Taking a Broader View: Female Directors, CEO Strategic Attention Breadth, and Firm Performance

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance 62(1):217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexiev A, Volberda H, Jansen J, Van Den Bosch F (2020) Contextualizing senior executive advice seeking: The role of decision process comprehensiveness and empowerment climate. Organ. Stud. 41(4):471–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Lyon JD (1997) Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. J. Financial Econom. 43(3):341–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bascle G (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 6(3):285–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 11(2):142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger B, Hoskisson RE (1990) The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 15(1):72–87.Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergh DD, Lawless MW (1998) Portfolio restructuring and limits to hierarchical governance: The effects of environmental uncertainty and diversification strategy. Organ. Sci. 9(1):87–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Boeker W (1997) Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Acad. Management J. 40(1):152–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Bednar MK, Aguilera RV, Andrus JL (2016) Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):319–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Withers MC, Graffin SD, Corley KG (2021) Corporate directors’ implicit theories of the roles and duties of boards. Strategic Management J. 42(9):1662–1695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Chin M, Hambrick DC (2014) CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1786–1809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 34(1):37–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P, Rau D (2016) Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process: A literature review. J. Management 42(1):174–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Yoon H, Gamache DL, Withers MC (2022) Omitted variable bias: Examining management research with the impact threshold of a confounding variable (ITCV). J. Management 48(1):17–48.Google Scholar
• Cafferata P, Tybout AM (1989) Gender Differences in Information Processing: A Selectivity Interpretation. Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising (Lexington Books, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
• Carter CB, Lorsch JW (2003) Back to the Drawing Board: Designing Corporate Boards for a Complex World (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Withers MC, Semadeni M (2017) A tale of two effects: Using longitudinal data to compare within-and between-firm effects. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1536–1556.Google Scholar
• Charan R, Carey D, Useem M (2013) Boards That Lead: When to Take Charge, When to Partner, and When to Stay Out of the Way (Harvard Business Review Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Harrison JS, Bergh DD (2003) Failed takeover attempts, corporate governance and refocusing. Strategic Management J. 24(1):87–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Crossland C, Huang S (2016) Female board representation and corporate acquisition intensity. Strategic Management J. 37(2):303–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick DC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Tihanyi L, Certo ST, Hitt MA (2010) Marching to the beat of different drummers: The influence of institutional owners on competitive actions. Acad. Management J. 53(4):723–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Sloan P (2012) Enterprise logic: Explaining corporate attention to stakeholders from the ‘inside‐out’. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1174–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cumming D, Leung TY, Rui O (2015) Gender diversity and securities fraud. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1572–1593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2003) Tight–loose coupling with customers: The enactment of customer orientation. Strategic Management J. 24(6):559–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darouichi A, Kunisch S, Menz M, Cannella AA Jr (2021) CEO tenure: An integrative review and pathways for future research. Corporate Governance 29(6):661–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desjardine M, Shi W (2023) The downside of displaying agentic values: Evidence from activism. Organ. Sci. 34(4):1577–1601.Link, Google Scholar
• Dulebohn JH, Davison RB, Lee SA, Conlon DE, McNamara G, Sarinopoulos IC (2016) Gender differences in justice evaluations: Evidence from fMRI. J. Appl. Psych. 101(2):151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Sarkar S (2022) Here comes the sun: The impact of incidental contextual factors on entrepreneurial resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 65(1):66–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1):1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Einstein GO, Hunt RR (1980) Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Learn. 6(5):588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eklund JC, Mannor MJ (2021) Keep your eye on the ball or on the field? Exploring the performance implications of executive strategic attention. Acad. Management J. 64(6):1685–1713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faleye O, Hoitash R, Hoitash U (2011) The costs of intense board monitoring. J. Financial Econom. 101(1):160–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrier WJ (2001) Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Acad. Management J. 44(4):858–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Field E, Krivkovich A, Kügele S, Robinson N, Yee L (2023) Women in the workplace. Accessed October 5, 2023, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace#/.Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
• Fong EA, Misangyi VF, Tosi HL (2010) The effect of CEO pay deviations on CEO withdrawal, firm size, and firm profits. Strategic Management J. 31(6):629–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank KA (2000) Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociol. Methods Res. 29:147–194.Google Scholar
• Gamache DL, Devers CE, Klein FB, Hannigan T (2023) Shifting perspectives: How scrutiny shapes the relationship between CEO gender and acquisition activity. Strategic Management J. 44(12):3012–3041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg S, Eisenhardt KM (2017) Unpacking the CEO–board relationship: How strategy making happens in entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1828–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong G, He Y, Evans AC (2011) Brain connectivity: Gender makes a difference. Neuroscientist 17(5):575–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Haleblian J, Kiley JT (2016) Ready, aim, acquire: Impression offsetting and acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 59(1):232–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guldiken O, Mallon MR, Fainshmidt S, Judge WQ, Clark CE (2019) Beyond tokenism: How strategic leaders influence more meaningful gender diversity on boards of directors. Strategic Management J. 40(12):2024–2046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Fukutomi GD (1991) The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Acad. Management Rev. 16(4):719–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harari D, Parke MR, Marr JC (2022) When helping hurts helpers: Anticipatory vs. reactive helping, helper’s relative status, and recipient self-threat. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1954–1983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2012) Process: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling (University of Kansas, Lawrence).Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2015) An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behav. Res. 50(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2018) Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Comm. Monographs 85(1):4–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson AD, Miller D, Hambrick DC (2006) How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management J. 27(5):447–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendry K, Kiel GC (2004) The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance 12(4):500–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill AD, Upadhyay AD, Beekun RI (2015) Do female and ethnically diverse executives endure inequity in the CEO position or do they benefit from their minority status? An empirical examination. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1115–1134.Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Dalziel T (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Cannella AA, Paetzold RL (2000) The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. J. Management Stud. 37(2):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Nicholson G, Shropshire C (2008) Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organ. Sci. 19(3):441–456.Link, Google Scholar
• Ikenberry D, Lakonishok J, Vermaelen T (1995) Market underreaction to open market share repurchases. J. Financial Econom. 39(2–3):181–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingalhalikar M, Smith A, Parker D, Satterthwaite TD, Elliott MA, Ruparel K, Hakonarson H, et al. (2014) Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(2):823–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joecks J, Pull K, Vetter K (2013) Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?”. J. Bus. Ethics 118:61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones RM (2006) Law, norms, and the breakdown of the board: Promoting accountability in corporate governance. Iowa Law Rev. 92:105.Google Scholar
• Kabanoff B, Brown S (2008) Knowledge structures of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders: Content, structure, stability, and performance. Strategic Management J. 29(2):149–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF (1991) Coefficient alpha for a principal component and the Kaiser-Guttman rule. Psych. Rep. 68(3):855–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(5):965–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (2008) Men and Women of the Corporation: New Edition (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Keil T, Lavie D, Pavićević S (2022) When do outside CEOs underperform? From a CEO-centric to a stakeholder-centric perspective of post-succession performance. Acad. Management J. 65(5):1424–1449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch A (2018) The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quart. 29(2):346–364.Google Scholar
• Klarner P, Probst G, Useem M (2020) Opening the black box: Unpacking board involvement in innovation. Strategic Organ. 18(4):487–519.Google Scholar
• Kolev KD, McNamara G (2020) Board demography and divestitures: The impact of gender and racial diversity on divestiture rate and divestiture returns. Long Range Planning 53(2):101881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Q, Maggitti PG, Smith KG, Tesluk PE, Katila R (2013) Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Acad. Management J. 56(3):893–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, Vijh AM (1997) Do long‐term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? J. Finance 52(5):1765–1790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo XR, Zhang J, Marquis C (2016) Mobilization in the internet age: Internet activism and corporate response. Acad. Management J. 59(6):2045–2068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav. Res. 39(1):99–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mah J, Kolev KD, McNamara G, Pan L, Devers CE (2023) Women in the C-suite: A review of predictors, experiences, and outcomes. Acad. Management Ann. 17(2):586–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClure EB, Monk CS, Nelson EE, Zarahn E, Leibenluft E, Bilder RM, Charney DS, et al. (2004) A developmental examination of gender differences in brain engagement during evaluation of threat. Biology Psychiatry 55(11):1047–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Westphal JD, Graebner ME (2008) What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance. Strategic Management J. 29(11):1155–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDougall PP, Covin JG, Robinson RB Jr, Herron L (1994) The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content. Strategic Management J. 15(7):537–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGivern RF, Huston JP, Byrd D, King T, Siegle GJ, Reilly J (1997) Sex differences in visual recognition memory: Support for a sex-related difference in attention in adults and children. Brain Cognition 34(3):323–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNamara GM, Haleblian J, Dykes BJ (2008) The performance implications of participating in an acquisition wave: Early mover advantages, bandwagon effects, and the moderating influence of industry characteristics and acquirer tactics. Acad. Management J. 51(1):113–130.Google Scholar
• Meyer‐Doyle P, Lee S, Helfat CE (2019) Disentangling the microfoundations of acquisition behavior and performance. Strategic Management J. 40(11):1733–1756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Loken B (2015) Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead. J. Consumer Psych. 25(1):129–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Maheswaran D (1991) Exploring differences in males’ and females’ processing strategies. J. Consumer Res. 18(1):63–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Sternthal B (1991) Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. J. Marketing Res. 28(1):84–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1991) Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Sci. 37(1):34–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Montagne B, Kessels RP, Frigerio E, De Haan EH, Perrett DI (2005) Sex differences in the perception of affective facial expressions: Do men really lack emotional sensitivity? Cognitive Processing 6:136–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA (1982) The measurement of firm diversification: Some new empirical evidence. Acad. Management J. 25(2):299–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Barr PS (2008) Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1395–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Herrmann P (2010) CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1050–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Pan L, Chen T (2019) Only timeline will tell: Temporal framing of competitive announcements and rivals’ responses. Acad. Management J. 62(1):117–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric Theory New York (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Main BG, Crystal GS (1988) CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(2):257–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2005) An Attention-Based Theory of Strategy Formulation: Linking Micro-and Macroperspectives in Strategy Processes (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2018) The attention-based view of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):289–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Paredes TA (2004) Too much pay, too much deference: Behavioral corporate finance, CEOs, and corporate governance. Florida State Univ. Law Rev. 32(2):673.Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Han J-H, Prakash P (2021) Salient expectations? Incongruence across capability and integrity signals and investor reactions to organizational misconduct. Acad. Management J. 64(2):562–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulhus DL, Williams KM (2002) The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J. Res. Personality 36(6):556–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Google Scholar
• Post C, Byron K (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1546–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post C, Lokshin B, Boone C (2022) What changes after women enter top management teams? A gender-based model of strategic renewal. Acad. Management J. 65(1):273–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugliese A, Bezemer PJ, Zattoni A, Huse M, Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2009) Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance 17(3):292–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putrevu S (2001) Exploring the origins and information processing differences between men and women: Implications for advertisers. Acad. Marketing Sci. Rev. 10(1):1–14.Google Scholar
• Rabier MR (2017) Acquisition motives and the distribution of acquisition performance. Strategic Management J. 38(13):2666–2681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C (2009) Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organ. Sci. 20(5):876–893.Link, Google Scholar
• Ryan MK, Haslam SA, Morgenroth T, Rink F, Stoker J, Peters K (2016) Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. Leadership Quart. 27(3):446–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1978) A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(2):224–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarah C, Mona LK (2008) Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political Stud. 56(3):725–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selig JP, Preacher KJ (2008) Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer Software], https://quantpsy.org/medmc/medmc.htm.Google Scholar
• Semadeni M, Withers MC, Trevis Certo S (2014) The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management J. 35(7):1070–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seo J, Gamache DL, Devers CE, Carpenter MA (2015) The role of CEO relative standing in acquisition behavior and CEO pay. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1877–1894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sood A, Tellis GJ (2009) Do innovations really pay off? Total stock market returns to innovation. Marketing Sci. 28(3):442–456.Link, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Pauwels K, Silva-Risso J, Hanssens DM (2009) Product innovations, advertising, and stock returns. J. Marketing 73(1):24–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terjesen S, Couto EB, Francisco PM (2016) Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. J. Management Governance 20:447–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terjesen S, Sealy R, Singh V (2009) Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance 17(3):320–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trzebiatowski T, McCluney C, Hernandez M (2023) Managing the double bind: Women directors’ participation tactics in the gendered boardroom. Organ. Sci. 34(2):801–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Tuggle CS, Schnatterly K, Johnson RA (2010) Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Acad. Management J. 53(3):550–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyran JR (2012) The gambler’s fallacy and gender. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):118–124.Google Scholar
• Um CT, Guo S-L, Lumineau F, Shi W, Song R (2022) The downside of CFO function-based language incongruity. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1984–2013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Useem M, Zelleke A (2006) Oversight and delegation in corporate governance: Deciding what the board should decide. Corporate Governance 14(1):2–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Doorn S, Jansen JJ, Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2013) Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Drawing attention to the senior team. J. Production Innovation Management 30(5):821–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne J-P, Wernicke G, Brenner S (2018) Signal incongruence and its consequences: A study of media disapproval and CEO overcompensation. Organ. Sci. 29(5):796–817.Link, Google Scholar
• Wade JB, O’Reilly CA III, Pollock TG (2006) overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organ. Sci. 17(5):527–544.Link, Google Scholar
• Washburn M, Bromiley P (2014) Managers and analysts: An examination of mutual influence. Acad. Management J. 57(3):849–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Acad. Management J. 42(1):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Mors ML (2024) Women directors and board dynamics: Qualitative insights from the boardroom. J. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Zhang Y (2011) CEO dismissal: The role of investment analysts. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1161–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Hambrick DC, Henderson AD (2011) Do CEOs encounter within-tenure settling up? A multiperiod perspective on executive pay and dismissal. Acad. Management J. 54(4):719–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu J, Richard OC, Triana Md C, Zhang X (2022) The performance impact of gender diversity in the top management team and board of directors: A multiteam systems approach. Human Resources Management 61(2):157–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• You D, Maeda Y, Bebeau MJ (2011) Gender differences in moral sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Ethics Behav. 21(4):263–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahavi T, Lavie D (2013) Intra‐industry diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 34(8):978–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Liu Z, Gong X (2016) Why does leader attention scope matter for innovation ambidexterity? The mediating role of transformational leadership. Leadership Organ. Development J. 37(7):912–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu DH, Chen G (2015) CEO narcissism and the impact of prior board experience on corporate strategy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):31–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zyung JD, Shi W (2022) In retrospect: The influence of chief executive officers’ historical relative pay on overconfidence. Strategic Organ. 20(3):627–651.Crossref, Google Scholar