Dominant Deceptions: How Future-Oriented Narratives Transform into Deception

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18038

References

  • Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Andiappan M, Dufour L (2021) The evolution of unethical behavior engagement amongst longshoremen in France: A 70-year perspective. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 166:49–67. Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Anteby M (2008) Identity incentives as an engaging form of control: Revisiting leniencies in an aeronautic plant. Organ. Sci. 19(2):202–220.Link, Google Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Anand V (2003) The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:1–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Ashforth BK, Saks AM (1996) Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Acad. Management J. 39(1):149–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Aven BL (2015) The paradox of corrupt networks: An analysis of organizational crime at Enron. Organ. Sci. 26(4):980–996.Link, Google Scholar
  • Balasubramanian P, Bennett VM, Pierce L (2017) The wages of dishonesty: The supply of cheating under high-powered incentives. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 137:428–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bandura A (1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 3(3):193–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J. Political Econom. 76(2):169–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19(1):3–24.Link, Google Scholar
  • Bennett VM, Pierce L, Snyder JA, Toffel MW (2013) Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Sci. 59(8):1725–1742.Link, Google Scholar
  • Bergemann P, Aven B (2023) Whistleblowing and group affiliation: The role of group cohesion and the locus of the wrongdoer in reporting decisions. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1243–1265.Link, Google Scholar
  • Bianchi EC, Mohliver A (2016) Do good times breed cheats? Prosperous times have immediate and lasting implications for CEO misconduct. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1488–1503.Link, Google Scholar
  • Blanken I, Van De Ven N, Zeelenberg M (2015) A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(4):540–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bonner JM, Greenbaum RL, Mayer DM (2016) My boss is morally disengaged: The role of ethical leadership in explaining the interactive effect of supervisor and employee moral disengagement on employee behaviors. J. Bus. Ethics 137(4):731–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Brown ME, Treviño LK (2006) Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quart. 17(6):595–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Brown ME, Treviño LK, Harrison DA (2005) Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 97(2):117–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Chai S, Doshi AR, Silvestri L, Zuzul T (2026) The promise–risk balance: Recalibrating design choices and strategic framing following catastrophic innovation failure. Admin. Sci. Quart. 71(3):527–572. Google Scholar
  • Clinard MB, Yeager PC, Brissette J, Petrashek D, Harries E (1979) Illegal Corporate Behavior (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Cottle GW, Anderson BS (2020) The temptation of exaggeration: Exploring the line between preparedness and misrepresentation in entrepreneurial pitches. J. Bus. Venturing Insights 14:e00190.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Davies CA (2012) Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • den Nieuwenboer NA, Cunha J, Treviño LK (2017) Middle managers and corruptive routine translation: The social production of deceptive performance. Organ. Sci. 28(5):781–803.Link, Google Scholar
  • Dyck A, Morse A, Zingales L (2024) How pervasive is corporate fraud? Rev. Accounting Stud. 29(1):736–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Falchetti D, Cattani G, Ferriani S (2022) Start with “why,” but only if you have to: The strategic framing of novel ideas across different audiences. Strategic Management J. 43(1):130–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Fisher RJ (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consumer Res. 20(2):303–315.Google Scholar
  • Fisher G, Kotha S, Lahiri A (2016) Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Acad. Management Rev. 41(3):383–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Forelle C, Bandler J (2006) The perfect payday. Wall Street Journal (March 18), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB114265075068802118.Google Scholar
  • Gabriel Y (2004) Narratives, stories and texts. Grant D, Hardy C, Oswick C, Putnam L, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse, Part I (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 61–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Garud R, Rappa MA (1994) A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5(3):344–362.Link, Google Scholar
  • Garud R, Snihur Y, Thomas LDW, Phillips N (2025) The dark side of entrepreneurial framing: A process model of deception and legitimacy loss. Acad. Management Rev. 50(2):299–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Gehman J, Wry T (2022) Cultural entrepreneurship: Theorizing the dark sides. Res. Sociol. Organ. 80:97–110.Google Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (2009) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Transaction Publishers, London).Google Scholar
  • Gottschalk P (2019) Convenience in criminal entrepreneurship: The case of a Norwegian hashish baron. Deviant Behav. 40(3):326–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Greve HR, Palmer D, Pozner JE (2010) Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):53–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A, Suarez FF (2015) The coevolution of technologies and categories during industry emergence. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):423–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Harris J, Bromiley P (2007) Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. 18(3):350–367.Link, Google Scholar
  • Hennes KM, Leone AJ, Miller BP (2008) The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. Accounting Rev. 83(6):1487–1519.Google Scholar
  • Heron RA, Lie E (2009) What fraction of stock option grants to top executives have been backdated or manipulated? Management Sci. 55(4):513–525.Link, Google Scholar
  • Hmieleski KM, Baron RA (2009) Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy Management J. 52(3):473–488.Google Scholar
  • Hsieh HH, Hsu HH, Kao KY, Wang CC (2020) Ethical leadership and employee unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and coworker ethical behavior. Leadership Organ. Development J. 41(6):799–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Huff A (2016) Inside the Nikola One: The electric semi is packed with tech to ‘revolutionize’ trucking. Equipment World (December 14), https://www.equipmentworld.com/trucks/class-7-8/article/14966356/inside-the-nikola-one-the-electric-semi-is-packed-with-tech-to-revolutionize-trucking.Google Scholar
  • Kahl SJ, Grodal S (2016) Discursive strategies and radical technological change: Multilevel discourse analysis of the early computer (1947–1958). Strategic Management J. 37(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Kanungo R (1996) Ethical Dimensions of Leadership (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Google Scholar
  • Liu Y, Lam LWR, Loi R (2012) Ethical leadership and workplace deviance: The role of moral disengagement. Mobley WH, Wang Y, Li M, eds. Advances in Global Leadership (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Logue D, Grimes M (2022) Living up to the hype: How new ventures manage the resource and liability of future-oriented visions within the nascent market of impact investing. Acad. Management J. 65(3):1055–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1993) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Merton RK (1938) Social structure and anomie. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 3(5):672–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mitchell MS, Rivera G, Treviño LK (2023) Unethical leadership: A review, analysis, and research agenda. Personnel Psych. 76(2):547–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mohliver A (2019) How misconduct spreads: Auditors’ role in the diffusion of stock-option backdating. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):310–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mohliver A, Ody-Brasier A (2023) Religious affiliation and wrongdoing: Evidence from U.S. nursing homes. Management Sci. 69(1):533–554.Link, Google Scholar
  • Moore C (2008) Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. J Bus Ethics 80(1):129–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Moore C, Detert JR, Klebe Treviño L, Baker VL, Mayer DM (2012) Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psych. 65(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Murray A, Fisher G (2023) When more is less: Explaining the curse of too much capital for early-stage ventures. Organ. Sci. 34(1):246–282.Link, Google Scholar
  • Ody‐Brasier A, Sharkey A (2019) Under pressure: Reputation, ratings, and inaccurate self‐reporting in the nursing home industry. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1517–1544.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Oremus W (2021) Elizabeth Holmes’s trial spotlights Silicon Valley’s thin line between hype and deceit. Washington Post (September 21), https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/01/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-trial-analysis-silicon-valley/.Google Scholar
  • Palmer D (2012) Normal Organizational Wrongdoing: A Critical Analysis of Theories of Misconduct in and by Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Palmer D, Weiss T (2022) The Unique Vulnerabilities of Entrepreneurial Ventures to Misconduct Entrepreneurialism and Society: New Theoretical Perspectives (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 129–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Palmer D, Smith-Crowe K, Greenwood R (2016) The imbalances and limitations of theory and research on organizational wrongdoing. Organizational Wrongdoing: Key Perspectives and New Directions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–16.Google Scholar
  • Parhankangas A, Ehrlich M (2014) How entrepreneurs seduce business angels: An impression management approach. J. Bus. Venturing 29(4):543–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3):267–292.Link, Google Scholar
  • Pierce L, Snyder J (2008) Ethical spillovers in firms: Evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Management Sci. 54(11):1891–1903.Link, Google Scholar
  • Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14(3):399–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Pollack JM, Bosse DA (2014) When do investors forgive entrepreneurs for lying? J. Bus. Venturing 29(6):741–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Raffaelli R, Zuzul T, Gulati R, Rivkin J (2025) Outcome and process frames: Strategic renewal and capability reprioritization at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Strategic Management J. 46(6):1325–1362.Google Scholar
  • Rindova VP, Martins LL (2022) Futurescapes: Imagination and temporal reorganization in the design of strategic narratives. Strategic Organ. 20(1):200–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Rindova V, Barry D, Ketchen DJ Jr (2009) Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):477–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Rixom J, Mishra H (2014) Ethical ends: Effect of abstract mindsets in ethical decisions for the greater social good. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124(2):110–121.Google Scholar
  • Roulet TJ, Pichler R (2020) Blame game theory: Scapegoating, whistleblowing and discursive struggles following accusations of organizational misconduct. Organ. Theory 1(4):2631787720975192.Google Scholar
  • Rutherford MW, Buller PF, Stebbins JM (2009) Ethical considerations of the legitimacy lie. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 33(4):949–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Sætre AS, Van de Ven A (2021) Generating theory by abduction. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):684–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Scheaf DJ, Wood MS (2022) Entrepreneurial fraud: A multidisciplinary review and synthesized framework. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 46(3):607–642.Google Scholar
  • Snyder J (2010) Gaming the liver transplant market. J. Law Econom. Organ. 26(3):546–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Waveland Press Inc., Long Grove, IL).Google Scholar
  • Sykes GM, Matza D (1957) Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 22(6):664–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Tavory I, Timmermans S (2019) Abductive analysis and grounded theory. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 532–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Treviño LK, Brown M, Hartman LP (2003) A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations 56(1):5–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Treviño LK, Den Nieuwenboer NA, Kish-Gephart JJ (2014) (Un) ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Rev. Psych. 65:635–660.Google Scholar
  • Umphress EE, Bingham JB (2011) When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organ. Sci. 22(3):621–640.Link, Google Scholar
  • United States Department of Justice (2023) Trevor Milton sentenced to four years in prison for securities fraud scheme. (December 18), https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/trevor-milton-sentenced-four-years-prison-securities-fraud-scheme.Google Scholar
  • Van Maanen J (2011) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Vaughan D (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Victor B, Cullen JB (1988) The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(1):101–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Weber M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 2 (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Zhang V, Mohliver AC, King M (2023) Where is all the deviance? Liminal prescribing and the social networks underlying the prescription drug crisis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(1):228–269.Google Scholar
  • Zuzul TW (2019) “Matter battles”: Cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities. Acad. Management J. 62(3):739–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Zuzul T, Edmondson AC (2017) The advocacy trap: When legitimacy building inhibits organizational learning. Acad. Management Discoveries 3(3):302–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia versus flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.