The Rise of Scientific Research in Corporate America

References

• Agarwal R, Kim S, Moeen M (2021) Leveraging private enterprise: Incubation of new industries to address the public sector’s mission-oriented grand challenges. Strategy Sci. 6(4):385–411.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2018) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A, Suh J (2020) The changing structure of American innovation: Some cautionary remarks for economic growth. Innovation Policy Econom. 20(1):39–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Cioaca L, Sheer L, Zhang H (2023) The effect of public science on corporate R&D. NBER Working Paper No. 31899, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Autor D, Dorn D, Katz LF, Patterson C, Van Reenen J (2020) The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. Quart. J. Econom. 135(2):645–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P (2002) Do pharmaceutical sales respond to scientific evidence? J. Econom. Management Strategy 11(4):551–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babina T, Bernstein A, Mezzanotti F (2023a) Financial disruptions and the organization of innovation: Evidence from the Great Depression. Rev. Financial Stud. 36(11):4271–4317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babina T, He AX, Howell ST, Perlman ER, Staudt J (2023b) Cutting the innovation engine: How federal funding shocks affect university patenting, entrepreneurship, and publications. Quart. J. Econom. 138(2):895–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belenzon S (2012) Cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from patent citations. Econom. J. 122(559):265–285.Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Berle A, Means G (1932) Private Property and the Modern Corporation (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Bhaskarabhatla A, Hegde D (2014) An organizational perspective on patenting and open innovation. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1744–1763.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2018) Made in academia: The effect of institutional origin on inventors’ attention to science. Organ. Sci. 29(5):818–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Marx M (2019) Bridging academia and industry: How geographic hubs connect university science and corporate technology. Management Sci. 66(8):3425–3443.Link, Google Scholar
• Birr K (1957) Pioneering in Industrial Research: The Story of the General Electric Research Laboratory (Public Affairs Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Jones C, Van Reenen J, Webb M (2020) Are ideas getting harder to find? Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(4):1104–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braguinsky S, Hounshell DA (2016) History and nanoeconomics in strategy and industry evolution research: Lessons from the Meiji-era Japanese cotton spinning industry. Strategic Management J. 37(1):45–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucheli M, Wadhwani RD, eds. (2014) Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Cerveaux A (2013) Taming the microworld: DuPont and the interwar rise of fundamental industrial research. Tech. Culture 54(2):262–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke HT (1971) Charles Edward Kenneth Mees, 1882–1960: A biographical memoir. Biographical Memoirs Natl. Acad. Sci. 1971:176–199.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R & D. Econom. J. 99(397):569–596.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Sauermann H, Stephan P (2020) Not in the job description: The commercial activities of academic scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 66(9):4108–4117.Link, Google Scholar
• Field AJ (2003) The most technologically progressive decade of the century. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(4):1399–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, MacGarvie MJ (2007) Academic science and the birth of industrial research laboratories in the US pharmaceutical industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):756–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geiger RL (1986) To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900–1940 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep Learning, Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning Series (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Leary MT, Roberts MR (2015) A century of capital structure: The leveraging of corporate America. J. Financial Econom. 118(3):658–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Sampat BN (2020) Organizing crisis innovation: Lessons from World War II. NBER Working Paper No. 27909, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gross DP, Sampat BN (2023) America, jump-started: World War II RD and the takeoff of the US innovation system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 113(12):3323–3356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez G, Philippon T (2020) Some facts about dominant firms. NBER Working Paper No. 27985, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, Insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hicks D (1995) Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Indust. Corporate Change 4(2):401–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoddeson L (1981) The emergence of basic research in the Bell telephone system, 1875–1915. Tech. Culture 22(3):512–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homburg E (1992) The emergence of research laboratories in the Dyestuffs industry, 1870–1900. British J. History Sci. 25(1):91–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hounshell D (1996) The evolution of industrial research in the United States. Rosenbloom RS, Spencer WJ, eds. Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research at the End of an Era (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hounshell D, Smith JKJ (1988) Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Howell ST (2017) Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(4):1136–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes TP (2004) American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870–1970 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt BJ (2021) Imperial Science: Cable Telegraphy and Electrical Physics in the Victorian British Empire (Cambridge University Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iaria A, Schwarz C, Waldinger F (2018) Frontier knowledge and scientific production: Evidence from the collapse of international science. Quart. J. Econom. 133(2):927–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Rao H, Silverman BS (2012) History in strategy research: What, why, and how? Kahl SJ, Silverman, BS, Cusumano MA, eds. History and Strategy (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 241–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Lerner J, Stern S, Thursby MC (2007) Academic science and entrepreneurship: Dual engines of growth? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):573–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins R, Chandler AD (1975) Images and Enterprise: Technology and the American Photographic Industry, 1839 to 1925 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandel E, Kosenko K, Morck R, Yafeh Y (2019) The great pyramids of America: A revised history of US business groups, corporate ownership and regulation, 1926–1950. Strategic Management J. 40(5):781–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly B, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Taddy M (2021) Measuring technological innovation over the long run. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 3(3):303–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T (2000) Business groups and social welfare in emerging markets: Existing evidence and unanswered questions. Eur. Econom. Rev. 44(4–6):748–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K (2000) Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. J. Finance 55(2):867–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kline R (1995) Construing “technology” as “applied science”: Public rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880–1945. Isis 86(2):194–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux NR, Sokoloff KL (1999) Inventors, firms, and the market for technology in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Lamoreaux NR, Raff DMG, Temin P, eds. Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 19–60.Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux NR, Raff DMG, Temin P, eds. (1999) Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Langmuir I (1913) The effect of space charge and residual gases on thermionic currents in high vacuum. Phys. Rev. 2(6):450–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lassman TC (2003) Industrial research transformed: Edward Condon at the Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company, 1935–1942. Tech. Culture 44(2):306–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipartito K (1989) The Bell System and Regional Business: The Telephone in the South, 1877–1920 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Maclaurin WR, Harman RJ (1949) Invention and Innovation in the Radio Industry (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Marx M, Fuegi A (2020) Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles. Strategic Management J. 41(9):1572–1594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moser P, Parsa S, San S (2020) Immigration, science, and invention. Evidence from the quota acts. Working paper, NYU Stern Department of Economics, New York.Google Scholar
• Mowery DC (1983) The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940. Explorations Econom. History 20(4):351–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC (2009) Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the “third industrial revolution.” Indust. Corporate Change 18(1):1–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D, Rosenberg N (1998) Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Simcoe T (2002) Is the internet a US invention?—An economic and technological history of computer networking. Res. Policy 31(8):1369–1387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller M (1997) Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone System (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Murmann JP, Landau R (1998) On the making of competitive advantage: The development of the chemical industries in Britain and Germany since 1850. Arora A, Landau R, Rosenberg N, eds. Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth: Insights from the Chemical Industry (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 27–70.Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1931) Industrial Research Laboratories of the United States, Including Consulting Research Laboratories (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1938) Research: A National Resource: II. Industrial Research (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. 67(3):297–306.Google Scholar
• Nicholas T (2010) The role of independent invention in US technological development, 1880–1930. J. Econom. History 70(1):57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicholas T (2011) Did R&D firms used to patent? Evidence from the first innovation surveys. J. Econom. History 71(4):1032–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nutter GW, Einhorn HA (1969) Enterprise Monopoly in the United States: 1899–1958 (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Salandra R, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Hughes A (2021) Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Res. Policy 50(1):104114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petralia S, Balland P-A, Rigby DL (2016) Unveiling the geography of historical patents in the United States from 1836 to 1975. Sci. Data 3(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillai SD, Goldfarb B, Kirsch D (2024) Lovely and likely: Using historical methods to improve inference to the best explanation in strategy. Strategic Management J. 45(8):1539–1566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reich LS (1983) Irving Langmuir and the pursuit of science and technology in the corporate environment. Tech. Culture 24(2):199–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reich LS (1985) The Making of American Industrial Research: Science and Business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Reich LS (1992) Lighting the path to profit: GE’s control of the electric lamp industry, 1892–1941. Bus. History Rev. 66(2):305–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riordan M, Hoddeson L (1997) Crystal Fire: The Invention of the Transistor and the Birth of the Information Age (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy 19(2):165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Agung SD, Jiang L (2007) University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 16(4):691–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowland HA (1883) A plea for pure science. Science 2(29):242–250.Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Cohen WM (2010) What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Sci. 56(12):2134–2153.Link, Google Scholar
• Servos JW (1994) Changing partners: The Mellon Institute, private industry, and the federal patron. Tech. Culture 35(2):221–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shvadron D (2024) Bread upon the waters: Corporate science and the benefits from follow-on public research. Working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, CA.Google Scholar
• Silverman BS, Ingram P (2017) Asset ownership and incentives in early shareholder capitalism: Liverpool shipping in the eighteenth century. Strategic Management J. 38(4):854–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soddy F (1907) The Wehnelt Kathode in a high vacuum. Nature 77(1986):53–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1949) Competition in the United States. Five Lectures on Economic Problems (Longmans, Green and Co., London), 46–62.Google Scholar
• Terman FE (1976) A brief history of electrical engineering education. Proc. IEEE 64(9):1399–1407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United States Department of Commerce, Office of Business Economics (1965) Survey of Current Business 45(9).Google Scholar
• Wilcox C (1940) Competition and monopoly in American industry. Investigation of Concentration of Economic Power, Hearings Before the Temporary National Economic Committee, Monograph No. 21 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Wise G (1985) Willis R. Whitney, General Electric, and the Origins of US Industrial Research (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar