Moral or Lawful? When Legal Constraints Reverse the Motivational Benefits of Moral Considerations

References

• Affinito S, Christian M, Sherf EN, Keeney JE, Yang J, Hofmann DA, Yu Y, Gray K (2020) From deviance to cover-up: The roles of confessional silence and punitive policies. Acad. Management Proc. 2020(1):18048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1993) Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Rev. 3(3):185–201.Google Scholar
• Atari M, Haidt J, Graham J, Koleva S, Stevens ST, Dehghani M (2023) Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 125(5):1157–1188.Google Scholar
• Babcock BA (1983) Defending the guilty. Cleveland State Law Rev. 32(2):175.Google Scholar
• Bauman CW, Skitka LJ (2012) Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:63–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass/Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Brink DO (1997) Moral motivation. Ethics 108(1):4–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown ME, Vogel RM, Akben M (2022) Ethical conflict: Conceptualization, measurement, and an examination of consequences. J. Appl. Psych. 107(7):1130–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan S, Barnett ML (2022) Inside the velvet glove: Sustaining private regulatory institutions through hollowing and fortifying. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2159–2186.Link, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Thompson JA (2009) The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):32–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron J, Pierce WD (1994) Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Rev. Ed. Res. 64(3):363–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell E (2013) Ethical intentions and the moral motivation of teachers. Heinrichs K, Oser F, Lovat T, eds. Handbook of Moral Motivation, Moral Development and Citizenship Education, vol. 1 (SensePublishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands), 517–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cangiano F, Parker SK (2016) Proactivity for mental health and well-being. Clarke S, Probst TM, Guldenmund F, Passmore J, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Occupational Safety and Workplace Health (Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ), 228–250.Google Scholar
• Cangiano F, Parker SK, Yeo GB (2019) Does daily proactivity affect well‐being? The moderating role of punitive supervision. J. Organ. Behav. 40(1):59–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caulfield M, Lynn A (2024) Federated corporate social responsibility: Constraining the responsible corporation. Acad. Management Rev. 49(1):32–55.Google Scholar
• Cesario J, Grant H, Higgins ET (2004) Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(3):388–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crant JM (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. J. Management 26(3):435–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Cascio WF, Rochester Univ., NY (1972) Changes in Intrinsic Motivation as a Function of Negative Feedback and Threats (Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (2012) Self-determination theory. Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA), 416–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Schwartz AJ, Sheinman L, Ryan RM (1981) An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control vs. autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. J. Ed. Psych. 73(5):642–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai SD, Kouchaki M (2017) Moral symbols: A necklace of garlic against unethical requests. Acad. Management J. 60(1):7–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dik BJ, Duffy RD (2009) Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice. Counseling Psychologist 37(3):424–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ditto PH, Koleva SP (2011) Moral empathy gaps and the American culture war. Emotion Rev. 3(3):331–332.Google Scholar
• Dobrow SR, Weisman H, Heller D, Tosti-Kharas J (2023) Calling and the good life: A meta-analysis and theoretical extension. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(2):508–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psych. Sci. 24(1):56–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg M, Willer R (2015) From gulf to bridge: When do moral arguments facilitate political influence? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(12):1665–1681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng J, Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhang L, Han X (2018) Just the right amount of ethics inspires creativity: A cross-level investigation of ethical leadership, intrinsic motivation, and employee creativity. J. Bus. Ethics 153(3):645–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbach A, Woolley K (2022) The structure of intrinsic motivation. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 9:339–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuller B, Marler LE, Hester K, Otondo RF (2015) Leader reactions to follower proactive behavior: Giving credit when credit is due. Human Relations 68(6):879–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagne M, Senecal CB, Koestner R (1997) Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: A multidimensional model. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 27(14):1222–1240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glavas A, Kelley K (2014) The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. Bus. Ethics Quart. 24(2):165–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gok K, Babalola MT, Lakshman C, Sumanth JJ, Vo LC, Decoster S, Bansal A, Coşkun A (2023) Enhancing employees’ duty orientation and moral potency: Dual mechanisms linking ethical psychological climate to ethically focused proactive behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 44(1):157–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin GP (2015) Moral character in person perception. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 24(1):38–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin GP, Darley JM (2012) Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(1):250–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin GP, Piazza J, Rozin P (2014) Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 106(1):148–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek BA (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(5):1029–1046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J, Nosek BA, Haidt J, Iyer R, Koleva S, Ditto PH (2011) Mapping the moral domain. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(2):366–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J, Haidt J, Koleva S, Motyl M, Iyer R, Wojcik SP, Ditto PH (2013) Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Devine P, Plant A, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA), 55–130.Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2008) Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):48–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psych. Rev. 108(4):814.Google Scholar
• Haidt J, Graham J (2007) When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Soc. Justice Res. 20(1):98–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannah ST, Avolio BJ (2010) Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership. Consulting Psych. J. 62(4):291–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Montoya AK (2017) A tutorial on testing, visualizing, and probing an interaction involving a multicategorical variable in linear regression analysis. Comm. Methods Measures 11(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Preacher KJ (2014) Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. 67(3):451–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland KJ, Cipriano AE, Huit TZ (2021) “A victim/survivor needs agency”: Sexual assault survivors’ perceptions of university mandatory reporting policies. Anal. Soc. Issues Public Policy 21(1):488–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G, Xie JL, Fang Y (1992) Mediating and moderating effects in job design. J. Management 18(4):657–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones TM (1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Acad. Management Rev. 16(2):366–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouchaki M, Dobson KS, Waytz A, Kteily NS (2018) The link between self-dehumanization and immoral behavior. Psych. Sci. 29(8):1234–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kundro TG (2023) The benefits and burdens of work moralization on creativity. Acad. Management J. 66(4):1183–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kundro TG, Nurmohamed S (2021) Understanding when and why cover-ups are punished less severely. Acad. Management J. 64(3):873–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Cunningham JL, Jachimowicz JM (2023) Discerning saints: Moralization of intrinsic motivation and selective prosociality at work. Acad. Management J. 66(6):1625–1650.Google Scholar
• Larson LR, Usher LE, Chapmon T (2018) Surfers as environmental stewards: Understanding place-protecting behavior at Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Leisure Sci. 40(5):442–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EE, Hall DT (1970) Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. J. Appl. Psych. 54(4):305–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lützén K, Johansson A, Nordström G (2000) Moral sensitivity: Some differences between nurses and physicians. Nursing Ethics 7(6):520–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manning R, Anteby M (2016) Wrong paths to right: Defining morality with or without a clear red line. Palmer D, Smith-Crowe K, Greenwood R, eds. Organizational Wrongdoing: Key Perspectives and New Directions, Cambridge Companions to Management (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 47–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Molinsky A (2008) Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. Acad. Management J. 51(5):847–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molinsky A, Margolis J (2005) Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):245–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore C, Detert JR, Klebe Treviño L, Baker VL, Mayer DM (2012) Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psych. 65(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran CM, Diefendorff JM, Kim TY, Liu ZQ (2012) A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. J. Vocational Behav. 81(3):354–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE (2006) The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J. Appl. Psych. 91(6):1321.Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Phelps CC (1999) Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad. Management J. 42(4):403–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Bindl UK, Strauss K (2010) Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. J. Management 36(4):827–856.Google Scholar
• Patall EA, Cooper H, Robinson JC (2008) The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psych. Bull. 134(2):270.Google Scholar
• Reid E, Ramarajan L (2022) Seeking purity, avoiding pollution: Strategies for moral career building. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1909–1937.Link, Google Scholar
• Reynolds SJ (2006) Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. J. Appl. Psych. 91(1):233–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards D (1995) Artful Work: Awakening Joy, Meaning, and Commitment in the Workplace (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Statist. Software 48:1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Connell JP (1989) Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(5):749–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psychologist 55(1):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoemann AM, Jorgensen TD (2021) Testing and interpreting latent variable interactions using the semTools package. Psych 3(3):322–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sekerka LE, Bagozzi RP, Charnigo R (2009) Facing ethical challenges in the workplace: Conceptualizing and measuring professional moral courage. J. Bus. Ethics 89(4):565–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shamir B, House RJ, Arthur MB (1993) The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organ. Sci. 4(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Silver J, Silver E (2017) Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law Human Behav. 41(3):258–272.Google Scholar
• Simmons-Duffin S (2022) Doctors who would like to defy abortion laws say it’s too risky. NPR.org (November 22), https://www.npr.org/2022/11/22/1138558392/doctors-who-would-like-to-defy-abortion-laws-say-its-too-risky.Google Scholar
• Skitka LJ (2010) The psychology of moral conviction. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 4(4):267–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skitka LJ, Houston DA (2001) When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Soc. Justice Res. 14:305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skitka LJ, Bauman CW, Lytle BL (2009) Limits on legitimacy: Moral and religious convictions as constraints on deference to authority. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(4):567–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skitka LJ, Bauman CW, Sargis EG (2005) Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(6):895–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith-Crowe K, Burke MJ, Kouchaki M, Signal SM (2013) Assessing interrater agreement via the average deviation index given a variety of theoretical and methodological problems. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):127–151.Google Scholar
• Staw BM (2016) Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: An autobiographical look at the direction of organizational research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone-Romero EF, Rosopa PJ (2008) The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organ. Res. Methods 11(2):326–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strohminger N, Nichols S (2014) The essential moral self. Cognition 131(1):159–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE, Kristel OV, Elson SB, Green MC, Lerner JS (2000) The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(5):853.Google Scholar
• Thomas KW (2000) Intrinsic Motivation at Work: Building Energy & Commitment (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Tomasello M, Melis AP, Tennie C, Wyman E, Herrmann E (2012) Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology 53(6):673–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tornau K, Frese M (2013) Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Appl. Psych. 62(1):44–96.Google Scholar
• Treviño LK, Den Nieuwenboer NA, Kish-Gephart JJ (2014) (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Rev. Psych. 65:635–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tymon WG, Stumpf SA, Doh JP (2010) Exploring talent management in India: The neglected role of intrinsic rewards. J. World Bus. 45(2):109–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unsworth KL, Parker S (2003) Proactivity and innovation: Promoting a new workforce for the new workplace. Holman D, Wall TD, Clegg CW, Sparrow P, Howard A, eds. The New Workplace: A Guide to the Human Impact of Modern Working Practices (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 175–196.Google Scholar
• van der Linden S (2015) The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Toward a comprehensive model. J. Environ. Psych. 41:112–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Werff E, Steg L, Keizer K (2013) The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. J. Environ. Psych. 34:55–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vonasch AJ, Reynolds T, Winegard BM, Baumeister RF (2018) Death before dishonor: Incurring costs to protect moral reputation. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 9(5):604–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren DE, Smith-Crowe K (2008) Deciding what’s right: The role of external sanctions and embarrassment in shaping moral judgments in the workplace. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:81–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberg RS (1978) Relationship between extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation. Psych. Rep. 42(3 Suppl):1255–1258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yidong T, Xinxin L (2013) How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. J. Bus. Ethics 116(2):441–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young C (2019) Putting the law in its place: Business ethics and the assumption that illegal implies unethical. J. Bus. Ethics 160:35–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Gino F, Margolis JD (2018) Does “could” lead to good? On the road to moral insight. Acad. Management J. 61(3):857–895.Crossref, Google Scholar