The Effect of Financial Resources on Misconduct: Evidence from Lottery Ticket Sales

References

• Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2022) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? Quart. J. Econom. 138(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agnew R, Piquero NL, Cullen FT (2009) General strain theory and white-collar crime. Simpson SS, Weisburd D, eds. The Criminology of White-Collar Crime (Springer, New York), 35–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agnew R, Cullen FT, Burton Jr VS, Evans TD, Dunaway RG (1996) A new test of classic strain theory. Justice Quart. 13(4):681–704.Google Scholar
• Alexander CR (1999) On the nature of the reputational penalty for corporate crime: Evidence. J. Law Econom. 42(S1):489–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman N, Krzywinski M (2015) Points of significance: Simple linear regression. Nature Methods 12(11):999–1000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asch P, Seneca JJ (1976) Is collusion profitable? Rev. Econom. Statist. 58(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker AC, Larcker DF, Wang CC (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financial Econom. 144(2):370–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucus MS, Near JP (1991) Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Acad. Management J. 34(1):9–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker HS (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Beenstock M, Haitovsky Y (2001) Lottomania and other anomalies in the market for lotto. J. Econom. Psych. 22(6):721–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett VM, Pierce L, Snyder JA, Toffel MW (2013) Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Sci. 59(8):1725–1742.Link, Google Scholar
• Bianchi E, Mohliver A (2016) Do good times breed cheats? Prosperous times have immediate and lasting implications for CEO misconduct. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1488–1503.Link, Google Scholar
• Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2021) Revisiting event study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. Preprint, submitted August 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12419.Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cespedes J, Huang X, Parra C (2023) More money, more options? The effect of cash windfalls on entrepreneurial activities in small businesses. Preprint, submitted July 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3301451.Google Scholar
• Clinard M, Yeager P, Clinard R (1980) Corporate Crime (Free Press; Collier Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Clinard MB, Yeager PC, Brissette J, Petrashek D, Harries E (1979) Illegal Corporate Behavior (U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Cloward R, Ohlin L (1960) Delinquency and Opportunity: A Study of Delinquent Gangs (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Cohen A (1955) Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Fang C, Liu C (2019) In search of behavioral opportunities from misattributions of luck. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):896–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiFranza JR, Tye JB (1990) Who profits from tobacco sales to children? J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 263(20):2784–2787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Gerken WC, Van Alfen T (2021) Real estate shocks and financial advisor misconduct. J. Finance 76(6):3309–3346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubois D, Rucker DD, Galinsky AD (2015) Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(3):436–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaglin FC (2024) The need for speed: The impact of capital constraints on strategic misconduct. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 22-056, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• FDA (2013) Compliance and enforcement report. Center for Tobacco Products, Office of Compliance and Enforcement. Accessed June 18, 2019, https://www.fda.gov/media/88447/download.Google Scholar
• Frake J, Harmon D (2023) Intergenerational transmission of organizational misconduct: Evidence from the Chicago Police Department. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print July 26, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00580.Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times (September 13), Section SM, 17.Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pierce L (2009) The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(2):142–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonsalves L (2022) When do firms crack under pressure? Legal professionals, negative role models, and organizational misconduct. Organ. Sci. 34(2):754–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Palmer D, Pozner JE (2010) Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):53–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grundmann S, Lambsdorff JG (2017) How income and tax rates provoke cheating–An experimental investigation of tax morale. J. Econom. Psych. 63:27–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guryan J, Kearney MS (2008) Gambling at lucky stores: Empirical evidence from state lottery sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):458–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris J, Bromiley P (2007) Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. 18(3):350–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Kelley PC, Agle BR, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE (1992) An empirical examination of the causes of corporate wrongdoing in the United States. Human Relations 45(10):1055–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Loewenstein J (2021) Analogical encoding fosters ethical decision making because improved knowledge of ethical principles increases moral awareness. J. Bus. Ethics 172(2):307–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornhauser R (1978) Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Models (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Pierce L (2016) Compensation and employee misconduct: The inseparability of productive and counterproductive behavior in firms. Palmer D, Smith-Crowe K, Greenwood R, eds. Organizational Wrongdoing: Key Perspectives and New Directions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 270–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu C, De Rond M (2016) Good night, and good luck: Perspectives on luck in management scholarship. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):409–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu JG, Quoidbach J, Gino F, Chakroff A, Maddux WW, Galinsky AD (2017) The dark side of going abroad: How broad foreign experiences increase immoral behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 112(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKendall MA, Wagner JA (1997) Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality. Organ. Sci. 8(6):624–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1938) Social structure and anomie. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 3(5):672–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishina Y, Dykes BJ, Block ES, Pollock TG (2010) Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Acad. Management J. 53(4):701–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell MS, Baer MD, Ambrose ML, Folger R, Palmer NF (2018) Cheating under pressure: A self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 103(1):54–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohliver A (2019) How misconduct spreads: Auditors’ role in the diffusion of stock-option backdating. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):310–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohliver A, Ody-Brasier A (2023) Religious affiliation and wrongdoing: Evidence from US nursing homes. Management Sci. 69(1):533–554.Link, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S, Shafir E (2013) Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• NACS (2018) Convenience stores sales, profits edged higher in 2017. NACS state of the industry report. https://www.convenience.org/Media/Daily/2018/Apr/ND0412181_Convenience-Store-Sales,-Profits-Edged-H.Google Scholar
• North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries (2019) Frequently asked questions. Accessed June 2019, https://www.naspl.org/faq.Google Scholar
• Office of the Surgeon General (2017) Preventing tobacco use among youths, Surgeon General fact sheet. Accessed June 19, 2019, https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/tobacco/preventing-youth-tobacco-use-factsheet/index.html.Google Scholar
• Palmer D (2008) Extending the process model of collective corruption. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:107–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D (2012) Normal Organizational Wrongdoing: A Critical Analysis of Theories of Misconduct in and by Organizations (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D (2017) Institutions, institutional theory, and organizational wrongdoing. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 737–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Yenkey C (2015) Drugs, sweat, and gears: An organizational analysis of performance-enhancing drug use in the 2010 Tour de France. Soc. Forces 94(2):891–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 70:153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snyder J (2008) Ethical spillovers in firms: Evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Management Sci. 54(11):1891–1903.Link, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Piff PK, Stancato DM, Côté S, Mendoza-Denton R, Keltner D (2012) Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(11):4086–4091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto J, Leana CR, Pil FK (2008) Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):685–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes E, Negro G, Rao H (2010) Stained red: A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the “red scare” in Hollywood, 1945 to 1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth J, Sant’Anna PH, Bilinski A, Poe J (2022) What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Preprint, submitted January 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01194.Google Scholar
• Schnatterly K (2003) Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management J. 24(7):587–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma E, Mazar N, Alter AL, Ariely D (2014) Financial deprivation selectively shifts moral standards and compromises moral decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 123(2):90–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson SS (1986) The decomposition of antitrust: Testing a multi-level, longitudinal model of profit-squeeze. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(6):859–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson SS, Koper CS (1997) The changing of the guard: Top management characteristics, organizational strain and antitrust offending. J. Quant. Criminol. 13(4):373–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Szwajkowski E (1975) The scarcity-munificence component of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many instruments. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, New York), 109–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stroube B (2021) Using allegations to understand selection bias in organizations: Misconduct in the Chicago Police Department. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 166:149–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutherland E (1949) White Collar Crime (The Dryden Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM (1999) Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):684–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM (2004) Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Soc. Justice Res. 17(2):223–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel AE, Smith-Crowe K (2008) Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):545–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Bingham JB (2011) When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organ. Sci. 22(3):621–640.Link, Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Bingham JB, Mitchell MS (2010) Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 95(4):769–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaughan D (1999) The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:271–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu D, Zhou KZ, Du F (2019) Deviant vs. aspirational risk taking: The effects of performance feedback on bribery expenditure and R&D intensity. Acad. Management J. 62(4):1226–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK, Shapiro DL (2012) Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1079–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang V, Mohliver AC, King M (2023) Where is all the deviance? Liminal prescribing and the social networks underlying the prescription drug crisis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(1):228–269.Crossref, Google Scholar