Managing Social Impact: An Integrated Approach and Research Agenda

References

• Addy C, Chorengel M, Collins M, Etzel M (2019) Calculating the value of impact investing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 97(1):102–109.Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Csaszar FA, Zemsky P (2014) Positioning on a multiattribute landscape. Management Sci. 60(11):2794–2815.Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Ruiz-Aliseda F, Zemsky P (2016) Specialist versus generalist positioning: Demand heterogeneity, technology scalability and endogenous market segmentation. Strategy Sci. 1(3):184–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Aragón-Correa JA, Marano V, Tashman PA (2021) The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. J. Management 47(6):1468–1497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Yayavaram S (2011) Perspective—Explaining influence rents: The case for an institutions-based view of strategy. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1631–1652.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Capron L, Lenox M, Yao DA (2018) Strategy and the institutional envelope. Strategy Sci. 3(2):ii–ix.Link, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Shiller RJ (2016) Phishing for Phools (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert D, Csaszar FA (2026) Search heuristics under multiple objectives: The case of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2014) Location strategies for agglomeration economies. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1749–1761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Lee S, Park J (2021) Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Sci. 67(9):5399–5429.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1969) The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarket allocation. The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditure: The PPB System (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC), 59–73.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1985) The potentials and limits of the market in resource allocation. Feiwel GR, ed. Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ, Hahn F (1970) General Competitive Analysis (Holden Day, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Arvate P, Cabral S, McGahan AM, Reis PR (2022) Structural advocacy organizations and intersectional outcomes: Effects of women’s police stations on female homicides. Public Admin. Rev. 82(3):503–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arvidson M, Lyon F, McKay S, Moro D (2013) Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring Social Return on Investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Rev. 4(1):3–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asmussen CG, Fosfuri A (2019) Orchestrating corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise. Strategic Management J. 40(6):894–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asmussen CG, Foss K, Foss NJ, Klein PG (2021) Economizing and strategizing: How coalitions and transaction costs shape value creation and appropriation. Strategic Management J. 42(2):413–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkin D, Schoar A, Wahnschafft K (2021) Evaluating Sama’s training and job programs in Nairobi, Kenya. Working paper, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Atkinson AB (2009) Giving overseas and public policy. J. Public Econom. 93(5–6):647–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):630–640.Google Scholar
• Bacq S, Aguilera RV (2022) Stakeholder governance for responsible innovation: A theory of value creation, appropriation, and distribution. J. Management Stud. 59(1):29–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ballesteros L, Gatignon A (2019) The relative value of firm and nonprofit experience: Tackling large‐scale social issues across institutional contexts. Strategic Management J. 40(4):631–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2009) The experimental approach to development economics. Annual Rev. Econom. 1(1):151–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2012) Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty (Public Affairs, New York).Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV, Karlan D, Zinman J (2015) Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: Introduction and further steps. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 7(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Durand R, Kreutzer M, Kunisch S, McGahan AM (2025) Strategy can no longer ignore planetary boundaries: A call for tackling Strategy’s ecological fallacy. J. Management Stud. 62(2):965–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnea A, Rubin A (2010) Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. J. Bus. Ethics 97(1):71–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):794–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML (2019) The business case for corporate social responsibility: A critique and an indirect path forward. Bus. Soc. 58(1):167–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2012) Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 33(11):1304–1320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett ML, Henriques I, Husted BW (2020) Beyond good intentions: Designing CSR initiatives for greater social impact. J. Management 46(6):937–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (2005) Should strategic management research engage public policy debates? Acad. Management J. 48(6):945–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (1995) Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. Calif. Management Rev. 37(2):47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (2009) A positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate social performance. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):7–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Obloj T, Pache AC, Sengul M (2022) Beyond shareholder value maximization: Accounting for financial/social trade-offs in dual-purpose companies. Acad. Management Rev. 47(2):237–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache AC, Model J (2015) Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1658–1685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Davis GF, Kunisch S, Luo J, Wu B (2023) Organizing for good—Using organization design to take on grand challenges. J. Organ. Design 12(4):165–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker E, Lindsay CM (1994) Does the government free ride? J. Law Econom. 37(1):277–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77(305):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Zenger T (2016) The lemons problem in markets for strategy. Strategy Sci. 1(2):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Bennett VM, Pierce L, Snyder JA, Toffel MW (2013) Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Sci. 59(8):1725–1742.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry H, Kaul A, Lee N (2021) Follow the smoke: The pollution haven effect on global sourcing. Strategic Management J. 42(13):2420–2450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Fisman R, Trebbi F (2020) Tax-exempt lobbying: Corporate philanthropy as a tool for political influence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(7):2065–2102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2007) Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility. J. Public Econom. 91(9):1645–1663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanken I, van de Ven N, Zeelenberg M (2015) A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(4):540–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Singh J (2018) Taking a hit to save the world? Employee participation in a corporate social initiative. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1003–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Rogan M, Singh J (2019) Sustainable cross-sector collaboration: A global platform for social impact. Acad. Management Discoveries 5(4):396–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Rogan M, Singh J (2022) Up to no good? Gender, social impact work, and employee promotions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(1):82–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Singh J, Rogan M (2015) Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1702–1720.Link, Google Scholar
• Boettger RD, Greer CR (1994) On the wisdom of rewarding A while hoping for B. Organ. Sci. 5(4):569–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Bondy K (2008) The paradox of power in CSR: A case study on implementation. J. Bus. Ethics 82(2):307–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boroomand F (2024) Children left behind: Charter schools and the privatization of public education in the US. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Bosse DA, Phillips RA, Harrison JS (2009) Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 30(4):447–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boumgarden P, Nickerson J, Zenger TR (2012) Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 33(6):587–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (2011) Co-Opetition (Currency Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Stuart WS (1996) Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 5(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bridoux F, Stoelhorst JW (2014) Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management J. 35(1):107–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bridoux F, Stoelhorst JW (2016) Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Acad. Management Rev. 41(2):229–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Safford S (2008) The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):460–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P, Marcus A (1989) The deterrent to dubious corporate behavior: Profitability, probability and safety recalls. Strategic Management J. 10(3):233–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021) The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform. Management Sci. 67(2):1004–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC, Koo WW, Luo J (2026) A platform rating system and vulnerable workers: Evidence from field experiments in Singapore. Organ. Sci., Articles in Advance April 21, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18153.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC, Mamer J, Snyder J (2018) Pro bono as a human capital learning and screening mechanism: Evidence from law firms. Strategic Management J. 39(11):2899–2920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Wiseman RM, Arrfelt M, Woo HS (2017) A review of the internal capital allocation literature: Piecing together the capital allocation puzzle. J. Management 43(8):2430–2455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Gambardella A, Messinese D, Novelli E, Paolucci E, Spina C (2024) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision‐making: Large‐scale replication and extension. Strategic Management J. 45(6):1209–1237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Mitchell W (2009) Selection capability: How capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organ. Sci. 20(2):294–312.Link, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Kryscynski D, Olson D (2017) When does corporate social responsibility reduce employee turnover? Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1932–1962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M, Kaul A, Wu B (2019) Adaptation across multiple landscapes: Relatedness, complexity, and the long run effects of coordination in diversified firms. Strategic Management J. 40(11):1791–1821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin MK, Hambrick DC, Treviño LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):197–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cirik K, Makadok R (2023) First-mover advantages versus first-mover benefits: What’s the difference and why does it matter? Acad. Management Rev. 48(3):409–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J. Law Econom. 3:1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobb JA (2016) How firms shape income inequality: Stakeholder power, executive decision making, and the structuring of employment relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 41(2):324–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R, March J (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Davis GF, DeWitt T (2025) Can strategy address the climate crisis without losing its essence? J. Management Stud. 62(2):1003–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Roo M, Wickert C, de Bakker FG, Elfring T (2025) From seller to broker: When and how issue sellers engage with external stakeholders to sell issues inside organizations. Strategic Organ. 23(3):520–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deb K (2001) Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Di Giuli A, Kostovetsky L (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 111(1):158–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Distelhorst G, McGahan A (2021) Socially irresponsible employment in emerging-market manufacturers. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2135–2158.Link, Google Scholar
• Dobrev SD, Carroll GR (2003) Size (and competition) among organizations: Modeling scale-based selection among automobile producers in four major countries, 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. 24(6):541–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorobantu S, Kaul A, Zelner B (2017) Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management J. 38(1):114–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchin R, Gao J, Xu Q (2025) Sustainability or greenwashing: Evidence from the asset market for industrial pollution. J. Finance 80(2):699–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Hawn O, Ioannou I (2019) Willing and able: A general model of organizational responses to normative pressures. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):299–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebrahim A, Rangan VK (2014) What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. Calif. Management Rev. 56(3):118–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebrahim A, Battilana J, Mair J (2014) The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 34:81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1105–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):404–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Fama EF (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. 88(2):288–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fangwa AA, Flammer C, Huysentruyt M, Quélin BV (2024) The governance of nonprofits and their social impact: Evidence from a randomized program in healthcare in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Management Sci. 70(5):2732–2755.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Gambardella A, Novelli E, Zenger T (2024) A scientific method for startups. J. Management 50(8):3080–3104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Sci. 61(11):2549–2568.Link, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Luo J (2017) Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment. Strategic Management J. 38(2):163–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Hong B, Minor D (2019) Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management J. 40(7):1097–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong CM, Oberholzer-Gee F (2011) Truth in giving: Experimental evidence on the welfare effects of informed giving to the poor. J. Public Econom. 95(5–6):436–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A, Giarratana MS, Roca E (2015) Walking a slippery line: Investments in social values and product longevity. Strategic Management J. 36(11):1750–1760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Klein PG (2025) Do we need a ‘new strategy paradigm’? No. J. Management Stud. 62(2):986–1002.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frake J, Hurst R, Kagan M (2026) Political segregation in the US workplace. Nature Human Behav., ePub ahead of print June 22, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02501-9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J (1985) Interorganizational relations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 11:281–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J (1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979-81, 1987-89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JK (1952) A Theory of Price Control (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gans J, Ryall MD (2017) Value capture theory: A strategic management review. Strategic Management J. 38(1):17–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganson B, He TL, Henisz WJ (2022) Business and peace: The impact of firm-stakeholder relational strategies on conflict risk. Acad. Management Rev. 47(2):259–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Zenger T (2023) The firm as a subsociety: Purpose, justice, and the theory of the firm. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1965–1980.Link, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Prat A, Serafeim G (2019) Corporate purpose and financial performance. Organ. Sci. 30(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Gatignon A (2022) The double‐edged sword of boundary‐spanning corporate social responsibility programs. Strategic Management J. 43(10):2156–2184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon A, Bode C (2023) When few give to many and many give to few: Corporate social responsibility strategies under India’s legal mandate. Strategic Management J. 44(9):2099–2127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon A, Capron L (2023) The firm as an architect of polycentric governance: Building open institutional infrastructure in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. 44(1):48–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Helfat CE, Marengo L (2017) Searching, shaping, and the quest for superior performance. Strategy Sci. 2(3):194–209.Link, Google Scholar
• George G, McGahan AM, Prabhu J (2012) Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. J. Management Stud. 49(4):661–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Fewer TJ, Lazzarini S, McGahan AM, Puranam P (2024) Partnering for grand challenges: A review of organizational design considerations in public-private collaborations. J. Management 50(1):10–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Premand P, Rawlings LB, Vermeersch CM (2011) Impact Evaluation in Practice (World Bank Publications, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Singh J (2026) Eliciting supplier cooperation for value chain decarbonization: A field experiment with smallholder farmers in India. Management Sci., Articles in Advance February 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05744.Link, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):777–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal J, Riedl EJ, Serafeim G (2018) Market reaction to mandatory nonfinancial disclosure. Management Sci. 65(7):3061–3084.Link, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG, Williams TA, Zhao EY (2019) Anchors aweigh: The sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):819–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gugerty MK, Karlan D (2018) The Goldilocks Challenge: Right-Fit Evidence for the Social Sector (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansmann HB (1980) The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law J. 89(5):835–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansmann HB (1996) The Ownership of Enterprise (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Bosse DA, Phillips RA (2010) Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 31(1):58–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (2008) Contracts as reference points. Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (2021) What does firm shaping of markets really mean? Strategy Sci. 6(4):360–370.Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Eisenhardt KM (2004) Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management J. 25(13):1217–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management J. 24(10):997–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2000) Product sequencing: Co‐evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):961–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1243–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Kaul A, Ketchen DJ Jr, Barney JB, Chatain O, Singh H (2023) Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods. Strategic Management J. 44(6):1357–1390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (2020) Reimagining Capitalism in a World on Fire (Public Affairs Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Dorobantu S, Nartey LJ (2014) Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1727–1748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyes A, Martin S (2017) Social labeling by competing NGOs: A model with multiple issues and entry. Management Sci. 63(6):1800–1813.Link, Google Scholar
• Hochman HM, Rodgers JD (1969) Pareto optimal redistribution. J. Law Econom. Organ. 59(4):542–557.Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horvath A, Powell WW (2016) Contributory or disruptive: Do new forms of philanthropy erode democracy? Reich R, Cordelli C, Bernholz L, eds. Philanthropy in Democratic Societies: Origins, Institutions, Values (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 87–122.Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Poliquin CW (2023) The effects of CEO activism: Partisan consumer behavior and its duration. Strategic Management J. 44(3):672–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurst R (2023) Countervailing claims: Pro-diversity responses to stigma by association following the Unite the Right rally. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(4):1094–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac RM, Norton DA (2013) Endogenous institutions and the possibility of reverse crowding out. Public Choice 156(1):253–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeong H, Kaul A, Luo J (2025) Comparative governance of for‐profit provision of public services: Investor‐owned firms versus cooperatives as internet providers. Strategic Management J. 46(5):1217–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia Y, Gao X, Julian S (2019) Do firms use corporate social responsibility to insure against stock price risk? Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management J. 41(2):290–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John K, Ross DG (2022) How a firm’s value capture affects value creation in its ecosystem. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):646–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson L (2025) EU Parliament approves pact to alter sustainability reporting laws. ESG Dive (December 17), https://www.esgdive.com/news/eu-parliament-approves-agreement-to-alter-sustainability-reporting-laws-csrd-csddd/808155/.Google Scholar
• Jones GR, Hill CW (1988) Transaction cost analysis of strategy‐structure choice. Strategic Management J. 9(2):159–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones TM, Donaldson T, Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Leana CR, Mahoney JT, Pearce JL (2016) Management theory and social welfare: Contributions and challenges. Acad. Management Rev. 41(2):216–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Sengul M (2025) Organization design: Current insights and future research directions. J. Management 51(1):249–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Wilson AJ (2018) The growth of the firm: An attention‐based view. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1779–1800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2019) The 360 Corporation: From Stakeholder Trade-Offs to Transformation (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A (2021) Putting the horse back before the cart: Designing strategic social enterprises. J. Organ. Design 10(3):103–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A, Luo J (2018) An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for-profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1650–1677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A, Luo J, Seo H (2024) Gotta serve somebody: The elitist nature of U.S. corporate philanthropy. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Kerr S (1975) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. 18(4):769–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim A (2025) Harambee! A triadic perspective on social impact: Organizations, evaluators, and target beneficiaries in Kenya. Admin. Sci. Quart. 70(1):246–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim E-H, Lyon TP (2015) Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organ. Sci. 26(3):705–723.Link, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. 43(4):698–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2001) Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J. Indust. Ecology 5(1):105–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Pucker KP (2021) The dangerous allure of win-win strategies. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 19(1) (Winter 2021):35–39.Google Scholar
• King BG, Soule SA (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitzmueller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J. Econom. Literature 50(1):51–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivleniece I, Quelin BV (2012) Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: A private actor’s perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):272–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2013) Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(1):70–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2019) Organizational governance adaptation: Who is in, who is out, and who gets what. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):6–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA, Winter SG (2014) Hidden but in plain sight: The role of scale adjustment in industry dynamics. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1569–1584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroeger A, Weber C (2014) Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):513–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazzarini SG (2020) The nature of the social firm: Alternative organizational forms for social value creation and appropriation. Acad. Management Rev. 45(3):620–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazzarini SG (2022) The Right Privatization: Why Private Firms in Public Initiatives Need Capable Governments (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee N, Kaul A (2025) Robbing Peter to pay Paul: The impact of California’s cap-and-trade program on toxic emissions. Management Sci. 71(6):5409–5418.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee E, Puranam P (2016) The implementation imperative: Why one should implement even imperfect strategies perfectly. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1529–1546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee M, Adbi A, Singh J (2020) Categorical cognition and outcome efficiency in impact investing decisions. Strategic Management J. 41(1):86–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM (2019) Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):538–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2021) Evolutionary Processes and Organizational Adaptation: A Mendelian Perspective on Strategic Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Gavetti G (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Wu B (2010) Opportunity costs and non‐scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management J. 31(7):780–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Wu B (2024) Resource redeployment and the pursuit of the new best use: Economic logic and organizational challenges. Strategy Sci. 10(1):32–47.Link, Google Scholar
• Li C, Csaszar FA (2019) Government as landscape designer: A behavioral view of industrial policy. Strategy Sci. 4(3):175–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1988) First‐mover advantages. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Balasubramanian N, Garcia‐Castro R (2018) Toward a dynamic notion of value creation and appropriation in firms: The concept and measurement of economic gain. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1546–1572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Lee GK, Folta TB (2017) Entry, exit, and the potential for resource redeployment. Strategic Management J. 38(3):526–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo J, Kaul A (2019) Private action in public interest: The comparative governance of social issues. Strategic Management J. 40(4):476–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo J, Kaul A, Seo H (2018) Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2591–2617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2008) Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective. Rev. Environ. Econom. Policy 2(2):240–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyon TP, Delmas MA, Maxwell JW, Bansal PT, Chiroleu-Assouline M, Crifo P, Durand R, et al. (2018) CSR needs CPR: Corporate sustainability and politics. Calif. Management Rev. 60(4):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Boerner CS (2006) Experience and scale and scope economies: Trade‐offs and performance in development. Strategic Management J. 27(9):845–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, McGahan AM (2007) The field of strategic management within the evolving science of strategic organization. Strategic Organ. 5(1):79–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, Qian L (2013) Market frictions as building blocks of an organizational economics approach to strategic management. Strategic Management J. 34(9):1019–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2009) Perspective—The interdependence of private and public interests. Organ. Sci. 20(6):1034–1052.Link, Google Scholar
• Maitland I (1985) The limits of business self-regulation. Calif. Management Rev. 27(3):132–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makadok R, Coff R (2009) Both market and hierarchy: An incentive-system theory of hybrid governance forms. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):297–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maritan CA, Lee GK (2017) Resource allocation and strategy. J. Management 43(8):2411–2420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lee M (2013) Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms. Strategic Management J. 34(4):483–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25(1):127–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2016) Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1325–1341.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Davis GF, Glynn MA (2013) Golfing alone? Corporations, elites, and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities. Organ. Sci. 24(1):39–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Toffel MW, Zhou Y (2016) Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organ. Sci. 27(2):483–504.Link, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Tirole J (2008) Public-private partnerships and government spending limits. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(2):412–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masulis RW, Reza SW (2015) Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(2):592–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):404–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK, Paolella L, Durand R (2023) A rivalry‐based theory of gender diversity. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1254–1291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, Werner T (2016) Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):584–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King BG, Soule SA (2015) A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(3):654–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Pongeluppe LS (2023) There is no Planet B: Aligning stakeholder interests to preserve the Amazon rainforest. Management Sci. 69(12):7860–7881.Link, Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Bogers ML, Chesbrough H, Holgersson M (2021) Tackling societal challenges with open innovation. Calif. Management Rev. 63(2):49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):117–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellahi K, Frynas JG, Sun P, Siegel D (2016) A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. J. Management 42(1):143–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melloni G, Patacconi A, Vikander N (2023) Cashing in on the culture wars? CEO activism, wokewashing, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 44(13):3098–3121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minefee I, Yue LQ (2025) Taking a stand while abroad? Towards a theory of MNCs’ sociopolitical activism in host countries. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 56(4):510–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management J. 6(3):257–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron G, Urschel JL (2010) Equal or fair? A study of revenues and expenditures in American charter schools. Education and the Public Interest Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, and Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
• Mohliver A, Crilly D, Kaul A (2023) Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1199–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molecke G, Pache A-C (2019) How do we know when social innovation works? A review and contingency model of social impact assessment. George G, Baker T, Tracey P, Joshi H, eds. Handbook of Inclusive Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 83–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molecke G, Pinkse J (2017) Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. J. Bus. Venturing 32(5):550–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B (1988) Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):623–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nardi L, Lazzarini SG, Cabral S (2022a) Impact measurement tools and social value creation: A strategic perspective. George G, Haas M, Joshi H, McGahan A, Tracey P, eds. Handbook on the Business of Sustainability (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 459–473.Google Scholar
• Nardi L, Zenger T, Lazzarini SG, Cabral S (2022b) Doing well by doing good, uniquely: Materiality and the market value of unique CSR strategies. Strategy Sci. 7(1):10–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2002) Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. 13(5):547–566.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oberholzer-Gee F, Yao DA (2018) Integrated strategy: Residual market and exchange imperfections as the foundation of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategy Sci. 3(2):463–480.Link, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Sengul M (2020) What do multiple objectives really mean for performance? Empirical evidence from the French manufacturing sector. Strategic Management J. 41(13):2518–2547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Laamanen T, Vaara E (2018) Communication and attention dynamics: An attention‐based view of strategic change. Strategic Management J. 39(1):155–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K (2022) Frenemies: Overcoming audiences’ ideological opposition to firm-activist collaborations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):469–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K, Zhu Y (2025) How social movements catalyze firm innovation. Organ. Sci. 36(4):1221–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K, Kaul A, Luo J (2024) Missing agent problems and the limits to stakeholder management. Acad. Management Proc. 2024(1).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olopade D (2014) The Bright Continent: Breaking Rules and Making Change in Modern Africa (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York).Google Scholar
• Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):641–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):455–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Santos F (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):972–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Santos FM (2021) When worlds keep on colliding: Exploring the consequences of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):640–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Battilana J, Spencer C (2024) An integrative model of hybrid governance: The role of boards in helping sustain organizational hybridity. Acad. Management J. 67(2):437–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pattanaik PK (2009) Limits of utilitarianism as the ethical basis of public action. Anand P, Pattanaik P, Puppe C, eds. Handbook of Rational and Social Choice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 323–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Peter F (2009) Rawlsian justice. Anand P, Pattanaik P, Puppe C, eds. Handbook of Rational and Social Choice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 433–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrenko OV, Aime F, Ridge J, Hill A (2016) Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 37(2):262–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snyder J (2008) Ethical spillovers in firms: Evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Management Sci. 54(11):1891–1903.Link, Google Scholar
• Poliquin C, Hou Y (2025) Policymaker responses to CEO activism. Organ. Sci. 36(6):2416–2434.Link, Google Scholar
• Pongeluppe LS (2022) The favela effect: Spatial inequalities and firm strategies in disadvantaged urban communities. Strategic Management J. 43(13):2777–2808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer M (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(12):56–68.Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK (2005) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Prakash A, Potoski M (2011) Voluntary environmental programs: A comparative perspective. J. Policy Anal. Management 31(1):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quelin BV, Cabral S, Lazzarini S, Kivleniece I (2019) The private scope in public-private collaborations: An institutional and capability-based perspective. Organ. Sci. 30(4):831–846.Link, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management 34(3):375–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rangan S, Samii R, Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Constructive partnerships: When alliances between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):738–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rangel A (2003) Forward and backward intergenerational goods: Why is social security good for the environment? Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):813–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravitch D (2013) Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools (Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
• Rawhouser H, Cummings M, Newbert SL (2019) Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 43(1):82–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawley E, Simcoe TS (2010) Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. 56(9):1534–1550.Link, Google Scholar
• Reyes G, Scholz M, Smith NC (2017) Beyond win-win: Creating shared value requires ethical frameworks. Calif. Management Rev. 59(2):142–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP, Schendel D, Teece DJ (1994) Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sakhartov AV, Folta TB (2014) Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sallee JM (2019) Pigou creates losers: On the implausibility of achieving Pareto improvements from efficiency-enhancing policies. NBER Working Paper No. 25831, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Sandel MJ (2010) Justice (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Sandel MJ (2012) What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Satz D (2010) Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savaget P, Ozcan P, Pitsis T (2025) Social entrepreneurs as ecosystem catalysts: The dynamics of forming and withdrawing from a self‐sustaining ecosystem. J. Management Stud. 62(1):246–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2007) Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1096–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Palazzo G, Seidl D (2013) Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. J. Management Stud. 50(2):259–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen A (2009) The Idea of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Seo H (2025) Counter-activism against ideological opponents: Evidence based on the competitive dynamics of corporate engagement in advocacy giving. Organ. Sci. 36(4):1333–1356.Link, Google Scholar
• Seo H, Luo J, Kaul A (2021) Giving a little to many or a lot to a few? The returns to variety in corporate philanthropy. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1734–1764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serafeim G, Zochowski TR, Downing J (2019) Impact-weighted financial accounts: The missing piece for an impact economy. White paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Sharkey AJ, Bromley P (2015) Can ratings have indirect effects? Evidence from the organizational response to peers’ environmental ratings. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(1):63–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver MJ, Flyer F (2000) Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management J. 21(12):1175–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T (2012) Standard setting committees: Consensus governance for shared technology platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):305–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T, Toffel MW (2014) Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California. J. Environ. Econom. Management 68(3):411–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Teng N, Netessine S (2019) Philanthropic campaigns and customer behavior: Field experiments on an online taxi booking platform. Management Sci. 65(2):913–932.Link, Google Scholar
• Skandera DJ, DesJardine MR, Blevins DP (2026) Corporate strategy and the portfolio-based view of CSR: Toward a theory of optimal CSR diversification. Acad. Management Rev., online ahead of print January 22, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stavins RN, Wagner AF, Wagner G (2003) Interpreting sustainability in economic terms: Dynamic efficiency plus intergenerational equity. Econom. Lett. 79(3):339–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern RN, Barley SR (1996) Organizations and social systems: Organization theory’s neglected mandate. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):146–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE (1989) Markets, market failures, and development. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(2):197–203.Google Scholar
• Stoelhorst JW, Vishwanathan P (2024) Beyond primacy: A stakeholder theory of corporate governance. Acad. Management Rev. 49(1):107–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szerb A, Kivleniece I, Aggarwal VA (2026) Designing dual-purpose organizations: The role of soft governance. Acad. Management Rev., online ahead of print February 9, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan D, West N (2023) Bad medicine: Litigation, competition, and the marketing of prescription opioids. Strategic Management J. 44(11):2658–2687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Economist (2022) ESG should be boiled down to one simple measure: Emissions. The Economist (July 21), https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/07/21/esg-should-be-boiled-down-to-one-simple-measure-emissions.Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui A (2013) 2012 Presidential address—On compassion in scholarship: Why should we care? Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):167–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vishwanathan P, van Oosterhout HJ, Heugens P, Duran P, van Essen M (2019) Strategic CSR: A concept building meta‐analysis. J. Management Stud. 57(2):314–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management J. 18(4):303–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J, Weber K, Margolis JD (2003) Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. J. Management 29(6):859–881.Google Scholar
• Weber K, Waeger D (2017) Organizations as polities: An open systems perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):886–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1986) The relation between market share and profitability. J. Bus. Strategy 6(4):67–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West T, Wunder AP, Sills EO, Börner J, Rifai SW, Neidermeier AN, Frey GP, Kontoleon A (2023) Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science 381(6660):873–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD (2023) Systemic symbolic management, corporate social responsibility, and corporate purpose: A cautionary tale. Strategy Sci. 8(2):221–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Whiteman G, Cooper WH (2016) Decoupling rape. Acad. Management Discoveries 2(2):115–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wickert C (2021) Corporate social responsibility research in the Journal of Management Studies: A shift from a business-centric to a society centric focus. J. Management Stud. 58(8):E1–E17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wickert C, de Bakker FGA (2018) Pitching for social change: Toward a relational approach to selling and buying social issues. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(1):50–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wickert C, Scherer AG, Spence LJ (2016) Walking and talking corporate social responsibility: Implications of firm size and organizational cost. J. Management Stud. 53(7):1169–1196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management J. 12(S2):75–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1996) The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1999) Public and private bureaucracies: A transaction cost economics perspectives. J. Law Econom. Organ. 15(1):306–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao DA (1988) Beyond the reach of the invisible hand: Impediments to economic activity, market failures, and profitability. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):59–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger T (2023) Special issue on corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):121–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.Link, Google Scholar