helms W (2024) Getting away with it (or not): The social control of organizational deviance. Acad. Management J. 49(2):249–272.Google Scholar
• Pierce JR, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Sivanathan N (2013) From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psych. Sci. 24(10):1986–1994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Lee W, Haynes R, Bothner MS (2018) Escalation of competition into conflict in competitive networks of Formula One drivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(15):E3361–E3367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2005) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Industries as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26:397–416.Google Scholar
• Racing Elite (2019) REVEALED: 2019 F1 driver salaries—Who is the richest F1 driver? Accessed March 4, 2023, https://racing-elite.com/2019/01/19/revealed-2019-f1-driver-salaries-who-is-the-richest-f1-driver/.Google Scholar
• Rencken D, Collantine K (2018) Grosjean accepts some of his penalty points are deserved. (November 5), https://www.racefans.net/2018/11/05/grosjean-admits-some-of-his-penalty-points-are-deserved/.Google Scholar
• Rushing WA (1962) Social influence and the social-psychological function of deference: A study of psychiatric nursing. Soc. Forces 41(2):142–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saccardo S, Pietrasz A, Gneezy U (2018) On the size of the gender difference in competitiveness. Management Sci. 64(4):1541–1554.Link, Google Scholar
• Sgourev SV, Operti E (2019) From Montagues to Capulets: Analyzing the systemic nature of rivalry in career mobility. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1333–1357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith C (2019) Formula One’s most valuable teams. Forbes (November 26), https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2019/11/26/formula-one-team-values-ferrari-mercedes/#248315e1ddb5.Google Scholar
• Soule SA, King BG (2008) Competition and resource partitioning in three social movement industries. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(6):1568–1610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sytch M, Tatarynowicz A (2013) Friends and foes: The dynamics of dual social structures. Acad. Management J. 57(2):585–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatchenkery S, Piezunka H (2025) Competition in collaboration: The problem of (mis) aligned perception. Admin. Sci. Quart. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2024) Outshining your rival: Interpersonal rivalry and its effects on organizational contributions. The Wharton School Research paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• To C, Kilduff GJ, Rosikiewicz BL (2020) When interpersonal competition helps and when it harms: An integration via challenge and threat. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):908–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• To C, Kilduff GJ, Ordoñez L, Schweitzer ME (2018) Going for it on fourth down: Rivalry increases risk taking, physiological arousal, and promotion focus. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1281–1306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaughan L, Romero‐Frías E (2014) Web search volume as a predictor of academic fame: An exploration of Google trends. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 65(4):707–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Velasco P (2020) Binotto: To be lapped is very painful for us and our fans. GP Today (July 19), http://www.gptoday.com/full_story/view/726805/BinottoTo_be_lapped_is_very_painful_for_us_and_our_fans/.Google Scholar
• Willer R, Sharkey A, Frey S (2012) Reciprocity on the hardwood: Passing patterns among professional basketball players. PLoS One 7(12):e49807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, London).Google Scholar